Mughal emperors

Badshah of Hindustan
Imperial

Bahaddur Shah II
Details
Style His Imperial Majesty
First monarch Babur
Last monarch Bahadur Shah II
Formation 30 April 1526
Abolition 14 September 1857
Residence Red Fort
Appointer Hereditary
Pretender(s) Javaid Jah Bahadur
Mughal emperors
Babur 1526 – 1530
Humayun 1530 – 1540
1555 – 1556
Akbar 1556 – 1605
Jahangir 1605 – 1627
Shahryar (de facto) 1627 – 1628
Shah Jahan 1628 – 1658
Aurangzeb 1658 – 1707
Muhammad Azam Shah (titular) 1707
Bahadur Shah I 1707 – 1712
Jahandar Shah 1712 – 1713
Farrukhsiyar 1713 – 1719
Rafi ud-Darajat 1719
Shah Jahan II 1719
Muhammad Shah 1719 – 1748
Ahmad Shah Bahadur 1748 – 1754
Alamgir II 1754 – 1759
Shah Jahan III (titular) 1759 – 1760
Shah Alam II 1760 – 1806
Jahan Shah IV (titular) 1788
Akbar II 1806 – 1837
Bahadur Shah II 1837 – 1857
Empire abolished and replaced by British Raj
The Mughal Empire in 1700.

The Mughal emperors, from the early 16th century to the early 18th century, built and ruled the Mughal Empire on the Indian subcontinent, mainly corresponding to the modern countries of Bangladesh, India and Pakistan. The Mughals were a branch of the Timurid dynasty. Their power rapidly dwindled during the 18th century and the last of the emperors was deposed in 1857, with the establishment of the British Raj.[1] The dynasty had Turco-Mongol roots from a Central Asian area now part of modern-day Uzbekistan, and the emperors claimed direct descent from both Timur (generally known in the West as Tamerlane the Great) and Genghis Khan, through his son Chagatai Khan. However, the Mughals had significant Indian Rajput and Persian admixture through marriage alliances.[2][3]

At their empire's greatest extent in the late 17th and early 18th centuries, they controlled much of the Indian subcontinent, extending from Bengal in the east to Kabul and Sindh in the west, Kashmir in the north to the Kaveri basin in the south.[4] Its population at the time has been estimated as between 110 and 150 million (a quarter of the world's population), over a territory of more than 3.2 million square kilometres (1.2 million square miles).[5]

Mughal Empire

Genealogy of the Mughal Dynasty. Only principal offsprings of each emperor are provided in the chart.

The Mughal Empire was founded by Babur, a Central Asian ruler who was descended from the Turko-Mongol conqueror Timur on his father's side and from Chagatai, the second son of the Mongol ruler Genghis Khan, on his mother’s side.[6] Ousted from his ancestral domains in Central Asia by Uzbek Khan, the 14-year old Prince Babur turned to India to satisfy his ambitions. He established himself in Kabul and then pushed steadily southward into India from Afghanistan through the Khyber Pass.[6] Babur's forces occupied much of northern India after his victory at Panipat in 1526.[6] The preoccupation with wars and military campaigns, however, did not allow the new emperor to consolidate the gains he had made in India.[6] The instability of the empire became evident under his son, Humayun, who was driven out of India and into Persia by rebels.[6] Humayun's exile in Persia established diplomatic ties between the Safavid and Mughal Courts, and led to increasing West Asian cultural influence in the Mughal court. The restoration of Mughal rule began after Humayun’s triumphant return from Persia in 1555, but he died from a fatal accident shortly afterwards.[6] Humayun's son, Akbar, succeeded to the throne under a regent, Bairam Khan, who helped consolidate the Mughal Empire in India.[6]

Through warfare and diplomacy, Akbar was able to extend the empire in all directions, and controlled almost the entire Indian subcontinent north of the Godavari river. He created a new class of nobility loyal to him from the military aristocracy of India's social groups, implemented a modern government and supported cultural developments.[6] At the same time Akbar intensified trade with European trading companies. The Indian historian Abraham Eraly wrote that foreigners were often impressed by the fabulous wealth of the Mughal court, but the glittering court hid darker realities, namely that about a quarter of the empire's gross national product was owned by 655 families while the bulk of India's 120 million people lived in appalling poverty.[7] After suffering what appears to have been an epileptic seizure in 1578 while hunting tigers, which he regarded as a religious experience, Akbar grew disenchanted with Islam, and came to embrace a syncretistic mixture of Hinduism and Islam.[8] Akbar allowed free expression of religion and attempted to resolve socio-political and cultural differences in his empire by establishing a new religion, Din-i-Ilahi, with strong characteristics of a ruler cult.[6] He left his successors an internally stable state, which was in the midst of its golden age, but before long signs of political weakness would emerge.[6] Akbar's son, Jahangir, ruled the empire at its peak, but he was addicted to opium, neglected the affairs of the state, and came under the influence of rival court cliques.[6] During the reign of Jahangir's son, Shah Jahan, the culture and splendour of the luxurious Mughal court reached its zenith as exemplified by the Taj Mahal.[6] The maintenance of the court, at this time, began to cost more than the revenue.[6]

