Human rights abuses in Jammu and Kashmir

Human rights abuses in the Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir state are an ongoing issue. The abuses range from mass killings, enforced disappearances, torture, rape and sexual abuse to political repression and suppression of freedom of speech. The Indian Army, Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), Border Security Personnel (BSF) and various separatist militant groups[1][2] have been accused and held accountable for committing severe human rights abuses against Kashmiri civilians.[3][4][5]

Crimes by militants are said to be incomparable with the larger scale abuse by Indian state forces.[6] Some rights groups say close to 100,000 people have died since 1989[7] while the official figures from Indian sources state the estimates of number of civilians killed due to the insurgency in the range of 16,725 [8] to 47,000 civilians, in which 3,642 civilians were killed by security forces.[9][10][11][12] The Jammu and Kashmir Coalition of Civil Society organisation states that there have been over 70,000 killings, 8000 plus forced disappearances, mass torture and sexual violence, the majority committed by Indian armed forces, and that these cases have had zero prosecution in civilian courts.[13] India accuses the Pakistan Army for abusing human rights in Jammu and Kashmir by violating the ceasefire and continuing to kill Kashmiri civilians,[14][15][16][17][18] a claim which is totally rejected by Pakistan who blames Indian army for the violation of LoC.[19] Diplomatic cables obtained by WikiLeaks revealed that the ICRC had briefed US officials in Delhi in 2005 about the use of torture from 2002–2004 by security forces against hundreds of detainees suspected of being connected to or having information about militants.[20][21]

In a 1993 report, Human Rights Watch stated that Indian security forces "assaulted civilians during search operations, tortured and summarily executed detainees in custody and murdered civilians in reprisal attacks"; according to the report, militants had also targeted civilians, but to a lesser extent than security forces. Rape was regularly used as a means to "punish and humiliate" communities.[22] Scholar Seema Kazi says it is used as a weapon of war by the state against the population.[23] A 2010 US state department report stated that the Indian army in Jammu and Kashmir had carried out extrajudicial killings of civilians and suspected insurgents. The report also described killings and abuse being carried out by insurgents and separatists.[24] In 2010, statistics presented to the Indian government's Cabinet Committee on Security showed that for the first time since the 1980s, the number of civilian deaths attributed to the Indian forces was higher than those attributed to insurgents' actions.[25] The Indian Army claims that 97% of the reports about the human rights abuse have been found to be "fake or motivated" based on the investigation performed by the Army.[26] However, a report by the US State Department said, "Indian authorities use Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) to avoid holding its security forces responsible for the deaths of civilians in Jammu and Kashmir."[27]

Militant violence led by the Jammu Kashmir Liberation front has caused ethnic cleansing of several hundred thousands of Kashmiri Hindu Pandits, who before their exodus comprised an estimated 3% of the Kashmir valley's population.[28] According to Asia Watch, the militant organisations forced the Hindus residing in the Kashmir valley to flee and become refugees in Delhi and Jammu. There is controversy regarding whether the Pandits left due to fear of violence or were encouraged by the government to leave in order to undermine the support for militant movements.[29] It is claimed that Kashmiri militants have been assisted and supported by Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). The chief perpetrators were the Jammu & Kashmir Liberation Front and the Hizbul Mujahideen. Ethnic cleansing continued till a vast majority of the Kashmiri Pandits were evicted out of the valley after having suffered many acts of violence, including sexual assault on women, arson, torture and extortion of property.[3][28] Some of the separatist leaders in Kashmir reject these allegations. The Indian government is attempting to reinstate the displaced Pandits in Kashmir. The remnants of Kashmiri Pandits have been living in Jammu, but most of them believe that, until the violence ceases, returning to Kashmir is not an option.[30]

Indian Armed Forces

Thousands of Kashmiris have been reported to be killed by Indian security forces in custody, extrajudicial executions and enforced disappearances and these human right violations are said to be carried out by Indian security forces under total impunity.[31][32] Civilians including women and children have been killed in "reprisal" attacks by Indian security forces. International NGO's as well as the US State Department have documented human rights abuses including disappearances, torture and arbitrary executions carried out during India's counter-terrorism operations.[28]

United Nations has expressed serious concerns over large number of killings by Indian security forces.[33] Human Rights groups have also accused the Indian security forces of using child soldiers,[34] although the Indian government denies this allegation.[5][note 1] Torture, widely used by Indian security sources, whose severity is described as beyond comprehension by Amnesty International, has been responsible for the huge number of deaths in custody.[35]

The Telegraph, citing a WikiLeaks report, quotes the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) that Indian security forces were physically abusing detainees with beatings, electrocutions and sexual interference. These detainees weren't Islamic insurgents or Pakistani-backed insurgents but civilians, in contrast to India's continual allegations of Pakistani involvement. The detainees were "connected to or believed to have information about the insurgents". According to ICRC, 681 of the 1296 detainees whom it interviewed claimed torture. US officials have been quoted reporting "terrorism investigations and court cases tend to rely upon confessions, many of which are obtained under duress if not beatings, threats, or in some cases torture."[36]

Amnesty International accused security forces of exploiting the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) that enables them to "hold prisoners without trial". The group argues that the law, which allows security to detain individuals for as many as two years "without presenting charges, violating prisoners’ human rights".[37] The Army sources maintain that "any move to revoke AFSPA in Jammu and Kashmir would be detrimental to the security of the Valley and would provide a boost to the terrorists."[38]

Former Indian Army Chief General V. K. Singh rejected the accusations that the action was not taken in the cases of human rights violations by Army personnel. On 24 October 2010, he has said that 104 Army personnel had been punished in Jammu and Kashmir in this regard, including 39 officers. He also said that 95% of the allegations of human rights abuses against Indian Army were proved to be false, of which he remarked, had apparently been made with the "ulterior motive of maligning the armed forces". Going into details, he said: 'since 1994, 988 allegations against the Army personnel were received in Jammu and Kashmir. Out of these, 965 cases were investigated in which 940 were found to be untrue, accounting for 95.2%, leaving only 25 genuine allegations.'[39] However, according to Human Rights Watch, the military courts in India, in general, were proved to be incompetent to deal with cases of serious human rights abuses and were responsible in covering up evidence and protecting the involved officers.[40] Amnesty International in its report in 2015, titled “Denied”-Failures in Accountability in Jammu and Kashmir, says, "...with respect to investigations, an inquiry that is conducted by the same authority accused of the crime raises serious questions about the independence and impartiality of those proceedings”, adding that according to the international law, an independent authority that is not involved in the alleged violations has to investigate such crimes.[41]

