Parasitoid

A parasitoidal wasp ovipositing into the body of a spotted alfalfa aphid

A parasitoid is an organism that spends a significant portion of its life history attached to or within a single host organism in a relationship where the host is ultimately killed. Thus, parasitoidy is a similar evolutionary strategy to typical parasitism, except for the more serious prognosis for the host.

There are parasitoids in a wide variety of taxa, including microbial diseases, plants, crustaceans, insects, and vertebrates. Especially among the Hymenoptera, ichneumons and many wasps are highly specialised for a parasitoidal way of life. Some parasitoidal wasps are used in biological pest control.

History

The term "parasitoid" was coined in 1913 by the Swedo-Finnish writer Odo Morannal Reuter,[1] and adopted in English by his reviewer, William Morton Wheeler.[2] Reuter used it to describe the strategy where the parasite develops in or on the body of a single host individual, eventually killing that host, while the adult is free-living. Since that time, the concept has been variously generalised and widely applied.[3]

Definitions and distinctions

Various endoparasitoids of the moth Phauda flammans

Definition of parasitoid

Parasitoidy is one of six major evolutionary strategies within parasitism, the others being parasitic castrator, directly transmitted parasite, trophically transmitted parasite, vector-transmitted parasite, and micropredator. These are adaptive peaks, with many possible intermediate strategies, but organisms in many different groups have consistently converged on these six.[4]

Parasitoids feed on a living host which is eventually killed, typically before it can produce offspring. While some conventional parasites kill their hosts under certain conditions, they usually do not. Many species of true parasites can cause the death of their host if they are present in overwhelming numbers, the host is in poor condition, or the host's health is compromised by secondary infections. For example, blood-sucking mites sometimes overwhelm nestlings of birds such as swallows to the point that the young birds cannot fledge.[5]

In their extreme forms, conventional parasitism and parasitoidy are distinct: there is no doubt that the larva of a Tarantula hawk wasp behaves more like a parasitoid, or even a predator, than a parasite; and similarly the biting midges that suck blood from large insects are plainly ectoparasites; but many intermediate forms exist. At the opposite extreme, parasitoidy grades into predation. Differences between various hunting wasps provide convenient illustrations. Predatory social wasps hunt flies, caterpillars and the like, kill, cut up, and carry them to a nest to feed to their young. Similarly, some solitary wasps such as beewolves, sting prey, sometimes fatally, before saving it, usually entire, in a nest or burrow for the young to feed on. In contrast, the best-known protelean solitary hunting wasps sting prey to paralyse it before storing it for the young in the nest.[6][7] Other wasps paralyse prey in the plant or other environment in which it feeds, before laying eggs nearby; the emerging young feed on the paralysed prey in its own home.[8] Some insect parasitoids lay their eggs where the larvae must locate the prey for themselves when they hatch from the eggs.[9] Examples include flies in the families Tachinidae and Bombyliidae, often with sophisticated physiological and strategic adaptations.

Parasitoid strategies

Parasitoids can be classified as either endo- or ectoparasitoids with idiobiont or koinobiont developmental strategies. Endoparasitoids live within their host's body. Ectoparasitoids feed on the host from outside. Idiobiont parasitoids prevent further development of the host after initially immobilizing it. Koinobiont parasitoids allow the host to continue its development while feeding upon it. Most ectoparasitoids are idiobiont, as the host could damage or dislodge the external parasitoid if allowed to move and or molt. Most endoparasitoids are koinobionts, giving them the advantage of a host that continue to grow larger and avoid predators.[10]

Primary parasitoids have the simplest parasitic relationship with two organisms involved: the host and the parasitoid. Hyperparasitoids are parasitoids of parasitoids. Secondary parasitoids are hyperparasitoids which use a primary parasitoid as their host. In this case there are three organisms involved. Hyperparasitoids are either facultative (can be a primary parasitoid or hyperparasitoid depending on the situation) or obligate (always develop as a hyperparasitoid). Levels of parasitoids beyond secondary also occur, especially among facultative parasitoids. In oak gall systems, up to five levels of parasitism have been documented.[11] Cases in which two or more species of parasitoids simultaneously attack the same host without parasitizing each other are called multi- or multiple parasitism. In many cases, multiple parasitism still leads to the death of one or more of the parasitoids involved. If multiple parasitoids of the same species coexist in a single host, it is called superparasitism. Gregarious species purposefully lay multiple eggs or polyembryonic eggs which lead to multiple larvae in a single host. The end result of gregarious superparasitism can be a single surviving parasitoid individual or multiple surviving individuals, depending on the species. If superparasitism occurs accidentally in normally solitary species the larvae often fight among themselves until only one is left.[12]

