Middle Magdalena Valley
Middle Magdalena Valley | |
---|---|
Valle Medio del Magdalena (VMM) | |
Petroleum production in Barrancabermeja | |
Location of the basin in Colombia | |
Etymology | Magdalena River |
Region | Andean natural region |
Country | Colombia |
State(s) | Boyacá, Cundinamarca, Santander, Tolima |
Cities | Barrancabermeja |
Characteristics | |
On/Offshore | Onshore |
Boundaries | Lower Magdalena Valley, Eastern Ranges, Upper Magdalena Valley, Central Ranges |
Part of | Andean foreland basins |
Area | 34,000 km2 (13,000 sq mi) |
Hydrology | |
River(s) | Magdalena |
Geology | |
Basin type | Intermontane foreland basin |
Orogeny | Andean |
Age | Jurassic-Holocene |
Stratigraphy | Stratigraphy |
Faults | Cantagallo, Infantas, La Salina |
Field(s) | La Cira-Infantas, Casabe, Yariguí-Cantagallo, Velásquez |
[1] |
The Middle Magdalena Valley, Middle Magdalena Basin or Middle Magdalena Valley Basin (Spanish: Valle Medio del Magdalena, VMM) is an intermontane basin, located in north-central Colombia between the Central and Eastern Ranges of the Andes.[2] The basin, covering an area of 34,000 square kilometres (13,000 sq mi), is situated in the departments of Santander, Boyacá, Cundinamarca and Tolima.
The basin is structurally bounded by the Palestina Fault to the west and the Bucaramanga Fault to the east.[2] The Middle Magdalena Valley hosts the middle course of the Magdalena River, the main river of Colombia, flowing from the Upper Magdalena Valley in the south to the Lower Magdalena Valley to the northwest.[3] The basin is elongated with an approximate width of 80 km (50 mi) and extends to the north for approximately 450 km (280 mi), where it terminates against the Santander Massif and Cesar Valley.[3] To the south, it terminates against the Upper Magdalena Valley, which consists of the Girardot and Neiva Sub-basins where the Central and Eastern Ranges converge.[4]
The basin is an important producer of oil in Colombia, with main fields Yariguí-Cantagallo, Moriche, Casabe, La Cira-Infantas, Velásquez, Santos, Palagua, Teca, Payoa and Lisama. The first three fields were among the twenty most producing fields of Colombia in 2016.[5] Until 2008, La Cira-Infantas and Casabe produced more than 730 million barrels (116×10 6 m3) and 289 million barrels (45.9×10 6 m3) respectively.[6] Main producing reservoirs are the Colorado, Mugrosa, Esmeraldas and La Paz Formations. Secondary reservoirs are Lisama and La Luna.[7]
Etymology
The name of the basin is taken from the middle course of the Magdalena River.
Basin development
During the Jurassic period, Pangea began to pull apart causing separation of North America from South America.[4] This rifting produced a subduction zone where the Nazca Plate was subducting to the east under the South American Plate. Part of this subducting plate was the Baudo-Island Arc separated from the South American continent by the marginal Colombian Sea.[3] The formation of the extensional back-arc basin associated with this subduction is the origin of the Middle Magdalena Basin in the late Jurassic.[3] Throughout the Cretaceous, the basin experienced thermal subsidence and five transgressive-regressive cycles as part of a marine megacycle.[3][4]
In the Paleocene, the rate of subduction increased causing the marginal Colombian Sea to close and the Baudo-Island Arc to collide with the South American continent.[3] This caused accretion of the Western Ranges and uplift of the Central Ranges transforming the back-arc basin into the pre-Andean foreland basin.[2][3][4] Around the time of the Oligocene, the Nazca plate increased its subduction to the east while the South American plate experienced a westward pull.[8] This caused the Andean orogeny in the Miocene and uplift of the Eastern Ranges in the Pliocene.[2] Now the Middle Magdalena basin is an intermontane basin situated between the uplifted Central and Eastern Ranges.[2]
Geologic structures
