Droughts in California

Percent Area in U.S. Drought Monitor Categories

Throughout history, California has experienced many droughts, such as 1841, 1864, 1924, 1928-1935, 1947-1950, 1959-1960, 1976-1977, 2006-2010, and 2012-2017.[1] As the most populous state in the United States and a major agricultural producer, drought in California can have a severe economic as well as environmental impact. Drought may be due solely or in combination to weather conditions; economic or political actions; or population and farming. The article will touch on the causes of drought, such as lack of new infrastructure, limited reservoir capacity, leaky distribution systems, etc... Also following up with the effects of these droughts and their impacts on the state of California, short term and long term. Then discussing the top historically droughts throughout history and finishing with possible responses, which will discuss mitigation and adaptation to the droughts that can possibly be implemented.

A dry riverbed in California, 2009

Causes

Water in California is very closely managed, with an extensive pipeline network to serve the most populated and dry areas of the state. Precipitation is limited, with the vast majority of rain and snowfall occurring in the winter months, in the northern part of the state. This delicate balance means that a dry rainy season can have lasting consequences.

Lack of new infrastructure

Very few large-scale water projects have been built since 1979, despite a doubling of the population since that year. [2] [3]

Inefficient distribution systems

Because much of California's water network relies on a system of pumps to move water from north to south, large volumes of water are often lost to the Pacific Ocean during winter storms when river flow exceeds the capacity of the pumps. This is further complicated by environmental rules which restrict pumping during certain months of the year, to protect migrating fish. In water year 2015, 9,400,000 acre feet (11.6 km3) of water flowed through the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta, but only 1,900,000 acre feet (2.3 km3) were recovered into water distribution systems.[4]

Reservoir capacity reserved for flood control

Dry boat ramp at Folsom Lake, January 2014

Most of California's major reservoirs serve important flood control functions. Due to the limited capacity of river channels and dam spillways, reservoirs cannot be quickly drained before major storms. This limits how much of a reservoir's capacity can be used for long-term storage. Reservoirs in California are designed to control either rain floods, snowmelt floods or both.

In the coastal and southern parts of the state, and much of the Sacramento River system, the primary threat is rain floods in the November–April wet season. Oceanic "atmospheric river" or Pineapple Express storms can generate massive precipitation in a short period (often up to 50 percent of the total annual rainfall in just a few storms).[5] This requires a certain safety margin to be maintained in reservoirs, which are often not allowed to capacity until late April or May. Shasta Lake, California's largest reservoir, is limited to approximately 71 percent of capacity in the winter in order to control rain flooding. Levees along Northern California rivers, such as the Sacramento and American rivers, are quite generously sized in order to pass large volumes of floodwater.[6]

In the San Joaquin River basin (San Joaquin Valley) and other areas of the state where snowpack is the primary source of river flow, river channels are sized mainly to control snowmelt floods, which do not produce the huge peaks typical of rain floods, but are longer in duration and have a much higher total volume. As a result, reservoirs in this region have very strict restrictions on the amount of water that can be released. An example of a reservoir operated for snow floods is Pine Flat Lake near Fresno, which is restricted to about 53 percent capacity well into spring in order to capture summer snowmelt.[7] However, Pine Flat and other San Joaquin reservoirs are frequently ineffectual in controlling rain floods, because they cannot release water fast enough between winter storms.[7][8]

Certain parts of the state, especially in the central Sierra Nevada, are prone to both rain and snow floods. Reservoirs such as Lake Oroville and Folsom Lake must respond to a wider range of runoff conditions. Lake Oroville is typically limited to 79–89 percent of capacity during the winter and Folsom Lake to 33–60 percent. These values are often adjusted up and down based on the amount of rain and snow forecast.[6] At Folsom Lake, due to the small size of the reservoir, it is difficult to balance the need for winter flood-control space with the need to store water for the summer. This often results in a failure to fill the lake due to a lower than expected spring snowmelt. Water managers and hydrology experts have criticized the outdated, overly conservative operation criteria at Folsom Dam, citing improved weather forecasting and snowpack measurement technology.[9]

Progress in forecasting methods has allowed more efficient or "smart" operation at certain California reservoirs, such as Lake Mendocino. If dry weather is forecast, water is allowed to be stored above the legal flood control limit, rather than being wasted downstream. This program is known as "Forecast Informed Reservoir Operations".[10] In addition, capital improvements such as the $900 million spillway project at Folsom Dam[11] will allow greater flexibility in water releases, making it safer to maintain a high reservoir level during the wet season.

