Léon Walras

Léon Walras

Léon Walras
Born (1834-12-16)16 December 1834
Évreux, Upper Normandy, France
Died 5 January 1910(1910-01-05) (aged 75)
Clarens, now Montreux, Switzerland
Nationality French
Field Economics, marginalism
School or
tradition		 Lausanne School
Alma mater École des Mines de Paris
Influences Augustin Cournot
French Rationalism
Contributions Walras's law
General equilibrium

Marie-Esprit-Léon Walras (French: [valʁas];[1] 16 December 1834 – 5 January 1910) was a French mathematical economist and Georgist.[2] He formulated the marginal theory of value (independently of William Stanley Jevons and Carl Menger) and pioneered the development of general equilibrium theory.

Life and career

Théorie mathématique de la richesse sociale, 1883

Walras was the son of French economist Auguste Walras. His father was a school administrator and not a professional economist, yet his economic thinking had a profound effect on his son. He found the value of goods by setting their scarcity relative to human wants.

Walras enrolled in the École des Mines de Paris, but grew tired of engineering. He worked as a bank manager, journalist, romantic novelist and railway clerk before turning to economics.[3] Walras received an appointment as the professor of political economy at the University of Lausanne.

Walras also inherited his father's interest in social reform. Much like the Fabians, Walras called for the nationalization of land, believing that land's value would always increase and that rents from that land would be sufficient to support the nation without taxes.

Another of Walras's influences was Augustin Cournot, a former schoolmate of his father. Through Cournot, Walras came under the influence of French Rationalism and was introduced to the use of mathematics in economics.

As Professor of Political Economy at the University of Lausanne, Walras is credited with founding, under the direction of economist and sociologist Vilfredo Pareto, the Lausanne school of economics.[4]

Because most of Walras's publications were only available in French, many economists were unfamiliar with his work. This changed in 1965 with the publication of William Jaffé's English translation of Walras's Éléments d'économie politique pure.[5] Walras's work was also too mathematically complex for many contemporary readers of his time. On the other hand, it has a great insight into the market process under idealized conditions so it has been far more read in the modern era.

Marginalist theory

Although Walras came to be regarded as one of the three leaders of the marginalist revolution,[6] he was not familiar with the two other leading figures of marginalism, William Stanley Jevons and Carl Menger, and developed his theories independently.

General equilibrium theory

In 1874 and 1877 Walras published Éléments d'économie politique pure (1899, 4th ed.; 1926, éd. définitive), in English, Elements of Pure Economics (1954), trans. William Jaffé.

That work that led him to be considered the father of the general equilibrium theory. The problem that Walras set out to solve was one presented by A. A. Cournot, that even though it could be demonstrated that prices would equate supply and demand to clear individual markets, it was unclear that an equilibrium existed for all markets simultaneously.

Walras constructed his basic theory of general equilibrium by beginning with simple equations and then increasing the complexity in the next equations. He began with a two-person bartering system, then moved on to the derivation of downward-sloping consumer demands. Next he moved on to exchanges involving multiple parties, and finally ended with credit and money.

Walras created a system of simultaneous equations in an attempt to solve Cournot's problem "which supposedly Walras at first thought was complete merely because the number of equations equalled the number of unknowns."[7]

The crucial step in the argument was Walras's law which states that any particular market must be in equilibrium, if all other markets in an economy are also in equilibrium. Walras's law hinges on the mathematical notion that excess market demands (or, inversely, excess market supplies) must sum to zero. This means that, in an economy with n markets, it is sufficient to solve n-1 simultaneous equations for market clearing. Taking one good as the numéraire in terms of which prices are specified, the economy has n-1 prices that can be determined by the equation, so an equilibrium should exist. Although Walras set out the framework for thinking about the existence of equilibrium clearly and precisely his attempt to demonstrate existence by counting the number of equations and variables was severely flawed: it is easy to see that not all pairs of equations in two variables have solutions. A more rigorous version of the argument was developed independently by Lionel McKenzie and the pair Kenneth Arrow and Gérard Debreu in the 1950s.

