SN 1987A

SN 1987A

Remnant of SN 1987A seen in light overlays of different spectra. ALMA data (radio, in red) shows newly formed dust in the center of the remnant. Hubble (visible, in green) and Chandra (X-ray, in blue) data show the expanding shock wave.[1]
Other designations SN 1987A, AAVSO 0534-69
Event type Supernova
Edit this on Wikidata
Spectral class Type II (peculiar)[2]
Observation
Date 24 February 1987 (23:00 UTC)
Las Campanas Observatory[3]
Location
Constellation Dorado
Right ascension 05h 35m 28.03s[4]
Declination −69° 16′ 11.79″[4]
Epoch J2000
Galactic coordinates G279.7-31.9
Distance 51.4 kpc (168,000 ly)
Host Large Magellanic Cloud
Characteristics
Progenitor Sanduleak -69° 202
Progenitor type B3 supergiant
Colour (B-V) +0.085
Notable features Closest recorded supernova since invention of telescope
Energetics
Peak apparent magnitude +2.9
See also
Related media on Wikimedia Commons
The SN 1987A remnant is the small, purplish point near the top of the frame, just right of center. Credit ESO

SN 1987A was a supernova in the outskirts of the Tarantula Nebula in the Large Magellanic Cloud (a nearby dwarf galaxy). It occurred approximately 51.4 kiloparsecs (168,000 ly) from Earth.[4] This was close enough that it was easily visible to the naked eye and it could be seen from the Southern Hemisphere. It was the closest observed supernova since SN 1604, which occurred in the Milky Way itself. The light from the new supernova reached Earth on February 23, 1987.[5] As the first supernova discovered in 1987, it was labeled “1987A”. Its brightness peaked in May with an apparent magnitude of about 3 and slowly declined in the following months. It was the first opportunity for modern astronomers to study the development of a supernova in great detail, and its observations have provided much insight into core-collapse supernovae.

SN1987A provided the first chance to confirm by direct observation the radioactive source of the energy for visible light emissions via the detection of predicted gamma-ray line radiation from two of its abundant radioactive nuclei. This proved the radioactive nature of the long-duration post-explosion glow of supernovae.

Discovery

SN 1987A was discovered independently by Ian Shelton and Oscar Duhalde at the Las Campanas Observatory in Chile on February 24, 1987, and within the same 24 hours by Albert Jones in New Zealand.[3] On March 4–12, 1987, it was observed from space by Astron, the largest ultraviolet space telescope of that time.[6]

Progenitor

SN 1987A, one of the brightest stellar explosions detected since the invention of the telescope more than 400 years ago[7]

Four days after the event was recorded, the progenitor star was tentatively identified as Sanduleak −69° 202, a blue supergiant.[8] After the supernova faded, that identification was definitely confirmed by Sanduleak −69° 202 having disappeared. This was an unexpected identification, because models of high mass stellar evolution at the time did not predict that blue supergiants are susceptible to a supernova event. Many models of the progenitor have since attributed the color to its chemical composition, particularly the low levels of heavy elements, among other factors.[9] There was some speculation that the star might have merged with a companion star prior to the supernova.[10] However, it is now widely understood that blue supergiants are natural progenitors of supernovae, although there is still speculation that the evolution of such stars requires mass loss involving a binary companion.[11] It is of note that the supernova of the blue giant Sanduleak −69° 202 was about one-tenth as luminous as the average observed type II supernova, which is associated with the denser makeup of the star. Because blue supergiant supernovae are not as bright as those generated by red supergiants, we cannot see them in as large a volume. We would thus not expect to see as many of them, and so they might not be as rare or unusual as previously thought.

Neutrino emissions

Approximately two to three hours before the visible light from SN 1987A reached Earth, a burst of neutrinos was observed at three separate neutrino observatories. This is likely due to neutrino emission, which occurs simultaneously with core collapse, but preceding the emission of visible light. Transmission of visible light is a slower process that occurs only after the shock wave reaches the stellar surface.[12] At 07:35 UT, Kamiokande II detected 12 antineutrinos; IMB, 8 antineutrinos; and Baksan, 5 antineutrinos; in a burst lasting less than 13 seconds. Approximately three hours earlier, the Mont Blanc liquid scintillator detected a five-neutrino burst, but this is generally not believed to be associated with SN 1987A.[9]

The Kamiokande II detection, which at 12 neutrinos had the largest sample population, showed that the neutrinos arrived in two distinct pulses. The first pulse, which started at 07:35:35 comprised 9 neutrinos, all of which arrived over a period of 1.915 seconds. A second pulse of three neutrinos arrived between 9.219 and 12.439 seconds after the first neutrino was detected, for a pulse duration of 3.220 seconds.