Influence on host behaviour

Zombie Bee
Female Apocephalus borealis ovipositing into the abdomen of a worker honey bee

In another strategy, some parasitoids influence the host's behaviour in ways that favour the propagation of the parasitoid, often at the cost of the host's life. A spectacular example is the lancet liver fluke that causes host ants to die clinging to grass stalks, where grazers or birds may be expected to eat them and complete the parasitoidal fluke's life cycle in its definitive host. Similarly, as strepsipteran parasitoids of ants mature, they cause the hosts to climb high on grass stalks, positions that are risky, but favour the emergence of the strepsipterans.[13] Other species of endoparasitoids cause infected woodlice and land Amphipoda such as Talitroides to run about in the open by day, where predators such as birds can catch them and continue the cycle. The rabies virus affects the host's central nervous system, eventually killing it, but perhaps helping to disseminate the virus by modifying the host's behaviour.[14] The paralysis inflicted by soft ticks might be seen as influencing behaviour, preventing the host from wandering away while they feed.[15] A species of braconid wasp in the genus Glyptapanteles modifies the behavior of its host caterpillar to defend the pupae of the wasps after they emerge from the caterpillar's body.[16]

In different taxa

SEM image of endoparasitoid ciliates of the genus Collinia, which can cause mass mortality in krill

Microbial diseases

Some microbial parasitoids waste most of the host's resources when it dies, but others exploit the host efficiently. Microbial pathogens of insects include microsporidiosis in the form of nosema in silkworms. This infection is highly virulent[17] and the tissues of the victims contain huge numbers of infectious spores. In effect the pathogen in its role of parasitoid has used up most of the resources of the host to propagate and spread its offspring. Similarly, many viruses propagate inside a host cell until it physically ruptures. Parasitoidal fungi such as Entomophthora species carry this principle as far as is possible. Having infected and killed an insect, they continue to grow on the carcass and release spores for as long as any resources remain. A nonlethal parasitic organism, especially if it is a fungus, is sometimes termed a biotroph, while a parasitoidal fungus may be called a necrotroph.[18][19]

Plants

Parasitoidal plants include various species of dodder, which indiscriminately parasitise wide ranges of host plants, and debilitate or kill the branches that they infect, and commonly the whole host plant as well.[4][20]

Mistletoes in families such as Santalaceae and Loranthaceae commonly accumulate on host trees until they stunt and eventually kill them, sometimes after many decades. Occasionally a freak condition can arise where the (strictly speaking "hemiparasitic") plant can supply sufficient photosynthetic power to support the root system of a small host tree for several years after the live host shoots have effectively disappeared.[21]

A related example is where the parasitoid plant is not strictly a parasite in the normal sense, but nonetheless exploits the host's resources of space, support and light. The best-known are the so-called "strangler figs". Some of them grow on and around the trunk of the host tree and squeeze or starve it of light until, after perhaps decades, it dies. The strangler eventually replaces the host utterly as the original trunk rots within the stems of the strangler, leaving a hollow framework.[4][22]

Crustaceans

The many parasitoidal Crustacea have a wide range of species and strategies. The killing of the host is often incidental. In the gill lice, most adult females live as parasites in the gills of fish, causing incidental harm that may kill the fish or weaken them so badly as to prevent breeding. Sacculina barnacles inject themselves into a crab, and convert themselves into egg-laying bags. This disrupts the crab's reproductive system in parasitic castration.[23]

Insects

About 10% of described insect species are parasitoids in four insect orders, the majority of them parasitoid wasps in the Hymenoptera.[24]

Parasitoid wasps

Braconidae wasp cocoons on giant leopard moth larva

The many species of parasitoid wasps in the Hymenopteran suborder Apocrita are mostly chalcidoid and ichneumon wasps, followed by the Proctotrupoidea and Platygastroidea. Outside these, many Hymenopteran lineages contain some parasitoids, such as most of the Chrysidoidea and Vespoidea, the rare Symphytan family Orussidae.[25]

Megarhyssa macrurus, a parasitoid, ovipositing into its host through the wood of a tree. The body of a female is c. 2 inches (51 mm) long, with an ovipositor c. 4 inches (100 mm) long.

