Rhynchophorus ferrugineus

Rhynchophorus ferrugineus
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Coleoptera
Family: Curculionidae
Genus: Rhynchophorus
Species: R. ferrugineus
Binomial name
Rhynchophorus ferrugineus
(Olivier, 1790) [1]
Synonyms
  • Curculio ferrugineus Olivier, 1790
  • Cordyle sexmaculatus Thunberg, 1797
  • Calandra ferruginea Fabricius, 1801
  • Rhynchophorus pascha v. papuanus Kirsch, 1877
  • Rhynchophorus indostanus Chevrolat, 1882
  • Rhynchophorus signaticollis Chevrolat, 1882
  • Rhynchophorus pascha v. cinctus Faust, 1893
  • Rhynchophorus ferrugineus v. seminiger Faust, 1895
  • Rhynchophorus signaticollis v. dimidiatus Faust, 1895

The palm weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus is one of two species of snout beetle known as the red palm weevil, Asian palm weevil or sago palm weevil. The adult beetles are relatively large, ranging between two and four centimeters long, and are usually a rusty red colour—but many colour variants exist and have often been classified as different species (e.g., Rhynchophorus vulneratus). Weevil larvae can excavate holes in the trunk of a palm trees up to a metre long, thereby weakening and eventually killing the host plant. As a result, the weevil is considered a major pest in palm plantations, including the coconut palm, date palm and oil palm.[2]

Originally from tropical Asia, the red palm weevil has spread to Africa and Europe, reaching the Mediterranean in the 1980s. It was first recorded in Spain in 1994,[3] and in France in 2006. Additional infestations have been located in Malta and Italy (Tuscany, Sicily and Campania). It is also well established throughout most of Portugal, especially in the South.[4] It also has established in Morocco, Tunisia, and other North African countries.[5] The weevil was first reported in the Americas on Curaçao in January 2009[6] and sighted the same year in Aruba.[7] It was reported in the United States at Laguna Beach, CA late in 2010[8][9] but this was a misidentification of the closely related species, Rhynchophorus vulneratus, and it did not become established.[10]

Taxonomy

Primarily due to the existence of numerous color forms across their ranges, the taxonomy and classification of red palm weevils has undergone a number of changes in understanding and circumscription. As such, the information in the literature should be viewed as a compilation of data which may apply to both species, depending primarily upon the biogeography; accordingly, the vast majority of publications presumably do refer to R. ferrugineus rather than vulneratus, as the former is by far the most widely invasive. The most recent genus-level revision in 1966[11] recognized two species of red palm weevil, ferrugineus and vulneratus, and for decades these were interpreted as separate taxa. A genetic study in 2004[12] concluded that vulneratus was not distinct from ferrugineus, and treated them as synonyms, a view that was accepted until 2013, when yet another genetic study[13] came to the opposite conclusion, based on more comprehensive geographic sampling. Accordingly, the "red palm weevil" species that appeared in the US was vulneratus rather than ferrugineus, though the latter is the invading species in all of the other global introductions.[13]

Life cycle

This weevil usually infests palms younger than twenty years.[14] While the adult causes some damage through feeding, it is the burrowing of the larva into the heart of the palm that can cause the greatest mortality of trees. The adult female lays approximately two hundred eggs on new growth in the crown of the palm, at the base of young leaves, or in open lesions on the plant. The egg hatches into a white, legless larva. The larva will feed on the soft fibres and terminal buds, tunneling through the internal tissue of the tree for about a month. The larvae can occasionally grow to a length of six to seven centimeters.[11] At pupation, the larva will leave the tree and form a cocoon built of dry palm fibers in leaf litter at the base of the tree. The total life cycle takes about 7–10 weeks.

Oviposition

After fertilization, the adult female can lay between 300 and 500 eggs. They lay in holes they produced while searching for food, or take advantage of the cracks or wounds in a recently cut palm. At oviposition, females bend upward and the tarsi are anchored to the tissue with the spines of the third pair of legs to push the ovipositor into the tough palm tissue. After laying, the female protects and secures the eggs with a secretion that rapidly hardens around the eggs. On average, females produce 210 eggs per clutch, most of which hatch over a period of 3 days. The eggs are white, cylindrical, glossy, oval shaped, and measure 1 to 2.5 mm. The back of these eggs possess special 'gill cover' structures that provide the developing insect with oxygen.

