Mezerein
Names | |
---|---|
Other names
meserein; 12β-[(E,E)-5-Phenyl-2,4-pentadienoyloxy]daphnetoxin; daphnetoxin,12-[(1-oxo-5-phenyl-2,4-pentadienyl)oxy]-,12-beta(E,E)] | |
Identifiers | |
3D model (JSmol) |
|
1675867 | |
ChemSpider | |
ECHA InfoCard | 100.159.782 |
PubChem CID |
|
| |
| |
Properties | |
C38H38O10 | |
Molar mass | 654.71 g·mol−1 |
Melting point | 258.0 to 262.0 °C; 496.4 to 503.6 °F; 531.1 to 535.1 K |
Hazards | |
R-phrases (outdated) | R38, |
S-phrases (outdated) | S22,S23,S24, S25 |
NFPA 704 | |
Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa). | |
verify (what is ?) | |
Infobox references | |
Mezerein is a toxic diterpene ester found in the sap of Daphne mezereum and related plants. Plants of the genus Euphorbiaceae and Thymelaeaceae possess a wide variety of different phorbol esters, which share the capacity of mimicking diacylglycerol (DAG) and thus activating different isoforms of protein kinase C. Mezerein was first isolated in 1975. It has antileukemic properties in mice, but it is also defined as a weak promoter of skin cancers in the same species.[1] All parts of the plants contain an acrid and irritant sap that contains mezerein, thought to be the principal poison. The sap is especially prevalent in the bark and berries.
Mezerein is highly liposoluble and can cause vomiting, diarrhea and burning of the mouth. When a large dose is taken, there can be shivering, dilation of the pupils, damage to the oral passages and the intestine and even death. It can also irritate the skin, resulting in redness by slight damage of the veins. Because of causing this redness, the sap used to be applied as rouge.[1]
History and alternative uses
Mezerein can be found in Daphne mezereum.[1] This plant has been used to make dyes, treat rheumatism and indolent ulcers and as a cosmetic.[2][3] In homeopathy, the plant is used to treat primarily skin disorders but is also prescribed to treat anxiety related to digestive disorders and congestion.[4] Once the toxicity of the plant was discovered, these uses were abandoned. The toxicity also led to new uses. In extreme cases, the berries are used to commit suicide.[5]
Mezerein and Daphnetoxin
The toxins mezerein and daphnetoxin are both present in the Daphne genus. Daphnetoxin has a structure similar to Mezerein, with the phenyl-pentadienoyl component (top left of the Mezerein structural diagram) missing. They are both PKC activators but with a different selectivity: mezerein exhibits antileukemic properties while daphnetoxin does not.[6]
Mechanism of action
Mezerein is a second stage tumor promoter. According to the IPP model, tumorigenesis happens in three stages: initiation, promotion, and progression. In the first stage, initiation, a gene-mutation with change of function occurs. These mutations often occur in oncogenes or regulatory sequences. In the promotion stage, interaction with cellular signaling pathways takes place. This leads to growth advantage for initiated cells. In the last stage, progression, the tumor has become karyotypically instable: morphological changes in the normal chromosomal structure take place. This instability is caused by additional mutations. This leads to metastasis, hyperproliferation and loss of control by the cellular environment. There is an increased risk that the tumor cells will mutate other genes. Second stage tumor promoters like mezerein do not have the capacity to initiate tumors, but can create circumstances in which initiated cells are more susceptible to additional mutations or in which initiated cells have growth advantage.[7] They do not cause mutations themselves: promotion happens through interference with cellular signaling pathways.
Mezerein and other phorbol esters interact with protein kinase C (PKC). PKC controls the cell cycle, so chemicals that interact with it can have pro-proliferative or anti-proliferative effects. PKC is normally activated by diacyl glycerol (DAG). Upon DAG binding to PKC, PKC's affinity for Ca2+ and membrane phosphoinositols is increased. After binding Ca2+, the DAG-PKC-Ca2+ complex is attached to the plasma membrane by binding to membrane phosphoinositols. Now, PKC can phosphorylate various substrates, affecting the activity of several intracellular pathways that regulate cell cycle and apoptosis among others. PKC binding to the plasma membrane is reversible, because after a short period of time DAG is enzymatically degraded, causing PKC to udergo a conformational change and detach from the membrane and stop phosphorylating substrates.
