Peter Fraser (New Zealand politician)
The Right Honourable Peter Fraser CH | |
---|---|
Peter Fraser, Prime Minister of New Zealand, circa 1946 | |
24th Prime Minister of New Zealand | |
In office 27 March 1940 – 13 December 1949 | |
Monarch | George VI |
Governor-General |
George Monckton-Arundell Cyril Newall Bernard Freberg |
Preceded by | Michael Joseph Savage |
Succeeded by | Sidney Holland |
15th Leader of the Opposition | |
In office 13 December 1949 – 12 December 1950 | |
Preceded by | Sidney Holland |
Succeeded by | Walter Nash |
4th President of the Labour Party | |
In office 1920–1921 | |
Vice President | Frederick Cooke |
Leader | Harry Holland |
Preceded by | Tom Paul |
Succeeded by | Frederick Cooke |
Member of the New Zealand Parliament for Wellington Central | |
In office 1918–1946 | |
Preceded by | Robert Fletcher |
Succeeded by | Charles Henry Chapman |
Member of the New Zealand Parliament for Brooklyn | |
In office 1946–1951 | |
Preceded by | None, seat created |
Succeeded by | Arnold Nordmeyer |
Personal details | |
Born |
Hill of Fearn, Scotland | 28 August 1884
Died |
12 December 1950 66) Wellington, New Zealand | (aged
Political party |
Labour (1916–50) Social Democratic (1913–16) Socialist (1910–13) |
Spouse(s) | Janet Henderson Munro (m. 1919; d. 1945) |
Profession | Stevedore |
Peter Fraser CH PC (28 August 1884 – 12 December 1950) was a New Zealand political figure who served as the 24th Prime Minister from 27 March 1940 until 13 December 1949. He assumed the office nearly seven months after the outbreak of World War II and remained as head of government for almost ten years. Considered by historians as a major figure in the history of New Zealand Labour Party, he was in office longer than any other New Zealand Labour Prime Minister and is to date the fourth-longest serving Prime Minister.
In Scotland until 1910
A native of Scotland, Peter Fraser was born in Hill of Fearn, a small village near the town of Tain in the Highland area of Easter Ross. He received a basic education, but had to leave school due to his family's poor financial state. Though apprenticed to a carpenter, he eventually abandoned this trade due to extremely poor eyesight – later in life, faced with difficulty reading official documents, he would insist on spoken reports rather than written ones. Before the deterioration of his vision, however, he read extensively – with socialist activists such as Keir Hardie and Robert Blatchford among his favourites.[1]
Becoming politically active in his early teens, he was 16 years old upon attaining the post of secretary of the local Liberal Association, and, eight years later, in 1908, joined the Independent Labour Party.
Move to New Zealand
In another two years, at the age of 26, after unsuccessfully seeking employment in London, Fraser decided to move to New Zealand, having apparently chosen the country in the belief that it possessed a strong progressive spirit.
He gained employment as a wharfie on arrival in Auckland, and became involved in union politics upon joining the New Zealand Socialist Party. Fraser worked as campaign manager for Michael Joseph Savage as the Socialist candidate for Auckland Central electorate. He was also involved in the New Zealand Federation of Labour, which he represented at Waihi during the Waihi miners' strike of 1912. He moved to Wellington, the country's capital shortly afterwards. Savage went on to be Fraser's predecessor in office as the nation's first Labour Prime Minister.
In 1913, he participated in the founding of the Social Democratic Party and, during the year, within the scope of his union activities, found himself under arrest for breaches of the peace. While the arrest led to no serious repercussions, it did prompt a change of strategy – he moved away from direct action and began to promote a parliamentary route to power.
Upon Britain's entry into World War I, he strongly opposed New Zealand participation since, sharing the belief of many leftist thinkers, Fraser considered the conflict an "imperialist war", fought for reasons of national interest rather than of principle.
