Quasicircle
In mathematics, a quasicircle is a Jordan curve in the complex plane that is the image of a circle under a quasiconformal mapping of the plane onto itself. Originally introduced independently by Pfluger (1961) and Tienari (1962), in the older literature (in German) they were referred to as quasiconformal curves, a terminology which also applied to arcs.[1][2] In complex analysis and geometric function theory, quasicircles play a fundamental role in the description of the universal Teichmüller space, through quasisymmetric homeomorphisms of the circle. Quasicircles also play an important role in complex dynamical systems.
Definitions
A quasicircle is defined as the image of a circle under a quasiconformal mapping of the extended complex plane. It is called a K-quasicircle if the quasiconformal mapping has dilatation K. The definition of quasicircle generalizes the characterization of a Jordan curve as the image of a circle under a homeomorphism of the plane. In particular a quasicircle is a Jordan curve. The interior of a quasicircle is called a quasidisk.[3]
As shown in Lehto & Virtanen (1973), where the older term "quasiconformal curve" is used, if a Jordan curve is the image of a circle under a quasiconformal map in a neighbourhood of the curve, then it is also the image of a circle under a quasiconformal mapping of the extended plane and thus a quasicircle. The same is true for "quasiconformal arcs" which can be defined as quasiconformal images of a circular arc either in an open set or equivalently in the extended plane.[4]
Geometric characterizations
Ahlfors (1963) gave a geometric characterization of quasicircles as those Jordan curves for which the absolute value of the cross-ratio of any four points, taken in cyclic order, is bounded below by a positive constant.
Ahlfors also proved that quasicircles can be characterized in terms of a reverse triangle inequality for three points: there should be a constant C such that if two points z1 and z2 are chosen on the curve and z3 lies on the shorter of the resulting arcs, then[5]
This property is also called bounded turning[6] or the arc condition.[7]
For Jordan curves in the extended plane passing through ∞, Ahlfors (1966) gave a simpler necessary and sufficient condition to be a quasicircle.[8][9] There is a constant C > 0 such that if z1, z2 are any points on the curve and z3 lies on the segment between them, then
These metric characterizations imply that an arc or closed curve is quasiconformal whenever it arises as the image of an interval or the circle under a bi-Lipschitz map f, i.e. satisfying
for positive constants Ci.[10]
Quasicircles and quasisymmetric homeomorphisms
If φ is a quasisymmetric homeomorphism of the circle, then there are conformal maps f of [z| < 1 and g of |z|>1 into disjoint regions such that the complement of the images of f and g is a Jordan curve. The maps f and g extend continuously to the circle |z| = 1 and the sewing equation
holds. The image of the circle is a quasicircle.
Conversely, using the Riemann mapping theorem, the conformal maps f and g uniformizing the outside of a quasicircle give rise to a quasisymmetric homeomorphism through the above equation.
The quotient space of the group of quasisymmetric homeomorphisms by the subgroup of Möbius transformations provides a model of universal Teichmüller space. The above correspondence shows that the space of quasicircles can also be taken as a model.[11]
Quasiconformal reflection
A quasiconformal reflection in a Jordan curve is an orientation-reversing quasiconformal map of period 2 which switches the inside and the outside of the curve fixing points on the curve. Since the map
provides such a reflection for the unit circle, any quasicircle admits a quasiconformal reflection. Ahlfors (1963) proved that this property characterizes quasicircles.
Ahlfors noted that this result can be applied to uniformly bounded holomorphic univalent functions f(z) on the unit disk D. Let Ω = f(D). As Carathéodory had proved using his theory of prime ends, f extends continuously to the unit circle if and only if ∂Ω is locally connected, i.e. admits a covering by finitely many compact connected sets of arbitrarily small diameter. The extension to the circle is 1-1 if and only if ∂Ω has no cut points, i.e. points which when removed from ∂Ω yield a disconnected set. Carathéodory's theorem shows that a locally set without cut points is just a Jordan curve and that in precisely this case is the extension of f to the closed unit disk a homeomorphism.[12] If f extends to a quasiconformal mapping of the extended complex plane then ∂Ω is by definition a quasicircle. Conversely Ahlfors (1963) observed that if ∂Ω is a quasicircle and R1 denotes the quasiconformal reflection in ∂Ω then the assignment
for |z| > 1 defines a quasiconformal extension of f to the extended complex plane.
