Seawall

An example of a modern seawall in Ventnor on the Isle of Wight
People socializing and walking at the Malecón, Havana
Seawall at Urangan, Queensland

A seawall (or sea wall) is a form of coastal defense constructed where the sea, and associated coastal processes, impact directly upon the landforms of the coast. The purpose of a sea wall is to protect areas of human habitation, conservation and leisure activities from the action of tides, waves, or tsunamis.[1] As a seawall is a static feature it will conflict with the dynamic nature of the coast and impede the exchange of sediment between land and sea.[2]

The coast is generally a high-energy, dynamic environment with spatial variations over a wide range of timescales.[3] The coast is exposed to erosion by rivers and winds as well as the sea, so that a combination of denudational processes will work against a sea wall.[4] Because of these persistent natural forces, sea walls need to be maintained (and eventually replaced) to maintain their effectiveness.

The many types of sea wall in use today reflect both the varying physical forces they are designed to withstand, and location specific aspects, such as local climate, coastal position, wave regime, and value of landform. Sea walls are hard engineering shore-based structures which protect the coast from erosion. But various environmental problems and issues may arise from the construction of a sea wall, including disrupting sediment movement and transport patterns.[5] Combined with a high construction cost, this has led to an increasing use of other soft engineering coastal management options such as beach replenishment.

Sea walls may be constructed from various materials, most commonly reinforced concrete, boulders, steel, or gabions. Other possible construction materials are: vinyl, wood, aluminium, fibreglass composite, and large biodegrable sandbags made of jute and coir.[6] In the UK, sea wall also refers to an earthen bank used to create a polder, or a dike construction.

Types

A seawall works by reflecting incident wave energy back into the sea, thus reducing the energy available to cause erosion.[7] Sea walls have two specific weaknesses. First, wave reflection from the wall may result in scour and subsequent lowering of the sand level of the fronting beach.[8] Second, sea walls may accelerate erosion of adjacent, unprotected coastal areas because they affect the littoral drift process.[9]

Different designs of man-made tsunami barriers include building reefs and forests to above-ground and submerged seawalls. In 2005, India began planting Casuarina and coconut saplings on its coast as a natural barrier against future tsunamis like the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake.[10] Studies have found that an offshore tsunami wall could reduce tsunami wave heights by up to 83%.[11]

The design and type of sea wall that is appropriate depends on aspects specific to the location, including the surrounding erosion processes.[12] There are three main types of seawalls: vertical, curved or stepped, and mounds, as set out in the table:

 Seawall types
Type Illustration Advantages Disadvantages Example
Vertical Vertical seawalls are built in particularly exposed situations. These reflect wave energy. Under storm conditions a non-breaking standing wave pattern can form, resulting in a stationary clapotic wave which moves up and down but does not travel horizontally.[13][14] These waves promote erosion at the toe of the wall and can cause severe damage to the sea wall.[15] In some cases piles are placed in front of the wall to lessen wave energy slightly.
  • The first implemented, most easily designed and constructed type of seawall.
  • Vertical sea walls deflect wave energy away from the coast.
  • Loose rubble can absorb wave energy.
  • These can suffer a lot of expensive damage in a short period of time.
  • Vertical design can be undercut by high-wave energy environments over a long period of time.
Curved Curved or stepped seawalls are designed to enable waves to break to dissipate wave energy and to repel waves back to the sea. The curve can also prevent the wave overtopping the wall and provides additional protection for the toe of the wall.
  • Concave structure introduces a dissipative element.
  • The curve can prevent waves from overtopping the wall and provides extra protection for the toe of the wall
  • Curved seawalls aim to re-direct most of the incident energy, resulting in low reflected waves and much reduced turbulence.
  • More complex engineering and design process.
  • The deflected waves can scour material at the base of the wall causing them to become undermined.
Mound Mound type seawalls, using revetments or riprap, are used in less demanding settings where lower energy erosional processes operate. The least exposed sites involve the lowest-cost bulkheads and revetments of sand bags or geotextiles. These serve to armour the shore and minimise erosion and may be either watertight or porous, which allows water to filter through after the wave energy has been dissipated.[16]
  • Current designs use porous designs of rock, concrete armour.
  • Slope and loose material ensure maximum dissipation of wave energy.
  • Lower cost option.
  • Less durable.
  • Shorter life expectancy.
  • Cannot withstand or protect from high-energy conditions effectively.