Co-founder of New Zealand Labour Party
In 1916, Fraser became involved in the foundation of the New Zealand Labour Party, which absorbed much of the moribund Social Democratic Party's membership. The members selected Harry Holland as the Labour Party's leader. Michael Joseph Savage, Fraser's old ally from the New Zealand Socialist Party, also participated.
Later in 1916, the government had Fraser and several other members of the new Labour Party arrested on charges of sedition. This resulted from their outspoken opposition to the war, and particularly their call to abolish conscription. Fraser received a sentence of one year in jail. He always rejected the verdict, claiming he would only have committed subversion had he taken active steps to undermine conscription, rather than merely voicing his disapproval.
After his release from prison, Fraser worked as a journalist for the official Labour Party newspaper. He also resumed his activities within the Labour Party, initially in the role of campaign manager for Harry Holland. In a 1918 by-election, Fraser himself gained election to Parliament, winning the electorate of Wellington Central.[2] He soon distinguished himself through his work to counter the influenza epidemic of 1918–19, of which Fraser was himself a survivor.[3]
On 1 November 1919, a year after his election to parliament, Fraser married Janet Kemp née Munro, from Glasgow and also a political activist. They remained together until Janet's death in 1945, five years before Fraser's own passing. They had no children, although Janet had a son from her first marriage to George Kemp.
Early parliamentary career
New Zealand Parliament | ||||
Years | Term | Electorate | Party | |
1918–1919 | 19th | Wellington Central | Labour | |
1919–1922 | 20th | Wellington Central | Labour | |
1922–1925 | 21st | Wellington Central | Labour | |
1925–1928 | 22nd | Wellington Central | Labour | |
1928–1931 | 23rd | Wellington Central | Labour | |
1931–1935 | 24th | Wellington Central | Labour | |
1935–1938 | 25th | Wellington Central | Labour | |
1938–1943 | 26th | Wellington Central | Labour | |
1943–1946 | 27th | Wellington Central | Labour | |
1946–1949 | 28th | Brooklyn | Labour | |
1949–1950 | 29th | Brooklyn | Labour |
During his early years in parliament, Fraser developed a clearer sense of his political beliefs. Although initially enthusiastic about the Russian October Revolution of 1917 and its Bolshevik leaders, he rejected them soon afterwards, and eventually became one of the strongest advocates of excluding communists from the Labour Party. His commitment to parliamentary politics rather than to direct action became firmer, and he had a moderating influence on many Labour Party policies.
Fraser's views clashed considerably with those of Harry Holland, still serving as leader, but the party gradually shifted its policies away from the more extreme left of the spectrum. Fraser soon became convinced that political action via parliamentary process was the only realistic course of action to achieve Labour movement ambitions. As a result, he accepted the inevitable compromises (which Holland did not) that the attainment of parliamentary success required.[4]
In 1933, however, Holland died, leaving the leadership vacant. Fraser considered contesting it, but eventually endorsed Michael Joseph Savage, Holland's more moderate deputy. Fraser became the new deputy leader.[1] While Savage represented perhaps less moderate views than Fraser, he lacked the extreme ideology of Holland. With Labour now possessing a "softer" image and the existing conservative coalition struggling with the effects of the Great Depression, Savage's party succeeded in winning the 1935 elections and forming a government.
Fraser served as vice-president of the Labour Party in 1919–1920, and as party president in 1920–1921.[5]
Cabinet minister
In the new administration, Fraser became the Minister of External Affairs, the Minister of Island Territories, Minister of Health, Minister of Education, Minister of Marine, and Minister of Police.[6] He showed himself extremely active as a minister, often working seventeen hours a day, seven days a week. During his first years in cabinet, his wife Janet had an office next to his and worked as his research assistant and adviser just so she could spend time with him. She would also prepare meals for him during his long days at parliament.[1]
He had a particular interest in education, which he considered vital for social reform. His appointment of C.E. Beeby to the Education Department provided him with a valuable ally for these reforms. Fraser held a passionate belief that education had a huge part to play in the social reform he desired.[1] Fraser also became the driving force behind the 1938 Social Security Act.
