Overdale

Overdale
Neighbourhood
Overdale

Location of Overdale in Montreal

Coordinates: 45°29′42″N 73°34′23″W / 45.494872°N 73.573122°W / 45.494872; -73.573122Coordinates: 45°29′42″N 73°34′23″W / 45.494872°N 73.573122°W / 45.494872; -73.573122
Country Canada
Province Quebec
City Montreal
Borough Ville-Marie

Overdale was a small residential district in downtown Montreal which became a famous symbol of the struggle between urban conservationists and land developers.

In the mid-1980s, two developers, Robert Landau and Douglas Cohen—operating under an array of names, including Les Galleria Dorchester, and Grinch Realties—purchased a series of buildings in an area bounded by Overdale Ave., Lucien L'Allier St., Mackay Street and Dorchester Blvd. (Dorchester was renamed as René Lévesque Blvd. in 1987.) The developers proposed to demolish all of the homes and replace them with a large condo project.

The Executive Committee of the Montreal city administration, headed by Mayor Jean Doré, was split on the issue. Doré had risen to power through the Montreal Citizens' Movement (known in French as the Rassemblement des citoyens et des citoyennes de Montréal or RCM). The MCM had considered the defense of tenants' rights to be among its primary goals. Doré had promised to change the demolitionist ways of his predecessor, Mayor Jean Drapeau; however, when developers promised a project that would yield significant municipal tax dollars, Doré decided to allow the project to evict the tenants of the homes and demolish the buildings which housed 87 residents. The buildings to be demolished included many fine, Victorian-era structures as well as the onetime home of Louis Hippolyte Lafontaine. Tenants and experts argued that the terrain was large enough to allow for the construction of the new project alongside the existing structures—yet the appeals were rejected.

City inspectors condemned the buildings as electrical hazards. The tenants were ordered out, saving the landlords the inconvenience of negotiating the departure of each individual tenant. In spite of protests and arrests and considerable public reaction in opposition to the planned project and the methods employed to evict the tenants, the buildings (except for the onetime home of Lafontaine) were demolished in 1989.

The promised $100-million condominium development was not built for decades and remained a parking lot until 2015, when construction started. See YUL Condos (below).

The developers paid the city to build a separate building farther from downtown which would be offered to the evicted tenants. The rents were much higher at the new development. The Overdale-area residents were invited to move to the new project but most refused.

Timeline

This is a chronological summary of the events that involved in the Overdale controversy, based on the notes of architect Michael Fish.

1986

Summer: The Doria Corporation, owner of all the residential properties on the block — Mackay, Dorchester, Lucien-L’Allier, Overdale — applies for demolition permits for all of the housing on the block. There are 75 apartments and studio-rooms within a greystone rooming house, a three storey apartment building, four triplexes, a mansion converted into apartments and 7 grey stone former grand homes converted into apartments. The average space in all units is 48 sq. meters. The Canadian census tract covering this block of houses notes that the median income of the households is 8,000 dollars per annum. The next lowest census tract on the Island covers the Dozois project where the median income is $11,000 dollars pa.

Fall: The City Executive under Mayor Drapeau decides to refuse permission to demolish any buildings. The decision of the Executive Committee notes that all the buildings have been inspected by city experts who certify that all of the buildings are in good condition. Furthermore, experts representing the Province who have also looked at the proposal to demolish state: that all of the buildings have a certain heritage value, that they are feasible to renovate, where desired, at economic cost, that they can be easily integrated into any further development and recommends that the city conserve all the buildings. Residents protest in November.[1][2]

Winter: Cohen and Landau having purchased the non-residential and vacant property on the block, buy the all the residential property to become the sole proprietor of the block. There are some 13000 sq meters of land on the whole block. They attest to having paid $11,000,000 for the whole block. Together with a source close to the Doré group, Cameron Charlebois, Cohen and Landau ask the newly elected executive committee member, John Gardiner, for rezonings on this block for a massive re-development. Gardiner agrees to allow Cohen and Landau to build two new small apartment buildings to be city-owned on a cost plus basis on some vacant city owned land a few blocks away. This land is valued at $235,000. The developers offer, in kind, up to $1.1 million toward their construction cost over any mortgages negotiated for them. They pledge up to $135,000 to help pay rental subsidies to the residents when and if they move. The city agree to pay all mortgages of these buildings estimated to amount to at least $1.25 million, and contribute temporary subsidies to the rents for displaced residents of up to $135,000. The total city contribution to the developers is valued at: land, $235,000; rent subsidies, $135,000; and mortgage guarantee, at least $1.25 million; streets and lanes, $207,000; and a plus value to the site of $1.88 million, totalling at least $3.7 million. Cohen and Landau pledge up to $1.1 million for the cost of the new buildings and $135,000 toward rental subsidies if and when residents move to the new buildings. Total is a maximum of $1.24 million. There will be 67 rooms and apartments in the new buildings replacing the 75 existing rooms and apartments in the existing buildings.[3]

1987

June: Gardiner announces Cohen and Landau’s proposal for development and the "generous gesture" of developers to replace the demolished homes. He claims a "first", in the "protection" of resident-tenants by the city. Gardiner starts negotiations with the Overdale residents on behalf of the developers to get them to move quickly to the new buildings. He promises Councillor Arnold Bennett and other housing activists close to his municipal party that rents will not rise in the new buildings from the low levels in the Overdale buildings.

