Joos–Weinberg equation

Quantum field theory
Feynman diagram
History
Background Field theory Electromagnetism Weak force Strong force Quantum mechanics Special relativity General relativity Gauge theory
Symmetries Symmetry in quantum mechanics C-symmetry P-symmetry T-symmetry Space translation symmetry Time translation symmetry Rotation symmetry Lorentz symmetry Poincaré symmetry Gauge symmetry Explicit symmetry breaking Spontaneous symmetry breaking Yang–Mills theory Noether charge Topological charge
Tools Anomaly Crossing Effective field theory Expectation value Faddeev–Popov ghosts Feynman diagram Lattice gauge theory LSZ reduction formula Partition function Propagator Quantization Regularization Renormalization Vacuum state Wick's theorem Wightman axioms
Equations Dirac equation Klein–Gordon equation Proca equations Wheeler–DeWitt equation Bargmann–Wigner equations
Standard Model Quantum electrodynamics Electroweak interaction Quantum chromodynamics Higgs mechanism
Incomplete theories Topological quantum field theory String theory Supersymmetry Technicolor Theory of everything Quantum gravity
Scientists C. D. Anderson P. W. Anderson Bethe Bjorken Bogoliubov Brout Callan Coleman DeWitt Dirac Dyson Englert Fermi Feynman Fierz Fock Fröhlich Glashow Gell-Mann Gross Guralnik Heisenberg Higgs Haag Hagen 't Hooft Jordan Kendall Kibble Lamb Landau Lee Majorana Mills Nambu Nishijima Parisi Polyakov Salam Schwinger Skyrme Sudarshan Tomonaga Veltman Ward Weinberg Weisskopf Weyl Wilczek Wilson Yang Yukawa

In relativistic quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, the Joos–Weinberg equation is a relativistic wave equations applicable to free particles of arbitrary spin $j$ , an integer for bosons ( $j = 1, 2, 3 ...$ ) or half-integer for fermions ( $j = 1 ⁄ 2, 3 ⁄ 2, 5 ⁄ 2 ...$ ). The solutions to the equations are wavefunctions, mathematically in the form of multi-component spinor fields. The spin quantum number is usually denoted by $s$ in quantum mechanics, however in this context $j$ is more typical in the literature (see references).

It is named after H. Joos and Steven Weinberg, found in the early 1960s.^[1]^[2]

Statement

Introducing a $2(2 j + 1) \times 2(2 j + 1)$ matrix;^[2]

\gamma ^{\mu _{1}\mu _{2}\cdots \mu _{2j}}

symmetric in any two tensor indices, which generalizes the gamma matrices in the Dirac equation,^[1]^[3] the equation is^[4]^[5]

[(i\hbar )^{2j}\gamma ^{\mu _{1}\mu _{2}\cdots \mu _{2j}}\partial _{\mu _{1}}\partial _{\mu _{2}}\cdots \partial _{\mu _{2j}}+(mc)^{2j}]\Psi =0

$[\gamma ^{\mu _{1}\mu _{2}\cdots \mu _{2j}}P_{\mu _{1}}P_{\mu _{2}}\cdots P_{\mu _{2j}}+(mc)^{2j}]\Psi =0$

(4)

Lorentz group structure

For the JW equations the representation of the Lorentz group is^[6]

D^{\mathrm {JW} }=D^{(j,0)}\oplus D^{(0,j)}.

This representation has definite spin $j$ . It turns out that a spin $j$ particle in this representation satisfy field equations too. These equations are very much like the Dirac equations. It is suitable when the symmetries of charge conjugation, time reversal symmetry, and parity are good.

The representations $D (j, 0)$ and $D (0, j)$ can each separately represent particles of spin $j$ . A state or quantum field in such a representation would satisfy no field equation except the Klein-Gordon equation.

Lorentz covariant tensor description of Weinberg–Joos states

The six-component spin-1 representation space,

D^{\mathrm {JW} }=D^{(1,0)}\oplus D^{(0,1)}

can be labeled by a pair of anti-symmetric Lorentz indexes, $[αβ]$ , meaning that it transforms as an antisymmetric Lorentz tensor of second rank $B_{[\alpha \beta ]},$ i.e.

