Gregory Dix

The Reverend Dom
Gregory Dix
Order of St Benedict
Prior of Nashdom Abbey

Portrait of Dom Gregory Dix
In office 1948 to 1952
Orders
Ordination 1925 (priest)
Personal details
Born 4 October 1901
London, England
Died 12 May 1952(1952-05-12) (aged 50)
England
Nationality British
Denomination Anglicanism
Education Westminster School
Alma mater Merton College, Oxford
Sainthood
Feast day 12 May
Venerated in Church of England

Gregory Dix, OSB (born George Eglinton Alston Dix; 4 October 1901 – 12 May 1952) was an English monk and priest of Nashdom Abbey, an Anglican Benedictine community. He was a noted liturgical scholar whose work had particular influence on the reform of Anglican liturgy in the mid-20th century.

Life

Dix was born in Woolwich, south London. He was the son of a schoolmaster who became a priest and served as the first principal of the College of St Mark and St John, Chelsea. He was educated at Westminster School and became an exhibitioner at Merton College, Oxford.[1] His modest degree did not reflect his real ability and from 1924 to 1926 he was appointed lecturer in modern history at Keble College, Oxford while studying at Wells Theological College. He was ordained priest in 1925. He entered Nashdom the following year and was sent to the Gold Coast as a novice until his health broke down in 1929.

Returning to Nashdom he became an intern oblate and took his final vows only in 1940. During the Second World War he lived for a while in Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire and looked after the Anglo-Catholic daughter church of St Michael whilst his brother Ronald, who was the priest there, served as a military chaplain. With another monk he lived in the parsonage, kept the round of monastic offices and cared for the parish. On his return to Nashdom he was succeeded in Beaconsfield by Dom Augustine Morris, who was to become Abbot of Nashdom in 1948. Dix was elected to the Southern Convocation in 1945 and prior of his abbey in 1948.

Scholarly work

As a scholar, Dix worked primarily in the field of liturgical studies. He produced an edition of the Apostolic Tradition in 1935. In The Shape of the Liturgy, first published in 1945, he argued that it was not so much the words of the liturgy but its "shape" which mattered. His study of the liturgy's historical development led him to formulate what he called the Four Action Shape of the Liturgy: Offertory, Consecration, Fraction, Communion. Dix's work then influenced liturgical revision in the Anglican Communion. More recent scholars, however, have criticised it as lacking historical accuracy. Dix's conclusion that "Cranmer in his eucharistic doctrine was a devout and theologically founded Zwinglian, and that his Prayer Books were exactly framed to express his convictions.", also proved controversial.[2]

In particular, Dix's claims for the "shape" of the liturgy, which laid emphasis on the significance of the offertory, have been argued to rest on weak evidence historically. On the other hand, Dix's thesis was defended by members of the English Parish Communion movement, such as Gabriel Hebert and Donald Gray, who saw the offertory as representing the bringing of the world into the eucharistic action. This is also the traditional Eastern Orthodox perspective on the offertory.[3]

Diarmaid MacCulloch, Cranmer's biographer, agrees with the thesis that the eucharistic theology of the two Prayer Books is the same. He does not class Cranmer's theology as Zwinglian, instead placing it nearer to that of Bullinger and Calvin.[4] He therefore differs from understanding Cranmer on the eucharistic action as "a vivid mental remembering of the passion as the achievement of 'my' redemption in the past", which is how Dix summarises Zwingli's thought.[5]

Ecclesiastical politics

Dix was an Anglican Papalist, who sought reunion with the Holy See and was against any developments which might make such a union impossible. He therefore campaigned against the projected church union in South India, which he saw as a possible model for similar schemes in England, and which in his view equated Anglican and Free Church ordinations. "If these proposals were to be put into practice, the whole ground for believing in the Church of England which I have outlined would have ceased to exist."[6] A by-product of his campaign was the book of essays entitled The Apostolic Ministry, published in 1946 and edited by Kenneth Kirk with a contribution by Dix.

In 1944. Dix defended Anglican orders against Roman Catholic critics. Believing that "Unless we are 'Catholics' inasmuch and because we are 'Anglicans', then we are not being 'Catholics'",[7] he stated that "For three centuries the C. of E. taught the essentials of the Catholic Faith and ministered the essential Catholic Sacraments to the ordinary English people, when no one else could, or would have been allowed by the state to do. That is her title to exist, and I think a man could and should love her for that, even if he felt that he must leave her now."[8] In explaining his oft-repeated description of the Anglican episcopate as Edwardian, he commented "Strictly Edward VI in theology; strictly Edward VII in mental equipment and strictly Edward VIII in their views on marriage."[9]

Death

Dix died of cancer in 1952, described by Kenneth Kirk, Bishop of Oxford, as "my closest and oldest friend, and the most brilliant man in the Church of England".[10]

References

  1. ↑ Levens, R.G.C., ed. (1964). Merton College Register 1900-1964. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. p. 135.
  2. ↑ Dix (1948). Dixit Cranmer Et Non Timuit. Dacre Press. p. 2.
  3. ↑ Schmemann, Alexander. For the Life of the World. pp. 2:7.
  4. ↑ MacCulloch, Diarmaid. Thomas Cranmer. Yale: Yale U.P. pp. 614;629.
  5. ↑ Dix, Gregory (1945). The shape of the Liturgy. London: Dacre Press. p. 632.
  6. ↑ Dix (1944). The Question of Anglican Orders. Dacre Press. p. 92.
  7. ↑ Question. p. 91.
  8. ↑ Dix (1944). The Question of Anglican Orders. Dacre Press. p. 91.
  9. ↑ Williamson, H. R. (1957). The Walled Garden. Macmillan. p. 144.
  10. ↑ Kemp, EW (1959). The Life and Letters of Kenneth Escott Kirk. Hodder & Stoughton. p. 204.

Works cited


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.