Behavioural despair test

Animal testing

Main articles
Animal testing
Alternatives to animal testing
Testing on: invertebrates
frogs · primates
rabbits · rodents
Animal testing regulations
History of animal testing
History of model organisms
IACUC
Laboratory animal sources
Pain and suffering in lab animals
Testing cosmetics on animals
Toxicology testing
Vivisection

Issues
Biomedical research
Animal rights · Animal welfare
Animals (Scientific Procedures)
Great ape research ban
International trade in primates

Cases
Brown Dog affair
Cambridge University primates
Pit of despair
Silver Spring monkeys
UCR 1985 laboratory raid
Unnecessary Fuss

Companies
Jackson Laboratory
Charles River Laboratories, Inc.
Covance · Harlan
Huntingdon Life Sciences
UK lab animal suppliers
Nafovanny · Shamrock

Groups/campaigns
AALAS · AAAS · ALF
Americans for Medical Progress
Boyd Group · BUAV
Dr Hadwen Trust
Foundation for Biomedical
Research
 · FRAME
National Anti-Vivisection Society
New England Anti-Vivisection Society
PETA · Physicians Committee
for Responsible Medicine

Primate Freedom Project
Pro-Test
SPEAK · SHAC
Speaking of Research
Understanding Animal Research

Writers/activists
Tipu Aziz · Michael Balls
Neal Barnard · Colin Blakemore
Simon Festing · Gill Langley
Ingrid Newkirk · Bernard Rollin
Jerry Vlasak · Syed Ziaur Rahman

Categories
Animal testing · Animal rights
Animal welfare

Related templates
Template:Animal rights

The behavioural despair test (or Porsolt forced swimming test) is a test, centered on a rodent's response to the threat of drowning, whose result has been interpreted as measuring susceptibility to negative mood. It is commonly used to measure the effectiveness of antidepressants,[1] although significant criticisms of its interpretation have been made.[2]

Method

Animals are subjected to two trials during which they are forced to swim in an acrylic glass cylinder filled with water, and from which they cannot escape. The first trial lasts 15 minutes. Then, after 24-hours, a second trial is performed that lasts 5 minutes. The time that the test animal spends in the second trial without making any movements beyond those required to keep its head above water[3] is measured. This immobility time is decreased by various types of antidepressants and also by electroconvulsive shock.[4] Another common variant of this behavioral test specifically used for mice is conducted only for one trial and lasts six minutes.[5] Modern implementations of the test score swimming and climbing behaviours separately, because swimming behaviour has been shown to be increased by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, while climbing behaviour is increased by selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors such as desipramine and maprotiline.[6]

Controversy in interpretation

Classically, immobility in the second test has been interpreted as a behavioral correlate of negative mood, representing a kind of hopelessness in the animal. Rodents given antidepressants swim harder and longer than controls (which forms the basis for claims of the test's validity).[7] However, there is some debate between scientists whether increased immobility instead demonstrates learning or habituation, and would therefore be a positive behavioral adaptation:[8] the animal is less fearful because it is now familiar with the environment of the test. This interpretation is supported by the fact that even rats who are first put into a container from which they can escape (and therefore do not experience despair) show reduced mobility in the second test.[9]

The term "behavioral despair test" bears an anthropomorphic connotation and is a somewhat subjective description as it is uncertain whether the test reliably gauges mood or despair. Strictly speaking, the descriptive term "forced swimming test" is preferred by researchers.[8] The use of forced swimming tests is criticised by animal rights groups, notably PETA[10] and seen as unethical by some people.

See also

References

  1. Petit-Demouliere, B; Chenu, F; Bourin, M (January 2005). "Forced swimming test in mice: a review of antidepressant activity.". Psychopharmacology. 177 (3): 245–55. PMID 15609067. doi:10.1007/s00213-004-2048-7.
  2. Borsini, Franco; Volterra, Giovanna; Meli, Alberto (1986). "Does the behavioral "despair" test measure "despair"?". Physiology & Behavior. 38 (3): 385–386.
  3. Porsolt, RD; Le Pichon, M; Jalfre, M (21 April 1977). "Depression: a new animal model sensitive to antidepressant treatments.". Nature. 266 (5604): 730–2. PMID 559941. doi:10.1038/266730a0.
  4. Porsolt, RD; Bertin, A; Jalfre, M (October 1977). "Behavioral despair in mice: a primary screening test for antidepressants.". Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamie et de Thérapie. 229 (2): 327–36. PMID 596982.
  5. Can, A.; et, al. (2012). "The Mouse Forced Swim Test". Journal of Visualized Experiments. 59 (3638): e3638. PMC 3353513Freely accessible. PMID 22314943. doi:10.3791/3638.
  6. Detke, MJ; Rickels, M; Lucki, I (September 1995). "Active behaviors in the rat forced swimming test differentially produced by serotonergic and noradrenergic antidepressants.". Psychopharmacology. 121 (1): 66–72. PMID 8539342. doi:10.1007/bf02245592.
  7. "Porsolt Forced Swim Test — Penn State University". Research.psu.edu. 2013-04-29. Retrieved 2014-03-24.
  8. 1 2 Borsini, F; Meli, A (1988). "Is the forced swimming test a suitable model for revealing antidepressant activity?". Psychopharmacology. 94 (2): 147–60. PMID 3127840. doi:10.1007/bf00176837.
  9. O'Neill, KA; Valentino, D (12 March 1982). "Escapability and generalization: effect on 'behavioral despair'.". European Journal of Pharmacology. 78 (3): 379–80. PMID 7067732. doi:10.1016/0014-2999(82)90043-7.
  10. "Mice and Rats in Laboratories". PETA. Retrieved 2016-11-02.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.