How Theosophy Came to Me

How Theosophy Came to Me
Author C. W. Leadbeater
Country British India
Language English
Subject Theosophical Society
Publisher Theosophical Publishing House
Publication date
1930 (as a book)
Pages VII–162
OCLC 561055008
Text How Theosophy Came to Me online

How Theosophy Came to Me are autobiographical notes by C. W. Leadbeater, a member of the Theosophical Society Adyar; notes were published in a book form in 1930.[1]

From history of publication

A magazine The Australian Theosophist

A magazine publication of these notes came out in 1928–1929 in The Australian Theosophist.[note 1][note 2]. Since Leadbeater at the time was the chief editor of this magazine, on its cover the name of this publication was a little changed: How Theosophy Came to the Editor. One should say that Leadbeater has published a small part of his memoirs still in 1912.[4]

Major themes of the book

Spiritualism and theosophy

Leadbeater tells that he was interested always in a variety of anomal phenomena, and if in any newspaper report it was said about the appearance of ghosts or other curious events in the troubled house, he had been going immediately to this location. In a large number of instances it was a blank — "either there was no evidence worth mentioning, or the ghost declined to appear when he was wanted." Sometimes, however, there were signs of some success, and soon had collected "an amount of direct evidence" that could easily convince him, if would had needed, as he said, in order it was convincing.[5]

In attitude to spiritualism Leadbeater was initially set up quite skeptical, but still one day decided to conduct an experiment with his mother and a some small boy, who, as they later discovered, "was a powerful physical medium." They had a small round table with a leg in the middle and silk hat, which they put on the table, and then put their "hands upon its brim as prescribed." Surprisingly the hat gave "a gentle but decided half-turn on the polished surface of the table," and then began to spin so vigorously that it was difficult to keep on it their hands.[6]
Further, the author describes the events as follows:

"Here was my own familiar silk hat, which I had never before suspected of any occult qualities, suspending itself mysteriously in the air from the tips of our fingers, and, not content with that defiance of the laws of gravity on its own account, attaching a table to its crown and lifting that also! I looked down to the feet of the table; they were about six inches from the carpet, and no human foot was touching them or near them! I passed my own foot underneath, but there was certainly nothing there—nothing physically perceptible, at any rate."[7][8]

The author says that he was not himself thinking of the phenomenon "in the least as a manifestation from the dead," but only as the disclosure of some unknown new force.[9][note 3]

Leadbeater says that the first theosophical book that fell into his hands was Sinnett's The Occult World. Histories contained in this book were for him very interested, but "its real fascination lay in the glimpses which it gave of a wonderful system of philosophy and of a kind of inner science which really seemed to explain life rationally and to account for many phenomena," which Leadbeater has watched. He had written to Sinnett, who invited him to come to London in order to meet.[13][14][note 4] The author tells that when he had claimed of joining the Society, Sinnett "became very grave and opined that that would hardly do," since Leadbeater was a clergyman. He had asked him why the Society discriminates against members according to the cloth. Sinnett replied: "Well, you see, we are in the habit of discussing every subject and every belief from the beginning, without any preconceptions whatever; and I am afraid that at our meetings you would be likely to hear a great deal that would shock you profoundly."[16] But most members of the Council of the London Lodge approved the joining of Leadbeater. He was joined into the Theosophical Society together with professor Crookes and his wife. On that day at the Lodge meeting "have been some two hundred people present," including such as professor Myers, Stainton Moses and others.[17][note 5]

Blavatsky

In a section I Meet Our Founder Leadbeater describes the "triumphant" appearance of Blavatsky at a meeting of the London Lodge of the British Theosophical Society, where he saw her for the first time.[note 6]

"Suddenly and sharply the door opposite to us opened, and a stout lady in black came quickly in and seated herself at the outer end of our bench. She sat listening to the wrangling on the platform for a few minutes, and then began to exhibit distinct signs of impatience. As there seemed to be no improvement in sight, she then jumped up from her seat, shouted in a tone of military command the one word 'Mohini!'[note 7] and then walked straight out of the door into the passage. The stately and dignified Mohini came rushing down that long room at his highest speed, and as soon as he reached the passage threw himself incontinently flat on his face on the floor at the feet of the lady in black. Many people arose in confusion, not knowing what was happening; but a moment later Mr. Sinnett himself also came running to the door, went out and exchanged a few words, and then, re-entering the room, he stood up on the end of our bench and spoke in a ringing voice the fateful words: 'Let me introduce to the London Lodge as a whole—Madame Blavatsky!' The scene was indescribable; the members, wildly delighted and yet half-awed at the same time, clustered round our great Founder, some kissing her hand, several kneeling before her, and two or three weeping hysterically."[20][note 8]