In the later revelations on 24 September 2013 made by General V. K. Singh, he said that the state politicians of Jammu and Kashmir are funded by an Army secret service to keep the general public at calm and this activity is there since the partition.[42][43]

Indian Army

The soldiers of the 4th Rajputana Rifles of the Indian Army on 23 February 1991 launched a search operation in a village Kunan Poshpora, in the Kupwara district of Jammu and Kashmir and allegedly gang raped 53 women of all ages.[44]:490 Later, interviews of victims and eyewitnesses were documented into a short film Ocean of Tears which was prevented from being broadcast.[45][46] Nevertheless, the Indian committee that led a thorough investigation concluded that the allegations were "grossly exaggerated" and the Kunan rape story was "a massive hoax orchestrated by militant groups and their sympathisers and mentors in Kashmir and abroad as a part of sustained and cleverly contrived strategy of psychological warfare and as an entry point for re-inscribing Kashmir on the International Agenda as a Human rights issue."[47] However, Human Rights organisations including Human Rights Watch have reported that the number of raped women could be as high as 100.[48][49][50] The Indian Army has also harmed the health care system in the valley. Major hospitals in Kashmir have experienced crackdowns and army men have even entered the operation theatres in search of insurgents.[51]

Border Security Force

On 22 October 1993, the 13th Battalion of the Border Security Forces was accused of arbitrarily firing on a crowd and killing 37 civilians in Bijbehara[52][53] The number of reported dead and wounded vary by source. Amnesty International reported that at least 51 people died and 200 were wounded on that day.[54]

The Indian government conducted two official enquiries and the National Human Rights Commission of India (NHRC) conducted a third. In March 1994 the government indicted the Border Security Force (BSF) for firing into the crowd "without provocation" and charged 13 BSF officers with murder.[52] In another incident which took place at Handwara on 25 January 1990, 9 protesters were killed by the same unit.[55]

Central Reserve Police Force

During the Amarnath land transfer controversy more than 40 unarmed protesters were killed by the personnels of Central Reserve Police Force.[56][57] At least 300 were detained under Public Safety Act, including teenagers.[58] The same practice was again repeated by the personnels of the Central Reserve Police Force, during the 2010 Kashmir Unrest, which resulted in 112 deaths, including many teenager protesters at various incidents.[59]

Special Operations Group

The Special Operations Group was raised in 1994 for counter-terrorism. A volunteer force, mainly came for promotions and cash rewards, comprising police officers and policemen from the Jammu and Kashmir Police.[60] The group is accused of torture and costodial killings.[61] A Senior Superintendent of this group and his deputy are among the 11 personnels, who were convicted for a fake encounter, which killed a local carpenter, and was labelled as a millitant to get the promotions and rewards.[62][63]

Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958

In July 1990 Indian Armed Forces were given special powers under an Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) that gives protection to Indian Armed Forces personnel from being prosecuted. The law provides them a shield, when committing human rights violations and has been criticised by Human Rights Watch as being wrongly used by the forces.[64] This law is widely condemned by human rights groups.[65][66] United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Navanethem Pillay has urged India to repeal AFSPA and to investigate the disappearances in Kashmir.[67]

“All three special laws in force in the state assist the government in shielding the perpetrators of human rights violations from prosecution, and encourage them to act with impunity. Provisions of the Armed Forces (Jammu and Kashmir) Special Powers Act clearly contravene international human rights standards laid down in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as members of the UN Human Rights Committee have pointed out. One Committee member felt that provisions of the act – including immunity from prosecution – were highly dangerous and encouraged violations of the right to life“.
A clipping from a report published by the Amnesty International, 1995.[68]
According to the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA), in an area that is proclaimed as "disturbed", an officer of the armed forces has powers to:[69]
  • Fire upon or use other kinds of force even if it causes death, against the person who is acting against law or order in the disturbed area for the maintenance of public order, after giving such due warning.
  • Destroy any arms dump, prepared or fortified position or shelter or training camp from which armed attacks are made by the armed volunteers or armed gangs or absconders wanted for any offence
  • To arrest without a warrant anyone who has committed cognizable offences or is reasonably suspected of having done so and may use force if needed for the arrest.
  • To enter and search any premise in order to make such arrests, or to recover any person wrongfully restrained or any arms, ammunition or explosive substances and seize it.
  • Stop and search any vehicle or vessel reasonably suspected to be carrying such person or weapons.
  • Any person arrested and taken into custody under this Act shall be made over to the officer in charge of the nearest police station with the least possible delay, together with a report of the circumstances occasioning the arrest.
  • Army officers have legal immunity for their actions. There can be no prosecution, suit or any other legal proceeding against anyone acting under that law. Nor is the government's judgment on why an area is found to be disturbed subject to judicial review.
  • Protection of persons acting in good faith under this Act from prosecution, suit or other legal proceedings, except with the sanction of the Central Government, in exercise of the powers conferred by this Act.[69]

Massacres

The Indian Army is also accused of many massacres. Some of them include:

Gawakadal massacre: On 21 January 1990, 51 civilians were killed by CRPF troopers during protests against earlier raids in which wanton arrests and molestation of women were conducted by CRPF troops.[70]

Handwara massacre: On January 25, 1990, two BSF patrolling parties in Handwara indiscriminately fired at peaceful protesters and killed 25 people. Many people were injured.[71]

Zakoora and Tengpora massacre: Indian forces killed 33 protesters and injured 47 on 1 March 1990 at Zakoora Crossing and Tengpora Bypass Road in Srinagar. The killers were not punished.[72]

Hawal massacre: At the funeral of Mirwaiz Muhammad Farooq on May 21, 1990 over 60 civilians were killed by paramilitary forces and hundreds injured in the indiscriminate firing on the funeral procession.[73]