Complex dynamical systems
Quasicircles were known to arise as the Julia sets of rational maps R(z). Sullivan (1985) proved that if the Fatou set of R has two components and the action of R on the Julia set is "hyperbolic", i.e. there are constants c > 0 and A > 1 such that
on the Julia set, then the Julia set is a quasicircle.[5]
There are many examples:[13][14]
- quadratic polynomials R(z) = z2 + c with an attracting fixed point
- the Douady rabbit (c = –0.122561 + 0.744862i, where c3 + 2 c2 + c + 1 = 0)
- quadratic polynomials z2 + λz with |λ| < 1
- the Koch snowflake
Quasi-Fuchsian groups
Quasi-Fuchsian groups are obtained as quasiconformal deformations of Fuchsian groups. By definition their limit sets are quasicircles.[15][16][17][18][19]
Let Γ be a Fuchsian group of the first kind: a discrete subgroup of the Möbius group preserving the unit circle. acting properly discontinuously on the unit disk D and with limit set the unit circle.
Let μ(z) be a measurable function on D with
such that μ is Γ-invariant, i.e.
for every g in Γ. (μ is thus a "Beltrami differential" on the Riemann surface D / Γ.)
Extend μ to a function on C by setting μ(z) = 0 off D.
admits a solution unique up to composition with a Möbius transformation.
It is a quasiconformal homeomorphism of the extended complex plane.
If g is an element of Γ, then f(g(z)) gives another solution of the Beltrami equation, so that
is a Möbius transformation.
The group α(Γ) is a quasi-Fuchsian group with limit set the quasicircle given by the image of the unit circle under f.
Hausdorff dimension
It is known that there are quasicircles for which no segment has finite length.[21] The Hausdorff dimension of quasicircles was first investigated by Gehring & Väisälä (1973), who proved that it can take all values in the interval [1,2).[22] Astala (1993), using the new technique of "holomorphic motions" was able to estimate the change in the Hausdorff dimension of any planar set under a quasiconformal map with dilatation K. For quasicircles C, there was a crude estimate for the Hausdorff dimension[23]
where
On the other hand, the Hausdorff dimension for the Julia sets Jc of the iterates of the rational maps
had been estimated as result of the work of Rufus Bowen and David Ruelle, who showed that
Since these are quasicircles corresponding to a dilatation
where
this led Becker & Pommerenke (1987) to show that for k small
Having improved the lower bound following calculations for the Koch snowflake with Steffen Rohde and Oded Schramm, Astala (1994) conjectured that
This conjecture was proved by Smirnov (2010); a complete account of his proof, prior to publication, was already given in Astala, Iwaniec & Martin (2009).
