Municipal electoral regime during Francoism

Madrid town hall

In Francoist Spain mandates in municipal councils were divided into 3 pools: in Tercio Familiar only so-called heads of family were entitled to vote, in Tercio Sindical the councillors were chosen in a phased system based on trade unions, and in Tercio de Entidades seats were filled also in a two-step way related to other organizations. Local elections were organized every 3 years, in each cycle voting for half of the mandates available in every ayuntamiento; from 1948 to 1973 the balloting took place 9 times. The system was designed to ensure bureaucratic control of the electoral process and as such it proved largely successful. Electoral campaign was non-confrontational and presented as administrative, not political exercise. Until the 1970s around 45% of adults were entitled to vote, later the figure grew significantly. The turnout is estimated to range from 80% during early Francoism to below 50% in its final stages.

The first general document regulating the regime of local elections was Ley de Bases de Régimen Local of 1945, in large part based on Estatuto Municipal prepared in 1924 by José Calvo Sotelo; it was detailed in a decree in 1950. Another decree of 1952 specified organization and modus operandi of local councils. In 1953 the 1945 Ley de Bases was replaced by a new one, in turn detailed in a decree of 1955. This set of documents remained in force until 1970, when it was appended by a new regulation. A third version of Ley de Bases de Régimen Local was adopted on November 19, 1975, few days before the death of Franco.[1]

Frequency

Until 1948 municipalities were governed by Comisiones Gestoras, municipal bodies entirely appointed by the government and provincial civil governors.[2] Since 1948 municipal elections were organized 9 times, in 1948, 1951, 1954, 1957, 1960, 1963, 1966, 1970 and 1973.[3] The unusually long 4-year term of 1966-1970 resulted from protracted works on new election regime, completed in 1970. Every time the elections were organized in late November and in a 2-week sequence: on the first Sunday of the cycle the vote fell on Tercio Familiar, on the second Sunday on Tercio Sindical and on the third Sunday on Tercio de Entidades; starting 1970 elections were organized on a Tuesday, reportedly to increase the turnout.[4]

General principles

Francoism adopted an organicist principle; it envisioned society not as a sum of individuals, but as a construction built of a number of traditional social entities. Accordingly, representation should be performed not on the basis of universal suffrage, but rather be exercised by means of so-called intermediary bodies.[5] In case of municipalities this principle was embodied in the scheme encompassing 3 equal pools of mandates, each pool to represent a specific organic body of the society: families, sindicates and other organisations. Electoral curias choosing their representatives were named accordingly as Tercio Familiar, Tercio Sindical and Tercio de Entidades (also named Tercio Corporativo).

Municipal electoral regime

The term of a councillor was 6 years, yet the elections were organised every 3 years and covered only half of the mandates in every council. This stipulation was inherited from the Restoration era, but was welcome as it prevented drastic changes and ensured a sense of continuity.[6] Each voter was permitted to choose as many candidates as many mandates were available. A voter had to cast his/her ballot in person and only in his/her constituency; voting by post was not allowed.[7] The mayor (alcalde) was appointed by the minister of interior in case of provincial capitals and by civil governor in case of other municipalities.[8] The alcalde did not have to be a councillor; the only requirements were that he is Spanish and above 25 years of age. This model changed in the legislation adopted few days before the death of Franco, which stipulated that alcaldes were to be elected by the councillors.[9]

Number of mandates available

In line with general division into 3 equal tercios, number of mandates available for every council was the multiplication of 3. The number of mandates available for council depended upon the number of inhabitants in the municipality and ranged from 3 (municipality below 501 inhabitants) to 6 (501 to 2,000 inhabitants), 9 (2,001 to 10,000 inhabitants), 12 (10,001 to 20,000 inhabitants), 15 (20,001 to 50,000 inhabitants), 18 (50,001 to 100,000 inhabitants), 21 (100,001 to 500,000 inhabitants) and 24 (above 500,000 inhabitants).[10] Compared to older Republican and Restoration regulations the scheme reduced significantly the number of mandates; e.g. during the Second Republic the city of Palencia, then ca. 25,000 inhabitants, was entitled to a 24-member council, while in the 1940s and 1950s, when its population ranged from 35,000 to 48,000 inhabitants, it was entitled to a 15-member council.[11]

Electoral rights

curia active suffrage passive suffrage
Tercio Familiar[12]
  • residents

AND

  • above 21 years of age OR younger but legally emancipated

AND

  • married males (since 1970 also married females) OR widows/widowers OR non-married women/men living on their own
  • residents (males and females)

