1858 Bradford sweets poisoning

1858 Bradford sweets poisoning

A caricature by John Leech, published in Punch magazine in November 1858, illustrating the Bradford poisoning case.
Date October 30, 1858 (1858-10-30)
Location Bradford, England
 United Kingdom
Cause Arsenic poisoning
Casualties
200+
Deaths 21
Arrest(s) 3
Suspect(s) Charles Hodgson
Joseph Neal
William Goddard
Accused Charles Hodgson
Charges Manslaughter by gross neglect
Verdict Not guilty

The 1858 Bradford sweets poisoning was the arsenic poisoning of more than 200 people in Bradford, England, when sweets accidentally made with arsenic were sold from a market stall. Twenty-one victims died as a result.[1] The event contributed to the passage of the Pharmacy Act 1868 in the United Kingdom and legislation regulating the adulteration of foodstuffs.[2]

Background

William Hardaker, known to locals as "Humbug Billy", sold sweets from a stall in the Greenmarket in central Bradford (now the site of Bradford's Arndale Centre).[3][4] Hardaker purchased his supplies from Joseph Neal, who made the sweets (or "lozenges") on Stone Street a few hundred yards to the north. The lozenges in question were peppermint humbugs, made of peppermint oil incorporated into a base of sugar and gum.[2] However, sugar was expensive (6½d per pound) and so Neal would substitute powdered gypsum (½d per pound) — known as "daff" — for some of the required sugar.[5][4][6] The adulteration of foodstuffs with cheaper substances was common at the time and the adulterators used obscure nicknames ("daff", "multum", "flash", "stuff") to hide the practice.[7][8]

Accidental poisoning

On the occasion in question, Neal sent James Archer, a lodger who lived at his house, to collect daff for Hardaker's humbugs from druggist Charles Hodgson. Hodgson's pharmacy was 3 miles away at Baildon Bridge in Shipley.[9] Hodgson was at his pharmacy, but did not serve Archer owing to illness and so his requests were seen to by his young assistant, William Goddard.[2][10] Goddard asked Hodgson where the daff was, and was told that it was in a cask in a corner of the attic.[8] However, rather than daff, Goddard sold Archer 12 pounds (5.4 kg) of arsenic trioxide.[6]

The mistake remained undetected even during manufacture of the sweets by James Appleton, an "experienced sweetmaker"[2] employed by Neal, though Appleton did observe that the finished product looked different from the usual humbugs. Appleton was suffering symptoms of illness during the sweet-making process and was ill for several days afterwards with vomiting and pain in his hands and arms, but did not realise it was caused by poison.[11] Forty pounds of lozenges were sold to Hardaker who also noticed the sweets looked unusual and used this to obtain a discount from Neal. Like Appleton, Hardaker, as one of the first to taste the sweets, also promptly became ill.

Arsenic trioxide is a white, crystalline powder that closely resembles sugar. It has no odour or taste.

Regardless, Hardaker sold 5 pounds (2.3 kg) of the sweets from his market stall that night – reportedly at a price of 1½d for 2 ounces (57 g).[2] Of those who purchased and ate the sweets, 21 people died with a further 200 or so becoming severely ill with arsenic poisoning within a day or so.

Consequences

Originally the first deaths—those of two children—were thought to be owing to cholera, a major problem in Britain at the time; but the growing number of casualties soon showed that the purchase of lozenges from Hardaker's stall was the cause, and from there the trail led to Neal and Hodgson.[12] Goddard was arrested and stood before magistrates in the court house in Bradford on 1 November with Hodgson and Neal later committed for trial with Goddard on a charge of manslaughter.[13] Dr John Bell identified arsenic as the cause, and this was confirmed by Felix Rimmington, a prominent chemist and druggist and analytical chemist.[2] Rimmington estimated that each humbug contained between 14 and 15 grains (0.91 and 0.97 grams) of arsenic, though a contemporary account suggests 9 grains (0.5831 grams), with 4.5 grains (0.292 grams) being a lethal dose.[13] As such, each lozenge would have contained enough arsenic to kill two people, and enough distributed by Hardaker in total to kill 2,000. The prosecution against Goddard and Neal was later withdrawn and Hodgson was acquitted when the case was considered at York Assizes on 21 December 1858.

The tragedy and resulting public outcry was a major contributing factor to The Pharmacy Act 1868 which recognized the chemist and druggist as the custodian and seller of named poisons (as medicine was then formally known). The requirement for record keeping and the requirement to obtain the signature of the purchaser is currently upheld under the Poisons Act 1972 for "non-medicinal" poisons. W. E. Gladstone's ministry of 1868–1874 also brought in legislation regulating the adulteration of foodstuffs as a result of the events.

References

Notes
  1. ↑ Whorton 2010, p. 163.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Jones 2000.
  3. ↑ Davis 2009.
  4. 1 2 "The poisonings by arsenic at Bradford". Salisbury and Winchester Journal. Salisbury. 6 November 1858. p. 5. Retrieved 6 June 2015 – via British Newspaper Archive. (Subscription required (help)).
  5. ↑ Emsley 2006, p. 100.
  6. 1 2 "The poisoned lozenges". Hampshire Advertiser. Southampton. 25 December 1858. p. 12. Retrieved 6 June 2015 – via British Newspaper Archive. (Subscription required (help)).
  7. ↑ Whorton 2010, p. 160.
  8. 1 2 "The late lozenge poisonings at Bradford". Belfast Morning News. Belfast. 24 December 1858. p. 4. Retrieved 6 June 2015 – via British Newspaper Archive. (Subscription required (help)).
  9. ↑ "The Bradford poisoned lozenge case". Lloyd's Weekly Newspaper. London. 26 December 1858. p. 5. Retrieved 6 June 2015 – via British Newspaper Archive. (Subscription required (help)).
  10. ↑ "The Poisoned Lozenges at Bradford". Essex Standard. Colchester. 10 November 1858. p. 4. Retrieved 6 June 2015 – via British Newspaper Archive. (Subscription required (help)).
  11. ↑ Rivington & Rivington 1859, p. 173.
  12. ↑ Rivington & Rivington 1859, p. 172.
  13. 1 2 "The Poisonings By Arsenic At Bradford". The Times (23144). London. 6 November 1858. p. 12.
Bibliography
  • Davis, Mark (2009). Bradford Through Time. Stroud: Amberley Publishing. ISBN 978-1-445-60330-8. 
  • Emsley, John (2006). The Elements of Murder: A History of Poison. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-192-80600-0. 
  • Holloway, S. W. F. (1991). Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain 1841–1991: A Political and Social History. London: Pharmaceutical Press. pp. 221–230. ISBN 978-0-853-69244-7. 
  • Jones, Ian F. (2000). "Arsenic and the Bradford poisonings of 1858". The Pharmaceutical Journal. 265 (7128): 938–993. 
  • Rivington, J.G.; Rivington, F. (1859). The Annual Register, Or, A View of the History and Politics of the Year 1858. London: Longman. 
  • Sheeran, George (1992). The Bradford Poisoning of 1858. Halifax: Ryburn. ISBN 978-1-853-31033-1. 
  • "Wholesale poisoning by arsenic at Bradford". The Pharmaceutical Journal. 18: 340–43. 1858. 
  • Whorton, James C. (2010). The Arsenic Century: How Victorian Britain was Poisoned at Home, Work, and Play. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-199-57470-4. 

Coordinates: 53°47′42″N 1°45′18″W / 53.79500°N 1.75500°W / 53.79500; -1.75500

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.