July: Residents point out that the rents offered to most of them are 40 per cent higher in the new buildings and that the subsidies slide down to nothing in the fourth year. The residents become divided among themselves under heavy continuous pressure from their landlords, city officials, lobbyists and the media. Elderly poor residents of the rooming house agree to the proposal to move, while a few other older and sick residents leave the area to avoid the stress of a protracted fight. Some residents feel that the temporary rental subsidies offered to everyone can be improved, and even made permanent. They continue to negotiate unsuccessfully with Gardiner. Public comment in major media, newspapers, radio and TV go strongly, even rabidly against the residents in support of the City and the developers. The local city councillor, and Montreal Gazette columnist, Nick Auf der Maur writes an article for the Montreal Daily News attacking the residents as greedy. The article will be reprinted in the Montreal Gazette as a paid advertisement.

Architect Michael Fish is asked by the residents to study the possibility of staying in their homes, purchasing them for their market worth and helping increase the profitability of the developers plans. One home is found by Senator Serge Joyal to be the former home of Louis Hippolyte-La Fontaine, an important Patriot during the 1837-38 Rebellion. The historic value of this building is enhanced by the facts that La Fontaine, later served as the first Prime Minister of the United Canadas 1848-1851. Nevertheless, demolition application notices are put up on all buildings. Several appeals to the City’s Commission d’arbitrage against demolition are launched. Cohen and Landau withdraw the application to demolish the La Fontaine House "provided it is proved that it is indeed the house of La Fontaine."

August: Negotiations between the residents and the City continue. Transition funds (damages owed under the rental code) to those who will just leave quickly are slowly negotiated up to $3,000 per apartment tenant, $1,400 per roomer to leave quickly. Few residents take the money. Public hearings are announced. The City Executive Committee announces their own revised intention to preserve 4 buildings on MacKay Street, the La Fontaine House and four triplexes on Overdale Street. They will allow demolition of the Kinkora-Cadillac Apts and all the greystone houses on Kinkora Avenue.[4] The hearings open for two evenings before a committee of City Councillors.

September: A report of the City Council Committee recommends saving of all buildings and the "integration of residents into the condo development," with a smaller scale new building to take certain residents who would not be part of a coop on the site. Only Councillor Nick Auf der Maur dissents, calling the report by the Committee "crazy." The City Council votes against the almost unanimous report of their own committee and accepts the development plan worked out by Gardiner. Four councillors vote against the majority of the city council. Several others abstain, including the powerful chairman of the Committee, Councillor André Lavallée. Several councillors in the Doré party sit from then on as independents.

October: The residents demonstrate for the first time against the council’s decision, they ask questions at city council. Residents will come to almost every council meeting during the next months to demonstrate and to ask for changes to keep them in their homes.

November: Residents demonstrate at an MCM convention. Delegates vote to maintain the program of the party which calls for integration of buildings and residents into new developments except when such is cost prohibitive. The City Executive Committee directs its Heritage Committee to cite as a Historic Monument : the La Fontaine House and its immediate Grey Stone triplex neighbour, originally built as an extension to the La Fontaine house. The Heritage Committee holds hearings. Objections by the architects of the development, represented by architect Panzini are sustained by the committee. Only the Lafontaine house is cited by the city as cultural property.

1988

January 13: Hearings open before the Commission d'arbitrage sur la demolition du patrimoine residentiel de Montreal to decide the question of whether the Kinkora-Cadillac apartments and the Kinkora St. greystone buildings are to be demolished.

March 16: A Superior Court Judge orders work stopped for a period of 10 days while the issue can be sorted out.[5]

April: Cohen and Landau are issued permits by the city to convert any and all buildings that will be ordered preserved by the Commission d’arbitrage from residences to commercial and offices. This tactic allows that residents can be legally removed from all buildings immediately, even from those buildings that will be ordered conserved. The permission documents note that the La Fontaine house with its stone extension and the Mackay Street row will become a community centre with a fitness club and offices. Such permits usually take months to approve. These are approved in nine days. Intense demolition work starts immediately on vacant buildings and in vacant apartments despite that some tenants have valid leases to occupy their apartments. Six more residents or supporters are arrested and jailed for a day while blocking workers from this work. They will ultimately be criminalized. An injunction is obtained by the residents from Superior Court to stop this work. Mayor Doré calls the work "premature and provocative".

May: The Commission d'Arbitrage decides to recommend approving all the demolitions applied for.The federal Minister of housing, McInnes announces a 100% increase in the number of very low income residents that can live in a nonprofit co-op. The feasibility of a co-op on the Overdale site is improved allowing for an increase in the offer to Cohen and Landau. Superior Court Hearings start for a permanent injunction requested by the residents to set the conversion permits aside on the grounds that the zoning bylaw which calls for residences only on the block is being contravened by the issue of commercial permits. Faults in the permit drawings and processes are alleged. Residents form a nonprofit coop and apply for a charter from the province.