Faulting in the Middle Magdalena Basin is primarily reverse and thrust faulting.[4] Reverse faulting is high angle in the west and low angle in the eastern and central areas of the basin with normal faults also developing along the eastern margin. These thrust faults formed from thrusting from the eastern margin of the Central Ranges in the Eocene and the western margin of the Eastern Ranges in the Miocene.[4] The major thrust faults in the Middle Magdalena Basin include the Infantas Thrust,[4] La Salina Thrust,[9] and Cantagallo Thrust.[9] The basin is structurally bounded by the Palestina Fault, a dextral strike-slip fault system, in the west and the Bucaramanga-Santa Marta Fault, a sinistral strike-slip system, in the east.[2]
The major surface structures of the Middle Magdalena Basin are asymmetric synclines and basement cored anticlines, which formed as a result of thrusting from the Eastern and Central Ranges. The thrusting initiated faulting in the Pre-Mesozoic basement. The faults then pushed through the Jurassic layers to the Cretaceous ductile stratigraphy. The faults then form horizontally at the ductile-brittle transition for 10 to 20 kilometres (6.2 to 12.4 mi) before cutting through the upper brittle stratigraphy. The resulting structure is a syncline against the hanging wall of the fault next to an inclined anticline.[4] Key folds in the basin for hydrocarbon exploration include the Nuevo Mundo and Guaduas Synclines.[4] As suggested by the formation of the folds, both of these synclines are bounded by thrust faulting and anticlines.[4][10]
Stratigraphy
The stratigraphy of the Middle Magdalena Basin can be divided into three sequences separated by angular unconformities.[2] The basement of these sequences is Pre-Mesozoic metaclastics and sediments which are now exposed on the surface of the Central Cordillera as a result of its deformation and uplift.[4] This geologic basement is at most 15 kilometres (9.3 mi) deep, with faulted sections shifted up to approximately 10 kilometres (6.2 mi) in depth.[11] The unconformity that separates the basement from the first sequences indicates the approximate time rifting began.
First sequence
The first sequence was deposited in the Jurassic during the rifting which caused the initial formation of the basin. This Jurassic formation is called the Girón Group which consists of siltstones and rhyolitic tuffs.[2] During this period, the basin also experienced granitic plutonism along its western margins.[3][4] The Jurassic-Cretaceous angular unconformity, separating the first and second sequence, is representative of the post-rift boundary.[2]
Second sequence
The middle sequence represents the formations deposited throughout the Cretaceous and Early Paleocene.[2] The oldest formations in this sequence are the Tambor and Los Santos Formations. The conglomerates and sandstones indicate a continental to fluvial depositional environment.[2] In the Early Cretaceous, sea level began to rise and formed a shallow marine environment with siltstone and shale deposits of the Cumbre Formation.[2][3] Sea level continued to rise throughout the Middle Cretaceous when the Tablazo and Salto limestones and Simití shales were deposited.[4] The La Luna Formation represents a maximum flooding surface with deep marine deposits of limestone, chert, and shale.[2] Sea level then began to fall, returning the environment to shallow marine with deposition of the Umir Formation of shales and sandstones.[2] Finally, the Paleocene saw the deposition of the Lisama Formation, consisting of deltaic mudstones and sandstones.[2] This entire middle sequence indicates a marine megacycle consisting of five transgressive-regressive cycles.[4] The angular unconformity between the second and third sequences is a result of erosion from the accretion of the Western Ranges.[2]
Third sequence