Larvae

The neonate larvae are yellow-white, segmented, legless, and have a chitinous head capsule that is a darker brown than the rest of the body. They have powerful horizontal conical jaws which they use to burrow from the axils of the leaves to the crown, where they feed voraciously. Upon completion of larval development, the larva will sometimes emerge from the trunk of the tree, and build a pupal case of fiber extracted from the galleries inside the palm. The larva will then undergo metamorphosis into an adult. The larva will also weave a pupal case at the base of the palm fronds within the frond itself or at the centre of the base of the plant.

Adult

The adult insect is an excellent flier and is able to travel great distances.[15] While they prefer to attack palms that are already infested or weakened by other stresses, they will colonize healthy palms.

Behaviour

The behaviour and bionomics of the red palm weevil have been investigated in the field . The biology and life history of the weevil have been investigated on five diets, including banana, sugarcane, squash fruit, apple, and palm crown. The rate of development showed great variation depending on the host used. Developmental time was shortest on palm crown, followed by banana, and then squash fruit and apple, and longest on sugarcane. Egg production was the highest on palm crown, being 338 ± 37.24 eggs/female followed by banana, squash fruit, and apple, and the lowest (117. ± 18.9 eggs/female) on sugarcane.

Studies show that this insect is attracted by ethyl acetate, 2-mehoxy.4.vinylphenol, gamma-nonanoic lactone, 4SSS-ferrugineol, 50H and 4me-9-5Kt.

Symptoms of infestation

The infestation of the pest can result in yellowing and wilting of palms, that may lead to the death of the affected plant. The crown wilts first, and lower leaves will follow, due to damage to vascular tissue. Major symptoms such as crown loss or leaf wilt are usually only visible long after the palm has become infested. Secondary infections of opportunistic bacteria and fungi may occur within damaged tissues, accelerating decline. By the time these external symptoms are observed, the damage is usually sufficient to kill the tree, and the infestation may have been present for six months or longer. In high-density infestations, sounds of the larvae burrowing and chewing can be heard by placing one's ear to the trunk of the palm. Recent research has been conducted using electronic listening devices or dogs trained to recognize the scent of weevils or palm decay to detect infestations at low densities earlier in the process.

Control

The main control method is through the application of a systemic insecticide. Insecticide is usually applied through a funnel about 5 cm above the infested area of the trunk. The red palm weevil can be monitored using pheromone lures [16] bucket or pitfall traps,[17] and alternative forms of control use field sanitation and mass trapping with traps baited with pheromone and plant derived semiochemicals. New alternative technologies using semiochemicals and bio insecticides are being developed to more effectively control this devastating pest of palm trees. One of them is a new formulation with insecticide and pheromone called SPLAT[18] RPW that attracts the weevils to a point source and kills them. Another ecofriendly management technique is to drench the base of palm fronds with the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae,[19] or Beauveria bassiana.[20] An Italian company has developed a microwave collar that can be used to sterilize individual trees.[21] For early detection of Red Palm Weevil, bioacoustics analysis may be implemented [22] by inserting sensitive microphone into the tree and recording any produced sounds. These sounds are analyzed by digital signal processing and artificial intelligence to decide whether they are generated by Red Palm Weevil.

Prevention

Hard pruning as a way of fighting against the red palm weevil

As the weevil prefers to lay its eggs in softer tissues, avoiding mechanical damage to plants can help to reduce infestation. Tarring wounds after pruning a plant of dead or old leaves can also reduce the probability of infestation. The movement of plant material such as husks, dead leaves, or untreated coir from infested to uninfested areas is not recommended.

Distribution

Range

The native range of this species is considered to include Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Laos, Myanmar, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, and Vietnam; it has now been reported and confirmed from Albania, Algeria, Aruba, Bahrain, Croatia, Curaçao, Cyprus, Egypt, France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Kuwait, Libya, Malta, Monaco, Montenegro, Morocco, Oman, Palestine, Portugal (incl. Madeira), Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Slovenia, Spain, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, and United Arab Emirates. Records from Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore, and Indonesia largely or exclusively refer to R. vulneratus. Records from Australia, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, the Solomon Islands, and Vanuatu[5] have not been confirmed and are likely to be specimens of Rhynchophorus bilineatus, a closely related species indigenous to the region.

