Matrix decomposition

In the mathematical discipline of linear algebra, a matrix decomposition or matrix factorization is a factorization of a matrix into a product of matrices. There are many different matrix decompositions; each finds use among a particular class of problems.

Example

In numerical analysis, different decompositions are used to implement efficient matrix algorithms.

For instance, when solving a system of linear equations , the matrix A can be decomposed via the LU decomposition. The LU decomposition factorizes a matrix into a lower triangular matrix L and an upper triangular matrix U. The systems and require fewer additions and multiplications to solve, compared with the original system , though one might require significantly more digits in inexact arithmetic such as floating point.

Similarly, the QR decomposition expresses A as QR with Q an orthogonal matrix and R an upper triangular matrix. The system Q(Rx) = b is solved by Rx = QTb = c, and the system Rx = c is solved by 'back substitution'. The number of additions and multiplications required is about twice that of using the LU solver, but no more digits are required in inexact arithmetic because the QR decomposition is numerically stable.

LU decomposition

LU reduction

Block LU decomposition

Rank factorization

Cholesky decomposition

QR decomposition

RRQR factorization

Interpolative decomposition

Eigendecomposition

Jordan decomposition

The Jordan normal form and the Jordan–Chevalley decomposition

Schur decomposition

Real Schur decomposition

QZ decomposition

Takagi's factorization

Singular value decomposition

Other decompositions

Polar decomposition

Algebraic polar decomposition

Mostow's decomposition

Sinkhorn normal form

Sectoral decomposition[8]

Williamson's normal form[10]

Generalizations

There exist analogues of the SVD, QR, LU and Cholesky factorizations for quasimatrices and cmatrices or continuous matrices.[11] A ‘quasimatrix’ is, like a matrix, a rectangular scheme whose elements are indexed, but one discrete index is replaced by a continuous index. Likewise, a ‘cmatrix’, is continuous in both indices. As an example of a cmatrix, one can think of the kernel of an integral operator.

These factorizations are based on early work by Fredholm (1903), Hilbert (1904) and Schmidt (1907). For an account, and a translation to English of the seminal papers, see Stewart (2011).

See also

Notes

  1. Simon & Blume 1994 Chapter 7.
  2. Piziak, R.; Odell, P. L. (1 June 1999). "Full Rank Factorization of Matrices". Mathematics Magazine. 72 (3): 193. doi:10.2307/2690882.
  3. Choudhury & Horn 1987, pp. 219–225
  4. 1 2 3 Bhatia, Rajendra (2013-11-15). "The bipolar decomposition". Linear Algebra and its Applications. 439 (10): 3031–3037. doi:10.1016/j.laa.2013.09.006.
  5. Horn & merino 1995, pp. 43–92
  6. Mostow, G. D. (1955), Some new decomposition theorems for semi-simple groups, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 14, pp. 31–54
  7. Nielsen, Frank; Bhatia, Rajendra (2012). Matrix Information Geometry. Springer. p. 224. ISBN 9783642302329. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30232-9.
  8. 1 2 Zhang, Fuzhen (30 June 2014). "A matrix decomposition and its applications". Linear and Multilinear Algebra: 1–10. doi:10.1080/03081087.2014.933219.
  9. Drury, S.W. (November 2013). "Fischer determinantal inequalities and Highamʼs Conjecture". Linear Algebra and its Applications. 439 (10): 3129–3133. doi:10.1016/j.laa.2013.08.031.
  10. Idel, Martin; Soto Gaona, Sebastián; Wolf, Michael M. (2017-07-15). "Perturbation bounds for Williamson's symplectic normal form". Linear Algebra and its Applications. 525: 45–58. doi:10.1016/j.laa.2017.03.013.
  11. Townsend & Trefethen 2015

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.