According to the author, the impression which Blavatsky made "was indescribable." She was looking straight through man, and obviously saw everything that was in one, and not everyone liked it. Sometimes Leadbeater heard from her very unpleasant revelations about those with whom she spoke. He's writing: "Prodigious force was the first impression, and perhaps courage, outspokenness, and straightforwardness were the second."[21]

Leadbeater writes that Blavatsky was the best interlocutor he had ever met: "She had the most wonderful gift for repartee; she had it almost to excess, perhaps." She also had knowledge of all sorts of things that relate to very different directions. She always had something to say, and it was never empty talk. She traveled a lot, and mostly on little-known places, and did not forget anything. She has been remembering even the most insignificant cases that had happened to her. She was a wonderful storyteller, who knew how to give a good story and make the right impression. "Whatever else she may have been, she was never commonplace. She always had something new, striking, interesting, unusual to tell us."[22][23]

In connection with the accusations of Blavatsky's enemies in her alleged fraud, cheating, forgery, Leadbeater writes: "The very idea of deception of any sort in connection with Madame Blavatsky is unthinkable to anyone who knew her... Her absolute genuineness was one of the most prominent features of her marvellously complex character."[22][24]

Letters from Kuthumi

The author tells that during the study of spiritualism his greatest confidant was medium Eglinton. On one of the spiritualistic séances Eglinton's spirit guide "Ernest" agreed to take Leadbiter's letter in order to transmit it to the Master Kuthumi. In this letter the author "with all reverence" wrote that ever since he had first heard of theosophy his one desire had been to place himself under Master as a chela (pupil).[13][25][note 9] He also wrote about his current circumstances and has asked, has a pupil need to be in India within seven years of probation.[13][28]

The response from the Master Kuthumi has arrived a few months.[note 10] The mahatma said that to be in India for seven years of probation isn't necessary—a chela can pass them anywhere. He offered to work for a few months at Adyar to see, may Leadbeater to be as a servant of the headquarters, and added a significant remark: "He who would shorten the years of probation has to make sacrifices for theosophy."[29][30][note 11]
The letter was ended with the following words:

"You ask me — 'what rules I must observe during this time of probation, and how soon I might venture to hope that it could begin'. I answer: you have the making of your own future, in your own hands as shown above, and every day you may be weaving its woof. If I were to demand that you should do one thing or the other, instead of simply advising, I would be responsible for every effect that might flow from the step and you acquire but a secondary merit. Think, and you will see that this is true. So cast the lot yourself into the lap of Justice, never fearing but that its response will be absolutely true.

Chelaship is an educational as well as probationary stage and the chela alone can determine whether it shall end in adeptship or failure. Chelas from a mistaken idea of our system too often watch and wait for orders, wasting precious time which should be taken up with personal effort. Our cause needs missionaries, devotees, agents, even martyrs perhaps. But it cannot demand of any man to make himself either. So now choose and grasp your own destiny, and may our Lord's the Tathâgata's memory aid you to decide for the best."[29][31]

After reading the letter, Leadbeater hurried back to London, not doubting his decision to devote his life to the service for the Masters. He hoped to send his answer with the help of Blavatsky. At first she refused to read the letter of the mahatma, saying that such cases are purely private, but as a result of Leadbeater's insistence, she finally read and asked him what answer he had decided to give. He said he wanted to quit his priesthood career and go to India, fully dedicating himself to a serving the Masters. Blavatsky assured him that, because of her constant connection with the mahatma, he already knows about Leadbeater's decision, and will give his answer in the near time. She warned that he need to stay close to her until he get an answer.[29][32][note 12] The author tells:

"She (Blavatsky) was talking brilliantly to those who were present, and rolling one of her eternal cigarettes, when suddenly her right hand was jerked out towards the fire in a very peculiar fashion, and lay palm upwards. She looked down at it in surprise, as I did myself, for I was standing close to her, leaning with an elbow on the mantel-piece: and several of us saw quite clearly a sort of whitish mist form in the palm of her hand and then condense into a piece of folded paper, which she at once handed to me, saying: 'There is your answer'."[29][33]

It was a very short note, and read it as follows:

"Since your intuition led you in the right direction and made you understand that it was my desire you should go to Adyar immediately, I may say more. The sooner you go the better. Do not lose one day more than you can help. Sail on the 5th if possible. Join Upasika[note 13] at Alexandria. Let no one know that you are going, and may the blessing of our Lord and my poor blessing shield you from every evil in your new life. Greeting to you, my new chela.
−K.H."[29][35][note 14]

In section A Message the author tells how Blavatsky received in the going train car from the mahatma Kuthumi a note, which had several words intended for him: "Tell Leadbeater that I am satisfied with his zeal and devotion."[36]

Leadbeater claims that in early days of the Theosophical Society commissions and orders from the mahatmas were common, and members lived at a "level of splendid enthusiasm which those who have joined since Madame Blavatsky’s death can hardly imagine."[37]

Tisarana and pansil

Leadbeater in Adyar, 1885

During the few weeks of traveling from Egypt to India, Blavatsky radically transformed personality of Leadbeater who was "an ordinary lawn-tennis-playing curate—well-meaning and conscientious... incredibly shy and retiring," making him a worthy disciple of mahatmas.[38][note 15]

During a brief stop in Ceylon, Blavatsky who together with Olcott even earlier became a Buddhist invited Leadbeater to follow the example of the founders of the Theosophical Society. The author writes that she believed that since he was a Christian priest, his public demonstration of Buddhism could convince both Hindus and Buddhists of the honesty of his intentions and would allow him to become more useful for the mahatmas.[40]
After three times pronouncing of a praise to the Lord Buddha: "I reverence the Blessed One, the Holy One, the Perfect in Wisdom," Leadbeater recitated on the Pali sacred formula of the Tisarana and then the Pancha Sila.[41][note 16]

Upon arrival in Madras, Blavatsky has spoke in front of the Hindustanies who filled the room, indignant at the actions of the Christian missionaries.

"When at last she was allowed to speak, she began very well by saying how touched she was by this enthusiastic reception, and how it showed her what she had always known, that the people of India would not accept tamely these vile, cowardly, loathsome and utterly abominable slanders, circulated by these unspeakable—but here she became so vigorously adjectival that the Colonel hurriedly intervened, and somehow persuaded her to resume her seat, while he called upon an Indian member to offer a few remarks."[42][note 17]

The author informs that his life at Adyar was ascetic; there were practically no servants, except two gardeners and a boy who has been working in the office. Leadbeater ate every day porridge from wheat flakes, which he brewed himself, also he was being brought milk and bananas.[44] At the headquarters of the Society, Leadbeater had been taking post of the recording secretary, since that allowed him to remain in the center of the Theosophical movement, where, as he knew, in the materialized forms, the Masters were often shown themselves.[45][note 18]

One day the author had met with the mahatma Kuthumi on the roof of the headquarters, next to Blavatsky's room. He was near a balustrade which "running along the front of the house at the edge of the roof" when the Master "materialized," stepping over the balustrade, as if before that he had been flying through the air. Leadbeater says:

"Naturally I rushed forward and prostrated myself before Him; He raised me with a kindly smile, saying that though such demonstrations of reverence were the custom among the Indian peoples, He did not expect them from His European devotees, and He thought that perhaps there would be less possibility of any feeling of embarrassment if each nation confined itself to its own methods of salutation."[46]

Occult training

The author claims that when he arrived in India, he did not have any clairvoyant abilities. One day when Kuthumi "honoured" him with a visit, he asked whether Leadbeater had ever attempted "a certain kind of meditation connected with the development of the mysterious power called kundalini."[47][note 19] Leadbeater had heard of that power, but thought it to be certainly out of reach for Western people. Yet Kuthumi recommended him to make a "few efforts along certain lines," and told him that he would himself "watch over those efforts to see that no danger should ensue." He accepted the offer of the Master and became "day after day" working on this kind of meditation. He was told that on average it would take forty days, if he do it constantly and vigorously.[49]

Leadbeater worked on the task assigned to him for forty-two days, and it seemed to him that he was already on the verge of achieving a result when Kuthumi intervened and "performed the final act of breaking through which completed the process," and enabled the author thereafter to use astral sight while as he was retaining full consciousness in the physical body. It is equivalent to saying that "the astral consciousness and memory became continuous," whether the physical body was awake or asleep.[50][51][note 20]

A lot of care and work was spent on occult training of the author by the Master Djwal Khul. Leadbeater tells:

"Over and over again He would make a vivid thought-form, and say to me: 'What do you see?' And when I described it to the best of my ability, would come again and again the comment: 'No, no, you are not seeing true; you are not seeing all; dig deeper into yourself, use your mental vision as well as your astral; press just a little further, a little higher.'"[52]

