Hungarian State (1849)

Hungarian State
Magyar Álladalom
Unrecognised state
1849
Anthem
Himnusz
Hymn
Capital Buda
Capital-in-exile Debrecen
Languages Hungarian (official) · German · Romanian · Slovak · Croatian · Slovene · Serbian · Italian · Ruthenian
Religion Roman Catholicism · Calvinism · Lutheranism · Eastern Orthodoxy · Eastern Catholicism · Unitarianism · Judaism
Government Not specified1
Head of State
 •  1849 Lajos Kossuth2
 • 1849 Artúr Görgey3
Prime Minister
 • 1849 Bertalan Szemere
Legislature Diet
Historical era Revolutions of 1848
 •  Established 14 April 1849
 •  Military collapse 13 August 1849
Currency Krajcár
Preceded by 		Succeeded by
Kingdom of Hungary (1526–1867)
Kingdom of Hungary (1526–1867)
  • ^1 In order to avoid tensions between monarchist and republican factions, the question of the form of government was left undecided.
    ^2 as Governor-President
    ^3 as acting civil and military authority

The Hungarian State (Hungarian: Magyar Álladalom) was a short-lived state that existed for 4 months in the last phase of the Hungarian Revolution of 1848–49.

History

On 2 December 1848 Ferdinand V of Hungary abdicated in favour of his nephew Francis Joseph. On 7 December the Diet of Hungary formally refused to acknowledge the title of the new king, "as without the knowledge and consent of the diet no one could sit on the Hungarian throne" and called the nation to arms.[1] Constitutionally, in the Hungarian point of view, Ferdinand was still king of Hungary, and this gave to the revolt an excuse of legality. Actually, from this time until the collapse of the revolution, Lajos Kossuth was the de facto ruler of Hungary.[1]

The struggle opened with a series of Austrian successes. Prince Windischgrätz, who had received orders to quell the rebellion, began his advance on 15 December; opened up the way to the capital by the victory at Mór (on 30 December), and on 5 January 1849 the Imperial-Royal Army occupied Pest-Buda, while the Hungarian government and diet retired behind the Tisza and established themselves at Debrecen. A last attempt at reconciliation, made by the more moderate members of the diet in Windischgrätz’s camp at Bicske (on 3 January), had foundered on the uncompromising attitude of the Austrian commander, who demanded unconditional submission; whereupon the moderates, including Ferenc Deák and Lajos Batthyány, retired into private life, leaving Kossuth to carry on the struggle with the support of the enthusiastic extremists who constituted the rump of the diet at Debrecen. The question now was: how far the military would subordinate itself to the civil element of the national government. The first symptom of dissonance was a proclamation by the commander of the Upper Danube division, Artúr Görgey, from his camp at Vác (on 5 January) emphasizing the fact that the national defence was purely constitutional, and menacing all who might be led astray from this standpoint by republican aspirations. Immediately after this proclamation Görgey disappeared with his army among the hills of Upper Hungary, and, despite the difficulties of a phenomenally severe winter and the constant pursuit of vastly superior forces, fought his way down to the valley of Hernád – and safety. This masterly winter-campaign first revealed Görgey’s military genius, and the discipline of that terrible month of marching and counter-marching had hardened his recruits into veterans whom his country regarded with pride and his country’s enemies with respect. Unfortunately his success caused some jealousy in official quarters, and when, in the middle of February 1849, a commander-in-chief was appointed to carry out Kossuth’s plan of campaign, that vital appointment was given, not to the man who had made the army what it was, but to a foreigner, a Polish refugee, Count Henrik Dembinski, who, after fighting the bloody and indecisive battle of Kápolna (26–27 February 1849), was forced to retreat. Görgey was immediately appointed his successor, and the new generalissimo led the Honvéds from victory to victory. Ably supported by György Klapka and János Damjanich he pressed forward irresistibly. The battles of Szolnok (on 5 March), Isaszeg (on 6 April), Vác (on 10 April), and Nagysarló (on 19 April) were so many milestones in his triumphal progress. On 21 May 1849, Buda, the Hungarian capital was once more in the hands of the Hungarians.[1]

Meanwhile, the earlier events of the war had so altered the political situation that any idea which the diet at Debrecen had cherished of a compromise with Austria was destroyed. The capture of Pest-Buda had confirmed the Austrian court in its policy of unification, which after the victory of Kápolna they thought it safe to proclaim.[2] On 7 March the diet of Kremsier was dissolved, and immediately afterwards a proclamation was issued in the name of the emperor Francis Joseph establishing a united constitution for the whole empire, of which the Kingdom of Hungary, cut up into half a dozen administrative districts, was henceforth to be little more than the largest of several subject provinces. The news of this manifesto, arriving as it did simultaneously with that of Görgey’s successes, destroyed the last vestiges of a desire of the Hungarian revolutionists to compromise, and on 14 April 1849, on the motion of Kossuth, the diet proclaimed the independence of Hungary, declared the House of Habsburg as false and perjured, for ever excluded from the throne, and elected Lajos Kossuth Governor-President of the Hungarian State. This was an execrable blunder in the circumstances, and the results were fatal to the national cause. Neither the government nor the army could accommodate itself to the new situation. From henceforth the military and civil authorities, as represented by Kossuth and Görgey, were hopelessly out of sympathy with each other, and the breach widened until all effective co-operation became impossible.[3]

Meanwhile the humiliating defeats of the Imperial-Royal Army and the course of events in Hungary had compelled the court of Vienna to accept the assistance which the emperor Nicholas I of Russia had proffered in the loftiest spirit of the Holy Alliance. The Austro-Russian alliance was announced at the beginning of May, and before the end of the month the common plan of campaign had been arranged. The Austrian commander-in-chief, Count Haynau, was to attack Hungary from the west, the Russian, Prince Paskevich, from the north, gradually environing the kingdom, and then advancing to end the business by one decisive blow in the mid-Tisza counties. They had at their disposal 375,000 men, to which the Hungarians could only oppose 160,000. The Hungarians, too, were now more than ever divided among themselves, no plan of campaign had yet been drawn up, no commander-in-chief appointed to replace Görgey, whom Kossuth had deposed. Haynau’s first victories (20–28 June) put an end to their indecisions. On 2 July the Hungarian government abandoned Pest and transferred its capital first to Szeged and finally to Arad. The Imperial Russian Army was by this time well on its way to the Tisza, and the terrible girdle which was to throttle the liberties of Hungary was all but completed. Kossuth again appointed as commander-in-chief the brave but inefficient Dembinski, who was utterly routed at Temesvár (on 9 August) by Haynau. This was the last great battle of the War of Independence. The final catastrophe was now unavoidable. On 13 August 1849, Görgey, who had been appointed dictator by the panic-stricken government two days before, surrendered the remnant of his hardly pressed army to the Russian General Theodor von Rüdiger at Világos. The other army corps and all the fortresses followed his example, Fort Monostor in Komárom, heroically defended by György Klapka, being the last to capitulate (on 27 September). Kossuth and his associates, who had left Arad on 10 August, took refuge in Ottoman territory.[3] A period of harsh repression followed. Lajos Batthyány and about 100 others were executed, several society women were publicly whipped, and the government outlawed public gatherings, theater performances, display of the national colours, and wearing of national costumes and Kossuth-style beards.[4]

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 Phillips 1911, p. 917.
  2. ↑ Phillips 1911, pp. 917–918.
  3. 1 2 Phillips 1911, p. 918.
  4. ↑ Burant 2011.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.