B_{[\alpha \beta ]}\sim D^{(1,0)}\oplus D^{(0,1)}.

The j-fold Kronecker product $T [α 1 β 1]...[α j β j]$ of $B [αβ]$

$T_{[\alpha _{1}\beta _{1}]\cdots [\alpha _{j}\beta _{j}]}=B_{[\alpha _{1}\beta _{1}]}\otimes \cdots \otimes B_{[\alpha _{j}\beta _{j}]}=\bigotimes _{i=1}^{j}B_{[\alpha _{i}\beta _{i}]},$

(8A)

decomposes into a finite series of Lorentz-irreducible representation spaces according to

\bigotimes _{i=1}^{j}\left(D_{i}^{(1,0)}\oplus D_{i}^{(0,1)}\right)\to D^{(j,0)}\oplus D^{(0,j)}\oplus D^{(j,j)}\oplus \cdots \oplus D^{(j_{k},j_{l})}\oplus D^{(j_{l},j_{k})}\oplus \cdots \oplus D^{(0,0)},

and necessarily contains a $D^{(j,0)}\oplus D^{(0,j)}$ sector. This sector can instantly be identified by means of a momentum independent projector operator $P (j,0)$ , designed on the basis of $C (1)$ , one of the Casimir elements (invariants)^[7] of the Lie algebra of the Lorentz group, which are defined as,

${\begin{cases}\left[C^{(1)}\right]_{AB}={\frac {1}{4}}{\left[M^{\mu \nu }\right]_{A}}^{C}\left[M_{\mu \nu }\right]_{CB}\\[6pt]\left[C^{(2)}\right]_{AB}={\frac {1}{4}}\varepsilon _{\mu \nu \lambda \eta }{\left[M^{\mu \nu }\right]_{A}}^{C}\left[M^{\lambda \eta }\right]_{CB}\end{cases}}\qquad A,B,C=1,\ldots ,(2j_{1}+1)(2j_{2}+1)$

(8B)

where $M μν$ are constant $(2 j 1 +1)(2 j 2 +1) \times (2 j 1 +1)(2 j 2 +1)$ matrices defining the elements of the Lorentz algebra within the $D^{(j_{1},j_{2})}\oplus D^{(j_{2},j_{1})}$ representations. The Capital Latin letter labels indicate^[8] the finite dimensionality of the representation spaces under consideration which describe the internal angular momentum (spin) degrees of freedom.

The representation spaces $D^{(j_{1},j_{2})}\oplus D^{(j_{2},j_{1})}$ are eigenvectors to $C (1)$ in (8B) according to,

C^{(1)}\left[D^{(j_{1},j_{2})}\oplus D^{(j_{2},j_{1})}\right]=\left(j_{1}(j_{1}+1)+j_{2}(j_{2}+1)\right)\left[D^{(j_{1},j_{2})}\oplus D^{(j_{2},j_{1})}\right],

Here we define:

\lambda _{(j_{1},j_{2})}^{(1)}=j_{1}(j_{1}+1)+j_{2}(j_{2}+1),

to be the $C (1)$ eigenvalue of the $D^{(j_{1},j_{2})}\oplus D^{(j_{2},j_{1})}$ sector. Using this notation we define the projector operator, $P (j,0)$ in terms of $C (1)$ :^[8]

${\left[P^{(j,0)}\right]_{\left[\alpha _{1}\beta _{1}\right]\cdots \left[\alpha _{j}\beta _{j}\right]}}^{\left[\rho _{1}\sigma _{1}\right]\cdots \left[\rho _{j}\sigma _{j}\right]}={\left[\prod _{k,l}\left({\frac {C^{(1)}-\lambda _{(j_{k},j_{l})}^{(1)}}{\lambda _{(j,\,0)}^{(1)}-\lambda _{(j_{k},j_{l})}^{(1)}}}\right)\right]_{\left[\alpha _{1}\beta _{1}\right]\cdots \left[\alpha _{j}\beta _{j}\right]}}^{\left[\rho _{1}\sigma _{1}\right]\cdots \left[\rho _{j}\sigma _{j}\right]}.$

(8C)

Such projectors can be employed to search through $T [α 1 β 1]...[α j β j]$ for $D^{(j,0)}\oplus D^{(0,j)},$ and exclude all the rest. Relativistic second order wave equations for any j are then straightforwardly obtained in first identifying the $D^{(j,0)}\oplus D^{(0,j)}$ sector in $T [α 1 β 1]...[α j β j]$ in (8A) by means of the Lorentz projector in (8C) and then imposing on the result the mass shell condition.