Shah Jahan's eldest son, the liberal Dara Shikoh, became regent in 1658, as a result of his father's illness. However, a younger son, Aurangzeb, allied with the Islamic orthodoxy against his brother, who championed a syncretistic Hindu-Muslim religion and culture, and ascended to the throne. Aurangzeb defeated Dara in 1659 and had him executed.[6] Although Shah Jahan fully recovered from his illness, Aurangzeb declared him incompetent to rule and had him imprisoned. During Aurangzeb's reign, the empire gained political strength once more, but his religious conservatism and intolerance undermined the stability of Mughal society.[6] Aurangzeb expanded the empire to include almost the whole of South Asia, but at his death in 1707, many parts of the empire were in open revolt.[6] Aurangzeb's attempts to reconquer his family's ancestral lands in Central Asia were not successful while his successful conquest of the Deccan region proved to be a Pyrrhic victory that cost the empire heavily in both blood and treasure.[9] A further problem for Aurangzeb was the army had always been based upon the land-owning aristocracy of northern India who provided the cavalry for the campaigns, and the empire had nothing equivalent to the Janissary corps of the Ottoman Empire.[10] The long and costly conquest of the Deccan had badly dented the "aura of success" that surrounded Aurangzeb, and from the late 17th century onwards, the aristocracy become increasing unwilling to provide forces for the empire's wars as the prospect of being rewarded with land as a result of a successful war was seen as less and less likely.[11] Furthermore, the fact that at the conclusion of the conquest of the Deccan, Aurangzeb had very selectively rewarded some of the noble families with confiscated land in the Deccan had left those aristocrats who received no confiscated land as reward and for whom the conquest of the Deccan had cost dearly, feeling badly disgruntled and unwilling to participate in further campaigns.[12] Aurangzeb's son, Shah Alam, repealed the religious policies of his father, and attempted to reform the administration. However, after his death in 1712, the Mughal dynasty sank into chaos and violent feuds. In the year 1719 alone, four emperors successively ascended the throne.[6]

During the reign of Muhammad Shah, the empire began to break up, and vast tracts of central India passed from Mughal to Maratha hands. Mughal warfare had always been based upon heavy artillery for sieges, heavy cavalry for offensive operations and light cavalry for skirmishing and raids.[9] To control a region, the Mughals had always sought to occupy a strategic fortress in some region, which would serve as a nodal point from which the Mughal army would emerge to take on any enemy that challenged the empire.[9] This system was not only expensive, but also made the army somewhat inflexible as the assumption was always the enemy would retreat into a fortress to be besieged or would engage in a set-piece decisive battle of annihilation on open ground.[9] The militantly Hindu Marathas were expert horsemen who refused to engage in set-piece battles, but rather engaged in campaigns of guerrilla warfare, a war of raids, ambushes and attacks upon the Mughal supply lines.[9] The Marathas were unable to take the Mughal fortresses via storm or formal siege as they lacked the artillery, but by constantly intercepting supply columns, they were able to starve Mughal fortresses into submission.[9] Successive Mughal commanders refused to adjust their tactics and develop an appropriate counter-insurgency strategy, which led to the Mughals losing more and more ground to the Maratha.[9] The Indian campaign of Nader Shah of Persia culminated with the Sack of Delhi and shattered the remnants of Mughal power and prestige,[6] as well as drastically accelerating its decline and alarming other far-off invaders, including the later British. Many of the empire's elites now sought to control their own affairs, and broke away to form independent kingdoms.[6] The Mughal Emperor, however, continued to be the highest manifestation of sovereignty. Not only the Muslim gentry, but the Maratha, Hindu, and Sikh leaders took part in ceremonial acknowledgements of the emperor as the sovereign of India.[13]

In the next decades, the Afghans, Sikhs, and Marathas battled against each other and the Mughals, only to prove the fragmented state of the empire. The Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II made futile attempts to reverse the Mughal decline, and ultimately had to seek the protection of outside powers. In 1784, the Marathas under Mahadji Scindia won acknowledgement as the protectors of the emperor in Delhi, a state of affairs that continued until after the Second Anglo-Maratha War. Thereafter, the British East India Company became the protectors of the Mughal dynasty in Delhi.[13] After a crushed rebellion which he nominally led in 1857-58, the last Mughal, Bahadur Shah Zafar, was deposed by the British government, who then assumed formal control of a large part of the former empire,[6] marking the start of the British Raj.

