Radiographic classification of osteoarthritis

Radiographic systems to classify osteoarthritis vary by which joint is being investigated.

Vertebral column

There are many grading systems for degeneration of intervertebral discs and facet joints in the cervical and lumbar vertebrae, of which the following radiographic systems can be recommended in terms of interobserver reliability:^[1]

Kellgren grading of cervical disc degeneration
Kellgren grading of cervical facet joint degeneration
Lane grading of lumbar disc degeneration
Thompson grading of lumbar disc degeneration (by Magnetic resonance imaging)
Pathria grading of lumbar facet joint degeneration (by computed tomography)
Weishaupt grading of lumbar facet joint degeneration (by computed tomography)

Kellgren grading of cervical disc degeneration^[2]
I	Minimal anterior osteophytosis
II	Definite anterior osteophytosis Possible disc space narrowing Some endplate sclerosis
III	Moderate disc space narrowing Definite endplate sclerosis Osteophytosis
IV	Severe disc space narrowing Endplate sclerosis Multiple large osteophytes.

Lane grading of lumbar disc degeneration^[1]
Grade	Joint space narrowing	Osteophytes	Sclerosis
0	None	None	None
1	Definite but mild narrowing	Small	Present
2	Moderate	Moderate	–
3	Severe (complete joint space loss)	Large	–

The Thomson grading system is regarded to have more academic than clinical value.^[1]

Thomson grading of lumbar disc degeneration^[1]
Grade	Nucleus	Anulus	Endplate	Vertebral body
I	Bulging gel	Discrete fibrous laminae	Hyaline, uniform thickness	Rounded margins
II	Peripheral white fibrous tissue	Mucinous material between laminae	Irregular thickness	Pointed margins
III	Consolidated fibrous tissue	Extensive mucinous infiltration; loss of annular-nuclear demarcation	Focal defects in cartilage	Small chondrophytes or osteophytes at margins
IV	Horizontal clefts parallel to endplate	Focal disruptions	Fibrocartilage extending from subchondral bone; irregularity and focal sclerosis in subchondral bone	Osteophytes smaller than 2 mm
V	Clefts extended through nucleus and annulus		Diffuse sclerosis	Osteophytes greater than 2 mm

Shoulder

The Samilson-Prieto classification is preferable for osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint.^[3]

Samilson-Prieto classification^[4]
Grade	Description
Mild	Exostosis of inferior humerus and/or glenoid measuring less than 3 mm
Moderate	Exostosis of inferior humerus and/or glenoid measuring 3–7 mm, and slight irregularity of the joint
Severe	Exostosis of inferior humerus and/or glenoid measuring more than 7 mm in height as well as sclerosis and narrowing of the joint space (normal joint space is 4–5 mm).^[5]

Hip

Hip joint with no signs of osteoarthritis.

The most commonly used radiographic classification system for osteoarthritis of the hip joint is the Kellgren-Lawrence system (or K-L system).^[6] It uses plain radiographs.

Kellgren-Lawrence system
Grade	Description
0	No radiographic features of osteoarthritis
1	Possible joint space narrowing (normal joint space is at least 2 mm at the superior acetabulum)^[7] and osteophyte formation
2	Definite osteophyte formation with possible joint space narrowing
3	Multiple osteophytes, definite joint space narrowing, sclerosis and possible bony deformity
4	Large osteophytes, marked joint space narrowing, severe sclerosis and definite bony deformity

Osteoarthritis of the hip joint may also be graded by Tönnis classification. There is no consensus whether it is more or less reliable than the Kellgren-Lawrence system.^[8]

Severe (Tönnis grade 3) osteoarthritis of the hip.

Tönnis classification^[9]
Grade	Description
0	No osteoarthritis signs
1	Mild: increased osteosclerosis minor joint space narrowing (normal joint space is at least 2 mm at the superior acetabulum)^[7] no or minor loss of head sphericity
2	Moderate: small bone cyst moderate joint space narrowing moderate loss of head sphericity
3	Severe: large bone cysts severe joint space narrowing, or joint space obliteration severe deformity of the head

Knee

For the grading of osteoarthritis in the knee, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) system is regarded to have the most favorable combination of interobserver precision and correlation to knee arthroscopy findings.^[10] The Ahlbäck system has been found to have comparable interobserver precision and arthroscopy correlation, but most of its span is focused at various degrees of bone defect or loss, and it is therefore less useful in early osteoarthritis.^[10] Systems that have been found to have lower interobserver precision and/or arthroscopy correlation are those developed by Kellgren-Lawrence, Fairbank, Brandt, and Jäger-Wirth.^[10]

International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) system^[10]
Grade	Findings
A	No joint space narrowing, defined in this system as at least 4 mm joint space
B	At least 4 mm joint space, but small osteophytes, slight sclerosis, or femoral condyle flattening
C	2-4 mm joint space
D	<2 mm joint space

Ahlbäck classification^[11]
Grade	Findings
I	Joint space narrowing, with or without subchondral sclerosis. Joint space narrowing is defined by this system as a joint space less than 3 mm, or less than half of the space in the other compartment, or less than half of the space of the homologous compartment of the other knee.
II	Obliteration of the joint space
III	Bone defect/loss <5 mm
IV	Bone defect/loss between 5 and 10 mm
V	Bone defect/loss >10 mm, often with subluxation and arthritis of the other compartment

For the patellofemoral joint, a classification by Merchant 1974 uses a 45° "skyline" view of the patella:^[12]