For a quasi-Fuchsian group Bowen (1978) and Sullivan (1982) showed that the Hausdorff dimension d of the limit set is always greater than 1. When d < 2, the quantity
is the lowest eigenvalue of the Laplacian of the corresponding hyperbolic 3-manifold.[24][25]
Notes
- ↑ Lehto & Virtanen 1973
- ↑ Lehto 1983, p. 49
- ↑ Lehto 1987, p. 38
- ↑ Lehto & Virtanen 1973, pp. 97–98
- 1 2 Carleson & Gamelin 1993, p. 102
- ↑ Lehto & Virtanen, pp. 100–102
- ↑ Lehto 1983, p. 45
- ↑ Ahlfors 1966, p. 81
- ↑ Lehto 1983, pp. 48–49
- ↑ Lehto & Virtanen, pp. 104–105
- ↑ Lehto 1983
- ↑ Pommerenke 1975, pp. 271–281
- ↑ Carleson & Gamelin 1993, pp. 123–126
- ↑ Rohde 1991
- ↑ Bers 1961
- ↑ Bowen 1979
- ↑ Mumford, Series & Wright 2002
- ↑ Imayoshi & Taniguchi 1992, p. 147
- ↑ Marden 2007, pp. 79–80,134
- ↑ Carleson & Gamelin 1993, p. 122
- ↑ Lehto & Virtanen 1973, p. 104
- ↑ Lehto 1982, p. 38
- ↑ Astala, Iwaniec & Martin 2009
- ↑ Astala & Zinsmeister 1994
- ↑ Marden 2007, p. 284
References
- Ahlfors, Lars V. (1966), Lectures on quasiconformal mappings, Van Nostrand
- Ahlfors, L. (1963), "Quasiconformal reflections", Acta Mathematica, 109: 291–301, Zbl 0121.06403, doi:10.1007/bf02391816
- Astala, K. (1993), "Distortion of area and dimension under quasiconformal mappings in the plane", Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 90: 11958–11959, doi:10.1073/pnas.90.24.11958
- Astala, K.; Zinsmeister, M. (1994), "Holomorphic families of quasi-Fuchsian groups", Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 14: 207–212, doi:10.1017/s0143385700007847
- Astala, K. (1994), "Area distortion of quasiconformal mappings", Acta Math., 173: 37–60, doi:10.1007/bf02392568
- Astala, Kari; Iwaniec, Tadeusz; Martin, Gaven (2009), Elliptic partial differential equations and quasiconformal mappings in the plane, Princeton mathematical series, 48, Princeton University Press, pp. 332=342, ISBN 0-691-13777-3, Section 13.2, Dimension of quasicircles.
- Becker, J.; Pommerenke, C. (1987), "On the Hausdorff dimension of quasicircles", Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A I Math., 12: 329–333
- Bowen, R. (1979), "Hausdorff dimension of quasicircles", Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math., 50: 11–25
- Carleson, L.; Gamelin, T. D. W. (1993), Complex dynamics, Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-97942-5
- Gehring, F. W.; Väisälä, J. (1973), "Hausdorff dimension and quasiconformal mappings", Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 6: 504–512, doi:10.1112/jlms/s2-6.3.504
- Gehring, F. W. (1982), Characteristic properties of quasidisks, Séminaire de Mathématiques Supérieures, 84, Presses de l'Université de Montréal, ISBN 2-7606-0601-5
- Imayoshi, Y.; Taniguchi, M. (1992), An Introduction to Teichmüller spaces, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-70088-9 +
- Lehto, O. (1987), Univalent functions and Teichmüller spaces, Springer-Verlag, pp. 50–59, 111–118, 196–205, ISBN 0-387-96310-3
- Lehto, O.; Virtanen, K. I. (1973), Quasiconformal mappings in the plane, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 126 (Second ed.), Springer-Verlag
- Marden, A. (2007), Outer circles. An introduction to hyperbolic 3-manifolds, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-83974-7
- Mumford, D.; Series, C.; Wright, David (2002), Indra's pearls. The vision of Felix Klein, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-35253-3
- Pfluger, A. (1961), "Ueber die Konstruktion Riemannscher Flächen durch Verheftung", J. Indian Math. Soc., 24: 401–412
- Rohde, S. (1991), "On conformal welding and quasicircles", Michigan Math. J., 38: 111–116, doi:10.1307/mmj/1029004266
- Sullivan, D. (1982), "Discrete conformal groups and measurable dynamics", Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 6: 57–73, doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-1982-14966-7
- Sullivan, D. (1985), "Quasiconformal homeomorphisms and dynamics, I, Solution of the Fatou-Julia problem on wandering domains", Annals of Mathematics, 122: 401–418, doi:10.2307/1971308
- Tienari, M. (1962), "Fortsetzung einer quasikonformen Abbildung über einen Jordanbogen", Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A, 321
- Smirnov, S. (2010), "Dimension of quasicircles", Acta Mathematica, 205: 189–197, MR 2011j:30027, doi:10.1007/s11511-010-0053-8