List of Mughal Emperors

Portrait Titular Name Birth Name Birth Reign Death Notes
Bābur
بابر		 Zahir-ud-din Muhammad
ظہیر الدین محمد		 23 February 1483 1 April 1526 – 26 December 1530 26 December 1530 (aged 47)
Humayun
ہمایوں		 Nasir-ud-din Muhammad Humayun
نصیر الدین محمد ہمایوں		 17 March 1508 26 December 1530 – 17 May 1540

22 February 1555 - 27 January 1556

 27 January 1556 (aged 48) Humayun was overthrown in 1540 by Sher Shah Suri of the Suri dynasty but returned to the throne in 1555 after the death of Islam Shah Suri (Sher Shah Suri's son and successor).
Akbar-e-Azam
اکبر اعظم		 Jalal-ud-din Muhammad
جلال الدین محمد اکبر		 14 October 1542 27 January 1556 – 27 October 1605 27 October 1605 (aged 63) His mother was Persian princess Hamida Banu Begum.[14]
Jahangir
جہانگیر		 Nur-ud-din Muhammad Salim
نور الدین محمد سلیم		 20 September 1569 15 October 1605 – 8 October 1627 28 October 1627 (aged 58) His mother was Rajput princess Mariam-uz-Zamani.[15]
Shah-Jahan-e-Azam
شاہ جہان اعظم		 Shahab-ud-din Muhammad Khurram
شہاب الدین محمد خرم		 5 January 1592 8 November 1627 – 2 August 1658 22 January 1666 (aged 74) His mother was Rajput princess Jagat Gosaini.[16] Built Taj Mahal.
Alamgir
عالمگیر		 Muhy-ud-din Muhammad Aurangzeb
محی الدین محمداورنگزیب 		4 November 1618 31 July 1658 – 3 March 1707 3 March 1707 (aged 88) His mother was Persian princess Mumtaz Mahal. He married Rajput princess Nawab Bai.[17]
Bahadur Shah
بہادر شاہ		 Qutb ud-Din Muhammad Mu'azzam
قطب الدین محمد معزام 		14 October 1643 19 June 1707 – 27 February 1712

(4 years, 253 days)

 27 February 1712 (aged 68) He made settlements with the Marathas, tranquilised the Rajputs, and became friendly with the Sikhs in the Punjab.
Jahandar Shah
جہاندار شاہ		 Ma'az-ud-Din Jahandar Shah Bahadur
معز الدین جہاندار شاہ بہادر 		9 May 1661 27 February 1712 – 11 February 1713

(0 years, 350 days)

 12 February 1713 (aged 51) Highly influenced by his Grand Vizier Zulfikar Khan.
Farrukhsiyar
فرخ سیر		 Farrukhsiyar
فرخ سیر		 20 August 1685 11 January 1713 – 28 February 1719

(6 years, 48 days)

 29 April 1719 (aged 33) Granted a firman to the East India Company in 1717 granting them duty-free trading rights for Bengal, strengthening their posts on the east coast. The firman or decree helped British East India company to import goods into Bengal without paying customs duty to the government.
Rafi ud-Darajat
رفیع اُد درجات		 Rafi ud-Darajat
رفیع اُد درجات		 30 November 1699 28 February – 6 June 1719

(0 years, 98 days)

 9 June 1719 (aged 19) Rise of Syed Brothers as power brokers.
Shah Jahan II
شاہ جہاں دوم		 Rafi ud-Daulah
شاہ جہاں دوم		 June 1696 6 June 1719 – 19 September 1719

(0 years, 105 days)

 19 September 1719 (aged 23) ----
Muhammad Shah
محمد شاہ		 Roshan Akhtar Bahadur
روشن اختر بہادر		 17 August 1702 27 September 1719 – 26 April 1748

(28 years, 212 days)

 26 April 1748 (aged 45) Got rid of the Syed Brothers. Fought a long war with the Marathas, losing Deccan and Malwa in the process. Suffered the invasion of Nader Shah of Persia in 1739. He was the last emperor to possess effective control over the empire.
Ahmad Shah Bahadur
احمد شاہ بہادر		 Ahmad Shah Bahadur
احمد شاہ بہادر		 23 December 1725 26 April 1748 – 2 June 1754 1 January 1775 (aged 49) Mughal forces defeated by the Marathas at the Battle of Sikandarabad.
Alamgir II
عالمگیر دوم		 Aziz-ud-din
عزیز اُلدین		 6 June 1699 2 June 1754 – 29 November 1759

(5 years, 180 days)

