Pentium FDIV bug

66 MHz Intel Pentium (sSpec=SX837) with the FDIV bug

The Pentium FDIV bug was a computer bug that affected the floating point unit (FPU) of the early Intel Pentium processors. Because of the bug, the processor could return incorrect binary floating point results when dividing a number. Discovered in 1994 by Professor Thomas R. Nicely at Lynchburg College,[1] Intel attributed the error to missing entries in the lookup table used by the floating-point division circuitry.[2]

The severity of the FDIV bug is debated. Intel, producer of the affected chip, claims that the common user would experience it once every 27,000 years while IBM, manufacturer of a chip competing with Intel's Pentium, claims that the common user would experience it once every 24 days. Though rarely encountered by most users (Byte magazine estimated that 1 in 9 billion floating point divides with random parameters would produce inaccurate results),[3] both the flaw and Intel's initial handling of the matter were heavily criticized by the tech community. The man who found the bug points out that since it went unnoticed for a year in a popular product, that likely indicates that the bug was less harmful than IBM suggested.

In December 1994, Intel recalled the defective processors. In January 1995, Intel announced "a pre-tax charge of $475 million against earnings, ostensibly the total cost associated with replacement of the flawed processors."[1]

Chronology

Thomas Nicely, a professor of mathematics at Lynchburg College, had written code to enumerate primes, twin primes, prime triplets, and prime quadruplets. Nicely noticed some inconsistencies in the calculations on June 13, 1994, shortly after adding a Pentium system to his group of computers, but was unable to eliminate other factors (such as programming errors, motherboard chipsets, etc.) until October 19, 1994. On October 24, 1994, he reported the issue to Intel. According to Nicely, his contact person at Intel later admitted that Intel had been aware of the problem since May 1994, when the flaw was discovered by Tom Kraljevic, a Purdue co-op student working for Intel in Hillsboro, Oregon, during testing of the FPU for its new P6 core, first used in the Pentium Pro.

On October 30, 1994, Nicely sent an email describing the error he had discovered in the Pentium floating point unit to various contacts, requesting reports of testing for the flaw on 486-DX4s, Pentiums and Pentium clones.[1]

This flaw in the Pentium FPU was quickly verified by other people around the Internet, and became known as the Pentium FDIV bug (FDIV is the x86 assembly language mnemonic for floating-point division). One example was found where the division result returned by the Pentium was off by about 61 parts per million.[1]

The story first appeared in the press on November 7, 1994, in an article in Electronic Engineering Times, "Intel fixes a Pentium FPU glitch" by Alexander Wolfe.[4]

The story was subsequently picked up by CNN in a segment aired on November 21, 1994.[1] This brought it into widespread public prominence.

Publicly, Intel acknowledged the floating-point flaw, but claimed that it was not serious and would not affect most users. Intel offered to replace processors to users who could prove that they were affected. However, although most independent estimates found the bug to be of little importance and would have negligible effect on most users, it caused a great public outcry. Companies like IBM (whose IBM 5x86C microprocessor competed at that time with the Intel Pentium line) joined the condemnation.

On December 20, 1994, Intel offered to replace all flawed Pentium processors on the basis of request, in response to mounting public pressure.[5] Although it turned out that only a small fraction of Pentium owners bothered to get their chips replaced, the financial impact on the company was significant. On January 17, 1995, Intel announced "a pre-tax charge of $475 million against earnings, ostensibly the total cost associated with replacement of the flawed processors."[1] Some of the defective chips were later turned into key rings by Intel.[6]

A 1995 article in Science describes the value of number theory problems in discovering computer bugs and gives the mathematical background and history of Brun's constant, the problem Nicely was working on when he discovered the bug.[7]

Affected models

This problem occurs only on some models of the original Pentium processor.[8] The bug only existed in some Pentium family processors with a clock speed of less than 120 MHz.[8] On affected models, the Intel Processor Frequency ID Utility checks for the presence of this bug.

The ten affected processors are listed below. The 39 S-specs of those processors are not listed in the Intel processor specification finder web page.

Pentium P5 800 nm 5V
Family Model Stepping Core stepping Clock rate FSB speed S-spec
5 1 3 B1 60 MHz 60 MHz Q0352, Q0412, SX753
5 1 3 B1 66 MHz 66 MHz Q0353, Q0413, SX754
5 1 5 C1 60 MHz 60 MHz Q0466, SX835, SZ949
5 1 5 C1 66 MHz 66 MHz Q0467, SX837, SZ950
Pentium P54C 600 nm 3.3V
Family Model Stepping Core stepping Clock rate FSB speed S-spec
5 2 1 B1 75 MHz 50 MHz Q0601
5 2 1 B1 90 MHz 60 MHz Q0542, Q0613, Q0543, SX879, SX885, SX909, SX874
5 2 1 B1 100 MHz 66 MHz Q0563, Q0587, Q0614, SX886, SX910
5 2 2 B3 75 MHz 50 MHz Q0606, SX951
5 2 2 B3 90 MHz 60 MHz Q0628, Q0611, Q0612, SX923, SX922, SX921, SX942, SX943, SX944, SZ951
5 2 2 B3 100 MHz 66 MHz Q0677, SX960

Example symptoms

The presence of the bug can be checked manually by performing the following calculation in any application that uses native floating point numbers, including the Windows Calculator or Microsoft Excel in Windows 95/98.

The correct value is:

When converted to the hexadecimal value used by the processor, 4,195,835 = 0x4005FB and 3,145,727 = 0x2FFFFF. The '5' in 0x4005 triggers the fault in the FPU control logic. As a result, the value returned by a flawed Pentium processor is incorrect at or beyond four digits:[9]

Another way of detecting the bug is using the pentnt utility included with Windows NT 3.51, NT 4.0, 2000, and XP.[10]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Professor Thomas Nicely. "Pentium FDIV flaw FAQ".
  2. ↑ "Statistical Analysis of Floating Point Flaw: Intel White Paper" (PDF). Intel. 9 July 2004. p. 9. Solution ID CS-013007. Retrieved 5 April 2016.
  3. ↑ Tom R. Halfhill (March 1995). "An error in a lookup table created the infamous bug in Intel's latest processor". BYTE (March 1995). Archived from the original (– Scholar search) on February 9, 2006. Retrieved 2006-12-19.
  4. ↑ Alexander Wolfe. "Intel fixes a Pentium FPU glitch".
  5. ↑ "Intel adopts upon-request replacement policy on Pentium processors with floating point flaw; Will take Q4 charge against earnings". Business Wire. 1994-12-20. Archived from the original on 2012-07-10. Retrieved 2006-12-24.
  6. ↑ "How many engineers does it take to change a lightbulb?". Boiledbeans. 20 April 2009. Retrieved 10 November 2009.
  7. ↑ Cipra, Barry A. (1995-01-13). "How number theory got the best of the Pentium chip". Science. 267 (5195): 175. PMID 17791336. doi:10.1126/science.267.5195.175.
  8. 1 2 "FDIV Replacement Program: Frequently asked questions". Intel. 2009-03-20. Solution ID CS-012748. Retrieved 2009-11-10.
  9. ↑ "Pentium FDIV bug - a Picture". Kansas University Institute for Policy and Social Research. 1994-11-30. Retrieved 2010-11-03.
  10. ↑ "Pentnt".
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.