Natural barriers

A report published by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) suggests that the tsunami of 26 December 2004 caused less damage in the areas where natural barriers were present, such as mangroves, coral reefs or coastal vegetation. A Japanese study of this tsunami in Sri Lanka used satellite imagery modelling to establish the parameters of coastal resistance as a function of different types of trees.[17] Natural barriers, such as coral reefs and mangrove forests, prevent the spread of tsunamis and the flow of coastal waters and mitigated the flood and surge of water.[18]

Trade-offs

A cost benefit approach is an effective way to determine whether a seawall is appropriate and whether the benefits are worth the expense. Besides controlling erosion, consideration must be given to the effects of hardening a shoreline on natural coastal ecosystems and human property or activities. A seawall is a static feature which can conflict with the dynamic nature of the coast and impede the exchange of sediment between land and sea. The table below summarises some positive and negative effects of seawalls which can be used when comparing their effectiveness with other coastal management options, such as beach nourishment.

Advantages and disadvantages of seawalls according to Short (1999)[19]
Advantages Disadvantages
  • Long term solution in comparison to soft beach nourishment.
  • Effectively minimizes loss of life in extreme events and damage to property caused by erosion.
  • Can exist longer in high energy environments in comparison to ‘soft’ engineering methods.
  • Can be used for recreation and sightseeing.
  • Forms a hard and strong coastal defense.
  • Very expensive to construct.
  • Can cause beaches to dissipate rendering them useless for beach goers.
  • Scars the very landscape that they are trying to save and provides an ‘eyesore.’
  • Reflected energy of waves leading to scour at base.
  • Can disrupt natural shoreline processes and destroy shoreline habitats such as wetlands and intertidal beaches.
  • Altered sediment transport processes can disrupt sand movement that can lead to increased erosion down drift from the structure.

Generally seawalls can be a successful way to control coastal erosion, but only if they are constructed well and out of materials which can withstand the force of ongoing wave energy. Some understanding is needed of the coastal processes and morphodynamics specific to the seawall location. Seawalls can be very helpful; they can offer a more long-term solution than soft engineering options, additionally providing recreation opportunities and protection from extreme events as well as everyday erosion. Extreme natural events expose weaknesses in the performance of seawalls, and analyses of these can lead to future improvements and reassessment.

3D simulation of wave motion near a sea wall.[20]

Issues

Sea level rise

Sea level rise creates an issue for seawalls worldwide as it raises both the mean normal water level and the height of waves during extreme weather events, which the current seawall heights may be unable to cope with (Allan et al. 1999).[3] The most recent analyses of long, good-quality tide gauge records (corrected for GIA and when possible for other vertical land motions by the Global Positioning System, GPS) indicate a mean rate of sea level rise of 1.6–1.8 mm/yr over the twentieth century.[21] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (1997)[22] suggested that sea level rise over the next 50 – 100 years will accelerate with a projected increase in global mean sea level of +18 cm by 2050 AD. This data is reinforced by Hannah (1990)[23] who calculated similar statistics including a rise of between +16-19.3 cm throughout 1900–1988. Super storm Sandy of 2012 is an example of the devastating effects rising sea levels can cause when mixed with a perfect storm. According to Nabil Ismail, Professor of Coastal Engineering at the Maritime Academy for Science and Technology and S. Jeffress Williams, Dept. of Geology and Geophysics at The University of Hawaii at Manoa stated that Super storm Sandy sent a storm surge of 4–5 m onto New Jersey's and New York's barrier island and urban shorelines, estimated at $70 billion in damage.[24] EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. Vol. 15. 2013.This problem could be overcome by further modelling and determining the extension of height and reinforcement of current seawalls which needs to occur for safety to be ensured in both situations.