 29 November 1759 (aged 60) Domination of Vizier Imad-ul-Mulk.
Shah Jahan III
شاہ جہاں سوم		 Muhi-ul-millat
محی اُلملت		 1711 10 December 1759 – 10 October 1760 1772 (aged 60–61) Consolidation of the Nizam of Bengal, Bihar, and Odisha, during the Battle of Buxar. Hyder Ali becomes Sultan of Mysore in 1761.
Shah Alam II
شاہ عالم دوم		 Ali Gauhar
علی گوہر		 25 June 1728 24 December 1759 – 19 November 1806 (46 years, 330 days) 19 November 1806 (aged 78) The death of Tipu Sultan of Mysore in 1799.
Akbar Shah II
اکبر شاہ دوم		 Mirza Akbar
مرزا اکبر		 22 April 1760 19 November 1806 – 28 September 1837 28 September 1837 (aged 77) Titular figurehead under British protection.
Bahadur Shah II
بہادر شاہ دوم		 Abu Zafar Sirajuddin Muhammad Bahadur Shah Zafar
ابو ظفر سراج اُلدین محمد بہادر شاہ ظفر		 24 October 1775 28 September 1837 – 22 September 1857 (19 years, 359 days) 7 November 1862 (aged 87) Last Mughal Emperor. Deposed by the British and exiled to Burma after the Indian Rebellion of 1857.

Note:The Mughal Emperors practised polygamy. Besides their wives, they also had a number of concubines in their harem, who produced children. This makes it difficult to identify all the offspring of each emperor.[18]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Spear 1990, pp. 147–148
  2. ↑ Jeroen Duindam (2015), Dynasties: A Global History of Power, 1300–1800, page 105, Cambridge University Press
  3. ↑ Mohammada, Malika (January 1, 2007). The Foundations of the Composite Culture in India. Aakar Books. p. 300. ISBN 978-8-189-83318-3.
  4. ↑ Chandra, Satish. Medieval India: From Sultanate To The Mughals. p. 202.
  5. ↑ Richards, John F. (January 1, 2016). Johnson, Gordon; Bayly, C. A., eds. The Mughal Empire. The New Cambridge history of India: 1.5. I. The Mughals and their Contemporaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1, 190. ISBN 978-0521251198. doi:10.2277/0521251192.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Berndl, Klaus (2005). National Geographic visual history of the world. University of Michigan. pp. 318–320. ISBN 978-0521522915.
  7. ↑ Eraly, Abraham The Mughal Throne The Sage of India's Great Emperors, London: Phonenix, 2004 page 520.
  8. ↑ Eraly, Abraham The Mughal Throne The Sage of India's Great Emperors, London: Phonenix, 2004 page 191.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 D'souza, Rohan "Crisis before the Fall: Some Speculations on the Decline of the Ottomans, Safavids and Mughals" pages 3-30 from Social Scientist, Volume 30, Issue # 9/10, September–October 2002 page 21.
  10. ↑ D'souza, Rohan "Crisis before the Fall: Some Speculations on the Decline of the Ottomans, Safavids and Mughals" pages 3-30 from Social Scientist, Volume 30, Issue # 9/10, September–October 2002 page 22.
  11. ↑ D'souza, Rohan "Crisis before the Fall: Some Speculations on the Decline of the Ottomans, Safavids and Mughals" pages 3-30 from Social Scientist, Volume 30, Issue # 9/10, September–October 2002 pages 22-23.
  12. ↑ D'souza, Rohan "Crisis before the Fall: Some Speculations on the Decline of the Ottomans, Safavids and Mughals" pages 3-30 from Social Scientist, Volume 30, Issue # 9/10, September–October 2002 pages 21-22.
  13. 1 2 Bose, Sugata Bose; Ayesha Jalal (2004). Modern South Asia: History, Culture, Political Economy. Routledge. p. 41. ISBN 978-0203712535.
  14. ↑ Begum, Gulbadan (1902). The History of Humayun (Humayun-Nama). Royal Asiatic Society. pp. 237–9.
  15. ↑ Marc Jason Gilbert (2017). South Asia in World History. Oxford University Press. p. 79.
  16. ↑ Emperor of Hindustan Jahangir (2010). The Tuzuk-I-Jahangiri; Or, Memoirs of Jahangir Translated by Alexander Rogers Edited by Henry Beveridge. General Books LLC. p. 18. ISBN 978-1-152-49040-6.
  17. ↑ Mohammada, Malika (January 1, 2007). The Foundations of the Composite Culture in India. Aakar Books. p. 300. ISBN 978-8-189-83318-3.
  18. ↑ Dalrymple, William (2006). The Last Mughal. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. p. 44. ISBN 978-1-4088-0092-8.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.