This algorithm is free from auxiliary conditions. The scheme also extends to half-integer spins, $s=j+{\tfrac {1}{2}}$ in which case the Kronecker product of $T [α 1 β 1]...[α j β j]$ with the Dirac spinor,

D^{\left({\frac {1}{2}},0\right)}\oplus D^{\left(0,{\frac {1}{2}}\right)}

has to be considered. The choice of the totally antisymmetric Lorentz tensor of second rank, $B [α i β i]$ , in the above equation (8A) is only optional. It is possible to start with multiple Kronecker products of totally symmetric second rank Lorentz tensors, $A α i β i$ . The latter option should be of interest in theories where high-spin $D^{(j,0)}\oplus D^{(0,j)}$ Joos-Weinberg fields preferably couple to symmetric tensors, such as the metric tensor in gravity.

An Example^[8]

The

\left({\tfrac {3}{2}},0\right)\oplus \left(0,{\tfrac {3}{2}}\right)

transforming in the Lorenz tensor spinor of second rank,

\psi _{[\mu \nu ]}=[(1,0)\oplus (0,1)]\otimes \left[\left({\tfrac {1}{2}},0\right)\oplus \left(0,{\tfrac {1}{2}}\right)\right].

The Lorentz group generators within this representation space are denoted by $\left[M_{\mu \nu }^{ATS}\right]_{[\alpha \beta ][\gamma \delta ]},$ and given by:

\left[M_{\mu \nu }^{ATS}\right]_{[\alpha \beta ][\gamma \delta ]}=\left[M_{\mu \nu }^{AT}\right]_{[\alpha \beta ][\gamma \delta ]}{\mathbf {1} }^{S}+{\mathbf {1} }_{[\alpha \beta ][\gamma \delta ]}\,\,\left[M_{\mu \nu }^{S}\right],

\mathbf {1} _{[\alpha \beta ][\gamma \delta ]}={\tfrac {1}{2}}\left(g_{\alpha \gamma }g_{\beta \delta }-g_{\alpha \delta }g_{\beta \gamma }\right),

M_{\mu \nu }^{S}={\tfrac {1}{2}}\sigma _{\mu \nu }={\frac {i}{4}}[\gamma _{\mu },\gamma _{\nu }],

where $1 [αβ] [γδ]$ stands for the identity in this space, $1 S$ and $M S μν$ are the respective unit operator and the Lorentz algebra elements within the Dirac space, while $γ μ$ are the standard gamma matrices. The $[M AT μν] [αβ] [γδ]$ generators express in terms of the generators in the four-vector,

\left[M_{\mu \nu }^{V}\right]_{\alpha \beta }=i\left(g_{\alpha \mu }g_{\beta \nu }-g_{\alpha \nu }g_{\beta \mu }\right),

\left[M_{\mu \nu }^{AT}\right]_{[\alpha \beta ][\gamma \delta ]}=-2\cdot {\mathbf {1} _{[\alpha \beta ]}}^{[\kappa \sigma ]}{\left[M_{\mu \nu }^{V}\right]_{\sigma }}^{\rho }{\mathbf {1} }_{[\rho \kappa ][\gamma \delta ]}.

Then, the explicit expression for the Casimir invariant $C (1)$ in (8B) takes the form,

\left[C^{(1)}\right]_{[\alpha \beta ][\gamma \delta ]}=-{\frac {1}{8}}\left(\sigma _{\alpha \beta }\sigma _{\gamma \delta }-\sigma _{\gamma \delta }\sigma _{\alpha \beta }-22\cdot \mathbf {1} _{[\alpha \beta ][\gamma \delta ]}\right),

and the Lorentz projector on (3/2,0)⊕(0,3/2) is given by,

\left[P^{\left({\frac {3}{2}},0\right)}\right]_{[\alpha \beta ][\gamma \delta ]}={\frac {1}{8}}\left(\sigma _{\alpha \beta }\sigma _{\gamma \delta }+\sigma _{\gamma \delta }\sigma _{\alpha \beta }\right)-{\frac {1}{12}}\sigma _{\alpha \beta }\sigma _{\gamma \delta }.