Sopore massacre: On 6 January 1993 Indian troops killed 55 civilians in the town of Sopore and set fire to many homes and buildings.[74]

Bijbehara massacre: On 22 October 1993 the Indian Army killed 51 civilians during protests over the siege of the Hazratbal Mosque. 25 of those killed were students None of the accused were punished.[75]

Kupwara massacre: On 27 January 1994 the Indian Army fired at and killed 27 civilians, mainly traders, in Kupwara district. Survivors say that the soldiers carried out the massacre to punish people for observing shutdown on January 26.[76]

Fake encounters

Hundreds of civilians including women and children have reportedly been extrajudicially executed by Indian security forces and the killings are concealed as fake encounters.[68] Despite government denial, Indian security officials have reportedly confessed to Human Rights Watch of the widespread occurrence of fake encounters and its encouragement for awards and promotions[77] According to a BBC interview with an anonymous security person, 'fake encounter' killings are those in which security personnel kill someone in cold blood while claiming that the casualty occurred in a gun battle. It also asserts that the security personnel are Kashmiris and "even surrendered militants".[78]

In 2010 three men were reported missing proceeding these missing reports 3 men claimed to be militants were killed in a staged gun battle the army also claimed they had found Pakistani currency among the dead. The major was subsequently suspended and a senior soldier transferred from his post.[79] In 2011, a Special Police Officer and an Indian Army Jawan were charged by the Kashmir police for murder of a civilian whom the duo had killed in an encounter claiming that he was a top Lashkar-e-Taiba militant.[80]

Disappearances

Indian security forces have been implicated in many reports for enforced disappearances of thousands of Kashmiris whereas the security forces deny having their information and/or custody. This is often in association with torture or extrajudicial killing. The extent of male disappearances has been so large that a new term "half-widows" has been created for their wives who end up with no information of their husbands' whereabouts. Human right activists estimate the number of disappeared to be over eight thousand, last seen in government detention.[68][77][81] The disappeared are believed to be dumped in thousands of mass graves across Kashmir.[82][83][84][85][86]

Mass graves

Mass graves have been identified all over Kashmir by human right activists believed to contain bodies of thousands of Kashmiris of enforced disappearances.[87][86] A State Human Rights Commission inquiry in 2011, has confirmed there are thousands of bullet-ridden bodies buried in unmarked graves in Jammu and Kashmir. Of the 2730 bodies uncovered in 4 of the 14 districts, 574 bodies were identified as missing locals in contrast to the Indian governments insistence that all the graves belong to foreign militants[87][88] According to deposition submitted by Parvez Imroz and his field workers in 2011, the total number of unmarked graves was more than 6,000.[89]

Extrajudicial killings by security personnel

In a 1994 report, Human Rights Watch described summary executions of detainees as a "hallmark" of counter-insurgency operations by Indian security forces in Kashmir. The report further stated that such extrajudicial killings were often administered within hours of arrest, and were carried out not as aberrations but as a "matter of policy".[90] In a 1995 report, Amnesty International stated that hundred of civilians had been victims of such killings, which were often claimed by officers as occurring during "encounters" or "cross-fire".[91]

Torture

Indian security forces and police have been accused of the systematic use of torture. US officials first showed concern regarding the widespread use of torture in 2007 where they presented evidence to Indian diplomats.[92][93][94]

In 2012, human rights lawyer Parvez Imroz and his field workers commenced the first statewide study of torture in Kashmir and his report concluded that torture in Kashmir is both endemic and systematic. The report suggests that one in six Kashmiris have faced torture. In Imroz's study sample of 50 villages, more than 2,000 extreme cases of torture were identified and documented, where he found that there were 50 centers run by the army and paramilitaries where torture is practised since 1989.[94]

Sexual violence

Though both security forces and militants are guilty of rape, according to scholar Seema Kazi and Jeffrey Kenney, rape by the former outstrips the latter in both scale and frequency.[95][96][97] Rape is said to have been used as a weapon of war against the Kashmiri population.[98][99][100] The frequent rape of Kashmiri Muslim women by Indian state security forces routinely goes unpunished.[101] According to a report by Human Rights Watch in 1993, the security forces use rape as a method of retaliation against Kashmiri civilians during reprisal attacks after militant ambushes.[100][102][103] Professor William Baker states that rape in Kashmir was not the result of a few undisciplined soldiers but an active strategy of the security forces to humiliate and intimidate the Kashmiri population.[104] Human rights groups state that 150 top officers, of the rank of major or above, have participated in torture as well as sexual violence and that the Indian government was covering up such acts.[92][93]

Suicide and psychological problems

Kashmiri women are reportedly said to be highly prone to suicidal tendencies due to the conflict-situations. The fear, stress, tension, and uncertainty prevailing in the state are said to be the main reasons for this. According a survey in 2012, 17,000 people, mostly women, have committed suicide during the past 20 years in the Valley.[105][106][107][108] According to a study by the Medecins Sans Frontieres,

“Women in Kashmir have suffered enormously since the separatist struggle became violent in 1989–90. Like the women in other conflict zones, they have been raped, tortured, maimed and killed. A few of them were even jailed for years together. Kashmiri women are among the worst sufferers of sexual violence in the world. Sexual violence has been routinely perpetrated on Kashmiri women, with 11.6% of respondents saying they were victims of sexual abuse.”[109]

Due to the impact of the conflict, a number of people in the valley suffer from various psychological problems like stress (normal or related to traumatic event), anxiety, mood and post-traumatic disorders. At the beginning of the insurgency there were 1200 patients in the valley‘s sole mental hospital. In 2016, the hospital is said to have been overcrowded with more than 100,000 patients.[106]

International response

A 2010 US State Department report cited extrajudicial killings by security forces in areas of conflict such as Kashmir as a major human rights problem in India.[24] The British parliament expressed its sadness and regret over the discovery of over 6,000 unmarked graves in Kashmir.[110] Christof Heyns, a special rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, has warned India that “all of these draconian laws had no place in a functioning democracy and should be scrapped.”[89][111]

