R* rule (ecology)

The R* rule (also called the resource-ratio hypothesis) is a hypothesis in community ecology that attempts to predict which species will become dominant as the result of competition for resources.^[1] It predicts that if multiple species are competing for a single limiting resource, then whichever species can survive at the lowest equilibrium resource level (i.e., the R*) can outcompete all other species.^[1] If two species are competing for two resources, then coexistence is only possible if each species has a lower R* on one of the resources.^[1] For example, two phytoplankton species may be able to coexist if one is more limited by nitrogen, and the other is more limited by phosphorus.

A large number of experimental studies have attempted to verify the predictions of the R* rule. Many studies have shown that when multiple plankton are grown together, the species with the lowest R* will dominate, or coexist if they are limited by multiple resources.^[2] There are fewer tests of the R* rule in communities of larger organisms, in part because of the difficulty of creating a situation in which only a single resource is limiting.^[2]^[3] However, some studies have use the R* rule with multiple resources to predict which groups of plants will be able to coexist.^[4]

Mathematical Derivation

Consider a community with multiple species. We will assume that each species competes for a single resource, and ignore the effects of interference or apparent competition. Each population increases by consuming resources, and declines when resources are too scarce. For example, we could model their population dynamics as

${\frac {dN_{j}}{dt}}=N_{j}(a_{j}R-d)$

${\frac {dR}{dt}}=r-R\sum _{j}a_{j}N_{j}$

where N_j is the density of species j, R is the density of the resource, a is the rate at which species j eats the resource, d is species js death rate, and r is the rate at which resources grow when not consumed. It is easy to show that when species j is at equilibrium by itself (i.e., dN_j/dt = 0), that the equilibrium resource density, R*_j, is

$R_{j}^{*}=d/a_{j}.$

When R > R*_j, species j's population will increase; when R is less than R*_j, species js population will decline. Because of this, the species with the lowest R* will eventually dominate. Consider the two species case, where R*₁ < R*₂. When species 2 is at equilibrium, R = R*₂, and species 1's population will be increasing. When species 1 is at equilibrium, R = R*₁, and species 2's population will be decreasing.^[1]

This method has been extended to analyze more complex models, such as species with a Type II functional response. Under many additional circumstances, the above result still holds: the species who can survive at the lowest resource levels will be the competitive dominant.^[2]

Relation to the CSR triangle theory

Understanding the differences between the R* theory and its major alternative the CSR triangle theory is a major goal in community ecology for many years.^[5]^[6] Unlike the R* theory, the CSR theory predicts that competitive ability is determined by relative growth rate and other size related traits. While some experiments supported the R* predictions, other supported the CSR predictions.^[5] The different predictions stem from different assumptions on the size asymmetry of the competition. The R* theory assumes that competition is size symmetric (i.e. resource exploitation is proportional to individual biomass), the CSR theory assumes that competition is size-asymmetric (i.e. large individuals exploit disproportional higher amounts of resources compared with smaller individuals).^[7]

References

1 2 3 4 Tilman, David (1982). Resource competition and community structure. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691083025.
1 2 3 Grover, James P. (1997). Resource competition (1st ed.). London: Chapman & Hall. ISBN 0412749300.
↑ Miller, Thomas E.; Burns, Jean H.; Munguia, Pablo; Walters, Eric L.; Kneitel, Jamie M.; Richards, Paul M.; Mouquet, Nicolas; Buckley, Hannah L. (April 2005). "A Critical Review of Twenty Years’ Use of the Resource‐Ratio Theory". The American Naturalist. 165 (4): 439–448. PMID 15791536. doi:10.1086/428681.
↑ Dybzinski, Ray; Tilman, David (September 2007). "Resource Use Patterns Predict Long‐Term Outcomes of Plant Competition for Nutrients and Light". The American Naturalist. 170 (3): 305–318. PMID 17879183. doi:10.1086/519857.
1 2 Craine, Joseph. "Reconciling plant strategy theories of Grime and Tilman". Journal of Ecology. 93: 1041–1052. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01043.x.
↑ Jabot. "general modelling framework for resource-ratio and CSR theories of plant community dynamics". Journal of Ecology. 100: 1296–1302. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.02024.x.
↑ DeMalach. "Size asymmetry of resource competition and the structure of plant communities". Journal of Ecology. 104: 899–910. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12557.