AND

  • above 23 years of age

AND

  • have been a councillor in the very council for at least a year OR are proposed by at least 2 Cortes deputies/ex-deputies from Tercio Corporativo of the province in question OR are proposed by at least 3 provincial diputación deputies/ex-deputies OR are proposed by at least 4 active councillors of the very council OR are proposed by at least 1/20 of all heads of family eligible to vote in the municipality
Tercio Sindical[13]
  • residents (males and females)

AND

  • above 23 years of age

AND

  • members of Organización Sindical

AND

  • elected as delegates (compromisarios) by all members of Social and Economic sections of syndicates registered in the municipality. Total number of delegates is to be tenfold the number of councillors to be elected. The number of delegates elected by workers and the number of delegates elected by employees should be equal[14]
  • residents (males and females)

AND

  • above 23 years of age

AND

  • members of Organización Sindical

AND

  • have held or hold any elected post within a sindical organization OR are proposed by at least 2 Cortes deputies/ex-deputies from Tercio Sindical of the province OR are proposed by at least 1/20 of all members of sindical organizations in the municipality OR in case the number of candidates from this tercio is less than double the number of mandates, individuals proposed by Junta Local de Elecciones Sindicales
Tercio de Entidades[15]
  • councillors elected from Tercio Familiar and Tercio Sindical
  • residents (males and females)

AND

  • above 23 years of age

AND

  • members of any economic, cultural or professional organization registered in the municipality[16] OR in case the number of candidates from this tercio is lower than 3 times the number of mandates available, individuals of prestige proposed by civil governor

Electorate

The population entitled to vote in Tercio Familiar ranged from 7m in the 1940s to 18m in the 1970s,[17] the increase resulting not only from demographic growth but also from extending the voting rights to married females. Until 1970 the electorate of Tercio Familiar represented some 45% of the entire adult population,[18] estimated on basis of the number of Spaniards entitled to vote in the Francoist referenda; since 1970 the number grew to some 75%.[19] Until the 1970s some 65% of adult males were entitled to vote, in case of females this number was 20%; since 1970 the percentage probably equalled this appropriate for males. In Tercio Sindical the number of those eligible to elect compromisarios is difficult to estimate, yet given the size of syndicalist bureaucracy it probably went into hundres of thousands. The number of compromisarios, i.e. those who were actually electing the councillors, is estimated for the whole Spain as hovering around 50,000; in 1948 in Madrid their number was 2,187.[20] In Tercio de Entidades the number of voters equalled the number of mandates available in two other tercios and remained in the range of few thousand. It is interesting to note that some individuals (mostly married working males) were entitled to participate in election process in all 3 tercios: in Tercio Familiar personally, in Tercio Sindical by electing compromisarios, and in Tercio de Entidades by electing councillors in two other tercios who acted as compromisarios.

Turnout

Technically taking part in elections was obligatory, though sanctions for absenteeism were low and their application rather exceptional.[21] This schizophrenic position of the authorities is summarised by a present day-scholar, who notes that the entire system was constructed to discourage mobilisation, but prior to the very day propaganda did everything to ensure largest possible turnout.[22] Actual turnout is subject to estimates, as official data is widely believed to be manipulated. Scholarly works suggest a decreasing trend, with 80% in the early 1950s, 55%-65% in the 1960s and below 50% in the 1970s.[23] Apart from fundamental political issues - like refusal to participate in the Francoist political system - other factors quoted as responsible for decreasing turnout were complex electoral system, perceived limitied role of elected ayuntamientos and suspicions of electoral fraud.[24]

Manipulation and fraud

The election system contained many in-built features which enabled manipulation. The key one was the right of civil governors to appoint candidates in Tercio de Entidades in case their overall number was lower than 3 times the number of mandates available; given the councillors from this tercio were elected by councillors already elected from two other tercios, candidates proposed by authorities were virtually ensured mandate and the pool was at times dubbed "tercio de consolación".[25] The similar mechanism was employed in case of Tercio Sindical, though this time it was Junta Local entitled to suggest own candidates. Notorious Article 29 was inherited from the Restoration system; in case the number of candidates in Tercio Familiar was lower than or equal to the number of mandates, the candidates were declared victorious with no balloting taking place.[26] Most of the electoral process was technically handled by Falange/Movimiento.[27]

Electoral campaigns

In the Francoist system choosing local governing bodies was not presented as politics, either big or small; instead, it was staged as part of the administrative process. Accordingly, candidatures were usually formatted as non-confrontational and the electorate was simply supposed to choose between these more and less competent. Official list of candidates was made public only 7 days prior to the election day, which rendered mounting and staging an individual electoral campaign extremely difficult.[28] Once the candidates were known local press used to present them, usually adhering to a non-partisan tone and refraining from promoting some contenders over the others.[29]

Role and impact within the system

A present-day scholar summarises the Francoist municipal electoral system as "leafy legislative tangle",[30] a conglomerate of shady rules developed at various stages and serving various ends. As a whole it was designed as means of ensuring some efficiency of governance at the local level combined with contributing to political stability of the regime in the general perspective. The former was to be achieved by non-confrontational format, detachment from politics and efficient interface with local entities. The latter was to be achieved by overall bureaucratic control with a number of means available to manipulate the election result.[31] Throughout all of the Francoist period local elections worked mostly as they were designed to. However, if the objective was also to forge some sort of identification with the regime and ensure sustainable level of mobilisation, they probably failed.