As Minister of Health, the planning of the Social Security Act, set out to establish a mostly free healthcare service had heavy obstacles, particularly the local branch of the British Medical Association who were bitterly opposed. Eventually, Fraser negotiated effectively enough to force the Association to yield. Luckily for him, Janet Fraser had long volunteered in the health and welfare fields and was an invaluable adviser and collaborator.[1]
When the Second World War broke out in 1939, Fraser had already taken over most of the functions of national leadership. Michael Joseph Savage had been ill for some time and was near death, although the authorities concealed this from the public. Fraser had to assume most of the Prime Minister's duties in addition to his own ministerial ones.
However, internal disputes within the Labour Party made Fraser's position more difficult. John A. Lee, a notable socialist within the Party, vehemently disapproved of the party's perceived drift towards the political centre, and strongly criticised Savage and Fraser. Lee's attacks, however, became strong enough that even many of his supporters denounced them. Fraser and his allies successfully moved to expel Lee from the Party on 25 March 1940.
Prime Minister
Savage died two days later, on 27 March, and Fraser successfully contested the leadership against Gervan McMillan and Clyde Carr. He had, however, to give the party's caucus the right to elect people to Cabinet without the Prime Minister's approval – a practice which has continued as a feature of the Labour Party today.
Despite the concession, Fraser remained in command, occasionally alienating colleagues due to a governing style described by some as "authoritarian". Some of his determination to exercise control may have come about due to the war, on which Fraser focused almost exclusively. Nevertheless, certain measures he implemented, such as censorship, wage controls, and conscription, proved unpopular with the party. In particular, conscription provoked strong opposition, especially since Fraser himself had opposed it during the First World War. Fraser replied that fighting in the Second World War, unlike in the First World War, had indeed a worthy cause, making conscription a necessary evil. Despite opposition from within the Labour Party, enough of the general public supported conscription to allow its acceptance.
World War II
Fraser was one of the immediate few in New Zealand who instantly grasped that war meant not merely the involvement of the military, but that of the whole country. These implications were not always recognised either by his own party or by the opposition. Fraser further developed somewhat of an authoritarian streak as a result, this reflected his insistence on the overwhelming importance of the war effort above all else.[1]
During the war, Fraser attempted to build support for an understanding between Labour and its main rival, the National Party. However, opposition within both parties prevented reaching an agreement, and Labour continued to govern alone. Fraser did, however, work closely with Gordon Coates, a former Prime Minister and now a National-Party rebel - Fraser praised Coates for his willingness to set aside his party loyalty, and appears to have believed that National leader Sidney Holland placed "party advantage before national unity".
In terms of the war effort itself, Fraser had a particular concern with ensuring that New Zealand retained control over its own forces. He believed that the more populous countries, particularly Britain, viewed New Zealand's military as a mere extension of their own, rather than as the armed forces of a sovereign nation. After particularly serious New Zealand losses in the Greek campaign in 1941, Fraser determined to retain a say as to where to deploy New Zealand troops. Fraser insisted to British leaders that Bernard Freyberg, commander of the 2nd New Zealand Expeditionary Force, should report to the New Zealand government just as extensively as to the British authorities.
When Japan entered the war, Fraser had to choose between recalling New Zealand's forces to the Pacific (as Australia had done) or keeping them in the Middle East (as Winston Churchill requested). Opinion was divided on the question and New Zealand's manpower resources were already stretched to capacity. Fraser received assurances from Franklin Roosevelt that American forces would be made available for New Zealand's defense, the local populace possessed an understandable view that division that their proper place was defending their homes. Fraser weighed up public opinions against the strategic arguments involved and eventually opted to leave New Zealand's Expeditionary Force where it was.[1]
In a remarkable display of political acumen and skill, he then persuaded a divided government and Parliament to give their full support [to leave the army in Africa]. It was leadership of the highest order.[1]
Fraser had a very rocky relationship with U.S. Secretary of State Cordell Hull, particularly over the Canberra Pact in January 1944. Hull gave Fraser a sharp and rather demeaning dressing-down when Fraser visited Washington D.C. in mid-1944, which resulted in New Zealand's military becoming sidelined to some extent in the conduct of the Pacific War.