The final sequence represents deposition from the Early Tertiary to present day.[2] Within this sequence, there are three subsequences that are the result of deformation and uplift of the Central and Eastern Ranges.[4] The first subsequence consists of the Chorro Group with the La Paz and Esmeraldas Formations and the Chuspas Group with the Mugrosa and Colorado Formations, all deposited during the Eocene to Oligocene.[4] These groups consist of fluvial sandstones, mudstones, siltstones, and shales, and are a result of erosion in the Central Ranges.[2][4] The second subsequence is the Miocene Real Group, consisting of fluvial sandstones and conglomerates.[2] Similar to the Real Group, the final subsequence is the Pliocene Mesa Formation, which is composed of sandstones and conglomerates deposited due to the Eastern Ranges uplift.[4] The uppermost sedimentary rocks of the basin are Pleistocene alluvial fan deposits, overlain by Holocene sediments of the Magdalena River.[4]
Petroleum resources
The primary reservoirs in the Middle Magdalena Basin are fluvial sandstones and conglomerates from the Churro and Chuspas Groups, which have 20 to 25% porosity and 0.5 to 1 D permeability.[4] The main source of hydrocarbons is the La Luna limestone, with a Total Organic Carbon (TOC) content of 3 to 4% and Type II marine kerogen, sealed by overlying Eocene shales.[4] There are three types of traps that house hydrocarbons in the Middle Magdalena Basin. The two structural traps are large anticlines in the center of the basin and smaller anticlines along the western margin. Both of these anticlinal traps produce from Tertiary sandstones within the Churro and Chuspas Groups. The third trap is stratigraphical with the La Luna limestone sealed by overlying shales.[4]
Primary fields
Field name | Producing formations | Lithologies | Structure |
---|---|---|---|
La Cira-Infantas | Colorado Fm., Mugrosa, La Paz | Sandstone, conglomerate, shale | Dome bounded by Infantas Thrust |
Casabe | Colorado Fm., Mugrosa Fm., La Paz Fm. | Claystone, sandstone | Fault bounded |
Yariguí-Cantagallo | La Paz Fm., Esmeraldas Fm. | Sandstone, claystone, shale | Fault bounded |
Velásquez | Tune, Avechucos | Claystone, siltstone, sandstone | Bounded by normal faults |
The table above shows some of the largest producing fields. Included is their producing formation, the lithologies of the formations, and the structure of the fields containing the hydrocarbons. The Tune and Avechucos Formations are equivalent to the Chorro and Chuspas Groups. Both the Casabe and Yariguí-Cantagallo Fields are located on the Magdalena River towards the western margin of the basin with the Yariguí-Cantagallo Field located approximately 40 kilometres (25 mi) north of the Casabe Field. Approximately 30 kilometres (19 mi) east of the Casabe Field is the oldest and largest La Cira-Infantas Field, situated towards the central to eastern margin of the basin. The Velásquez Field is located at the southern end of the basin near the Upper Magdalena Valley.[12]
Current exploration is focused in the southern area of the basin, where heavy amounts of faulting could house potential hydrocarbons. Aside from the La Luna limestone, other potential source rocks include Early Cretaceous sediments such as the Paja and Simití Formations, or the Late Cretaceous shales of the Umir Formation.[10]
Gallery
- VMM, major in South America
- Pipelines in Colombia
- Alto Magdalena pipeline
- Caño Limón-Coveñas pipeline
- Colombia pipeline
- Ocensa pipeline
- Barrancabermeja
- Barrancabermeja
- Santander
- La Dorada
- Puerto Boyacá
- Puerto Triunfo
- Pulí
See also
References
- ↑ Barrero et al., 2007, p.78
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Cubillos, Flavio. "Structural Analysis of an Area in the Northern Central Part of the Middle Magdalena Basin, Colombia". Colorado School of Mines. Retrieved 8 February 2015.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Cooper, M.A.; Addison, F.T.; Alvarez, R.; Coral, M.; Graham, R.H.; Hayward, A.B.; Howe, S.; Martinez, J.; Naar, J.; Penas, R.; Pulham, A.J.; Taborda, A. (October 1995). "Basin Development and Tectonic History of the Llanos Basin, Eastern Cordillera, and Middle Magdalena Valley, Colombia". AAPG Bulletin. 79 (10): 1421–1443. doi:10.1306/7834d9f4-1721-11d7-8645000102c1865d.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Schamel, Steven (1991). "Upper and Middle Magdalena Basins, Colombia". Active Margin Basins (Memoir). AAPG Special Volumes. pp. 281–301.