Hymenopteran parasitoids often have remarkable life cycles. In one family, the Trigonalidae, the female wasps deposit eggs into small pockets they cut into the edge of leaves with their ovipositor. A caterpillar chewing these leaves may unknowingly swallow some of the eggs, and when they get into the caterpillar's gut, they hatch and burrow through the gut wall and into the body cavity. Later they search the caterpillar's body cavity for other parasitoid larvae, and it is these they attack and feed on. Some trigonalids, once in a caterpillar or sawfly larva, need their vehicle to fall prey to a social wasp. The wasp carries the caterpillar back to its nest, and there it is butchered and fed to the wasp's young; they will serve as the host for the trigonalid, the eggs of which are in the butchered caterpillar.[26] The ichneumon wasp Ichneumon eumerus parasitises the butterfly Phengaris rebeli by directly seeking out, through smell, Myrmica ant nests that the butterfly larvae previously parasitised, and ovipositing into the P. rebeli larvae.[27] Once the wasps' eggs hatch, they feast on the carcass of the dead caterpillar.

Parasitoid wasps can be classified as either endoparasitic or ectoparasitic according to where they lay their eggs.[28] Endoparasitic wasps insert their eggs inside their host, while ectoparasitic wasps deposit theirs outside the host's body.[29] Most species of wasps attack the or egg or larval stage of their host, but some attack adult hosts. Oviposition is complex, as it depends on finding the host and on evading host defense mechanisms. The ovipositor is a long tube-like organ used to inject eggs into hosts. It consists of the genital structures from segments eight and nine of the wasp's body.[30]

Parasitoid wasps face a range of obstacles to oviposition,[29] including behavioral, morphological, physiological or immunological defenses of their hosts.[31] An example of immunological defense against endoparasitic wasps would be the encapsulation of their eggs.[32] To thwart this immunological protection system, some wasps inundate their host with their eggs so as to overload the encapsulation response.[33] Another way of hindering a host's defense is to introduce a virus which interferes with the immune system.[34]

Some parasitoid wasps locate hosts by detecting chemicals released as indirect plant defenses against insect herbivores.[35]

Parasitoid wasps have specialized behavior for ovipositing on their hosts. For example, those that attack ants either use a horizontal or vertical alighting approach from behind the host.[36] In the horizontal method, the wasp maintains its body horizontally until it grabs on to the ant's metasoma (upper abdomen) with its tarsi (lower legs). After that, it places the rest of its legs on the ant's abdomen, folds its wings, and proceeds to inject its victim with the ovipositor.[36] The vertical approach is more complicated, and requires more steps. The wasp attaches its front legs onto the ant's abdomen, then rotates 180 degrees so that it becomes upside down.[36] After that, it rotates once more so that its head and legs switch places, before inserting its ovipositor.[36]

Ants are often aware of the wasps' presence, as they violently turn around, moving their mandibles and legs in order to defend against their attacker. This sometimes prevents the wasps from depositing their eggs successfully. To try to beat such behavioral diversions, the wasps close in very fast to inject their hosts.[37] To prevent missing the target when making contact with the host, the wasp may wait for the ant to stop moving, and then attack suddenly.[37]

Flies

The true flies (Diptera) include several families of parasitoids, the largest of which is the Tachinidae, along with others such as the Pipunculidae and Conopidae. Other families of flies include some protelean species. For example, the Phoridae are parasitoidal on ants, and some flesh flies, such as Emblemasoma auditrix, are parasitoidal on cicadas, locating their hosts by sound.[38]

Strepsiptera

The "twisted-wing parasites" (Strepsiptera) consists entirely of parasitoids which usually sterilise their host. Two beetle families, Ripiphoridae and Rhipiceridae, are largely parasitoids, as are Aleochara rove beetles. Other orders include a few parasitoids, such as epipyropid moths, which are ectoparasitoids of planthoppers and cicadas. More elaborately, the genus Cyclotorna begins its growth period parasitising plant bugs, and ends by feeding on ant larvae in their colonies.