Although only 25 neutrinos were detected during the event, it was a significant increase from the previously observed background level. This was the first time neutrinos known to be emitted from a supernova had been observed directly, which marked the beginning of neutrino astronomy. The observations were consistent with theoretical supernova models in which 99% of the energy of the collapse is radiated away in the form of neutrinos.[13] The observations are also consistent with the models' estimates of a total neutrino count of 1058 with a total energy of 1046 joules.[14]

The neutrino measurements allowed upper bounds on neutrino mass and charge, as well as the number of flavors of neutrinos and other properties.[9] For example, the data show that within 5% confidence, the rest mass of the electron neutrino is at most 16 eV/c2, 1/30,000 the mass of an electron. The data suggest that the total number of neutrino flavors is at most 8 but other observations and experiments give tighter estimates. Many of these results have since been confirmed or tightened by other neutrino experiments such as more careful analysis of solar neutrinos and atmospheric neutrinos as well as experiments with artificial neutrino sources.

Missing neutron star

SN 1987A appears to be a core-collapse supernova, which should result in a neutron star given the size of the original star.[9] The neutrino data indicate that a compact object did form at the star's core. However, since the supernova first became visible, astronomers have been searching for the collapsed core but have not detected it. The Hubble Space Telescope has taken images of the supernova regularly since August 1990, but, so far, the images have shown no evidence of a neutron star. A number of possibilities for the 'missing' neutron star are being considered, although none are clearly favored. The first is that the neutron star is enshrouded in dense dust clouds so that it cannot be seen. Another is that a pulsar was formed, but with either an unusually large or small magnetic field. It is also possible that large amounts of material fell back on the neutron star, so that it further collapsed into a black hole. Neutron stars and black holes often give off light when material falls onto them. If there is a compact object in the supernova remnant, but no material to fall onto it, it would be very dim and could therefore avoid detection. Other scenarios have also been considered, such as if the collapsed core became a quark star.[15][16]

Light curve

The bright ring around the central region of the exploded star is composed of material ejected.[17]

Much of the light curve, or graph of luminosity as a function of time, after the explosion of a Type II Supernova such as SN 1987A is provided its energy by radioactive decay. Although the luminous emission consists of optical photons, it is the radioactive power absorbed that keeps the remnant hot enough to radiate light. Without radioactive heat it would quickly dim. The radioactive decay of 56Ni through its daughters 56Co to 56Fe produces gamma-ray photons that are absorbed and dominate the heating and thus the luminosity of the ejecta at intermediate times (several weeks) to late times (several months).[18] Energy for the peak of the light curve of SN1987A was provided by the decay of 56Ni to 56Co (half life 6 days) while energy for the later light curve in particular fit very closely with the 77.3 day half-life of 56Co decaying to 56Fe. Later measurements by space gamma-ray telescopes of the small fraction of the 56Co and 57Co gamma rays that escaped the SN1987A remnant without absorption[19] confirmed earlier predictions that those two radioactive nuclei were the power source.[20]

Because the 56Co in SN1987A has now completely decayed, it no longer supports the luminosity of the SN 1987A ejecta. That is currently powered by the radioactive decay of 44Ti with a half life of about 60 years. With this change, X-rays produced by the ring interactions of the ejecta began to contribute significantly to the total light curve. This was noticed by the Hubble Space Telescope as a steady increase in luminosity 10,000 days after the event in the blue and red spectral bands.[21] X-ray lines 44Ti observed by the INTEGRAL space X-ray telescope showed that the total mass of radioactive 44Ti synthesized during the explosion was 3.1 ± 0.8×10−4 M☉.[22]

Observations of the radioactive power from their decays in the 1987A light curve have measured accurate total masses of the 56Ni, 57Ni, and 44Ti created in the explosion, which agree with the masses measured by gamma-ray line space telescopes and provides nucleosynthesis constraints on the computed supernova model.[23]