Kashmiri insurgents

Further information: Rape by militants and Insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir

Reports from Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the International Commission of Jurists have confirmed Indian reports of systematic human rights violations by militants which claim Jammu and Kashmir to be part of Pakistan.[28] The Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF) has also been blamed of carrying out human rights violations, ranging from kidnapping to ethnic cleansing of several hundred thousand Hindu Kashmiri Pandits.[28] A 2010 US state department report blamed separatist insurgents in Kashmir and other parts of the country of committing several serious abuses, including the killing of security personnel as well as civilians, and of engaging in widespread torture, rape, beheadings, kidnapping, and extortion.[24]

Exodus of Kashmiri Pandits

The Hindu Kashmiri Pandits, a small but prominent group, had been a favoured section of the population during Dogra rule (1846–1947). About 20 per cent of whom had left the Kashmir valley by 1950 after the land reforms.[112] began to leave in much greater numbers in the 1990s. According to a number of authors, approximately 100,000 of the total Kashmiri Pandit population of 140,000 left the valley during that decade.[113] Other authors have suggested a higher figure for the exodus, ranging from the entire population of over 150,000,[114] to 190,000 of a total Pandit population of 200,000,[115] to a number as high as 253,000.[116] The US government has reported on the terrorist threat to Pandits still living in the Kashmir region.[117]

The alleged rigging of the 1987 Assembly Elections by the ruling party, National Conference,[118] saw the rise of an armed rebellion among Kashmiris associated with the Muslim United Front (MUF), a conglomerate of several Muslim political organisations opposed to National Conference. During the eruption of the armed rebellion, the insurgents are reported to have specifically targeted the Pandits, with torture and killings.[30] Reports by Indian government state that 219 Kashmiri Pandits were killed from 1989 to 2004 and around 140,000 migrated due to militancy while over 3000 stayed in the valley[119][120] The local organisation of Pandits in Kashmir, Kashmir Pandit Sangharsh Samiti after carrying out a survey in 2008 and 2009, claimed that 399 Kashmiri Pandits were killed by insurgents from 1990 to 2011 with 75% of them being killed during the first year of the Kashmiri insurgency.[121][122] Motilal Bhat, the president of the Pandit Hindu Welfare Society, rejected the figure of 399 killed and said that only 219 were killed.[123]

Kashmiri separatists believe that the then Governor Jagmohan encouraged the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits from the Valley by deliberately creating an atmosphere of paranoia. This, they claim, was done to "facilitate the counter-insurgency" operations and suppressing the anti-Indian uprising in Kashmir. The mass migration of Kashmiri Pandits from the Valley started on 19 January 1990 immediately preceding the first massacre of Kashmiri Muslims at Gawakadal. The Gawakadal massacre was followed by eight other major massacres and allegations of fake encounters, enforced disappearances, tortures and crackdown operations.[124].[123] Pro-India commentators have refuted this version as a false allegation "to hide the truth".

"Our people were killed. I saw a girl tortured with cigarette butts. Another man had his eyes pulled out and his body hung on a tree. The armed separatists used a chainsaw to cut our bodies into pieces. It wasn't just the killing but the way they tortured and killed."
 A crying old Kashmiri Hindu in refugee camps of Jammu told BBC news reporter[30]

The violence against Kashmiri Pandits was condemned and labelled as ethnic cleansing in a 2006 resolution passed by the United States Congress.[125] It stated that insurgents infiltrated the region in 1989 and began an ethnic cleansing campaign to convert Kashmir to a Muslim state. According to the same, the population of Kashmiri Pandits in Kashmir had declined from 400,000 in 1989 to 4,000 in 2011.[126] Mridu Rai says that such high numbers are not credible because the total Kashmiri Pandit population was only 160,000 to 170,000 at the time of their departure.[127]

The CIA has reported nearly 506,000 people, about half of which are Pandit Hindus are displaced due to the insurgency.[116][128] The United Nations Commission on Human Rights reports that there are roughly 1.5 million refugees from Indian-administered Kashmir, bulk of whom arrived in Pakistan-administered Kashmir and in Pakistan after the situation on the Indian side worsened in 1989 insurgency.[129]

Post-1989, Kashmiri Pandits and other minority groups in Jammu and Kashmir have been targets of jihadi elements which India alleges and blames on the Inter-Services Intelligence.[130] The Kashmiri Pandits, a community of Hindu Brahmins, then comprising 5% of the population of the state were the primary targets of Islamic militants, who also sought to also eliminate Kashmir's record of 5000 years of Hindu Sanskrit culture and scholarship as well as the tolerant indigenous multiculturalism referred to as Kashmiriyat.[131] As many as 170,000 Kashmiri Pandits are estimated to have fled the state due to being targeted and threatened by militant groups.[132] In 1989, attacks on Pandits escalated and Muslim paramilitaries selectively raped, tortured and killed Kashmiri Pandits, burnt their temples, idols and holy books. The Pandits fled en masse from the state after which their houses were burnt by militants and their artwork and sculptures were destroyed.[131]

In August 2000, militant groups killed 30 Hindu pilgrims in what became known as the 2000 Amarnath pilgrimage massacre.[133] The Indian government blamed the Lashkar-e-Taiba for the killings.[134][135] The BBC writes that "hundreds of Hindu labourers ha[d] been leaving the Kashmir Valley" in August 2000 due to targeted killings against Hindu workers.[133]

Other minorities such as Kashmiri Sikhs were also targeted. According to Chitkara, the killing of Sikhs near Anantnag in 2001, by the Jehadis was aimed at ethnic cleansing. Hindus have migrated from most of the Kashmir valley, Sikhs who form a very small percentage could be forced to migrate in the wake of such killings.[136] The Lashkar-e-Taiba has been blamed by Indian government for the Chittisinghpura massacre, which killed 36 Sikhs at the time of Clinton‘s visit to India.[137] Many local Sikh bodies refute this version and claim that the act was perpetrated by Indian armed forces with Hindu sectarian leanings.[138][139]

See also

Notes

  1. The Indian Government claims that even though children can join the armed forces, they are not formally enrolled into regular service before the age of 18. [..]In Jammu and Kashmir, the Indian army has armed local Village Defence Committees (VDC) – primarily Hindus – in Doda, Udhampur and the border districts to assist security forces in anti-insurgency operations.(HRW, Behind the Kashmir Conflict: Abuses by Indian Security Forces and Militant Groups Continue, op. cit.; Bukhari, S., "Militants kill 19 in Jammu", The Hindu, 21 July 1999.) So far more than 15,000 inhabitants, reportedly including teenagers, have joined these self-defence groups.("Jammu & Kashmir: the new vigilantes: despite lack of proper training and sophisticated arms, Village Defence Committees are proving invaluable in the fight against militancy in the state", India Today, 11 October 1999.)