Fraser's government also established a far closer working understanding with the Labor government in Australia. He signed the Australian–New Zealand Agreement of 1944, in which Fraser, under pressure by Australia’s foreign minister, H. V. Evatt, overplayed his hand seeking to ensure that both Australian and New Zealand interests in the Pacific would not be overlooked in the war or its aftermath.[1] New Zealand and Australia were both anxious to have their input in the planning of the Pacific war, and later in the decisions of the "Great Powers" in the shaping of the post-war world.[4]
Post-war
After the war ended, Fraser devoted much attention to the formation of the United Nations at the San Francisco conference (UNCIO) in 1945; this "was the apogee of Fraser's career".[7] Noteworthy for his strong opposition to vesting powers of veto in permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, he often spoke unofficially for smaller states. He was elected chairman of one of the main committees which was considering dependent territories, and next year in London was chairman of one of the social-economic committees at the first assembly in London. He earned the respect of many world statesmen through his commitment to principle, his energy, and most of all his skill as a chairman.[8] It was to Fraser's stature that New Zealand would later owe much of its favourable international reputation.[4]
Fraser had a particularly close working relationship with Alister McIntosh, the head of the Prime Minister's department during most of Fraser's premiership and then of the Department of External Affairs, created in 1946. McIntosh privately described his frustration with Fraser's workaholism, and with Fraser's insensitivity towards officials' needs for private lives; but the two men had a genuinely affectionate relationship.
Fraser also took up the role of Minister of Native Affairs (which he renamed Māori Affairs) in 1947. Fraser had had an interest in Māori concerns for some time, and he implemented a number of measures designed to reduce inequality.
Statute of Westminster and the New Commonwealth
Fraser's Government had proposed to adopt the Statute of Westminster 1931 in its Speech from the Throne in 1944 (two years after Australia adopted the Act), in order to gain greater constitutional independence. During the Address-In-Reply debate, the opposition passionately opposed the proposed adoption, claiming the Government was being disloyal to the United Kingdom. National MP for Tauranga, Frederick Doidge, argued "With us, loyalty is an instinct as deep as religion".[9]
The proposal was buried. Ironically, the National opposition prompted the adoption of the Statute in 1947 when its leader and future Prime Minister Sidney Holland introduced a private members' bill to abolish the New Zealand Legislative Council. Because New Zealand required the consent of the Parliament of the United Kingdom to amend the New Zealand Constitution Act 1852, Fraser decided to adopt the Statute.[10][11]
The adoption of the Statute of Westminster was soon followed by the debate on the future of the British Commonwealth in its transformation into the Commonwealth of Nations. In April 1949 Ireland, formerly the Irish Free State, declared itself a republic and ceased to be a member of the Commonwealth. Fraser's government reacted by passing the Republic of Ireland Act 1949, which treated Ireland as if it were still a member of the Commonwealth. Meanwhile, newly independent India would have to leave the Commonwealth on becoming a republic also, although it was the Indian Prime Minister's view that India should remain a member of the Commonwealth as a republic. Fraser believed that the Commonwealth could as a group address the evils of colonialism and maintain the solidarity of common defence.[12]
To Fraser the acceptance of India as a republican member would threaten the political unity of the Commonwealth. Fraser knew his domestic audience and was tough on republicanism or defence weakness to deflect criticism from the loyalist and imperialist-minded opposition National Party. Labour had been in office for fourteen years and faced an uphill battle to retain power against National at the general election, which would come just months after the high-profile April 1949 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting. In March 1949 Fraser wrote to the Canadian Prime Minister, Louis St Laurent, stating his frustration and unease over India's position. Saint Laurent had indicated that he would not be able to attend the meeting where the issue of India's republican status would dominate. Fraser argued:
I have the greatest desire to see India retained in the Commonwealth, but for the moment, I see no satisfactory means of bringing this about. Are the members of the Commonwealth who do wish to retain the Crown to end up with a form of words covering an arrangement which is entirely nebulous? Are we justified in releasing India from the obligations which the rest of us willingly assume without any reasonable accommodation on the part of India in return?[12]
Fraser left little doubt New Zealand was opposed to India's membership as a republic when he stated to his colleagues at Downing Street:[12]
New Zealand had been colonized by people of British stock, who had built their new country as an extension of the homeland; and their sentiments of loyalty and affection towards the Royal Family had intensified with the passage of time. Throughout the successive stages by which they had attained full national independence their loyalty and allegiance had grown progressively stronger. New Zealand would not tolerate any dilution of those loyalties.[12]
The conference quashed a proposal of a two-tier structure that would have had the traditional Commonwealth realms, perhaps with defence pacts, on one tier, and the new members which opted for a republic, on the second tier. The final compromise is perhaps best seen from the title finally accepted for the King, as Head of the Commonwealth.[12]
Fraser argued that the compromise allowed the Commonwealth dynamism, that would in the future allow former colonies of Africa to join as republics and be stalwarts of this New Commonwealth. It also allowed New Zealand the freedom to maintain its individual status of loyalty to the Crown and to pursue collective defence. Indeed, Fraser cabled a senior minister, Walter Nash, after the decision was taken to accept India that "while the Declaration is not as I would have wished, it is on the whole acceptable and maximum possible, and does not at any rate leave our position unimpaired".[12]
Decline and defeat
Although he relinquished the role of Minister of Education early in his term as Prime Minister, he and Walter Nash continued to have an active role in developing educational policy with C. E. Beeby.
In 1946, Fraser moved to the Wellington seat of Brooklyn, which he held until his death. From 1940 to 1949 Fraser lived in a house "Hill Haven" at 64-66 Harbour View Road, Northland, Wellington, which had been purchased for the use of the then-ill Savage in 1939.[13]
Fraser's domestic policies came under criticism. His slow speed in removing war-time rationing and his support for compulsory military training during peacetime in the 1949 referendum particularly damaged him politically. Some thought this hypocritical compared to Fraser's earlier sentiments on the subject. Much earlier in his career, in 1927 he is noted to have said that compulsory military training was "out of date, inefficient and not worth the money spent on it".[4]
With dwindling support from traditional Labour voters, and a population weary of war-time measures, Fraser's popularity declined. At this stage of his career, Fraser relied heavily on the party "machine". As a result, the gap between the party leadership and rank and file members widened to the point where Labour's political enthusiasm dwindled.[4] In the 1949 elections the National Party defeated his government.
Leader of the Opposition
Fraser became Leader of the Opposition, but declining health prevented him from playing a significant role. He died in Wellington at the age of 66 and was buried in the city's Karori cemetery. His successor as leader of the Labour Party was Walter Nash. His successor in the Brooklyn electorate, elected in the Brooklyn by-election, 1951, was Arnold Nordmeyer.
Honours
In 1935, Fraser was awarded the King George V Silver Jubilee Medal,[14] and in 1937, he was awarded the King George VI Coronation Medal.[15] He was appointed a Privy Counsellor in 1940 and a Member of the Order of the Companions of Honour in 1946.[1]
In popular culture
Fraser was portrayed in the 2011 New Zealand TV movie, Spies and Lies. Fraser was portrayed by the New Zealand actor Peter Hambleton, without a Scottish accent.
Notes
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Beaglehole, Tim. "Fraser, Peter". Dictionary of New Zealand Biography. Ministry for Culture and Heritage. Retrieved 11 December 2011.
