Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators
| Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators | |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Argued February 6, 9–14, 16, 1795 Decided February 24, 1795 | |
| Full case name | Penhallow, et al. v. Doane's Administrators |
| Citations |
1 L. Ed. 507; 1795 U.S. LEXIS 329; 1999 AMC 2652; 3 Dall. 54 |
| Holding | |
| Federal district courts have the powers in prize causes that were formerly granted to the Court of Appeals in Cases of Capture under the Congress of the Articles of Confederation. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Paterson, joined by unanimous |
Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators, 3 U.S. 54 (1795), was a United States Supreme Court case about prize causes, holding that federal district courts have the powers formerly granted to the Court of Appeals in Cases of Capture under the Congress of the Articles of Confederation. In the case:
it was held that the Congress under the Confederation had power to erect a court of appeals in prize causes, that its decrees were conclusive, and that the district courts of the United States created under the Constitution have, as courts of admiralty, power to carry into effect the decrees of the former court of appeals in prize causes erected by the Congress of the Confederation.[1]
References
- ↑ Judicial settlement of controversies between states of the American union: cases decided in the Supreme Court of the United States, Volume 1 (Oxford University Press, 1918)page 341, footnote 1
This article is issued from
Wikipedia.
The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike.
Additional terms may apply for the media files.