    At the Asia-Pacific Conference on the Use of Children as Soldiers in May 2000 the representative of the state government of Jammu and Kashmir denied the involvement of children in VDCs. He acknowledged that there may have been some instances of young boys taking up arms to defend themselves under attack, but that there was "no policy to encourage young boys to become members of the Village Defence Committees."

References

Notes

  1. "Ten Killed In Kashmir Bomb Blast". abc NEWS. 10 August 2000. Retrieved 6 April 2015.
  2. "Four killed in Kashmir bomb blast". BBC. 20 July 2005. Retrieved 6 April 2015.
  3. 1 2 "23 years on, Kashmiri Pandits remain refugees in their own nation". Rediff News. Retrieved 15 September 2012.
  4. Hindwan, Sudhir (1998). Verma, Bharat, ed. "Policing the police". Indian Defence Review. Lancer. 13 (2): 95. ISSN 0970-2512.
  5. 1 2 Hartjen, Clayton; S. Priyadarsini (2011). The Global Victimization of Children: Problems and Solutions (2012 ed.). Springer. p. 106. ISBN 978-1-4614-2178-8.
  6. Kazi, Seema. Gender and Militarization in Kashmir. Oxford Islamic Studies Online. Oxford University Press. Sordid and gruesome as the militant record of violence against Kashmiri women and civilians is, it does not compare with the scale and depth of abuse by Indian State forces for which justice has yet to be done.
  7. "40,000 people killed in Kashmir: India". The Express Tribune.
  8. "Ultras kill 16,725 civilians in J&K in 24 years".
  9. "Kashmir Death Toll Hits 1,980 in 2003". The Washington Post. 21 November 2003.
  10. "India revises Kashmir death toll to 47,000". Reuters. 21 November 2008.
  11. "Kashmir fighting death toll hits 19". CNN. 23 March 2009. Retrieved 5 May 2010.
  12. "India revises Kashmir death toll to 47,000". Hindustan Times. Reuters. 21 November 2008.
  13. "Like Karadzic, Prosecute All Accused of HR Violations in Kashmir: JKCCS". Kashmir Observer.
  14. "Pakistan Violated Ceasefire In Jammu And Kashmir 685 Times In 8 Months". Huffington Post. 24 February 2015. Retrieved 6 April 2015.
  15. "Kashmir: India says eight civilians injured in Pakistan firing". BBC. 25 October 2013. Retrieved 6 April 2015.
  16. "1 killed, 9 injured as Pakistan trains guns on civilians". The Hindu. 3 January 2015. Retrieved 6 April 2015.
  17. "Pakistan continues to violate ceasefire, kills 5 civilians". Hindustan Times. 7 October 2014. Retrieved 6 April 2015.
  18. "Pakistan violates ceasefire yet again; 2 civilians killed in J&K". The Times of India. 23 August 2014. Retrieved 6 April 2015.
  19. "LoC violation: Indian forces target Harpal sector in Sialkot". Dunya News. 7 October 2014. Retrieved 10 May 2015.
  20. Burke, Jason (16 December 2010). "WikiLeaks cables: India accused of systematic use of torture in Kashmir". The Guardian. London.
  21. "US embassy cables: Red Cross clashes with India over treatment of detainees". The Guardian. 16 December 2010. Retrieved 6 December 2014.
  22. "Rape in Kashmir: A Crime of War" (PDF). Human Rights Watch. 1993. Retrieved 21 July 2012.
  23. Kazi, Seema. Between democracy and nation: Gender and militarisation in Kashmir. Diss. London School of Economics and Political Science (United Kingdom), 2008.
  24. 1 2 3 "2010 Human Rights Reports: India". State.gov. Retrieved 2012-03-10.
  25. "For the first time, security men kill more civilians than terrorists in J&K". Times of India. 7 September 2010. Retrieved 29 June 2012.
  26. "Why Kashmiris want the hated AFSPA to go". Daily News Analysis. Retrieved 15 September 2012.
  27. "India uses AFSPA to obscure civilian killings in Kashmir: US Report". www.greaterkashmir.com. Retrieved 2016-04-15.
  28. 1 2 3 4 5 Tolley, Howard B., Jr. (2009), "Kashmir", in David P Forsythe, Encyclopedia of Human Rights, Volume 3, New York: Oxford University Press, p. 306, ISBN 978-0-19-533402-9, retrieved 23 September 2012
  29. Asia Watch, Kashmir Under Siege Kashmir Under Siege (May 1991), pp.147–151
  30. 1 2 3 Paradise lost, BBC World Service, undated. Retrieved August 2016.
  31. "Document – India: Jammu/Kashmir government should implement human rights program | Amnesty International". Amnesty.org. 27 October 2002. Retrieved 2012-10-01.
  32. http://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/session13/IN/JS22_UPR_IND_S13_2012_JointSubmission22_E.pdf
  33. Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary and arbitrary executions, E/CN.4/1994/7, paragraph 327
  34. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (19 February 1997). "Refworld | Child Soldiers Global Report 2001 – India". UNHCR. Archived from the original on 16 April 2013. Retrieved 2013-02-23.
  35. https://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/ASA20/033/1995/en/28f7013b-f893-11dd-b378-7142bfbe1838/asa200331995en.pdf
  36. Allen, Nick (17 December 2010). "WikiLeaks: India 'systematically torturing civilians in Kashmir'". telegraph.co.uk. London: Telegraph Media Group Limited. Retrieved 11 March 2012.
  37. Huey, Caitlin (28 March 2011). "Amnesty International Cites Human Rights Abuse in Kashmir". Usnews.com. Retrieved 2012-10-01.
  38. "Army opposes Omar's plans to revoke AFSPA: Report - Times of India". The Times of India. Retrieved 2017-05-06.
  39. "104 armymen punished for human rights violations in JK: Gen VK Singh | Latest News & Updates at Daily News & Analysis". dna. 2010-10-24. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
  40. "Rape by Security Forces: The Pattern of Impunity". www.hrw.org. Retrieved 2017-05-01.
  41. Correspondent, Reader (2016-09-03). "96% complaints against army rejected by GoI under ‘colonial’ AFSPA: Amnesty". Kashmir Reader. Retrieved 2017-05-01.
  42. "Paying ministers nothing new in J&K, former Army chief Gen VK Singh". indiatimes.com. Retrieved 2013-10-11.
  43. "JK ministers on Army payroll: Gen Singh". greaterkashmir.com. Retrieved 2013-10-09.
  44. Manoj Joshi (January 1999). The Lost Rebellion. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-027846-0.
  45. Billal A. Jan (Director) (2012). Ocean of Tears (Excerpt) (Youtube). Jammu and Kashmir: PSBTIndia.
  46. "A documentary movie on Kashmir lands in controversy". english.samaylive.com. Retrieved 2014-05-17.
  47. Crisis and credibility: Press Council of India. Lancer International. December 1991. pp. 12. ISBN 8170621526.
  48. Abdul Majid Mattu (2002). Kashmir issue: a historical perspective. Ali Mohammad & Sons.