Vertebrates

Sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus

Lampreys can be either parasitic or parasitoidal. Most species are not parasitic, but among the North American species for example, several are ectoparasitic on freshwater fishes. They rasp away the skin of the host and suck the blood, but most do only superficial damage. In contrast, the sea lamprey inflicts deep rasping wounds, and the muscle damage and loss of blood commonly weaken the host severely, affecting its reproduction or killing it.

The sabre-toothed blenny parasitises the cleaning symbiosis relationship between some cleaner fish and their client fishes. It attacks the client fish, approaching it in the guise of cleaner wrasse, and snatches a mouthful of scales or other convenient tissue. Clients often react violently, and thereafter trust neither wrasse nor the wrasse-mimicking blenny.

Another form of parasitism that can approach parasitoidy occurs in the Perissodini, cichlids from Lake Tanganyika. Seven species in the genus Perissodus are specialised in eating scales from other fish. Their teeth are variously suited to being able to grab bits of skin with the scales attached. At least some of the species also have adaptations in their behavior to enable them to approach potential hosts.[39] They have an adaptation of the jaw that enables them to lash out sideways when passing a victim; the jaw is asymmetrical,[40] and there is continuous selection for the asymmetry that currently is less frequent in the population, because host fishes are more alert to defend themselves on the side on which they have been attacked in the past.[41]

Such a lifestyle is reminiscent of sharks of the genus Isistius, also known as the cookiecutter shark because of the circular wounds it leaves on the skin of whales and large fish that it has bitten in passing.[42] Isistius species have been referred to as partly ectoparasitic,[43] but they sometimes overwhelm their hosts and kill them.

Among birds, brood parasitism is found in the cuckoos, honey-guides, cowbirds and other groups. They are parasitoids, as they often cause the starvation of the host's chicks by competing with them for food, while others either remove host eggs when laying eggs in host nests (sometimes eating the eggs removed), or the chick ejects or kills the eggs or chicks of the host when they hatch. Some hatchlings have hooked beaks adapted to attacking the host chicks and eggs; these hooks vanish before fledging.

Biological control

Encarsia formosa, bred commercially to control whitefly in greenhouses

Parasitoids are among the most widely used biological control agents. From the point of view of the farmer or horticulturalist, the most important groups are the Ichneumonid wasps, which prey mainly on caterpillars of butterflies and moths; Braconid wasps, which attack caterpillars and a wide range of other insects including greenfly; Chalcid wasps, which parasitise eggs and larvae of greenfly, whitefly, cabbage caterpillars, and scale insects; and Tachinid flies, which parasitize a wide range of insects including caterpillars, adult and larval beetles, and true bugs.[44] Commercially, there are two types of rearing systems: short-term daily output with high production of parasitoids per day, and long-term low daily output with a range in production of 4-1000 million female parasitoids per week.[45] Larger production facilities produce on a yearlong basis, whereas some facilities produce only seasonally. Rearing facilities are usually a significant distance from where the agents are to be used in the field, and transporting the parasitoids from the point of production to the point of use can pose problems.[46] Shipping conditions can be too hot, and even vibrations from planes or trucks can adversely affect parasitoids.[45]