June: The coop offers $700,000 for the buildings again, almost twice what was paid for their value as condos by Landau and Cohen, leaving the surplus land development rights for the whole block. Considering that the buildings will be demolished by the developers, this is a land transaction that an intelligent developer could not turn down. However it is refused. A letter written by the Mayor and Gardiner supports the co-op application to senior governments as a part of the condo development.

June 14: The city fire department orders an evacuation of the buildings on MacKay St and of the Kinkora-Cadillac Apts, citing minor dangerous conditions of the buildings.

June 21: Mayor Doré refuses to try to persuade the developers to sell the coop their homes. He defends the arrangements as they are.

June 22: The residents are refused permits to correct the "dangerous conditions" in the buildings on their own at their own cost.

June 27: Remaining residents of the condemned buildings barricade themselves into their apartments.

June 28: Six more residents and their supporters are arrested by the police for blocking city movers from the buildings that are evacuating them by force. Thirteen residents are arrested and jailed overnight in an all morning police operation involving the riot squad, the SWAT team and a platoon of 20 or thirty police to empty the buildings. A later trial condemns several residents and sentences them to absence from all demonstrations for two years.

June 29: Mayor Doré defends the use of force against the residents.

July: Residents continue to try to persuade Landau, Cohen and Doré to sell their homes for a 100% profit to their coop as part of the condo development. In the meantime, developers have $3.7 million in city donated benefits for $1.6 million in developer concessions to a publicly owned project open only to middle class tenancy.

September: The following buildings are demolished. All that remain are: three facades on Mackay Street, the La Fontaine House, its grey stone extension and three brick triplexes fronting on Overdale. All have been gutted for offices that never materialize, the whole of the rest of the city block is covered with gravel and a parking lot operation is commenced which is still in operation today.

Fall: Superior court refuses to intervene to stop demolition. There will be no appeal.

Winter: The Lafontaine house and its extensions have their insides ripped out. The insides of the triplexes are removed for offices. Weeks later, that collapse occurs.

1991

September: Fires are set in the truncated houses on Mackay Street. There is now little left of the protected houses on Mackay Street to demolish. That happens a week later. The brick triplexes on Overdale are already gone, un-protested, replaced by more parking space.

October: A $200,000 dollar bond required by Cohen and Landau to guarantee new construction by this date and required by their rezoning and permission to demolish comes due. It goes unpaid.

1992

May 22: An exhibition of art relating to the Fight to Preserve the homes of Overdale is opened in the Concordia University art gallery.

2001

A squat to draw attention to poverty and the housing crisis in Montreal occupies the Lafontaine mansion for several weeks.

2006

Winter: The mature Kentucky coffeetrees cut back a few years earlier, in front of the La Fontaine house are cut down, their roots pulled up.

Spring: Several big-name celebrated Canadians from across the country ask that something be done about the Mansion. They suggest turning the house into a museum.

June: Fish asks Mayor Gérald Tremblay to step in and homologate the property around the La Fontaine House as a minimum immediately. This request is shunted off to the local Mayor of the arrondissement. Senator Serge Joyal, Mme Lise Bacon and Phyllis Lambert ask the Federal Monuments Commission to declare the house a federal Historic site.

The Commission of Federal Monuments refuses so to do. They then apply to the Provincial Monuments Commission to classify the House. The Commission refuses but agree to reconsider.

Jean Francois Lisée and Jacques Monet, and other noted historians urge the classification of the building by the province in local newspapers. They invoke the crucial historic importance of La Fontaine to Canada and to the survival of French speaking people in North America.

August: The Gazette’s Alan Hustak writes an article about the house in which several interested groups are quoted as wanting the house used for a public interpretation centre. An editorial the next day says that people wanting this should just purchase the property. Landau, the owner says that the site is worth 50 million dollars.

Aftermath

Several prominent and longtime MCM councilors were outraged by the decision to allow the project and quit the party.[6] These included Sam Boskey, Marvin Rotrand and Marcel Sevigny. The MCM suffered a split from which it would never recover. Doré and the MCM were voted out of office in 1994.

Since 1992, a new City Master Plan has been written for the whole city. The Overdale frontage allows 25 meter high buildings.

See also

References

  1. ↑ McGovern, Sheila (17 November 1986). "Inner-city protest: Save our homes!". The Montreal Gazette. Retrieved 16 October 2013.
  2. ↑ Peritz, Ingrid (10 September 1986). "Tenants say they're not budging to make way for research institute". The Montreal Gazette. Retrieved 16 October 2013.
  3. ↑ Peritz, Ingrid (16 December 1986). "Council question periods start tonight". The Montreal Gazette. Retrieved 16 October 2013.
  4. ↑ Gravenor, Kristian (14 December 2008). "Overdale: the final years before demolition". Coolopolis. Retrieved 16 October 2013.
  5. ↑ "Overdale: une victoire symbolique". Le Devoir (in French). 17 May 1988. Retrieved 16 October 2013.
  6. ↑ Montreal Mirror

Bibliography

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.