To participate in the training of Leadbeater, often came to headquarters swami Subba Row, "our great pandit," as the author calls him. And Leadbeater claims that he will forever remain an obligor to these "two great people" — Djwal Khul and Subba Row — for all the help which they gave him "at this critical stage" of his life.[53]

Criticism

Roerich claimed that Leadbeater "was an evil genius of the [Theosophical] movement."[54][55] She wrote:

"Leadbeater was very harmful because of his psychism, developed at the expense of spirituality. The Great Masters had wanted to hold him for awhile near Mme. Blavatsky's aura for his neutralization. After her death, he gained the confidence and friendship of Mrs. Besant and became her dark genius. He was responsible for many of her blunders. His lower psychism had joined to the pathological dishonesty and the perverted nature and has blossomed as a bouquet of the most tasteless and false writings."[56][55][note 21]

New editions and translations

The book was reprinted several times and translated into Russian. Second edition of the book was published in 1948, and third — in 1967.[1]

See also

Notes

  1. The Australian Theosophist, 1928–1929, Vol. 5, Issue 1 (pp. 15–20), Issue 2 (pp. 59–64), Issue 3 (pp. 80–86), Issue 4 (pp. 114–21), Issue 5 (pp. 145–52), Issue 7 (pp. 210–18).[2]
  2. "How Theosophy Came to Me, in The Australian Theosophist, August 15, September 15, October 15, November 15 and December 15, 1928, and February 15, 1929."[3]
  3. Tillett stated: "Leadbeater's interest in spiritualism increased after the death of his mother on May 24, 1882."[10] Also Matley wrote that Leadbeater has been on "few spiritualistic séances" of the mediums Husk[11] and Eglinton.[12]
  4. His new life had started in 1883, when he has had read Sinnett's The Occult World. It had led the "young curate" to contact with the Theosophical Society in London.[15]
  5. Leadbeater "was welcomed into the London Lodge on February 21, 1884."[15]
  6. Senkevich wrote: "The appearance of Blavatsky at the meeting was triumphant, some of its participants fell down in front of her to their knees.... At this re-election meeting she was deservedly represented by the queen of occultism, all were obeying her will unquestioningly."[18]
  7. Mohini Mohun Chatterji (1858–1936) was a private secretary to Henry Steel Olcott.[19]
  8. "Then, on April 7, 1884, Leadbeater met Helena Petrovna Blavatsky and Henry Steel Olcott at a turbulent election meeting of the London Lodge. Deeply impressed by Blavatsky, from that day on Leadbeater's commitment tilted more and more away from Anglicanism and toward theosophy."[15]
  9. Goodrick-Clarke wrote that "the very concept of the Masters" is the Rosicrucian idea of "invisible and secret adepts, working for the advancement of humanity."[26] And Tillett stated: "The concept of Masters or Mahatmas as presented by HPB involved a mixture of western and eastern ideas; she located most of them in India or Tibet. Both she and Colonel Olcott claimed to have seen and to be in communication with Masters. In Western occultism the idea of 'Supermen' has been found in such schools as... the fraternities established by de Pasqually and de Saint-Martin."[27]
  10. See K.H. Letters to C.W. Leadbeater#First letter from the Master
  11. Leadbeater "received a letter from the Master Koot Hoomi (K.H.) in October 31, 1884, just prior to Blavatsky's return to India. Leadbeater responded by writing a letter on November 1 in which he offered to give up his career in the Church and go to India with her to serve theosophy."[15]
  12. Leadbeater passed the mahatma's letter to Blavatsky in London and asked her to read it, that she did unwillingly, since she believed so it was a confidential correspondence. He "then accompanied her to the home of the Cooper-Oakleys where, 'after midnight' (i.e., early November 2, 1884) a reply materialized on Blavatky's upturned hand while Leadbeater was watching."[15]
  13. "Upasika is a name often used for H.P.B. in the Letters; the word is from Buddhism, where it denotes a Lay Disciple."[34]
  14. With this note mahatma ordered to Leadbeater to leave England immediately, since it was his desire, and to join Blavatsky in Alexandria. "This he did, precipitously resigning his priesthood, putting his affairs in order, and sailing for India on November 5."[15]
  15. Senkevich wrote: "The last trip of Blavatsky to India was described in memoirs by Charles Leadbeater, who was a young rural Anglican priest that had just joined the Theosophical Society. He had been accompanying Blavatsky from England to Port Said, from there — to Colombo, and then — to Madras."[39]
  16. Leadbeater "took pansil, formally becoming a Buddhist, in Colombo, Ceylon, and then arrived in Adyar in December 1884."[15]
  17. "As soon as the audience was quiet, Blavatsky began her fierce speech directed against Christian missionaries. In it, she used such an obscene word that Olcott jumped up in terror and looked pleadingly at her."[43]
  18. "From 1884 to 1888, Leadbeater was recording secretary of the Theosophical Society, assistant to Olcott and a student of the Ancient Wisdom called theosophy."[15]
  19. "Leadbeater and later Esotericists up to and including New Age writers have reinterpreted kundalini as simply a form of energy."[48]
  20. Ellwood wrote that from 1884 to 1888 Leadbeater has had a course of meditation practice "which awakened his clairvoyance."[15]
  21. Nevertheless Ellwood stated that he "was a prominent theosophical writer, speaker, and teacher... Leadbeater has been read more widely than any other theosophical author, and has had an influence, direct and indirect, on western occultism, including the 'New Age' movement, perhaps greater than any other single person of his time or since... Hardly necessary to hold that he was evil incarnate."[15]

