Harborough by-election, 1916
The Harborough by-election was a Parliamentary by-election. It returned one Member of Parliament to the House of Commons of the United Kingdom, elected by the first past the post voting system.
Vacancy
John William Logan had been Liberal MP for the seat of Harborough since the December 1910 General Elections. His health was poor following a hunting accident. In 1910 he returned to House but by 1916 the strain proved too great, forcing him to retire permanently from public life.[1]
Electoral history
Harborough had been won by a Liberal candidate at every election since its 1885 creation, apart from 1886 when the Conservative won. Logan had represented the division firstly from 1891-1904 and latterly since December 1910.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John William Logan | 8,632 | 53.3 | -5.5 | |
Conservative | Joseph Herbert Marshall | 7,561 | 46.7 | +5.5 | |
Majority | 1,071 | 6.6 | -11.0 | ||
Turnout | 85.4 | -5.0 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | -5.5 | |||
Candidates
Logan's long-standing poor health had meant that the local Liberal Association were advanced in selecting his replacement. In anticipation of a 1915 General Election, they had already selected Percy Harris.[4][5] Harris was a London County Councillor, who had stood twice for parliament elsewhere. He had no links with the constituency but his candidacy was officially endorsed by both the Unionist and Labour parties, due to the wartime electoral truce.
Campaign
The campaign took place against a national backdrop of a war that was not going well for Britain. The Coalition Government led by H.H. Asquith was being criticized by the Northcliffe Press. They got behind the Independent candidate Tommy Bowles. Advertising hoardings in the constituency were bought up by Northcliffe and carried slogans like "Buy the Daily Mail and vote for Bowles". A special pro-Bowles local edition of the Daily Mirror was produced and delivered free to homes in the constituency. Although the local Unionist association formally supported Harris, in line with the national all-party agreement, a number of local Unionists chose to support and actively campaign for Bowles.[6]
Result
Despite the activities of the Northcliffe press and local Unionists, the Lib3erals held the seat with an increased share of the vote.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Percy Harris | 7,826 | 67.8 | +14.3 | |
Independent | Thomas Gibson Bowles | 3,711 | 32.2 | n/a | |
Majority | 4,115 | 35.6 | +28.6 | ||
Liberal hold | Swing | n/a | |||
Aftermath
In 1918, Harris's Unionist opponent was endorsed by the Coalition Government and gained the seat.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Keith Fraser | 8,465 | |||
Liberal | Percy Harris | 4,608 | |||
Labour | Walter Baker | 4,495 | n/a | ||
Majority | |||||
Turnout | |||||
Unionist gain from Liberal | Swing | ||||
References
- ↑ The Late Mr. J. W. Logan, The Times, Friday 29 May 1925, p. 16
- 1 2 British Parliamentary Election Results 1885-1918, FWS Craig
- 1 2 Debrett's House of Commons & Judicial Bench, 1916
- ↑ Standard 23 Feb 1914
- ↑ Forty Years In and Out of Parliament by Sir Percy Harris
- ↑ Forty Years In and Out of Parliament by Sir Percy Harris