See also

References

  1. Reuter, Reuter, O.M. (1913). Lebensgewohnheiten und Instinkte der Insekten (Berlin: Friendlander).
  2. Wheeler, William Morton. Social life among the insects: being a series of lectures delivered at the Lowell Institute in Boston in March 1922. Harcourt, Brace 1923, Previously published in Scientific Monthly, June 1922, to February 1923.
  3. H. C. J. Godfray (January 1994). Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-00047-6.
  4. 1 2 3 Poulin, Robert; Randhawa, Haseeb S. (February 2015). "Evolution of parasitism along convergent lines: from ecology to genomics". Parasitology. 142 (Suppl 1): S6–S15. PMC 4413784Freely accessible. PMID 24229807. doi:10.1017/S0031182013001674.
  5. Møller, A. P. (1990). "Effects of parasitism by a haematophagous mite on reproduction in the barn swallow". Ecology. 71 (6): 2345–2357. JSTOR 1938645. doi:10.2307/1938645.
  6. Peckham, Elizabeth G.; Peckham, George A. (2010). On the Instincts and Habits of the Solitary Wasps, Issue 2. Nabu Press. ISBN 1-143-02120-7.
  7. Burroughs, John; Peckham, George A.; Peckham, Elizabeth G. (2007). Wasps: Social And Solitary (1905). Kessinger. ISBN 0-548-63589-7.
  8. Li, Jian; Seal, Dakshina R.; "Parasitoids of Dipteran leafminers, Diglyphus spp. (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Eulophidae)" EENY-484 (IN877), Entomology and Nematology Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. December 2010.
  9. Bugnyar, Thomas; Weber, Emilie A.; Krause, Lara H.; Boebel, Olaf (2009). Animal Behavior: New Research. Nova Science. ISBN 1-60456-782-1.
  10. Askew, R. R. (1961). "On the biology of the inhabitants of oak galls of Cynipidae (Hymenoptera) in Britain". Transactions of the Society for British Entomology. 14: 237.
  11. Askew, [by] R.R. (1971). Parasitic insects ([1st American ed.]. ed.). New York: American Elsevier Pub. Co. ISBN 0-444-19629-3.
  12. Wojcik, Daniel P.; Behavioral Interactions between Ants and Their Parasites.; The Florida Entomologist Vol. 72, No. 1 (Mar., 1989), pp. 43-51
  13. Taylor PJ (December 1993). "A systematic and population genetic approach to the rabies problem in the yellow mongoose (Cynictis penicillata)". Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 60 (4): 379–87. PMID 7777324.
  14. Holm, Erik, Dippenaar-Schoeman, Ansie; Goggo Guide; LAPA publishers (URL: WWW.LAPA.co.za). 2010
  15. Grosman, Amir H.; Janssen, Arne; Brito, Elaine F. de; Cordeiro, Eduardo G.; Colares, Felipe; Fonseca, Juliana Oliveira; Lima, Eraldo R.; Pallini, Angelo; Sabelis, Maurice W. (2008-06-04). "Parasitoid Increases Survival of Its Pupae by Inducing Hosts to Fight Predators". PLOS ONE. 3 (6): e2276. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 2386968Freely accessible. PMID 18523578. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002276.
  16. Ahmad Bhat, Shabir; Bashir, Ifat; Kamili, Afifa S. "Microsporidiosis of silkworm, Bombyx mori L. (Lepidoptera- bombycidae): A review". African Journal of Agricultural Research. 4 (13): 1519–1523.
  17. Webster, Joanne P. (2009). Natural History of Host-Parasite Interactions. Academic Press. p. 233. ISBN 978-0-08-095088-4.
  18. Malik, Abdul; Grohmann, Elisabeth; Alves, Madalena (2013). Management of Microbial Resources in the Environment. Springer. p. 74. ISBN 978-94-007-5931-2.
  19. Press M. C. and Graves J. D. (1995). Parasitic Plants. Chapman & Hall, London
  20. Visser, Johann (1981). South African parasitic flowering plants. Cape Town: Juta. ISBN 0-7021-1228-3.
  21. Putz, F. E.; Holbrook, N. M. (1989). "Strangler fig rooting habits and nutrient relations in the llanos of Venezuela". American Journal of Botany. 76: 781–788. doi:10.2307/2444534.
  22. Janovy, John; Schmidt, Gerald D.; Roberts, Larry S. (1996). Gerald D. Schmidt & Larry S. Roberts' Foundations of parasitology. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown. ISBN 0-697-26071-2.
  23. Godfray, H.C.J. (1994) Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, ISBN 0-691-03325-0
  24. Hymenoptera of the world : an identification guide to families. Goulet, Henri., Huber, John T. (John Theodore), Canada. Agriculture Canada. Research Branch. Ottawa, Ont.: Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research. 1993. ISBN 0660149338. OCLC 28024976.