- ↑ (in Spanish) En 20 campos se produce el 66 % del petróleo del país
- ↑ Garcia González et al., 2009, p.185
- ↑ Garcia González et al., 2009, p.80
- ↑ Husson, Laurent; Conrad, Clinton P.; Faccenna, Claudio (2012). "Plate motions, Andean orogeny, and volcanism above the South Atlantic convection cell". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 317-318: 126–135. Bibcode:2012E&PSL.317..126H. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2011.11.040.
- 1 2 Moreno, Christopher J.; Horton, Brian K.; Caballero, Victor; Mora, Andrés; Parra, Mauricio; Sierra, Jairo (2011). "Depositional and provenance record of the Paleogene transition from foreland to hinterland basin evolution during Andean orogenesis, northern Middle Magdalena Valley Basin, Colombia". Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 32: 246–263. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2011.03.018.
- 1 2 3 Moretti, Isabelle; Rodríguez Charry, Germán; Mayorga Morales, Marcela; Mondrago, Juan Carlos (2010). "Integrated exploration workflow in the southern Middle Magdalena Valley (Colombia)". Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 29: 187–197. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2009.08.011.
- ↑ Sanchez, Carlos Javier (2011). "Cenozoic structural evolution of the eastern margin of the Middle Magdalena Valley basin, Colombia : integration of structural restorations, low-temperature thermochronology, and sandstone petrography". UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations.
- 1 2 Morales, Luis G. (1958). "General Geology and Oil Occurrences of the Middle Magdalena Valley, Colombia". In Weeks, Lewis G. SP 18: Habitat of Oil. Colombian Petroleum Industry. Tulsa, OK: AAPG. pp. 641–695.
Bibliography
- Barrero, Dario; Andrés Pardo; Carlos A. Vargas, and Juan F. Martínez. 2007. Colombian Sedimentary Basins: Nomenclature, Boundaries and Petroleum Geology, a New Proposal, 1–92. ANH.
- García González, Mario; Ricardo Mier Umaña; Luis Enrique Cruz Guevara, and Mauricio Vásquez. 2009. Informe Ejecutivo – evaluación del potencial hidrocarburífero de las cuencas colombianas, 1–219. Universidad Industrial de Santander.
Further reading
Basin classifications
- Bally, A.W., and S. Snelson. 1980. Realms of subsidence. Canadian Society for Petroleum Geology Memoir 6. 9–94.
- Kingston, D.R.; C.P. Dishroon, and P.A. Williams. 1983. Global Basin Classification System. AAPG Bulletin 67. 2175–2193. Accessed 2017-06-23.
- Klemme, H.D. 1980. Petroleum Basins – Classifications and Characteristics. Journal of Petroleum Geology 3. 187–207. Accessed 2017-06-23.
Colombia general
- Acosta Garay, Jorge, and Carlos E Ulloa Melo. 2001. Geología de la Plancha 208 Villeta – 1:100,000, 1–84. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-03-16.
- Acosta, Jorge E., and Carlos E. Ulloa. 2002. Mapa geológico del Departamento de Cundinamarca 1:250,000 – Memoria Explicativa, 1–108. INGEOMINAS.
- Garzón, José William. 2014. Recursos de CBM en Colombia – estimación del potencial, 1–31. ANH. Accessed 2017-06-09.
- Rodríguez Parra, Antonio José, and Orlando Solano Silva. 2000. Mapa Geológico del Departamento de Boyacá – 1:250,000 – Memoria explicativa, 1–120. INGEOMINAS.
Middle Magdalena Valley
- Ávila Cordero, Nicolay Alberto. 2010. Aplicación de datos de afloramiento en el modelo de facies de las formaciones Colorado y Mugrosa en el Campo Casabe Sur en la cuenca del Valle Medio del Magdalena (VMM), 1–143. Schlumberger & Universidad Industrial de Santander. Accessed 2017-06-09.
- Conde Gómez, Jairo; Luis Carlos Mantilla Figueroa; Julián Francisco Naranjo Vesga, and Nelson Sánchez Rueda. . Fluid migration history from analysis of filling fractures in a carbonate formation (Lower Cretaceous, Middle Magdalena Valley basin, Colombia). CT&F – Ciencia, Tecnología y Futuro 4. 21–36. Accessed 2017-06-09.