See also

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Domingo García Ramos, Las elecciones municipales del franquismo, [in:] Pilar Sánchez Castro et al. (eds.), El franquismo: el régimen y la oposición, Guadalajara 2000, ISBN 8493165808, pp. 258-260
  2. ↑ García Ramos 2000, p. 258, Miguel Angel Ruiz de Azúa Antón, Las elecciones franquistas, [in:] Historia 16 (1977), pp. 90-93
  3. ↑ García Ramos 2000, p. 269
  4. ↑ García Ramos 2000, p. 267
  5. ↑ Santiago Varela, La perspectiva histórica, [in:] Juan de Esteban (ed.), El proceso electoral, Barcelona, 1977, p. 305, Jorge Esteban, Desarrollo político y constitución española, Barcelona 1973, p. 67
  6. ↑ García Ramos 2000, p. 259
  7. ↑ García Ramos 2000, p. 262
  8. ↑ García Ramos 2000, p. 259
  9. ↑ García Ramos 2000, pp. 259-260
  10. ↑ García Ramos 2000, p. 259
  11. ↑ Garcia Ramos 2000, p. 259
  12. ↑ table prepared on basis of García Ramos 2000, pp. 260-262
  13. ↑ table prepared on basis of García Ramos 2000, p. 263
  14. ↑ another condition listed by a contemporary scholar is that they can read and write, García Ramos 2000, p. 263. The same condition is not listed in case of other terios
  15. ↑ table prepared on basis of García Ramos 2000, pp. 263-264
  16. ↑ it is not clear whether they were to be proposed by the organisation they belonged to or self-proposed
  17. ↑ demographical extrapolations based on information that in 1951 there were 17,6m people eligible to vote, Garcia Ramos 2000, p. 261, Ruiz de Azúa Antón 1977, p. 87
  18. ↑ in 1951 there were 7,5m (1.77 of these were women) entitled to vote in Tercio Familiar compared to 17,6m entitled to vote in referendum, Garcia Ramos 2000, p. 261. Calculations referring to sexes are based on assumption that the 17,6m number was equally divided among males and females
  19. ↑ once in 1970 married women gained the right to vote, the only adults (both males and females) not entitled to cast their ballots were those living in common households with their parents
  20. ↑ Garcia Ramos 2000, p. gr 263
  21. ↑ García Ramos 2000, p. 261
  22. ↑ "la necesidad de mover el «cuerpo electoral» el día de la votación, mientras que anteriormente debían hacer todo lo posible para que las elecciones suscitasen el menor grado posible de movilización política", Juan Francisco Pérez Ortiz, José Antonio Miranda Encarnación, Actitudes falangistas ante las elecciones municipales (1948-1957), [in:] Anales de la Universidad de Alicante 8-9 (1991/2), p. 144
  23. ↑ Miguel Martínez Cuadrado, Representación, Elecciones, Referéndum, [in:] Manuel Fraga (ed.), La España de los años 70 vol. 3/1, Madrid 1974, p. 1414, Miguel Angel Ruiz de Azúa Antón, Las elecciones franquistas, [in:] Historia 16 (1977), p. 89
  24. ↑ García Ramos 2000, p. 267
  25. ↑ García Ramos 2000, p. 264
  26. ↑ García Ramos 2000, pp. 261-262. Actual application of Article 29 was by no mean marginal; in 1948 in Palencia it was applied in 46 out of 200 municipalities, in Sabadell in 1966 the elections were held in only 11 municipalities, Pere Ysas, Carme Molinero, La Diputació de 1949 a 1977, [in:] História de la Diputació de Barcelona, Barcelona 1988, vol. 3, pp. 55, 61-63
  27. ↑ Roque Moreno Fonseret, La presencia de los grupos políticos en el régimen de Franco a través de las elecciones municipales de 1948, [in:] Javier Tusell (ed.), Estudios sobre la derecha española contemporanea, Madrid 1993, pp. 614-617
  28. ↑ García Ramos 2000, p. 264
  29. ↑ for a good sample see Hoja oficial de provincia de Barcelona 26.10.63, available here
  30. ↑ Varela 1977, pp. 306-307
  31. ↑ Glicerio Sánchez Recio, Los cuadros políticos intermedios del régimen franquista, 1939-1959, Alicante 1996

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.