- ↑ Scholefield 1950, p. 107.
- ↑ Collier 1974
- 1 2 3 4 5 Brown 1966.
- ↑ Gustafson 1980, p. 156.
- ↑ New Zealand Parliamentary Debates, Vols. 263-288 (1943-1949).
- ↑ Bassett (2000) p296
- ↑ Michael Ashby in Clark (1998) p180
- ↑ Cited in Jim Bolger (16 March 1994). Speech to the Annual Conference of the Newspaper Publishers Association. Newspaper Publishers Association.
- ↑ History, Constitutional - The Legislative Authority of the New Zealand Parliament - 1966 Encyclopaedia of New Zealand
- ↑ "New Zealand Parliament - New Zealand sovereignty: 1857, 1907, 1947, or 1987?".
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Harshan Kumarasingham. "The 'New Commonwealth' 1947 - 49: A New Zealand perspective on India joining the Commonwealth". Victoria University of Wellington. Retrieved 7 July 2010.
- ↑ Dominion Post (Wellington), 2012: 1 December pE1 & 26 December pA14
- ↑ "Official jubilee medals". The Evening Post. 6 May 1935. p. 4. Retrieved 2 July 2013.
- ↑ Taylor, Alister (1998). The New Zealand Roll of Honour. Alister Taylor. p. 399. ISBN 0-908578-58-X.
References
- Bassett, Michael; King, Michael (2000). Tomorrow Comes the Song: A Life of Peter Fraser. Auckland: Penguin. ISBN 0-14-029793-6.
- Thorn, James (1952). Peter Fraser: New Zealand's Wartime Prime Minister. London: Odhams Press.
- Brown, Bruce. "FRASER, Right Hon. Peter, P.C., C.H.". In McLintock, A. H. An Encyclopaedia of New Zealand. Ministry for Culture and Heritage / Te Manatū Taonga. Retrieved 21 April 2016.
- Clark, Margaret (editor) (1998). Peter Fraser: Master Politician. Dunmore Press, Palmerston North (1997 symposium) ISBN 0-86469-323-0
- Gustafson, Barry (1986). The First 50 Years : A History of the New Zealand National Party. Auckland: Reed Methuen. ISBN 0-474-00177-6.
- McGibbon, Ian, ed. (1993). Undiplomatic Dialogue: Letters between Carl Berendsen and Alister McIntosh. Auckland University Press, Auckland
- Scholefield, Guy (1950) [First ed. published 1913]. New Zealand Parliamentary Record, 1840–1949. Wellington: Govt. Printer.
External links
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Peter Fraser. |
Government offices | ||
---|---|---|
Preceded by Michael Joseph Savage |
Prime Minister of New Zealand 1940–1949 |
Succeeded by Sidney Holland |
Political offices | ||
Preceded by Alexander Young |
Minister of Health 1935–1940 |
Succeeded by Tim Armstrong |
Preceded by Sydney Smith |
Minister of Education 1935–1940 |
Succeeded by Rex Mason |
Preceded by Sidney Holland |
Leader of the Opposition 1949–1950 |
Succeeded by Walter Nash |
Preceded by Āpirana Ngata |
Father of the House 1943–1950 |
Succeeded by Bill Parry |
New Zealand Parliament | ||
Preceded by Robert Fletcher |
Member of Parliament for Wellington Central 1918–1946 |
Succeeded by Charles Henry Chapman |
New constituency | Member of Parliament for Brooklyn 1946–1950 |
Succeeded by Arnold Nordmeyer |
Party political offices | ||
Preceded by Michael Joseph Savage |
Leader of the Labour Party 1940–1950 |
Succeeded by Walter Nash |
Preceded by Tom Paul |
President of the Labour Party 1920–1921 |
Succeeded by Frederick Cooke |
Preceded by Michael Joseph Savage |
Deputy-Leader of the Labour Party 1933–1940 |
Succeeded by Walter Nash |