References

  1. 1 2 Formats and editions.
  2. Index.
  3. Tillett 1986, p. 1083.
  4. Leadbeater 1912, Sect. 9/3.
  5. Leadbeater 1967, p. 8; Tillett 1986, pp. 99–100.
  6. Leadbeater 1967, pp. 10–11; Tillett 1986, p. 101.
  7. Leadbeater 1967, pp. 11–12; Tillett 1986, p. 102.
  8. Melton 2001b.
  9. Leadbeater 1967, p. 12; Tillett 1986, p. 102.
  10. Tillett 1986, p. 107.
  11. Melton 2001.
  12. Matley 2013.
  13. 1 2 3 Leadbeater 1930, Ch. II.
  14. Tillett 1986, pp. 112–13, 122.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ellwood.
  16. Leadbeater 1930, p. 22; Tillett 1986, pp. 122–23.
  17. Leadbeater 1930, pp. 24–5; Tillett 1986, pp. 124–25.
  18. Сенкевич 2012, pp. 404–5.
  19. Tillett 1986, p. 970.
  20. Leadbeater 1930, pp. 43–4; Tillett 1986, pp. 131–32.
  21. Leadbeater 1930, p. 50; Tillett 1986, p. 133.
  22. 1 2 Leadbeater 1930, Ch. IV.
  23. Oliveira.
  24. Дружинин 2012, p. 26.
  25. Tillett 1986, p. 126.
  26. Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 6.
  27. Tillett 1986, p. 966.
  28. Tillett 1986, pp. 126–27.
  29. 1 2 3 4 5 Leadbeater 1930, Ch. V.
  30. Jinarajadasa 1919, p. 33.
  31. Jinarajadasa 1919, pp. 33–5.
  32. Tillett 1986, p. 138.
  33. Jinarajadasa 2013, First phenomenon.
  34. Jinarajadasa 1919, p. 113.
  35. Jinarajadasa 1919, p. 35; Tillett 1986, p. 139.
  36. Leadbeater 1930, p. 62; Washington 1995, p. 117.
  37. Leadbeater 1930, p. 91; Tillett 1986, pp. 144–45.
  38. Leadbeater 1930, p. 92; Tillett 1986, p. 145.
  39. Сенкевич 2012, p. 414.
  40. Leadbeater 1930, p. 101; Tillett 1986, p. 147.
  41. Leadbeater 1930, pp. 103–6; Tillett 1986, p. 148.
  42. Leadbeater 1930, p. 118; Tillett 1986, p. 150.
  43. Сенкевич 2012, pp. 416–17.
  44. Leadbeater 1930, pp. 130–31; Tillett 1986, pp. 160–61.
  45. Leadbeater 1930, p. 149; Tillett 1986, p. 158.
  46. Leadbeater 1930, p. 151; Tillett 1986, p. 155.
  47. Melton 2001a.
  48. Hammer 2003, p. 185.
  49. Leadbeater 1930, pp. 131–32; Tillett 1986, pp. 161–62.
  50. Leadbeater 1930, p. 133; Tillett 1986, p. 162.
  51. Wessinger 2013, p. 36.
  52. Leadbeater 1930, pp. 133–34; Tillett 1986, p. 163.
  53. Leadbeater 1930, p. 134; Tillett 1986, p. 165.
  54. Рерих 2000a.
  55. 1 2 Дружинин 2012, p. 8.
  56. Рерих 2000b.

Sources

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.