Interaction with circumstellar material

The three bright rings around SN 1987A that were visible after a few months in images by the Hubble Space Telescope are material from the stellar wind of the progenitor. These rings were ionized by the ultraviolet flash from the supernova explosion, and consequently began emitting in various emission lines. These rings did not "turn on" until several months after the supernova; the turn-on process can be very accurately studied through spectroscopy. The rings are large enough that their angular size can be measured accurately: the inner ring is 0.808 arcseconds in radius. The time light traveled to light up the inner ring gives its radius of 0.66 light years. Using this as the base of a right angle triangle and the angular size as seen from the Earth for the local angle, one can use basic trigonometry to calculate the distance to SN 1987A, which is about 168,000 light-years.[24] The material from the explosion is catching up with the material expelled during both its red and blue supergiant phases and heating it, so we observe ring structures about the star.

The expanding ring-shaped remnant of SN 1987A and its interaction with its surroundings, seen in X-ray and visible light.

Around 2001, the expanding (>7000 km/s) supernova ejecta collided with the inner ring. This caused its heating and the generation of x-rays — the x-ray flux from the ring increased by a factor of three between 2001 and 2009. A part of the x-ray radiation, which is absorbed by the dense ejecta close to the center, is responsible for a comparable increase in the optical flux from the supernova remnant in 2001–2009. This increase of the brightness of the remnant reversed the trend observed before 2001, when the optical flux was decreasing due to the decaying of 44Ti isotope.[25]

A time sequence of Hubble Space Telescope images, taken in the 15 years from 1994 to 2009, showing the collision of the expanding supernova remnant with a ring of dense material ejected by the progenitor star 20,000 years before the supernova.[25]

A study reported in June 2015,[26] using images from the Hubble Space Telescope and the Very Large Telescope taken between 1994 and 2014, shows that the emissions from the clumps of matter making up the rings are fading as the clumps are destroyed by the shock wave. It is predicted the ring will fade away between 2020 and 2030. As the shock wave passes the circumstellar ring it will trace the history of mass loss of the supernova's progenitor and provide useful information for discriminating among various models for the progenitor of SN 1987A.[27]