Amoral definition of utility

Léon Walras (like all economists) provides an amoral definition of economic utility:

I state that things are useful as soon as they may serve whatever usage, as soon as they match whatever need and allow its fulfillment. Thus, there is here no point to deal with 'nuances' by way of which one classes, in the language of everyday conversation, utility beside what is pleasant and between the necessary and the superfluous. Necessary, useful, pleasant and superfluous, all of this is, for us, more or less useful. There is here as well no need to take into account the morality or immorality of the need that the useful things matches and permits to fulfill. Whether a substance is searched for by a doctor to heal an ill person, or by a assassin to poison his family, this is an important question from other points of view, albeit totally indifferent from ours. The substance is useful, for us, in both cases, and may well be more useful in the second case than in the first one.

In economic theories of value, the term "value" is unrelated to any notions of value used in ethics, they are homonyms.

Reception

In 1941 George Stigler[8] wrote about Walras:

There is no general history of economic thought in English which devotes more than passing reference to his work. … This sort of empty fame in English-speaking countries is of course attributable in large part to Walras's use of his mother tongue, French, and his depressing array of mathematical formulas.

What caused the U-turn of Walras's consideration in the US, was the influx of German-speaking scientists – the German version of the Éléments was published in 1881 – during Hitler's rule.

To Schumpeter:[9]

Walras is … greatest of all economists. His system of economic equilibrium, uniting, as it does, the quality of 'revolutionary' creativeness with the quality of classic synthesis, is the only work by an economist that will stand comparison with the achievements of theoretical physics.

Major works

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ H. K. Manmohan Singh, "Marie-Esprit-Léon Walras", Indian Economic Review, Vol. 4, No. 1 (February 1958), p. 6: "The final 'S' is to be sounded in the correct pronunciation of the name."
  2. ↑ Cirillo, Renato (Jan 1984). "Léon Walras and Social Justice". The American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 43 (1): 53–60. doi:10.1111/j.1536-7150.1984.tb02222.x. Retrieved 12 November 2013.
  3. ↑ Economyths (2010) by David Orrell, p. 54
  4. ↑ "Marie-Ésprit Léon Walras, 1834–1910". The New School, The History of Economic Thought Website. Archived from the original on January 6, 2011. Retrieved 2010-12-30.
  5. ↑ Walker, Donald A. (December 1981). "William Jaffé, Historian of Economic Thought, 1898–1980". The American Economic Review. 71 (5): 1012–19. JSTOR 1803482.
  6. ↑ Sandmo, Agnar (2011). Economics Evolving: A History of Economic Thought, Princeton University Press: Princeton, p. 190
  7. ↑ Boland, Lawrence (1992). The principles of economics: some lies my teachers told me. New York: Routledge. p. 53.
  8. ↑ Stigler, George, 1994 [1941], Production and Distribution Theories, New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, p. 222.
  9. ↑ Schumpeter, J. A., 1994 [1954], History of Economic Analysis, Oxford University Press, p. 795

^ « Je dis que les choses sont utiles dès qu'elles peuvent servir à un usage quelconque, dès qu'elles répondent à un besoin quelconque et en permettent la satisfaction. Ainsi, il n'y a pas à s'occuper ici des nuances par lesquelles on classe, dans le langage de la conversation courante, l'utilité à côté de l'agréable entre le nécessaire et le superflu. Nécessaire, utile, agréable et superflu, tout cela, pour nous, est plus ou moins utile. Il n'y a pas davantage à tenir compte ici de la moralité ou de l'immoralité du besoin auquel répond la chose utile et qu'elle permet de satisfaire. Qu'une substance soit recherchée par un médecin pour guérir un malade ou pour un assassin pour empoisonner sa famille, c'est une question très importante à d'autres points de vue, mais tout à fait indifférente au nôtre. La substance est utile, pour nous, dans les deux cas, et peut l'être plus dans le second que dans le premier. » Elements d'économie pure, ou théorie de la richesse sociale, 1874

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.