  49. Abdication of Responsibility: The Commonwealth and Human Rights. Human Rights Watch. 1991. pp. 13–20. ISBN 978-1-56432-047-6.
  50. James Goldston; Patricia Gossman (1991). Kashmir Under Siege: Human Rights in India. Human Rights Watch. pp. 88–91. ISBN 978-0-300-05614-3.
  51. The Human Rights Crisis in Kashmir: A Pattern of Impunity. Asia Watch Committee (U.S.), Human Rights Watch (Organization), Physicians for Human Rights (U.S.). Human Rights Watch, 1993. 1993. p. -115, 116. ISBN 9781564321046. Retrieved 11 September 2012.
  52. 1 2 Siddharth Varadarajan and Manoj Joshi, BSF record: Guilty are seldom punished The Times of India, India, 21 April 2002
  53. Shibli, Murtaza. "Bijbehara Massacre: 22 October 1993". Kashmir Affairs. Retrieved 11 September 2012.
  54. "Amnesty International Report 1994 – India". Amnesty International. 1 January 1994. Retrieved 11 September 2012.
  55. Goldston, James; Gossman, Patricia. Kashmir under siege: Human rights in India. Human Rights Watch. p. 59. ISBN 0300056141. Retrieved 11 September 2012.
  56. "BBC World Service – News – Non-violent protest in Kashmir". Bbc.co.uk. 14 October 2008. Retrieved 2010-09-11.
  57. "South Asia | Top Kashmir separatists detained". BBC News. 5 September 2008. Retrieved 2010-09-11.
  58. "After Uprising, 300 Protestors Arrested in Indian Kashmir". Newsblaze.com. 6 September 2008. Retrieved 2010-09-12.
  59. "India to free protesters in Kashmir peace move". Reuters. 30 September 2010. Retrieved 11 September 2012.
  60. "Special Operations Group". uttaranchalpolice.com. Retrieved 2012-09-11.
  61. "J&K: Sopore protests death of youth in police custody". indiatoday. Retrieved 2012-09-11.
  62. "Azad orders probe into Padroo’s killing". indianexpress. Retrieved 2012-09-11.
  63. "Ganderbal Fake encounter case". kashmirwatch. Archived from the original on 5 April 2013. Retrieved 11 September 2012.
  64. “Crisis in Kashmir” Council on Foreign Relations retrieved 11 September 2012
  65. "India: Security forces cannot claim immunity under AFSPA, must face trial for violations". Amnesty International. Retrieved 7 March 2012.
  66. "Mass Rape Survivors Still Wait for Justice in Kashmir". Thomson Reuters Foundation. Retrieved 7 March 2012.
  67. "India has duty to use global influence to speak out on human rights". United Nations News Service. Retrieved 7 March 2012.
  68. 1 2 3 https://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/ASA20/002/1995/en/42cb86f1-1ffe-4b90-a12d-c3f6f03b164d/asa200021995en.pdf
  69. 1 2 “(PDF) The Armed Forces (Jammu and Kashmir) Special Powers Act, 1990” Archived 1 October 2008 at the Wayback Machine. Indian Ministry of Law and Justice Published by the Authority of New Delhi
  70. Wani, Arif Shafi (20 January 2014). "Gaw Kadal massacre: Lone survivor recounts CRPF terror"Greater Kashmir.
  71. Ahmed, Mushtaq (2014-01-25). "January 25, 1990: When BSF gunned down 25 in Handwara". Kashmir Reader. Retrieved 2017-04-17.
  72. Aslam, Faheem (1 March 2009). "Zakura, Tengpora carnages haunt survivors". Greater Kashmir.
  73. Wani, Arif Shafi (20 May 2015). "Hawal massacre anniversary: 'It was hell; saw paramilitary men firing with machine guns on civilians’". Greater Kashmir.
  74. Muhammad, Ghulam (5 January 2016). "23-years on, Sopore massacre still haunts survivors". Greater Kashmir.
  75. "23 years of Bijbehara Massacre:‘Guilty yet to be punished’". Kashmir Observer. 2016-10-23. Retrieved 2017-04-17.
  76. Rafiq, Shahid (26 January 2016). "1994 Kupwara Massacre: 27 civilians shot dead for ‘observing shutdown on Jan 26’". Greater Kashmir.
  77. 1 2 Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch (16 February 2007). "India: Investigate All ‘Disappearances’ in Kashmir | Human Rights Watch". Hrw.org. Retrieved 2012-10-01.
  78. "South Asia | Kashmir's extra-judicial killings". BBC News. 8 March 2007. Retrieved 2012-03-10.
  79. Hussain, Altaf (28 June 2010). "BBC News – 'Fake killings' return to Kashmir". Bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 2012-03-10.
  80. "SPO, jawan arrested for fake encounter in Kashmir, victim 'civilian'". Deccan Chronicle. 8 August 2011. Archived from the original on 9 August 2011. Retrieved 21 July 2012.
  81. Human Rights Watch (11 September 2006). "Everyone Lives in Fear". Hrw.org. Retrieved 2012-10-01.
  82. "India | Human Rights Watch". Hrw.org. Retrieved 2012-10-01.
  83. Bukhari, Shujaat. "Mass graves found in North Kashmir containing 2,900 unmarked bodies". The Hindu. Retrieved 2017-04-22.
  84. "Kashmir graves: Human Rights Watch calls for inquiry". BBC News. 2011-08-25. Retrieved 2017-04-22.
  85. "India must investigate unidentified graves, News, Amnesty International Australia". 2008-08-30. Archived from the original on 2008-08-30. Retrieved 2017-04-22.
  86. 1 2 Buried Evidence: Unknown, Unmarked, and Mass Graves in Indian-Administered Kashmir A preliminary report; International People's Tribunal on Human Rights and Justice in Kashmir
  87. 1 2 "India: Investigate Unmarked Graves in Jammu and Kashmir | Human Rights Watch". Hrw.org. 24 August 2011. Retrieved 2012-10-01.
  88. LYDIA POLGREEN (22 August 2011). "Mass Graves Hold Thousands, Kashmir Inquiry Finds". NYTimes.
  89. 1 2 Scott-Clark, Cathy (9 July 2012). "The mass graves of Kashmir". The Guardian. London.
  90. "Continuing Repression in Kashmir" (PDF). Human Rights Watch. 1994. Retrieved 21 July 2012.
  91. "Summary of Human Rights Concerns in Jammu and Kashmir" (PDF). Amnesty International. 1995. Retrieved 21 July 2012.
  92. 1 2 Burke, Jason (16 December 2010). "WikiLeaks cables: India accused of systematic use of torture in Kashmir" via The Guardian.
  93. 1 2 Burke, Jason (11 September 2015). "Indian forces in Kashmir accused of human rights abuses cover-up" via The Guardian.
  94. 1 2 Scott-Clark, Cathy (2012-07-09). "The mass graves of Kashmir". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2017-04-17.
  95. Kazi, Seema. Gender and Militarization in Kashmir. Oxford Islamic Studies Online. Oxford University Press. Sordid and gruesome as the militant record of violence against Kashmiri women and civilians is, it does not compare with the scale and depth of abuse by Indian State forces for which justice has yet to be done.
  96. Kazi, Seema. "Rape, Impunity and Justice in Kashmir." Socio-Legal Rev. 10 (2014): 21-23.