See also

References

  1. ↑ "ALMA Spots Supernova Dust Factory". ESO Press Release. Retrieved 7 January 2014.
  2. ↑ Lyman, J. D.; Bersier, D.; James, P. A. (2013). "Bolometric corrections for optical light curves of core-collapse supernovae". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 437 (4): 3848. Bibcode:2014MNRAS.437.3848L. arXiv:1311.1946 Freely accessible. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2187.
  3. 1 2 "IAUC4316: 1987A, N. Cen. 1986". 24 February 1987.
  4. 1 2 3 "SN1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud". Hubble Heritage Project. Retrieved 2006-07-25.
  5. ↑ "Astrometry of SN 1987A and Sanduleak-69 202". Bibcode:1987A&A...177L...1W.
  6. ↑ "Observations on Astron: Supernova 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud". Bibcode:1987PAZh...13..739B.
  7. ↑ "Hubble Revisits an Old Friend". Picture of the Week. ESA/Hubble. Retrieved 17 October 2011.
  8. ↑ Sonneborn, G. (1987). "The Progenitor of SN1987A". In Minas Kafatos; Andrew Michalitsianos. Supernova 1987a in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-35575-3.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Arnett, W.D.; et al. (1989). "Supernova 1987A". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 27: 629–700. Bibcode:1989ARA&A..27..629A. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.27.090189.003213.
  10. ↑ Podsiadlowski, P. (1992). "The progenitor of SN 1987 A". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 104: 717. Bibcode:1992PASP..104..717P. doi:10.1086/133043.
  11. ↑ Dwarkadas, V. V. (2011). "On luminous blue variables as the progenitors of core-collapse supernovae, especially Type IIn supernovae". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 412 (3): 1639–1649. Bibcode:2011MNRAS.412.1639D. arXiv:1011.3484 Freely accessible. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18001.x.
  12. ↑ Nomoto, Ken'ichi; Shigeyama, Toshikazu (1987). "Supernova 1987A: Constraints on the Theoretical Model". In Minas Kafatos; Andrew Michalitsianos. Supernova 1987a in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Cambridge University Press. section 3.2 Shock propagation time. ISBN 0-521-35575-3
  13. ↑ Scholberg, Kate (27 May 2012). "Supernova Neutrino Detection". arXiv:1205.6003v1 Freely accessible.
  14. ↑ Pagliaroli, G.; Vissani, F.; Costantini, M. L.; Ianni, A. (2009). "Improved analysis of SN1987A antineutrino events". Astroparticle Physics. 31 (3): 163. Bibcode:2009APh....31..163P. arXiv:0810.0466 Freely accessible. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2008.12.010.
  15. ↑ Chan, T. C.; Cheng, K. S.; Harko, T.; Lau, H. K.; Lin, L. M.; Suen, W. M.; Tian, X. L. (2009). "Could the compact remnant of SN 1987A be a quark star?". The Astrophysical Journal. 695: 732. Bibcode:2009ApJ...695..732C. arXiv:0902.0653 Freely accessible. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/732.
  16. ↑ Parsons, Paul (February 21, 2009). "Quark star may hold secret to early universe". New Scientist.
  17. ↑ "New image of SN 1987A". www.spacetelescope.org. Retrieved 27 February 2017.
  18. ↑ Kasen, D.; Woosley, S. (2009). "Type II Supernovae: Model Light Curves and Standard Candle Relationships". The Astrophysical Journal. 703 (2): 2205–2216. Bibcode:2009ApJ...703.2205K. arXiv:0910.1590 Freely accessible. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/2205.
  19. ↑ "Gamma-ray line emission from SN1987A", S.M. Matz, G.H. Share et al. Nature 331, 416–418 (1988); "OSSE Observations of 57Co in SN1987A", J.D. Kurfess, D.D. Clayton et al., Asytophys. J. (Lett.) 399, L137 (1992)
  20. ↑ Clayton, Donald D.; Colgate, Stirling A.; Fishman, Gerald J. (1969). "Gamma-Ray Lines from Young Supernova Remnants". Astrophysical Journal. 155: 75. Bibcode:1969ApJ...155...75C. doi:10.1086/149849.
  21. ↑ McCray, Richard; Fansson, Claes (2016). "The Remnant of Supernova 1987A". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophisics. 54: 19–52. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082615-105405.
  22. ↑ Grebenev, S. A.; Lutovinov, A. A.; Tsygankov, S. S.; Winkler, C. (2012). "Hard-X-ray emission lines from the decay of 44Ti in the remnant of supernova 1987A". Nature. 490 (7420): 373–375. Bibcode:2012Natur.490..373G. PMID 23075986. arXiv:1211.2656 Freely accessible. doi:10.1038/nature11473.
  23. ↑ C. Fransson; R. Gilmozzi; P. Groeningsson; R. Hanuschik; K. Kjaer; B. Leibundgut & J. Spyromilio (2007). "Twenty Years of Supernova 1987A". The Messenger. 127: 44. Bibcode:2007Msngr.127...44F.
  24. ↑ Panagia, N. (1998). "New Distance Determination to the LMC". Memorie della Societa Astronomia Italiana. 69: 225. Bibcode:1998MmSAI..69..225P.
  25. 1 2 Larsson, J.; Fransson, C.; Ostlin, G.; Gröningsson, P.; Jerkstrand, A.; Kozma, C.; Sollerman, J.; Challis, P.; Kirshner, R. P.; Chevalier, R. A.; Heng, K.; McCray, R.; Suntzeff, N. B.; Bouchet, P.; Crotts, A.; Danziger, J.; Dwek, E.; France, K.; Garnavich, P. M.; Lawrence, S. S.; Leibundgut, B.; Lundqvist, P.; Panagia, N.; Pun, C. S. J.; Smith, N.; Sonneborn, G.; Wang, L.; Wheeler, J. C. (2011). "X-ray illumination of the ejecta of supernova 1987A". Nature. 474 (7352): 484–486. Bibcode:2011Natur.474..484L. PMID 21654749. arXiv:1106.2300 Freely accessible. doi:10.1038/nature10090.
  26. ↑ Kruesi, Liz. "Supernova prized by astronomers begins to fade from view". New Scientist. Archived from the original on 13 June 2015. Retrieved 13 June 2015.
  27. ↑ Fransson, Claes; et al. (2015). "The Destruction of the Circumstellar Ring of SN 1987A". The Astrophysical Journal. 806: L19. Bibcode:2015ApJ...806L..19F. arXiv:1505.06669 Freely accessible. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/806/1/L19.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.