Extreme events

Extreme events also pose a problem as it is not easy for people to predict or imagine the strength of hurricane or storm induced waves compared to normal, expected wave patterns. An extreme event can dissipate hundreds of times more energy than everyday waves, and calculating structures which will stand the force of coastal storms is difficult and, often the outcome can become unaffordable. For example, Omaha Beach seawall in New Zealand was designed to prevent erosion from everyday waves only, and when a storm in 1976 carved out 10 m behind the existing seawall the whole structure was destroyed (GeoResources, 2001).[12]

Other issues

Some further issues include: lack of long term trend data of seawall effects due to a relatively short duration of data records; modelling limitations and comparisons of different projects and their effects being invalid or unequal due to different beach types; materials; currents; and environments (Christchurch City Council, 2009).[25] Lack of maintenance is also a major issue with sea walls. In a post on October 21, 2013 by NBC reporter Lucas Seiler, more than 5,000 feet of seawall was found to be crumbling in Punta Gorda, Florida. Residents of the area pay hundreds of dollars each year into a seawall repair program. The problem is that most of the seawalls are over a half century old and are being destroyed by only heavy downpours. If not kept in check, seawalls lose effectiveness and become expensive to repair.[26]

Historical examples

A seawall, made of rocks, in Paravur near Kollam city in India.

Seawall construction has existed since ancient times. In the 1st century BCE, Romans built a seawall / breakwater at Caesarea Maritima creating an artificial harbor (Sebastos Harbor). The construction used Pozzolana concrete which hardens in contact with sea water. Barges were constructed and filled with the concrete. They were floated into position and sunk. The resulting harbor / breakwater / sea wall is still in existence today - more than 2000 years later.

More recently, sea walls were constructed in 1623 in Canvey Island, UK, when great floods of the Thames estuary occurred, prompting the construction of protection for further events in this flood prone area (Council of Europe, 1999).[27] Since then, seawall design has become more complex and intricate in response to an improvement in materials, technology and an understanding of how coastal processes operate. This section will outline some key case studies of seawalls in chronological order and describe how they have performed in response to tsunami or ongoing natural processes and how effective they were in these situations. Analysing the successes and shortcomings of seawalls during severe natural events allows their weaknesses to be exposed, and areas become visible for future improvement.

Pondicherry

On December 26, 2004, towering waves of the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake tsunami crashed against India's south-eastern coastline killing thousands. However, the former French colonial enclave of Pondicherry escaped unscathed. This was primarily due to French engineers who had constructed (and maintained) a massive stone seawall during the time when the city was a French colony. This 300-year-old seawall effectively kept Pondicherry's historic center dry even though tsunami waves drove water 24 ft (7.3 m) above the normal high-tide mark.

The barrier was initially completed in 1735 and over the years, the French continued to fortify the wall, piling huge boulders along its 1.25 mi (2 km) coastline to stop erosion from the waves pounding the harbor. At its highest, the barrier running along the water's edge reaches about 27 ft (8.2 m) above sea level. The boulders, some weighing up to a ton, are weathered black and brown. The sea wall is inspected every year and whenever gaps appear or the stones sink into the sand, the government adds more boulders to keep it strong (Allsop, 2002).[28]

The Union Territory of Pondicherry recorded some 600 deaths from the huge tsunami waves that struck India's coast after the mammoth underwater earthquake (which measured 9.0 on the moment magnitude scale) off Indonesia, but most of those killed were fishermen who lived in villages beyond the artificial barrier which reinforces the effectiveness of seawalls.

Vancouver

The Vancouver Seawall is a stone seawall constructed around the perimeter of Stanley Park in Vancouver. The seawall was constructed initially as waves created by ships passing through the First Narrows were eroding the area between Prospect Point and Brockton Point. The Vancouver Seawall also exemplifies how seawalls can be utilised and valued for recreational activities and coastal sightseeing. A pedestrian, cycling and roller blading pathway exists on the seawall and has been extended far outside the parameters of Stanley Park. Construction of the seawall began in 1917, and since then this pathway has become one of the most used features of the park by both locals and tourists and now extends 22 km in total (Belyea & Ross, 1992).[29] The construction of the seawall also provided employment for relief workers during the Great Depression and seamen from HMCS Discovery on Deadman's Island who were facing punishment detail in the 1950s (Steele, 1985).[30]

Overall, the Vancouver Seawall is a prime example of how seawalls can simultaneously provide shoreline protection and a source of recreation which enhances human enjoyment of the coastal environment. It also illustrates that although shoreline erosion is a natural process, human activities, interactions with the coast and poorly planned shoreline development projects can accelerate natural erosion rates.

