Jerald and Sandra Tanner

Jerald Dee Tanner (June 1, 1938 — October 1, 2006) was an American writer and researcher who, with his wife Sandra McGee Tanner (born January 14, 1941), was noted for publishing archival and evidential materials about the history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church). They are both ex-Mormons. The Tanners founded the Utah Lighthouse Ministry, whose stated mission is "to document problems with the claims of Mormonism and compare LDS doctrines with Christianity". Sandra Tanner continues to operate it.

The Tanners printed original versions of early Mormon writings and scripture in which they annotated and highlighted doctrinal changes, such as the rejection of Brigham Young's "Adam–God theory". They jointly published more than 40 books about many aspects of the Church, but primarily its history.

Biographies

Jerald Tanner was born in Provo, Utah, and was a fifth-generation Mormon. He studied at the University of Utah and received a degree from Salt Lake Trade Technical Institute. His great-great-grandfather, John Tanner, gave large donations to LDS founder Joseph Smith when the fledgling church was deeply in debt.

Like her husband, Sandra was a fifth-generation Mormon. She is a great-great-granddaughter of Brigham Young, the second president of the LDS church. Both families had longstanding ties to the Mormon community.

Soon after they were introduced, Tanner and Sandra began jointly researching the subject of Mormonism. Each had been raised in the LDS faith, but discovered that they each as a teenager had begun to question the church.

Jerald and Sandra Tanner were married in Mission Hills, California, on June 14, 1959. Soon afterward, both resigned from the LDS. In 1964, they began an outreach to Mormons at their house in Salt Lake City, which grew into Utah Lighthouse Ministry. They had two daughters and a son together. After 47 years of marriage, Jerald Tanner died in Salt Lake City on October 1, 2006, as a result of complications arising from Alzheimer's disease. He had retired a few months before his death.[1]

Publications

Joseph Smith Egyptian Papers

The Tanners have specialized in publishing original documents that would otherwise be inaccessible to the general public. For example, in 1966, they were the first to publish Joseph Smith's Egyptian Alphabet and Grammar (since called the "Joseph Smith Egyptian Papers"). Prior to their publication, few LDS followers knew about these documents.[2] The next year, Tanners' publication prompted discussions and debates about the content of the documents, which have continued for decades.

Joseph Smith said that, in addition to translating the golden plates, he translated the Book of Abraham papyri. These materials were thought to have been lost in the Great Chicago Fire. However, in 1966 scholars found ten fragments of the papyri in the archives of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. Subsequently, an additional fragment was located in the LDS Church Historian's Office. Both Mormon and non-Mormon Egyptologists agree that the Book of Abraham, as published by Joseph Smith, is not a translation of these papyri, and that the papyri were not written by the Biblical Abraham.


Rather, the papyri have been determined to be portions of Egyptian funerary texts, dating to about the first century BC.[2] The LDS Church disputes the Tanners' position stating in an Ensign article, "... some people have concluded that this Book of Breathings must be the text Joseph Smith used in his translation of the book of Abraham. However, there are some serious problems associated with this assumption. First of all, from paleographic and historical considerations, the Book of Breathings papyrus can reliably be dated to around A.D. 60-much too late for Abraham to have written it. Of course, it could be a copy-or a copy of a copy-of the original written by Abraham. However, a second problem arises when one compares the text of the book of Abraham with a translation of the Book of Breathings; they clearly are not the same..."

The Tanners contend that the Book of Abraham is a 19th-century work written only by Joseph Smith.

Other documents and books

The Tanners have also published photo-mechanical reproductions of texts such as complete sets of early-LDS periodicals, including Messenger and Advocate, Times and Seasons, and the Millennial Star. Also notable is a reproduction of the 1825 edition of Ethan Smith's View of the Hebrews. Their version contains the margin notes made by the Elder B. H. Roberts, who compared this text with the Book of Mormon at the request of an LDS leader. His report was initially kept secret, but it gradually was distributed within Mormon circles and was published posthumously as part of A Book of Mormon Study (also known as Studies of the Book of Mormon) and A Parallel. Again the LDS Church views the situation very differently than the Tanners, as statements made by individual member do not represent the official position of the Church, particularly when the source of such statements and hand written notes in the margin of a book and no one can substantiate who wrote said notes.

The Tanners have published compiled lists of changes to the text of the Book of Mormon and other texts used by the LDS church. They argue that the alterations are substantial and that the inconsistencies in the texts are evidence against LDS claims of their being divinely inspired. This is because of the Tanner's interpretation of Joseph Smith's claim the Book of Mormon was "the most correct book on the face of the earth ... and a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than by any other book."

The Tanners' best-known publication is Mormonism: Shadow or Reality?, originally published in 1963 as Mormonism: A Study of Mormon History and Doctrine, and reprinted five times since. Dean M. Helland of Oral Roberts University describes it as "the heavyweight of all books on Mormonism".[3] The Tanners question the character and integrity of the witnesses to the Book of Mormon; they discuss the different accounts that Joseph Smith gave of the First Vision. Their book includes copies of original LDS documents.