Mezerein binds to PKC instead of DAG. It has a higher affinity for PKC than DAG does, and it cannot be degraded as easily as DAG. Therefore, when mezerein is bound, PKC remains in the active conformation much longer than it normally does. Furthermore, when mezerein has bound to PKC, PKC no longer requires Ca2+ for activation. This causes overstimulation of the pathways PKC initiates, leading to more cellular proliferation and less apoptosis.[8]
However, it seems that chronic activation of PKC leads to a negative effect, that is, apoptosis. Furthermore, high doses of mezerein have been used to terminally differentiate cancer cells, preventing their growth. Thus, mezerein can have both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic properties. This is an interesting case, because usually low doses cause a beneficial effect and high doses cause a toxic effect.[9][10]
Dose-response relationships
Mezerein has been shown to have two effects in chick embryo fibroblasts (CEF cells) that are associated with cancer. These effects are stimulation of 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) transport and causing of fibronectin loss. These effects are known to correlate with tumorigenicity in mice.[11] Both effects are mediated by PKC.[12][13] Interestingly, the ability of mezerein to decrease fibronectin levels is 46-fold lower than its ability to stimulate 2-DG transport. In related compounds, the difference between the two effects is usually 2- to 9-fold. This may have something to do with the weak tumorigenicity of mezerein.
The shape of the 2-DG transport dose-response curve has an optimum at a mezerein concentration of approximately 50 ng/mL. This is atypical, since a dose-response curve usually is S-shaped. The explanation for this behaviour is unknown. Possibly, at high concentrations, mezerein is converted by enzymes that have low affinity for it. That would lower the effective concentration and thus decrease the effects. In this picture, a NOAE-level can be observed between mezerein concentrations of 0 to approximately 0.09 ng/mL. The concentration that gives half-maximal effects is reached for a low concentration of mezerein: about 0.7 ng/mL.
The shape of the fibronectin-decrease curve is more usual, although not quite: the separate parts of the curve are all more or less linear, which is not the case in an S-shaped curve. In this case, a maximum dose can be determined: above concentrations of about 103 ng/mL the effect remains more or less stable. A NOAE-level is visible for concentrations of up to 1 ng/mL of mezerein. The concentration that gives half-maximal effect is approximately 90 ng/mL. The difference with the half-maximal concentration for 2-DG transport is remarkable. Mezerein causes a 46-fold lower effect for fibronectin decrease than for 2-DG stimulation, and apparently only causes this effect at high concentrations. This might also correlate with mezerein being a weak tumor promotor.
References
- 1 2 3 Robertson, John. "The Poison Garden". The Poison Garden website. Robbo Services Ltd. Retrieved 28 March 2013.
- ↑ Plants, Practical (12 September 2012). "Practical Plants". Daphne mezereum. Retrieved 28 March 2013.
- ↑ "Daphne mezereum - L.". Plants For A Future. Plants For A Future. 2012. Retrieved 28 March 2013.
- ↑ "Mezereum Homeopathy Information". Beneforce. Retrieved 28 March 2013.
- ↑ Dybedahl, Calle. "Suicide Faq". Retrieved 27 March 2013.
- ↑ Saraiva L.; Fresco, Paula; Pinto, Eugénia; Portugal, Helena; Gonçalves, Jorge (2001). "Differential Activation oby Daphnetoxin and Mezerein of PKC-Isotypes α, βI, δ and ζ". Planta Medica. Thieme. 67 (9): 787–790. PMID 11745011. doi:10.1055/s-2001-18843.
- ↑ Koenderink, Jan (2013). "Chemical carcinogenesis" (PDF). Retrieved 1 April 2013.
- ↑ Black A, Black J (2013). "Protein kinase C signaling and cell cycle regulation. Review". Front Immun. 3 (423). doi:10.3389/fimmu.2012.00423.
- ↑ Huynh KM, Soh JW, Dash R, Sarkar D, Fisher PB, Kang D (2010). "FOXM1 Expression Mediates Growth Suppression During Terminal Differentiation of HO-1 Human Metastatic Melanoma Cells". J. Cell. Physiol. 226 (1): 194–204. PMID 20658516. doi:10.1002/jcp.22326.
- ↑ Bögi K, Lorenzo PS, Szállázsi Z, Ács P, Wagner GS, Blumberg PM (1998). "Differential Selectivity of Ligands for the Cla and Clb Phorbol Ester Binding Domains of Protein Kinase Co: Possible Correlation with Tumor promoting Activity". Cancer Research. 58 (7): 1423–1428. PMID 9537243.
- ↑ Driedger, P & Blumberg, M. (1980). "Structure-Activity Relationships in Chick Embryo Fibroblasts for Phorbol-related Diterpene Esters Showing Anomalous Activities in Vivo". Cancer Research. American Association for Cancer Research. 40 (40): 339–346. PMID 7356517. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
- ↑ Tsuru; et al. (2002). "Role of PKC isoforms in glucose transport in 3T3-L1 adipocytes: insignificance of atypical PKC". American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism. American Physiological Society. 238 (2): 338–345. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00457.2001.
- ↑ Lee; Yu, MR; Song, JS; Ha, H; et al. (2004). "Reactive oxygen species amplify protein kinase C signaling in high glucose-induced fibronectin expression by human peritoneal mesothelial cells". Kidney International. 65 (4): 1170–1179. PMID 15086456. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00491.x.