Particle-induced X-ray emission

Particle-induced X-ray emission or proton-induced X-ray emission (PIXE) is a technique used in the determining of the elemental make-up of a material or sample. When a material is exposed to an ion beam, atomic interactions occur that give off EM radiation of wavelengths in the x-ray part of the electromagnetic spectrum specific to an element. PIXE is a powerful yet non-destructive elemental analysis technique now used routinely by geologists, archaeologists, art conservators and others to help answer questions of provenance, dating and authenticity.

The technique was first proposed in 1970 by Sven Johansson of Lund University, Sweden, and developed over the next few years with his colleagues Roland Akselsson and Thomas B Johansson.[1]

Recent extensions of PIXE using tightly focused beams (down to 1 μm) gives the additional capability of microscopic analysis. This technique, called microPIXE, can be used to determine the distribution of trace elements in a wide range of samples. A related technique, particle-induced gamma-ray emission (PIGE) can be used to detect some light elements.

Theory

Three types of spectra can be collected from a PIXE experiment:

  1. X-ray emission spectrum.
  2. Rutherford backscattering spectrum.
  3. Proton transmission spectrum.

X-ray emission

Quantum theory states that orbiting electrons of an atom must occupy discrete energy levels in order to be stable. Bombardment with ions of sufficient energy (usually MeV protons) produced by an ion accelerator, will cause inner shell ionization of atoms in a specimen. Outer shell electrons drop down to replace inner shell vacancies, however only certain transitions are allowed. X-rays of a characteristic energy of the element are emitted. An energy dispersive detector is used to record and measure these X-rays.

Only elements heavier than fluorine can be detected. The lower detection limit for a PIXE beam is given by the ability of the X-rays to pass through the window between the chamber and the X-ray detector. The upper limit is given by the ionisation cross section, the probability of the K electron shell ionisation, this is maximal when the velocity of the proton matches the velocity of the electron (10% of the speed of light), therefore 3 MeV proton beams are optimal.

Proton backscattering

Protons can also interact with the nucleus of the atoms in the sample through elastic collisions, Rutherford backscattering, often repelling the proton at angles close to 180 degrees. The backscatter give information on the sample thickness and composition. The bulk sample properties allow for the correction of X-ray photon loss within the sample.they are sample but convective process.

Proton transmission

The transmission of protons through a sample can also be used to get information about the sample.

Protein analysis

Protein analysis using microPIXE allow for the determination of the elemental composition of liquid and crystalline proteins. microPIXE can quantify the metal content of protein molecules with a relative accuracy of between 10% and 20%.[2]

The advantage of microPIXE is that given a protein of known sequence, the X-ray emission from sulfur can be used as an internal standard to calculate the number of metal atoms per protein monomer. Because only relative concentrations are calculated there are only minimal systematic errors, and the results are totally internally consistent.

The relative concentrations of DNA to protein (and metals) can also be measured using the phosphate groups of the bases as an internal calibration.

Data analysis

Analysis of the data collected can be performed by the programs Dan32,[3] the front end to gupix.[4][5]

Limitations

In order to get a meaningful sulfur signal from the analysis, the buffer should not contain sulfur (i.e. no BES, DDT, HEPES, MES, MOPSO or PIPES compounds). Excessive amounts of chlorine in the buffer should also be avoided, since this will overlap with the sulfur peak; KBr and NaBr are suitable alternatives.

Advantages

There are many advantages to using a proton beam over an electron beam. There is less crystal charging from Bremsstrahlung radiation, although there is some from the emission of Auger electrons, and there is significantly less than if the primary beam was itself an electron beam.

Because of the higher mass of protons relative to electrons, there is less lateral deflection of the beam; this is important for proton beam writing applications.

Scanning

Two-dimensional maps of elemental compositions can be generated by scanning the microPIXE beam across the target.

Cell and tissue analysis

Whole cell and tissue analysis is possible using a microPIXE beam, this method is also referred to as nuclear microscopy.

Artifact analysis

MicroPIXE is a useful technique for the non-destructive analysis of paintings and antiques. Although it provides only an elemental analysis, it can be used to distinguish and measure layers within the thickness of an artifact.[6]

Proton beam writing

Proton beams can be used for writing (proton beam writing) through either the hardening of a polymer (by proton induced cross-linking), or through the degradation of a proton sensitive material. This may have important effects in the field of nanotechnology.

References

  1. ↑ Roland Akselsson mini-CV- accessed 2008-01-29
  2. ↑ Garman, EF; Grime, GW (2005). "Elemental analysis of proteins by microPIXE". Progress in biophysics and molecular biology. 89 (2): 173–205. PMID 15910917. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.09.005.
  3. ↑ Geoffrey W Grime Dan32: recent developments in the windows interface to gupix. Tenth International Conference on Particle Induced X-ray Emission, Portoroz, Slovenia, 2004
  4. ↑ Maxwell, J; Teesdale, W; Campbell, J (1995). "The Guelph PIXE software package II". Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B. 95: 407. Bibcode:1995NIMPB..95..407M. doi:10.1016/0168-583X(94)00540-0.
  5. ↑ Campbell, J (2000). "The Guelph PIXE software package III: Alternative proton database". Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B. 170: 193. Bibcode:2000NIMPB.170..193C. doi:10.1016/S0168-583X(00)00156-7.
  6. ↑ Grassi, N., et al. Differential PIXE measurements for the stratigraphic analysis of the painting “Madonna dei fusi” 10th international PIXE conference (2004)- accessed 2008-01-29 Archived September 8, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.