In effect, the (3/2,0)⊕(0,3/2) degrees of freedom, denoted by

\left[w_{\pm }^{\left({\frac {3}{2}},0\right)}\left({\mathbf {p} },{\tfrac {3}{2}},\lambda \right)\right]^{[\gamma \delta ]}

are found to solve the following second order equation,

\left({\left[P^{\left({\frac {3}{2}},0\right)}\right]^{[\alpha \beta ]}}_{[\gamma \delta ]}p^{2}-m^{2}\cdot {{\mathbf {1} }^{[\alpha \beta ]}}_{[\gamma \delta ]}\right)\left[w_{\pm }^{\left({\frac {3}{2}},0\right)}\left({\mathbf {p} },{\tfrac {3}{2}},\lambda \right)\right]^{[\gamma \delta ]}=0.

Expressions for the solutions can be found in.^[8]

References

1 2 E.A. Jeffery (1978). "Component Minimization of the Bargman–Wigner wavefunction" (PDF). Australian Journal of Physics. Melbourne: CSIRO. 31: 137. Bibcode:1978AuJPh..31..137J. doi:10.1071/ph780137. NB: The convention for the four gradient in this article is $\partial μ = (\partial/\partial t, \nabla)$ , same as the Wikipedia article. Jeffery's conventions are different: $\partial μ = (- i \partial/\partial t, \nabla)$ . Also Jeffery uses collects the $x$ and $y$ components of the momentum operator: $p \pm = p 1 \pm ip 2 = p x \pm ip y$ . The components $p \pm$ are not to be confused with ladder operators; the factors of $\pm1, \pm i$ occur from the gamma matrices.
1 2 Weinberg, S. (1964). "Feynman Rules for Any spin" (PDF). Phys. Rev. 133 (5B): B1318–B1332. Bibcode:1964PhRv..133.1318W. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.133.B1318. ; Weinberg, S. (1964). "Feynman Rules for Any spin. II. Massless Particles" (PDF). Phys. Rev. 134 (4B): B882–B896. Bibcode:1964PhRv..134..882W. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.134.B882. ; Weinberg, S. (1969). "Feynman Rules for Any spin. III" (PDF). Phys. Rev. 181 (5): 1893–1899. Bibcode:1969PhRv..181.1893W. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.181.1893.
↑ Gábor Zsolt Tóth (2012). "Projection operator approach to the quantization of higher spin fields". arXiv:1209.5673 .
↑ V.V. Dvoeglazov (2003). "Generalizations of the Dirac Equation and the Modified Bargmann–Wigner Formalism". arXiv:hep-th/0208159 .
↑ D. Shay (1968). "A Lagrangian formulation of the Joos–Weinberg wave equations for spin-j particles". Il Nuovo Cimento A. 57 (2): 210–218. Bibcode:1968NCimA..57..210S. doi:10.1007/BF02891000.
↑ T. Jaroszewicz; P.S Kurzepa (1992). "Geometry of spacetime propagation of spinning particles". Annals of Physics. California, USA. 216 (2): 226–267. Bibcode:1992AnPhy.216..226J. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(92)90176-M.
↑ Y. S. Kim; Marilyn E. Noz (1986). Theory and applications of the Poincaré group. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel. ISBN 9789027721419.
1 2 3 4 E. G. Delgado Acosta; V. M. Banda Guzmán; M. Kirchbach (2015). "Bosonic and fermionic Weinberg-Joos (j,0) ⊕ (0,j) states of arbitrary spins as Lorentz tensors or tensor-spinors and second-order theory". The European Physical Journal A. 51 (3): 35. Bibcode:2015EPJA...51...35D. arXiv:1503.07230 . doi:10.1140/epja/i2015-15035-x.

V. V. Dvoeglazov (1993). "Lagrangian Formulation of the Joos–Weinberg's 2(2j+1)–theory and Its Connection with the Skew-Symmetric Tensor Description". International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics. 13 (4): 1650036. arXiv:hep-th/9305141 . doi:10.1142/S0219887816500365.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.