Hosts

This species of red palm weevil is reported to attack 19 palm species worldwide. Although the weevil was first reported on coconut in Southeast Asia, it has gained a foothold on date palm over the last two decades in several Middle Eastern countries, and then expanded its range to Africa and Europe.[23] This expansion has been due to the movement of infested planting material from contaminated to uninfected areas.[3] In the Mediterranean region, the red palm weevil also severely damages Phoenix canariensis. Currently, the pest is reported in almost 15% of the global coconut-growing countries and in nearly 50% of the date palm-growing countries.[24]

The list of known hosts includes: Areca catechu, Arenga pinnata, Borassus flabellifer, Caryota maxima, C. cumingii, Cocos nucifera (coconut palm), Corypha gebanga, C. elata, Elaeis guineensis, Livistona decipiens, Metroxylon sagu, Oreodoxa regia, Phoenix canariensis, P. dactylifera (date palm), P. sylvestris, Sabal umbraculifera, Trachycarpus fortunei, Washingtonia spp.[25] Lab studies have reared the insect on diets of Agave americana and Saccharum officinarum, but these findings have not been observed in the wild. There is evidence that the weevil prefers the 'Sukkary' cultivar of date palm to other cultivars.[26]

The palm species Washingtonia filifera and Chamaerops humilis may be resistant to the red palm weevil.[27]

Culinary uses

Sago worms in Papua New Guinea
Sago worms in Papua New Guinea

The larval grub is considered a delicacy in Southeast Asian countries. The worm are considered a speciality in Vietnam,[28] Malaysian Borneo,[29][30] and in eastern Indonesia of West Papua, as well on Papua New Guinea.[31] Sago grubs have been described as creamy tasting when raw, and like bacon or meat when cooked. They are often prepared with sago flour. In Vietnam, the larvae are usually eaten alive with fish sauce. Other methods of cooking include toasting and steaming. They are eaten with sticky rice and salad or cooked with porridge. The larvae are known in the Vietnamese language as đuông dừa ("coconut beetle-larva").[28] The larvae are also eaten either raw or roasted in Malaysian Bornean states of Sabah and Sarawak, and regarded as a special high-nutrient meal among the natives there like the Kadazan-Dusun, Melanau and the Dayak.[30][32] It is called in Sabah as butod.[33] The Asmat, Korowai and Kombai peoples of southern New Guinea also hold the larva in high regard as a food source.[34] Sago worms are roasted on a spit to celebrate special occasions in New Guinea.[35]