Flood control limitations at selected California reservoirs[7]
Reservoir River Capacity Max. flood
control
reservation
Percent
of total
capacity
Target flood
water release
Acre feet km3 Acre feet km3 ft3/s m3/s
Shasta Lake Sacramento River 4,552,000 5.615 1,300,000 1.6 28.5% 79,000 2,200
Lake Oroville Feather River 3,540,000 4.37 750,000 0.93 21.1% 150,000 4,200
New Bullards Bar Reservoir Yuba River 966,000 1.192 170,000 0.21 17.6% 50,000 1,400
Folsom Lake American River 977,000 1.205 670,000 0.83 68.5% 115,000 3,300
Camanche Lake Mokelumne River 417,000 0.514 200,000 0.25 48.0% 5,000 140
New Hogan Lake Calaveras River 317,000 0.391 165,000 0.204 52.1% 12,500 350
New Melones Lake Stanislaus River 2,420,000 2.99 450,000 0.56 18.6% 8,000 230
Lake Don Pedro Tuolumne River 2,030,000 2.50 340,000 0.42 16.7% 9,000 250
Lake McClure Merced River 1,024,600 1.2638 350,000 0.43 34.2% 6,000 170
Millerton Lake San Joaquin River 520,500 0.6420 390,500 0.4817 75.0% 8,000 230
Pine Flat Lake Kings River 1,000,000 1.2 475,000 0.586 47.5% 7,950 225
Lake Isabella[12] Kern River 568,000 0.701 398,000 0.491 70.1% 4,600 130

Weather cycles

California has one of the most variable climates of any U.S. state, and often experiences very wet years followed by extremely dry ones.[13] The state's reservoirs have insufficient capacity to balance the water supply between wet and dry years.

El Niño and La Niña have often been associated with wet and dry cycles in California, respectively (the 1982–83 El Niño event, one of the strongest in history, brought record precipitation to the state), but climate data show scant evidence for such a relationship. The very wet 2010–2011 season occurred during a strong La Niña phase, while the 2014–16 El Niño event, which surpassed 1982–83 in intensity, did not bring an appreciable increase of precipitation to the state.

The 2012–15 North American Drought was caused by conditions of the Arctic oscillation and North Atlantic oscillation which removed winter storms from the U.S. the winter of 2011–2012.

Climate change

According to the NOAA Drought Task Force report of 2014, the drought is not part of a long-term change in precipitation and was a symptom of the natural variability, although the record-high temperature that accompanied the recent drought may have been amplified due to human-induced global warming.[14] This was confirmed by a 2015 scientific study which estimated that global warming "accounted for 8–27% of the observed drought anomaly in 2012–2014... Although natural variability dominates, anthropogenic warming has substantially increased the overall likelihood of extreme California droughts."[15]

Increasingly dramatic fluctuations in California weather have been observed in the 21st century. In 2015, California experienced its lowest snowpack in at least 500 years; the 2012–15 period was the driest in at least 1200 years.[16][17][18][19][20][21] However, the winter of 2016–17 was the wettest ever recorded in Northern California, surpassing the previous record set in 1982–83. In February, Shasta, Oroville and Folsom Lakes were simultaneously dumping water into the ocean for flood control. Lake Oroville flowed over the emergency spillway for the first time in 48 years, after the main spillway was damaged resulting in the temporary evacuation of 200,000 people.[22] The combined inflow to Shasta, Oroville and Folsom Lakes on February 9 was 764,445 acre feet (0.942929 km3). Two days later, the combined flood control release was 370,260 acre feet (0.45671 km3).[23] This water would have been worth $370M at Los Angeles County municipal rates.[24]

Water rights complexity

Without changes in water use, it would take about 6 dry years to deplete the state's reservoirs. [25]

Large water consumers

Approximately 2.7 trillion gallons are effectively exported from California every year in cattle feed. [26] This is more than California's annual urban water consumption, which is only 2.3 trillion gallons. [27] California's annual cattle feed production is worth only $1.3 billion. [28]