- Duarte González, Paola, and Luz Adriana Ortíz Orduz. 2016. Reconstrucción de la historia diagenética de las areniscas de la Formación Lisama en la cuenca del Valle Medio del Magdalena, 1–155. Universidad Industrial de Santander. Accessed 2017-06-09.
- Silva Cárdenas, Laura Natalia. 2016. Anáisis de la viabilidad técnico-financiera de un proceso de recobro químico álcali-surfactante-polímero (ASP) en el Campo La Cira-Infantas, 1–185. Fundación Universidad de América. Accessed 2017-06-09.
Maps
- Bernal Vargas, Luis Enrique, and Luis Carlos Mantilla Figueroa. 2006. Plancha 55 – El Banco – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Royero, José María; Jairo Clavijo; Hernando Mendoza; Gonzalo Barbosa; G. Vargas; R.E. Bernal, and P. Ferreira. 1994. Plancha 65 – Tamalameque – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Daconte, Rommel; Rosalba Salinas; José María Royero; Jairo Clavijo; Alfonso Arias; Luz S. Carvajal; Martín E. López; Leonidas Angarita, and Hernando Mendoza. 2009. Plancha 66 – Miraflores – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Clavijo, Jairo; Gonzalo Barbosa; J.A. Camacho; L.E. Bernal; José María Royero, and E. Castro. 1992. Plancha 75 – Aguachica – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Daconte, Rommel, and Rosalba Salinas. 2009. Plancha 76 – Ocaña – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Bernal Vargas, Luis Enrique, and Luis Carlos Mantilla Figueroa. 2006. Plancha 85 – Simití – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Vargas, Rodrigo, and Alfonso Arias. 2009. Plancha 86 – Ábrego – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Bernal Vargas, Luis Enrique, and Luis Carlos Mantilla Figueroa. 2006. Plancha 96 – Bocas del Rosario – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Vargas, Rodrigo, and Alfonso Arias. 2009. Plancha 97 – Cáchira – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Beltrán, Alejandro, and Claudia I. Quintero. 2008. Plancha 119 – Barrancabermeja – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Ward, Dwight E.; Richard Goldsmith; Andrés Jimeno; Jaime Cruz; Hernán Restrepo, and Eduardo Gómez. 2010. Plancha 120 – Bucaramanga – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Beltrán, Alejandro; José Alfredo Lancheros; Carolina López; Claudia Chaquea; Alejandro Patiño; Angela Guerra; Julio C. Cabrera; Claudia I. Quintero, and Simón Emilio Molano. 2008. Plancha 134 – Puerto Parra – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Beltrán, Alejandro; José Alfredo Lancheros; Carolina López; Claudia Chaquea; Alejandro Patiño; Angela Guerra; Julio C. Cabrera; Claudia I. Quintero, and Simón Emilio Molano. 2008. Plancha 149 – Puerto Serviez – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Beltrán, Alejandro; José Alfredo Lancheros; Carolina López; Claudia Chaquea; Alejandro Patiño; Angela Guerra; Julio C. Cabrera; Claudia I. Quintero, and Simón Emilio Molano. 2008. Plancha 150 – Cimitarra – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Ulloa, Carlos E, and Erasmo Rodríguez. 2009. Plancha 170 – Vélez – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Barrero L., Darío, and Carlos J. Vesga O. 2009. Plancha 188 – La Dorada – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Barrero, Darío, and Carlos J. Vesga. 2010. Plancha 207 – Honda – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Ulloa, Carlos, and Jorge Acosta. 1998. Plancha 208 – Villeta – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Barrero, Darío, and Carlos J. Vesga. 2010. Plancha 226 – Líbano – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Ulloa, Carlos E; Erasmo Rodríguez, and Jorge E. Acosta. 1998. Plancha 227 – La Mesa – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
- Acosta, Jorge E.; Rafael Guatame; Oscar Torres, and Frank Solano. 1999. Plancha 245 – Girardot – 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.