  25. Piper, Ross (2007), Extraordinary Animals: An Encyclopedia of Curious and Unusual Animals, Greenwood Press.
  26. Hochberg, M; Elmes, G. W.; Thomas, J. A.; Clarke, R. T. (1996). "Mechanisms of local persistence in coupled host-parasitoid associations: the case model of Maculinea rebeli and Ichneumon eumerus". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 351 (1348): 1713–1724. doi:10.1098/rstb.1996.0153.
  27. Kapranasa Apostolos, and Alejandro Tenab, Robert F. Lucka "Dynamic virulence in a parasitoid wasp: the influence of clutch size and sequential oviposition on egg encapsulation." 83 (2012): 833-838.Print.
  28. 1 2 H.C.J. Godfray. "Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology" Princeton University Press, (1994).
  29. P. J. Gullan and P. S. Cranston, The Insects: An Outline of Entomology, 4th ed., Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 2010.
  30. Apostolos, Kapranasa; Tenab, Alejandro; Lucka, Robert F. (2012). "Dynamic virulence in a parasitoid wasp: the influence of clutch size and sequential oviposition on egg encapsulation". 8 (3): 833–838.
  31. Schmidt, O.; Theopold, U.; Strand, M.R. (2001). "Innate immunity and evasion by insect parasitoids". BioEssays. 23: 344–351. doi:10.1002/bies.1049.
  32. "The resistance of insect parasitoids to the defense reactions of their hosts". Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 43: 200–232. 1968. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1968.tb00959.x.
  33. Summers, M. D.; Dib-Hajj (1995). "Polydnavirus-facilitated endoparasite protection against host immune defenses". PNAS. 92: 29–36. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.1.29.
  34. Kessler, Andre; Baldwin, Ian T. (2002). "PLANT RESPONSES TO INSECT HERBIVORY: The Emerging Molecular Analysis". Annual Reviews. 53: 299–328. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135207.
  35. 1 2 3 4 Gomez, Jose-Maria; van Achterberg, Cornelius (2011). "Oviposition behaviour of four ant parasitoids (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Euphorinae, Neoneurini and Ichneumonidae, Hybrizontinae), with the description of three new European species". ZooKeys. 125: 59–106. doi:10.3897/zookeys.125.1754.
  36. 1 2 van Achterberg C, Argaman Q. "Kollasmosoma gen. nov. and a key to the genera of the subfamily Neoneurinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)". Zoologische Mededelingen Leiden. 67. (1993):63-74.
  37. Köhler U, Lakes-Harlan R.; Auditory behaviour of a parasitoid fly (Emblemasoma auditrix, Sarcophagidae, Diptera). J Comp Physiol A. 2001 Oct; 187(8):581–7.
  38. Takahashi, R.; Watanabe, K.; Nishida, M.; Hori, M. (2007). "Evolution of feeding specialization in Tanganyikan scale-eating cichlids: A molecular phylogenetic approach". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 7: 195. PMC 2212659Freely accessible. PMID 17945014. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-195.
  39. Evolution of a unique predatory feeding apparatus: functional anatomy, development and a genetic locus for jaw laterality in Lake Tanganyika scale-eating cichlids. BMC Biol. 2010 Jan 26 ;8:8.
  40. Hori, M (1993). "Frequency-dependent natural selection in the handedness of scale-eating cichlid fish". Science. 260: 216–219. doi:10.1126/science.260.5105.216.
  41. Mann, Janet (2000). Cetacean societies : field studies of dolphins and whales. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-50341-0.
  42. Papastamatiou, Y. P.; Wetherbee, B. M.; o'Sullivan, J.; Goodmanlowe, G. D.; Lowe, C. G. (2010). "Foraging ecology of Cookiecutter Sharks (Isistius brasiliensis) on pelagic fishes in Hawaii, inferred from prey bite wounds". Environmental Biology of Fishes. 88 (4): 361. doi:10.1007/s10641-010-9649-2.
  43. "Parasitoid Wasps (Hymenoptera)". University of Maryland. Retrieved 6 June 2016.
  44. 1 2 Smith, S.M. (1996). "Biological control with Trichogramma: advances, successes, and potential of their use". Annual Review of Entomology. 41: 375–406. PMID 15012334. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.002111.
  45. Wajnberg, E.; Hassan, S.A. (1994). Biological Control with Egg Parasitoids. CABI Publishing.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.