SIMS (Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology)
The Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) is a psychometric test that measures neurological and psychiatric symptoms amplification. This tool is used both for clinical and forensic purposes.[1] It can provide presumptive indication of malingering, that must be tested by other assessment tools.
The SIMS is a self-report screening questionnaire made of 75 dichotomic items (true/false). From a psychometric point of view, this tool shows a high degree of sensitivity and specificity.[2]
The SIMS has been translated into many European languages: German,[3] Italian,[4] Spanish,[5] and Dutch.[6]
This test has also been used to investigate, in medical-legal and forensic contexts, the distorting impact that the evaluative context itself exerts on the tendency of subjects with mental psychopathology (psychosis) to amplify or not the self-reported symptoms.[7]
Note
- ↑ G. P. Smith, G. K. Burger. Detection of malingering: Validation of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). Journal of the Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 25 (1997), pp. 180–183
- ↑ Merckelbach (2013). "De Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS): Een update" (PDF). Tijdschrift voor Neuropsychologie.
- ↑ German Version
- ↑ Italian version
- ↑ Spanish version
- ↑ Dutch version
- ↑ Montrone, Alessandro; Martino, Vito; Grattagliano, Ignazio; Massaro, Ylenia; Campobasso, Filippo; Lisi, Andrea; Di Conza, Angiola; Catanesi, Roberto (2016). "L’uso del test sims nella valutazione psicodiagnostica delle condotte distorsive: la simulazione. Uno studio pilota." [Use of the SIMS test in psychological assessment of distorting behavior: simulation. A pilot study.]. Rassegna Italiana di Criminologia [Italian Journal of Criminology] (in Italian). 48 (2): 139–145. ISSN 2240-8053. Retrieved 2017-06-02.
Bibliography
G. P. Smith, G. K. Burger. Detection of malingering: Validation of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). Journal of the Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 25 (1997), pp. 180–183