Roebuck v NUM (Yorkshire Area) No 2

Roebuck v NUM (Yorkshire Area) No 2
Court	High Court
Citation(s)	[1978] ICR 676
Keywords
Trade union, collective bargaining

Roebuck v NUM (Yorkshire Area) No 2 [1978] ICR 676 is a UK labour law case, concerning trade union regulation.

Facts

Union members gave evidence for the Sheffield Star in a libel action by Mr Arthur Scargill. They were disciplined by their union under its rules, prompted by Mr Scargill who chaired the disciplinary panel. They were found in breach and disqualified from office for two years.

Judgment

Templeman J held that the disciplinaries were unlawful. He noted that ‘all members of a domestic tribunal where the interests of their own organisation are at stake, have a general inclination to defend the union and its officers against attack from any source.’ Scargill’s role as chairman ‘undoubtedly gave the impression that the dice were loaded against... the appearance of bias was inevitable.’ The question is ‘whether a reasonable man with no inside knowledge might well think that it might be biased.^[1] Here it was obvious.

Sources on trade unions
European Convention on Human Rights art 11
ILO Freedom of Association Convention (1948) C87
ASLEF v United Kingdom [2007] ECHR 184
Lee v Showmen’s Guild of Great Britain [1952] 2 QB 359
Edwards v Halliwell [1950] 2 All ER 1064
Hodgson v NALGOA [1972] 1 WLR 130
TULRCA 1992 ss 46-61
Ecclestone v National Union of Journalists [1999] IRLR 166
Breen v Amalgamated Engineering Union [1971] 2 QB 175
AB v CD [2001] IRLR 808
TULRCA 1992 ss 71-96
Paul v NALGO [1987] IRLR 413
Roebuck v NUM (Yorkshire Area) No 2 [1978] ICR 676
Esterman v NALGO [1974] ICR 625
Cheall v APEX [1983] 2 AC 180
TULRCA 1992 ss 62-65
see UK labour and trade unions

UK labour law

Notes

↑ Hannam v Bradford Corporation [1970] 1 WLR 937, 979

References

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.