  97. Jeffrey T. Kenney (15 August 2013). Islam in the Modern World. Routledge. pp. 156–. ISBN 978-1-135-00795-9. Studies on women's lives in contemporary Kashmir show how nationalist resistance has been heightened due to the sexual assaults, displacements and loss of life suffered by Kashmiri women, primarily at the hands of Indian security forces.
  98. "RAPE IN KASHMIR: A Crime of War" (PDF). Asia Watch & Physicians for Human Rights A Division of Human Rights Watch. 5 (9): 6.
  99. Sharon Frederick (2001). Rape: Weapon of Terror. World Scientific. pp. 101–. ISBN 978-981-4350-95-2.
  100. 1 2 Inger Skjelsbæk (2001) Sexual violence in times of war: A new challenge for peace operations?, International Peacekeeping, 8:2, 75-76.
  101. Rawwida Baksh; Wendy Harcourt (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Transnational Feminist Movements. Oxford University Press. pp. 683–. ISBN 978-0-19-994349-4.
  102. "Rape in Kashmir: A Crime of War" (PDF). Asia Watch & Physicians for Human Rights A Division of Human Rights Watch. 5 (9): 1.
  103. Littlewood, Roland. “Military Rape.” Anthropology Today, vol. 13, no. 2, 1997, pp. 7–16.
  104. Ranjan, Amit. "A Gender Critique of AFSPA: Security for Whom?." Social Change 45.3 (2015): 447.
  105. "17,000 Kashmiris committed suicide in two decades | KashmirWatch". KashmirWatch. 2012-10-19. Retrieved 2017-06-05.
  106. 1 2 Shahnawaz Mushtaq, Zeenat Fatima; Psychological Impact of Human Rights Violation on Kashmiri People; Indian Journal of Applied Research, October 2016.
  107. "Increasing cases of suicide in Kashmir". milligazzette. Retrieved 2012-09-12.
  108. "Kashmir women lead suicidal tendencies". kashmirdispatch. Retrieved 2012-09-11.
  109. "Oppression driving women in Kashmir to suicide". tehelka. Retrieved 2012-09-11.
  110. "Early day motion 2607 – KASHMIR GRAVES – UK Parliament". Parliament.uk. Retrieved 2012-03-10.
  111. http://www.wghr.org/pdf/Status%20report%2023.05%20version.pdf
  112. Zutshi 2003, p. 318 Quote: "Since a majority of the landlords were Hindu, the (land) reforms (of 1950) led to a mass exodus of Hindus from the state. ... The unsettled nature of Kashmir's accession to India, coupled with the threat of economic and social decline in the face of the land reforms, led to increasing insecurity among the Hindus in Jammu, and among Kashmiri Pandits, 20 per cent of whom had emigrated from the Valley by 1950."
  113. Bose 1997, p. 71, Rai 2004, p. 286, Metcalf & Metcalf 2006, p. 274 Quote: "The Hindu Pandits, a small but influential elite community who had secured a favourable position, first under the maharajas, and then under the successive Congress regimes, and proponents of a distinctive Kashmiri culture that linked them to India, felt under siege as the uprising gathered force. Of a population of some 140,000, perhaps 100,000 Pandits fled the state after 1990; their cause was quickly taken up by the Hindu right."
  114. Malik 2005, p. 318
  115. Madan 2008, p. 25
  116. 1 2 "CIA – The World Factbook". Cia.gov. Retrieved 2012-08-03.
  117. "India". Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, US Department of State. 6 March 2007. Retrieved 8 July 2011.
  118. "Kashmir's flawed elections". BBC News. 14 September 2002. Retrieved 3 August 2016.
  119. "Front Page : "219 Kashmiri Pandits killed by militants since 1989"". Chennai, India: The Hindu. 24 March 2010. Retrieved 2012-08-03.
  120. "219 Pandits Killed in J&K Since 1989". news.outlookindia.com. Retrieved 2012-08-03.
  121. Azad Essa. "Kashmiri Pandits: Why we never fled Kashmir – Kashmir: The forgotten conflict". Al Jazeera English. Retrieved 2012-08-03.
  122. GreaterKashmir.com (Greater Service) (20 June 2011). "399 Pandits killed since 1990 KPSS Lastupdate:- Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:30:00 GMT". Greaterkashmir.com. Retrieved 2012-05-24.
  123. 1 2 Bhat, Bilal (19 March 2015). "The Gaw Kadal Massacre and exodus of Kashmiri Pandits". The Milli Gazette.
  124. "LET TRUTH PREVAIL | JKCCS | Jammu Kashmir Coalition of Civil Society". www.jkccs.net. Retrieved 2016-08-03.
  125. Expressing the sense of Congress that the Government of the Republic of India and the State Government of Jammu and Kashmir should take immediate steps to remedy the situation of the Kashmiri Pandits and should act to ensure the physical, political, and economic security of this embattled community. HR Resolution 344, United States House of Representatives, 2006-02-15
  126. "Resolution on Kashmiri Pandits in US House". Retrieved 5 August 2011.
  127. Essa, Azad. "Kashmir: The Pandit question". www.aljazeera.com. Retrieved 2017-04-17.
  128. Ka Leo The Voice – Kashmir: The Predicament Archived 26 September 2011 at the Wayback Machine.
  129. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2 July 2008). "Refworld | Freedom in the World 2008 – Kashmir [Pakistan]". UNHCR. Retrieved 2010-02-02.
  130. B. Raman (19 January 2012). "Future of Kashmiri Pandits". Outlook. Retrieved 15 March 2012.
  131. 1 2 Knuth, Rebecca (2006). Burning books and leveling libraries: extremist violence and cultural destruction. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 77–79. ISBN 978-0-275-99007-7. Retrieved 15 March 2012.
  132. Leather, Kaia (2004). "Kashmiri Separatists : Origins, Competing Ideologies and Prospects for Resolution of the Conflict". In Columbus, Frank. Asian economic and political issues, Volume 10. Nova Publishers. p. 156. ISBN 978-1-59454-089-9. Retrieved 15 March 2012.
  133. 1 2 Amarnath pilgrimage resumes, BBC, 2000-08-04
  134. "Steve Coll: "Zawahiri's record suggests he will struggle" | FRONTLINE". PBS. 2 May 2011. Retrieved 2011-12-17.
  135. "Prime Minister Vajpayee's statement in Parliament regarding the recent massacre in Jammu & Kashmir". Embassy of India. August 4, 2000. Archived from the original on 2007-08-04.
  136. M. G. Chitkara (2002). Kashmir Shaivism: under siege. APH Publishing. p. 172. ISBN 978-81-7648-360-5. Retrieved 11 March 2012.
  137. Terrorism in India and the Global Jihad, Brookings Institution, archived from the original on 11 November 2011, LeT has been linked to numerous terrorist attacks in India including the massacre of dozens of Sikhs in Kashmir in March 2000 during President Clinton’s visit to India, bombings in New Delhi in 2005 and bombings in Varanasi and Mumbai in 2006,
  138. "‘Pathribal linked to Chatisinghpora’- Sikh bodies say 'clean chit' to accused Army-men a shame". Sikh Siyasat News. 2014-01-26. Retrieved 2016-08-03.
  139. "Chittisinghpura Massacre – SikhiWiki, free Sikh encyclopedia.". www.sikhiwiki.org. Retrieved 2016-08-03.