In 1999 the LDS Church sued the Tanners for internet linking from their website to the copyrighted Church Handbook of Instructions. The lawsuit was settled out of court before an appeals court could rule on what observers described as a potentially landmark case concerning internet linking.[4]

Criticism

Lawrence Foster, a non-Mormon historian of Mormon history, has offered a mixed assessment of the Tanners and their work. On the negative side, Foster has written that, until the Tanners "are prepared to abide by accepted standards of scholarly behavior and common courtesy, they can expect little sympathy from serious historians".[5] He criticized them for "a holier-than-thou stance, refusing to be fair in applying the same debate standard of absolute rectitude that they demand of Mormonism to their own actions, writings, and beliefs. ... The Tanners seem to be playing a skilful shell game in which the premises for judgment are conveniently shifted so that the conclusion is always the same—negative."[6]

On a more positive note, Foster says that some of the Tanners' "research and analysis ... would do credit to any professional historian".[7] He credits them with being "more than simply gadflies", saying their work has helped stimulate serious Mormon scholarship.[8]

Michael Quinn, a historian and former member of the LDS Church, takes issue with the Tanners' work. He noted that "although the most conscientious and honest researcher can overlook pertinent sources of information, the repeated omissions of evidence by the Tanners suggest an intentional avoidance of sources that modify or refute their caustic interpretation of Mormon history."[5]

Tanners challenge anti-Mormonism

On occasion, the Tanners have publicly challenged critics of Mormonism and earned praise from some LDS scholars. For instance, the historian Daniel C. Peterson, chairman of Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies (FARMS) at Brigham Young University, suggested the Tanners' willingness to debunk false documents regardless of their content was a sign of integrity:

"There are some anti-Mormons out there that I hold in contempt. They're demagogic. They spread hatred and strife and disharmony. I don't see the Tanners in that way."[9]

The Tanners were among the first public critics of the forger (and later, murderer) Mark Hofmann. Though Hofmann's "discoveries" of important Mormon documents appeared to bolster the Tanners' arguments, by early 1984 Jerald Tanner had concluded there was significant doubt as to the Salamander Letter's authenticity. He even went as far as to publish an attack on the Salamander Letter, shocking many scholars, historians and students.[10] By late 1984, Jerald Tanner questioned the authenticity of most if not all of Hofmann's "discoveries", based in large part on their undocumented provenance. Tanner was ultimately vindicated when Hofmann's "discoveries" were exposed as forgeries.

The Tanners have debunked what they characterize as misrepresentations of the LDS Church by Ed Decker, a Christian evangelist. They criticized his film The God Makers II[11] despite their involvement in his earlier film, The God Makers.

Selected publications

See also

References

  1. ↑ "Tribute to Jerald Tanner". Utah Lighthouse Ministry. October 7, 2006.
  2. 1 2 Larson, Charles M. (1992) [1985]. By his own hand upon papyrus (Revised ed.). Institute for Religious Research. OCLC 26140322.
  3. ↑ Dean M. Helland (1990). Meeting the Book of Mormon Challenge in Chile (Ph.D. thesis). Oral Roberts University. p. 58. Cited by Matthew Roper of Brigham Young University.
  4. ↑ Rivera, Ray (2000-12-01). "LDS Suit Nearing Settlement". The Salt Lake Tribune.
  5. 1 2 Foster, Lawrence (Summer 1984). "Career Apostates: Reflections on the Works of Jerald and Sandra Tanner". Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought. Vol. 17 no. 2.
  6. ↑ "Faith Without Works Is Dead". The Truth About 'The God Makers'. Foundation for Apologetic Information & Research (FAIR).
  7. ↑ Ash, Michael R. "The Impact of Mormon Critics on LDS Scholarship". Foundation for Apologetic Information & Research (FAIR)., presentation at the 2002 FAIR conference.
  8. ↑ Some scholars have also, at least in private, been very pleased that the Tanners have made available hard-to-find printed works from early LDS history... even those scholars who are most critical of the Tanners and their methods have profited, at least indirectly, because the Tanners' allegations have spurred them to begin their own investigations into vital and still incompletely understood topics.... Jerald and Sandra Tanner have functioned with regard to Mormonism in much the same way that Ralph Nader has functioned with regard to American business.... The Tanners have prodded the church to begin, however haltingly and imperfectly, to develop a more realistic sense of itself. I would imagine, for example, that much of the flowering of Mormon historical studies in the 1970s, which has helped to give at least some Mormons a richer and more vital knowledge of their own heritage, has been more than tangentially related to the desire of Latter-day Saint historians to prove the Tanners wrong by showing that a full and honest history of the Latter-day Saints can indeed be written. Much like the irritating grain of sand in the oyster, the result has been a pearl." Tanner, Jerald & Sandra. "Mormon FARMS: Battling The AntiMormonoids", Salt Lake City Messenger, May 1996 (Issue No. 90).
  9. ↑ Kristen Moulton (May 16, 1998). "Tanners are wellspring of documents". The Deseret News. Salt Lake City. Associated Press. p. E9.
  10. ↑ Schindler, Harold (15 February 1987). "First 'Hofmann' history-mystery". The Salt Lake Tribune.. Online reprint by utlm.org
  11. ↑ Tanner, Jerald & Sandra. (November 1993). "God Makers II Lawyer Threatens Tanners With Suit". Salt Lake City Messenger. No. 85.
  12. ↑ Mormonism—Shadow or Reality. Utah Lighthouse Ministr. 1992 [1964]. ISBN 99930-74-43-8.
  13. ↑ The Changing World of Mormonism. Moody Publishers. 1979. ISBN 0-8024-1234-3.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.