Lawbot

Lawbots are a broad class of customer-facing legal AI applications that are used to automate specific legal tasks, such as document automation and legal research.[1][2] Lawbots use various artificial intelligence techniques or other intelligent systems to limit humans' direct ongoing involvement in certain steps of a legal matter.[3][4] The user interfaces on lawbots vary from smart searches and step-by-step forms to chatbots.[5] Consumer and enterprise-facing lawbot solutions often do not require direct supervision from a legal professional.[6] Depending on the task, some client-facing solutions used at law firms operate under an attorney supervision.[7][8][9]

In the 2016 report, Deloitte estimated that more than 110,000 law jobs in just the United Kingdom alone could be gone within the next twenty years because of automation. That could result in the creation of more highly-skilled jobs and reduction of paralegal and temp positions. Deloitte's report asserts that "there is significant potential for high-skilled roles that involve repetitive processes to be automated by smart and self-learning algorithms".[10]

Access to law and justice

It has been widely estimated for at least the last generation that all the programs and resources devoted to ensuring access to justice address only 20% of the civil legal needs of low-income people in the United States.[11] Drawing on this experience, in late 2011, the U.S. government-funded Legal Services Corporation decided to convene a summit of leaders to explore how best to use technology in the access-to-justice community. The group adopted a mission for The Summit on the Use of Technology to Expand Access to Justice (Summit) consistent with the magnitude of the challenge: "to explore the potential of technology to move the United States toward providing some form of effective assistance to 100% of persons otherwise unable to afford an attorney for dealing with essential civil legal needs".[12].

In April 2017, joined by Microsoft and Pro Bono Net, the Legal Services Corporation (LSC) announced a pilot program to develop online, statewide legal portals to direct individuals with civil legal needs to the most appropriate forms of assistance. These portals will use cutting-edge, user-centered technology to help ensure that all people with civil legal needs can navigate their options and more easily access solutions and services available from legal aid, the courts, the private bar, and community partners.[13]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Goodman, Joanna. "Legal technology: the rise of the chatbots." Lawgazette.co.uk. The Law Society Gazette, 20 Mar. 2017. Web. 17 June 2017. <https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/features/legal-technology-the-rise-of-the-chatbots/5060310.article>.
  2. ↑ Fisher, Zeev, and Richard Tromans. "Legal Bots: A Partner’s Little Helper." Artificial Lawyer. N.p., 29 Aug. 2016. Web. 17 June 2017. <https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2016/08/29/legal-bots-a-partners-little-helper/>.
  3. ↑ Monahan, Gwynne. "How automation is changing the legal profession." Americanbar.org. American Bar Association, Oct. 2015. Web. 17 June 2017. <https://www.americanbar.org/publications/youraba/2015/october-2015/5-questions-on-automation.html>.
  4. ↑ See also Cohen, Mark A. "Automated And Agile: The New Paradigm For Legal Service." Forbes.com. Forbes, 30 Dec. 2016. Web. 17 June 2017. <https://www.forbes.com/sites/markcohen1/2016/12/30/automated-and-agile-the-new-paradigm-for-legal-service/#4c31b7c64e5d>.
  5. ↑ See Lawbots.info. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 June 2017. <https://www.lawbots.info/>.
  6. ↑ Ambrogi, Robert. "Latest legal victory has LegalZoom poised for growth." ABA Journal. American Bar Association, 1 Aug. 2014. Web. 17 June 2017. <http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/latest_legal_victory_has_legalzoom_poised_for_growth>.
  7. ↑ Cohen, Mark A. "Automated And Agile: The New Paradigm For Legal Service." Forbes.com. Forbes, 30 Dec. 2016. Web. 17 June 2017. <https://www.forbes.com/sites/markcohen1/2016/12/30/automated-and-agile-the-new-paradigm-for-legal-service/#4c31b7c64e5d>.
  8. ↑ Mammen, Christian, and Jason Lohr. "The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Law Practice." Legaltechnews.com. ALM, 8 Feb. 2017. Web. 17 June 2017. <http://www.legaltechnews.com/id=1202778650454/The-Ethics-of-Artificial-Intelligence-in-Law-Practice>.
  9. ↑ See e.g. CodeX Techindex. Stanford Law School, n.d. Web. 17 June 2017. <https://techindex.law.stanford.edu/>.
  10. ↑ "Developing legal talent: Stepping into the future law firm." Deloitte. N.p., Feb. 2016. Web. 17 June 2017. <https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pages/audit/articles/developing-legal-talent.html#>.
  11. ↑ Legal Services Corporation, Documenting the Justice Gap in America: The Current Unmet Civil Legal Needs of Low Income Americans, 2009, p.13.
  12. ↑ Legal Services Corporation, Report of The Summit on the Use of Technology to Expand Access to Justice, p. 1; December 2013.
  13. ↑ "Press Release: The Legal Services Corporation Announces Pilot States for Innovative Program to Increase Access to Justice." Lsc.gov. Legal Service Corporation (LSC), 24 Apr. 2017. Web. 17 June 2017. <http://www.lsc.gov/media-center/press-releases/2017/legal-services-corporation-announces-pilot-states-innovative>.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.