Merchant system
Stage	Description
1 (mild)	Patellofemoral joint space > 3mm
2 (moderate	Joint space < 3 mm but no bony contact
3 (severe)	Bony surfaces in contact over less than one quarter of the joint surface
4 (very severe)	Bony contact throughout the entire joint surface

Other joints

In the temporomandibular joint, subchondral sclerosis of the mandibular condyle has been described as an early change, condylar flattening as a feature of progressive osteoarthritis, and narrowing of the temporomandibular joint space as a late stage change.^[13] A joint space of between 1.5 and 4 mm is regarded as normal.^[14]
For the ankle, the Kellgren-Lawrence scale, as described for the hip, has been recommended.^[15] The distances between the bones in the ankle are normally as follows:^[16]

Talus - medial malleolus : 1.70 ± 0.13 mm
Talus - tibial plafond: 2.04 ± 0.29 mm
Talus - lateral malleolus: 2.13 ± 0.20 mm

References

1 2 3 4 Kettler, Annette; Wilke, Hans-Joachim (2005). "Review of existing grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration". European Spine Journal. 15 (6): 705–718. ISSN 0940-6719. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0954-y.
↑ Ofiram, Elisha; Garvey, Timothy A.; Schwender, James D.; Denis, Francis; Perra, Joseph H.; Transfeldt, Ensor E.; Winter, Robert B.; Wroblewski, Jill M. (2009). "Cervical degenerative index: a new quantitative radiographic scoring system for cervical spondylosis with interobserver and intraobserver reliability testing". Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 10 (1): 21–26. ISSN 1590-9921. doi:10.1007/s10195-008-0041-3.
↑ Brox, Jens; Lereim, Paul; Merckoll, Else; Finnanger, Anne Marie (2009). "Radiographic classification of glenohumeral arthrosis". Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 74 (2): 186–189. ISSN 0001-6470. doi:10.1080/00016470310013932.
↑ Page 117 in Barbara N. W. Weissman (2009). Imaging of Arthritis and Metabolic Bone Disease. Elsevier Health Sciences. ISBN 9780323041775.
↑ "Glenohumeral joint space". radref.org. , in turn citing: Petersson, Claes J.; Redlund-Johnell, Inga (2009). "Joint Space in Normal Gleno-Humeral Radiographs". Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 54 (2): 274–276. ISSN 0001-6470. doi:10.3109/17453678308996569.
↑ Zdravko Jotanovic, Radovan Mihelic, Gordan Gulan, Branko Sestan, Zlatko Dembic (2015). "Osteoarthritis of the hip: An overview". Periodicum biologorum. 117 (1).
1 2 Lequesne, M (2004). "The normal hip joint space: variations in width, shape, and architecture on 223 pelvic radiographs". Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 63 (9): 1145–1151. ISSN 0003-4967. doi:10.1136/ard.2003.018424.
↑ Terjesen, Terje; Gunderson, Ragnhild B (2012). "Radiographic evaluation of osteoarthritis of the hip". Acta Orthopaedica. 83 (2): 185–189. ISSN 1745-3674. doi:10.3109/17453674.2012.665331.
↑ "Tönnis Classification of Osteoarthritis by Radiographic Changes". Society of Preventive Hip Surgery. Retrieved 2016-12-13.
1 2 3 4 "Osteoarthritis Classification Scales: Interobserver Reliability and Arthroscopic Correlation". The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 96 (14): 1145–1151. 2014. ISSN 0021-9355. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.00929.
↑ Hernández-Vaquero, Daniel; Fernández-Carreira, José Manuel (2012). "Relationship between radiological grading and clinical status in knee osteoarthritis. a multicentric study". BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 13 (1). ISSN 1471-2474. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-194.
↑ Kim, Young-Mo; Joo, Yong-Bum (2012). "Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis". Knee Surgery & Related Research. 24 (4): 193–200. ISSN 2234-0726. doi:10.5792/ksrr.2012.24.4.193.
↑ Page 722 in Gary S. Firestein, Ralph Budd, Sherine E Gabriel, Iain B. McInnes, James R O'Dell (2012). Kelley's Textbook of Rheumatology E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences. ISBN 9781455737673.
↑ Massilla Mani, F.; Sivasubramanian, S. Satha (2016). "A study of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis using computed tomographic imaging". Biomedical Journal. 39 (3): 201–206. ISSN 2319-4170. doi:10.1016/j.bj.2016.06.003.
↑ Nicolas Holzer, Davide Salvo, Anne Karien Marijnissen, Aminudin Che Ahmad, Emanuele Sera, Pierre Hoffmeyer, Anne Lübbeke Wolff, Mathieu Assal (2017-09-14). "How to assess ankle osteoarthritis: comparison of the Kellgren and Lawrence scale with functional outcome and digital image analysis". Orthopaedic Proceedings. 94–B.
↑ Imai, Kan; Ikoma, Kazuya; Kido, Masamitsu; Maki, Masahiro; Fujiwara, Hiroyoshi; Arai, Yuji; Oda, Ryo; Tokunaga, Daisaku; Inoue, Nozomu; Kubo, Toshikazu (2015). "Joint space width of the tibiotalar joint in the healthy foot". Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. 8 (1). ISSN 1757-1146. doi:10.1186/s13047-015-0086-5.
↑ Quintana, José M.; Escobar, Antonio; Arostegui, Inmaculada; Bilbao, Amaia; Azkarate, Jesús; Goenaga, J. Ignacio; Arenaza, Juan C. (2006). "Health-Related Quality of Life and Appropriateness of Knee or Hip Joint Replacement". Archives of Internal Medicine. 166 (2): 220. ISSN 0003-9926. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.2.220.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.