Ecology: Modelling ecosystems: Trophic components
General	Abiotic component Abiotic stress Behaviour Biogeochemical cycle Biomass Biotic component Biotic stress Carrying capacity Competition Ecosystem Ecosystem ecology Ecosystem model Keystone species List of feeding behaviours Metabolic theory of ecology Productivity Resource
Producers	Autotrophs Chemosynthesis Chemotrophs Foundation species Mixotrophs Myco-heterotrophy Mycotroph Organotrophs Photoheterotrophs Photosynthesis Photosynthetic efficiency Phototrophs Primary nutritional groups Primary production
Consumers	Apex predator Bacterivore Carnivores Chemoorganotroph Foraging Generalist and specialist species Intraguild predation Herbivores Heterotroph Heterotrophic nutrition Insectivore Mesopredators Mesopredator release hypothesis Omnivores Optimal foraging theory Predation Prey switching
Decomposers	Chemoorganoheterotrophy Decomposition Detritivores Detritus
Microorganisms	Archaea Bacteriophage Environmental microbiology Lithoautotroph Lithotrophy Microbial cooperation Microbial ecology Microbial food web Microbial intelligence Microbial loop Microbial mat Microbial metabolism Phage ecology
Food webs	Biomagnification Ecological efficiency Ecological pyramid Energy flow Food chain Trophic level
Example webs	Cold seeps Hydrothermal vents Intertidal Kelp forests Lakes North Pacific Subtropical Gyre Rivers San Francisco Estuary Soil Tide pool
Processes	Ascendency Bioaccumulation Cascade effect Climax community Competitive exclusion principle Consumer-resource systems Copiotrophs Dominance Ecological network Ecological succession Energy quality Energy Systems Language f-ratio Feed conversion ratio Feeding frenzy Mesotrophic soil Nutrient cycle Oligotroph Paradox of the plankton Trophic cascade Trophic mutualism Trophic state index
Defense/counter	Animal coloration Antipredator adaptations Camouflage Deimatic behaviour Herbivore adaptations to plant defense Mimicry Plant defense against herbivory Predator avoidance in schooling fish

Ecology: Modelling ecosystems: Other components
Population ecology	Abundance Allee effect Depensation Ecological yield Effective population size Intraspecific competition Logistic function Malthusian growth model Maximum sustainable yield Overpopulation in wild animals Overexploitation Population cycle Population dynamics Population modeling Population size Predator–prey (Lotka–Volterra) equations Recruitment Resilience Small population size Stability
Species	Biodiversity Density-dependent inhibition Ecological effects of biodiversity Ecological extinction Endemic species Flagship species Gradient analysis Indicator species Introduced species Invasive species Latitudinal gradients in species diversity Minimum viable population Neutral theory Occupancy–abundance relationship Population viability analysis Priority effect Rapoport's rule Relative abundance distribution Relative species abundance Species diversity Species homogeneity Species richness Species distribution Species-area curve Umbrella species
Species interaction	Antibiosis Biological interaction Commensalism Community ecology Ecological facilitation Interspecific competition Mutualism Storage effect
Spatial ecology	Biogeography Cross-boundary subsidy Ecocline Ecotone Ecotype Disturbance Edge effects Foster's rule Habitat fragmentation Ideal free distribution Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis Island biogeography Landscape ecology Landscape epidemiology Landscape limnology Metapopulation Patch dynamics r/K selection theory Source–sink dynamics
Niche	Ecological niche Ecological trap Ecosystem engineer Environmental niche modelling Guild Habitat Marine habitats Limiting similarity Niche apportionment models Niche construction Niche differentiation
Other networks	Assembly rules Bateman's principle Bioluminescence Ecological collapse Ecological debt Ecological deficit Ecological energetics Ecological indicator Ecological threshold Ecosystem diversity Emergence Extinction debt Kleiber's law Liebig's law of the minimum Marginal value theorem Thorson's rule Xerosere
Other	Allometry Alternative stable state Balance of nature Biological data visualization Constructal theory Ecocline Ecological economics Ecological footprint Ecological forecasting Ecological humanities Ecological stoichiometry Ecopath Ecosystem based fisheries Endolith Evolutionary ecology Functional ecology Industrial ecology Macroecology Microecosystem Natural environment Regime shift Systems ecology Urban ecology Theoretical ecology
List of ecology topics

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.