Sources

  • Bose, Sumantra (1997), The challenge in Kashmir: democracy, self-determination, and a just peace, New Delhi: Sage Publications, in association with The Book Review Literary Trust, ISBN 978-0-8039-9350-1 
  • Bose, Sumantra (2005), Kashmir: roots of conflict, paths to peace, Harvard University Press. Pp. 307, ISBN 978-0-674-01817-4 
  • Madan, T. N. (2008), "Kashmir, Kashmiris, Kashmiriyat: An Introductory Essay", in Rao, Aparna, The Valley of Kashmir: The Making and Unmaking of a Composite Culture?, Delhi: Manohar. Pp. xviii, 758, pp. 1–36, ISBN 978-81-7304-751-0 
  • Malik, Iffat (2005), Kashmir: Ethnic Conflict, International Dispute, Karachi and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. xxvi, 392, ISBN 0-19-579622-5 
  • Metcalf, Barbara; Metcalf, Thomas R. (2006), A Concise History of Modern India (Cambridge Concise Histories), Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. xxxiii, 372, ISBN 0-521-68225-8 .
  • Rai, Mridu (2004), Hindu Rulers, Muslim Subjects: Islam, Rights, and the History of Kashmir, Princeton University Press/Permanent Black. Pp. xii, 335., ISBN 81-7824-202-8 
  • Zutshi, Chitralekha (2003), Language of belonging: Islam, regional identity, and the making of Kashmir, Oxford University Press/Permanent Black. Pp. 359, ISBN 978-0-19-521939-5 
  • Zutshi, Chitraleka (2008), "Shrines, Political Authority, and Religious Identities in Late-Nineteenth and Early-Twentieth-century Kashmir", in Rao, Aparna, The Valley of Kashmir: The Making and Unmaking of a Composite Culture?, Delhi: Manohar. Pp. xviii, 758, pp. 235–258, ISBN 978-81-7304-751-0 
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.