Japan

At least 43 percent of Japan’s 29,751 km (18,486 mi)[31] coastline is lined with concrete seawalls or other structures designed to protect the country against high waves, typhoons or even tsunamis.[32] During the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami, the seawalls in most areas were overwhelmed. In Kamaishi, 4-metre (13 ft) waves surmounted the seawall — the world's largest, erected a few years ago in the city's harbour at a depth of 63 m (207 ft), a length of 2 km (1.2 mi) and a cost of $1.5 billion — and eventually submerged the city center.[33]

The risks of dependence on seawalls was most evident in the crisis at the Fukushima Dai-ichi and Fukushima Dai-ni nuclear power plants, both located along the coast close to the earthquake zone, as the tsunami washed over walls that were supposed to protect the plants. Arguably, the additional defense provided by the seawalls presented an extra margin of time for citizens to evacuate and also stopped some of the full force of energy which would have caused the wave to climb higher in the backs of coastal valleys. In contrast, the seawalls also acted in a negative way to trap water and delay its retreat.

The failure of the world's largest seawall, which cost $1.5 billion to construct, shows that building stronger sea walls to protect larger areas would have been even less cost-effective. In the case of the ongoing crisis at the nuclear power plants, higher and stronger sea walls should have been built if power plants were to be built at that site. Fundamentally, the devastation in coastal areas and a final death toll predicted to exceed 10,000 could push Japan to redesign its seawalls or consider more effective alternative methods of coastal protection for extreme events. Such hardened coastlines can also provide a false sense of security to property owners and local residents as evident in this situation.[33]

Seawalls along the Japanese coast have also been criticized for cutting settlements off from the sea, making beaches unusable, presenting an eyesore, disturbing wildlife, and being unnecessary.[34]

Cost

The city of New York and mayor Bill de Blasio in 2015 after Hurricane Sandy invested $3 billion in a hurricane restoration fund, with part of the money dedicated to building new sea walls and protection from future hurricanes.[35]

See also

Related types of walls:

Specific walls:

General:

References

  1. ↑ Kamphuis, W J. (2010) Introduction to Coastal Engineering and Management. World Scientific Publishing Co Ltd. Singapore.
  2. ↑ Shipman, B & Stojanovic, T. (2007) “Facts, Fictions, and Failures of Integrated Coastal Zone Management” in Europe Coastal Management. Vol. 35, Issue 2, p375 - 398 .
  3. 1 2 Allan, J C, Kirk, R M, Hemmingsen, M & Hart, D. (1999) Coastal Processes in Southern Pegasus Bay: A Review – A Report to Woodward-Clyde New Zealand Ltd. and the Christchurch City Council. Land and Water Studies Ltd. Christchurch.
  4. ↑ Fletcher C H, Mullane R A & Richmond B M. (1997) “Beach loss along armored shorelines on Oahu, Hawaiian Islands” in Journal of Coastal Research. Vol. 13, No 3. P 209-215
  5. ↑ Kraus, N & McDougal. (1996) The Effects of Seawalls on the Beach: Part I: An Updated Literature Review in Journal of Coastal Research. Vol. 12, No. 3.
  6. ↑ Clarke, J R. 1994. Integrated Management of Coastal Zones. Fao Corporate Document Repository, USA.
  7. ↑ Kajendra, R. (2011)
  8. ↑ Masselink, G and Hughes, M J. (2003) Introduction to Coastal Processes and Geomorphology. Oxford University Press. New York. Ch 11.
  9. ↑ NOAA. (2007) Shoreline Management: Alternatives to Hardening the Shore. Retrieved online 15 April 2011 from: http://coastalmanagement.noaa.gov/shoreline.html
  10. ↑ "India builds tsunami barrier". News 24. January 14, 2005. Retrieved March 29, 2011.
  11. ↑ "Design of a tsunami barrier to The North of Penang Island". Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Institutional Repository. 25 November 2010. Retrieved March 29, 2011.
  12. 1 2 GeoResources. (2001) Coastal management. Retrieved online 18 April 2011 from: http://www.georesources.co.uk/coastman.htm
  13. ↑ Carter, Bill (1989). Coastal environments: an introduction to the physical, ecological, and cultural systems of coastlines. Boston: Academic Press. p. 50. ISBN 0-12-161856-0.
  14. ↑ Matzner, Richard A. (2001). Dictionary of geophysics, astrophysics, and astronomy (PDF). Boca Raton: CRC Press. p. 81. ISBN 0-8493-2891-8.
  15. ↑ Beer, Tom (1997). Environmental oceanography. Boca Raton: CRC Press. p. 44. ISBN 0-8493-8425-7. ... the reflected wave energy interacted with the incoming waves to produce standing waves known as clapotis, which promote erosion at the toe of the wall.
  16. ↑ Milligan, J & O’riordan, T. (2007) “Governance for Sustainable Coastal Futures” in Coastal Management. Vol. 35, Issue 4, p 499–509.
  17. ↑ [1] Archived 2011-07-16 at the Wayback Machine. Satellite imagery and modelling show how forests cushion the impact of tsunamis
  18. ↑ "Tsunami Barriers". Science NetLinks. Retrieved March 30, 2011.
  19. ↑ Short, A. (1999) Handbook of Beach and Shoreface Morphodynamics. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Ch 7.
  20. ↑ MEDUS. (2011) Marine Engineering Division of University of Salerno. Retrieved online 10 April 2011 from: http://www.diciv.unisa.it/docenti/dentale/medus_.php (MEDUS)
  21. ↑ Link text, "Sea level rise and its coastal impacts." Earth's Future (2013). Retrieved Online 21 February 2014.
  22. ↑ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007. Retrieved Online 15 April 2011 from: www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports
  23. ↑ Hannah, J. (1990) "The Analysis of Mean Sea Level Data from New Zealand for the Period 1899–1988" in The Journal of Geophysical Research, 95, No. 88.
  24. ↑ Link test, "Sea-Level Rise Implications for Coastal Protection from Southern Mediterranean to the USA Atlantic Coast."
  25. ↑ Christchurch City Council. (2009) Study of the Effects of Sea Level Rise for Christchurch. Tonkin + Taylor, Christchurch.
  26. ↑ , "More failing Seawalls in Punta Gorda Isles - NBC-2.com WBBH News for Fort Myers, Cape Coral & Naples, Florida." NBC-2.com. Nbc, 21 Oct. 2013. Web. 21 Feb. 2014.
  27. ↑ Council of Europe. (1999) European code of conduct for coastal zones, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
  28. ↑ N.W.H. Allsop. (2002). Breakwaters, coastal structures and coastlines. Thomas Telford. ISBN 0-7277-3042-8.
  29. ↑ Belyea, R (21 January 1992). The Stanley Park Technical Report. Vancouver: Stanley Park Task Force, prepared by Belyea, Sorensen & Associates. P 15.
  30. ↑ Steele, Richard M. (1985). The Stanley Park Explorer. Vancouver: Whitecap Books. P 23–24.
  31. ↑ https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ja.html
  32. ↑ New York Times. (2011) Japan’s Seawalls Didn’t Provide Security from tsunami retrieved online 18 April 2011 from: http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/953485--japan-s-seawalls-didn-t-provide-security-from-tsunami
  33. 1 2 Msubi (2011) Seawalls are no Match for Japan Tsunami. Retrieved online 8 April 2011 from: http://www.nippon-sekai.com/main/articles/great-east-japan-earthquake-of-2011/sea-walls-were-no-match-for-this-tsunami/
  34. ↑ Lucy Craft (2014-03-11). "In Tsunami's Wake, Fierce Debate Over Japan's 'Great Wall'". NPR.
  35. ↑ "Why big hurricanes weaken before they hit America’s coast". 2017-01-07. Retrieved 2017-01-20.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.