References

  1. Rhynchophorus ferrugineus at European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO)
  2. Rhynchophorus ferrugineus at North American Plant Protection Organization (NAPPO)
  3. 1 2 Ferry & Gómez. 2002. The red palm weevil in the Mediterranean. Vol. 46, No 4, Palms (formerly Principes), Journal of the International Palm Society. link http://www.palms.org/palmsjournal/2002/redweevil.htm link
  4. "As palmeiras ainda podem ganhar a guerra contra o escaravelho-vermelho" Article in publico.pt, February 9th, 2014
  5. 1 2 CABI fact Sheet
  6. "Biologische bestrijding Red Palm Weevil" Ben Kleine, March 28th, 2009 on Amigo.com
  7. 2010 California Farmer periodical "World's worst palm pest in state" Richardson
  8. Orange County Register, "Destructive exotic beetle found in Laguna Beach."
  9. CDFA; Red Palm Weevil, Worst Known Pest of Palm Trees Detected in Laguna Beach
  10. Hoddle et al. (2017) The palm weevil Rhynchophorus vulneratus is eradicated from Laguna Beach. California Agriculture 71(1): 25-29
  11. 1 2 Wattanapongsiri, A. 1966. A revision of the genera Rhynchophorus and Dynamis (Coleoptera: Curculonidae). Department of Agriculture Science Bulletin 1: 1-328
  12. Hallett, R.H., Crespi, B.J., Borden, J.H. 2004. Synonymy of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier), 1790 and R. vulneratus (Panzer), 1798 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Rhynchophorinae). J. Nat. Hist. 38:2863-2882
  13. 1 2 Rugman-Jones, P.F., C.D. Hoddle, M.S. Hoddle, R. Stouthamer. 2013. The Lesser of Two Weevils: Molecular-Genetics of Pest Palm Weevil Populations Confirm Rhynchophorus vulneratus (Panzer 1798) as a Valid Species Distinct from R. ferrugineus (Olivier 1790), and Reveal the Global Extent of Both. PLoS One. 2013; 8(10): e78379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078379
  14. Abraham, V.A., Al-Shuaibi. Mahmood, J.R., Faleiro, R.A. Abozuhairah and P.S.P.V. Vidyasargar. 1998. An integrated approach for the management of red palm weevil, Rhyncophorus ferrugineus Oliv. - A key pest of date palm in the Middle East. Sultan Qaboos University Journal of Scientific Research, Agricultural Science, 3: 77-83.
  15. http://phys.org/news/2015-12-red-palm-weevils-kilometers-hours.html
  16. http://www.iscatech.com/ecommerce/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=2&products_id=35
  17. http://www.iscatech.com/ecommerce/index.php?main_page=popup_image&pID=116
  18. http://www.iscatech.com/exec/SPLAT.htm
  19. http://www.iraqi-datepalms.net/uploadedfiles/entomopathogenic%20fungi.pdf
  20. http://www.pubhort.org/datepalm/datepalm2/datepalm2_31.pdf
  21. "Ecopalm Ring". ecopalm.it. Retrieved 24 August 2015.
  22. http://www.eurasip.org/Proceedings/Eusipco/Eusipco2009/contents/papers/1569189952.pdf
  23. Malumphy, C; Moran, H. 2007. Red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus. Plant Pest Notice, Central Science Laboratory (50): 1-3.
  24. A review of the issues and management of the red palm weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Rhynchophoridae) in coconut and date palm during the last one hundred years. J.R. Faleir
  25. FDACS Pest Alert
  26. Al-Ayedh, H. 2008. Evaluation of date palm cultivars for rearing the red date palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Curculonidae). Florida Entomologist, 91(3): 353 - 358.
  27. Journal of Applied Entomology, "Are the palms Washingtonia filifera and Chamaerops humilis suitable hosts for the red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Col. Curculionidae)?"
  28. 1 2 "'Kinh dị' Đuông dừa, đặc sản khó xơi" (in Vietnamese). Vietnam Net. 7 March 2014. Retrieved 7 October 2016.
  29. Adam Leith Gollner (11 June 2013). The Fruit Hunters: A Story of Nature, Adventure, Commerce, and Obsession. Simon and Schuster. pp. 86–. ISBN 978-1-4767-0499-9.
  30. 1 2 Tamara Thiessen (5 January 2016). Borneo. Bradt Travel Guides. pp. 190–. ISBN 978-1-84162-915-5.
  31. Jerry Hopkins (15 May 2004). Extreme Cuisine: The Weird and Wonderful Foods That People Eat. Tuttle Publishing. pp. 210–. ISBN 978-1-4629-0472-3.
  32. Kuan Leong Yew; Victoria Shinq Ling Kok (2012). "Exotic Food Anaphylaxis and the Broken Heart: Sago Worm and Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy" (PDF). Heart Centre, Sarawak General Hospital, Sarawak, Malaysia. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 October 2016. Retrieved 7 October 2016.
  33. Anna Vivienne (3 September 2012). "Magahavat: Celebrating sago". The Borneo Post. Retrieved 7 October 2016.
  34. Bhaskar Nath (1998). Environmental Management in Practice: Compartments, stressors and sectors. Psychology Press. pp. 186–. ISBN 978-0-415-14907-5.
  35. Andrew Nyakupfuka (3 April 2013). Global Delicacies: Diversity, Exotic, Strange, Weird, Relativism. Balboa Press. pp. 61–. ISBN 978-1-4525-6791-4.

Additional resources

Wikispecies has information related to: Rhynchophorus ferrugineus
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Rhynchophorus ferrugineus.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.