Also, from 2008–2015, 1.4 trillion gallons were dumped into the ocean to save 36 Delta smelt. [29] An alternative, salinity barriers, is being installed.[30]

Supply and Demand

Water in California can be rather expensive. [24] These conditions lead to awareness of water management challenges. [31]

In rain rich states and countries, which are not drought prone, the water, as elsewhere, is managed by government consent, which assumes ownership and management of all free flowing rivers, lakes, and bodies of water in its parameters. The water being used for commercial purposes, such as NESTLE'S 72 brands of bottled water, is done so only as permitted and granted by governmental authorities. Lately, locales have been fighting back against the "stealing" of precious resources by opposing and not allowing huge water draw down facilities to be set up. [32] In some instances, water tables underground have dropped from 100 to 400–600 feet deep, basically shutting down most private well owners from their own water sources. [33] [34]

Orange County is working toward water independence by building the world's largest indirect potable water recycling project - the Groundwater Replenishment System. Poseidon Water is also developing a seawater desalination plant in Huntington Beach for Orange County and has already built and is operating a seawater desalination plant in Carlsbad for San Diego County. Combined the two plants will provide 100 million gallons of drinking water per day, or enough water for about 800,000 people.

Effects

Short Term Effects

The runoff from rainfall used to support many aspects of California infrastructure, such as agriculture and municipal use, will be severely diminished during the drought. While groundwater diminishes at a much lower rate than runoff, the lack of runoff will lead to increased groundwater pumping to meet the needs of the water demand. If groundwater is being pumped at a rate higher than it can be replenished by precipitation then groundwater levels will begin to fall and the quality of water will also decrease. With that said the relationship between surface water and groundwater contribute to the hydrologic system, and groundwater helps maintain surface water flows during extended dry periods. With both sources diminishing, the quality and availability of water will decrease.

Long Term Effects

Excessive ground water pumping and aquifer depletion will lead to land sinking and permanent loss of groundwater storage. Decreasing groundwater levels lead to exposing of underground water storage areas, this will cause lack of soil structure strength and possible sinking if the land above is heavy enough. This has already begun in certain parts of the state during the most recent drought. In coastal communities, excessive water pumping can lead to sea water intrusion, which means sea water will begin to flow into the underground water storage areas that were vacated by excess pumping. This can cause decreased water quality and lead to an expensive desalination effort to clean the water before distribution. Water flows through wildlife refuges and national parks can decrease or stop all together due to the decrease of surface and groundwater, the California Water Science Center is a part of a team trying to restore and maintain water flow in these at risk areas. With reduction of water flow and increased windy or dry weather, wildfire risks increase; lightning strikes or accidental human mistake can lead to huge wildfires due to the drier-than-normal climate.[35]

Historic droughts

Since 1900, the following dry years have had significantly below-average precipitation.

[36][37]

Mono Lake in 2006 (left), and Mono Lake in August 2014

1841

The drought was so bad that "a dry Sonoma was declared entirely unsuitable for agriculture"[1]

1864

This drought was preceded by the torrential floods of 1861-1862, showing the fluctuation in climate back in the 1800s.[1]

1924

This drought encouraged farmers to start using irrigation more regularly because of the fluctuation in California weather the need for consistent water availability was crucial for farmers.[1]

1929–1934

This drought was during the infamous Dust Bowl period that ripped across the plains of the United States in the 1920s and 1930s.[1] The Central Valley Project was started in the 1930s in response to drought.[38]

1950s

The 1950s drought contributed to the creation of the State Water Project.[38]

1976–77

1977 had been the driest year in state history to date.[39] According to the Los Angeles Times, "Drought in the 1970s spurred efforts at urban conservation and the state's Drought Emergency Water Bank came out of drought in the 1980s."[38]

1986–1992

California endured one of its longest droughts ever observed from late 1986 through early 1992. Drought worsened in 1988 as much of the United States also suffered from severe drought. In California, the six-year drought ended in late 1992 as a significant El Niño event in the Pacific Ocean (and the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in June 1991) most likely caused unusual persistent heavy rains.[40]

2007–2009

2007–2009 saw three years of drought conditions, the 12th worst drought period in the state's history, and the first drought for which a statewide proclamation of emergency was issued. The drought of 2007–2009 also saw greatly reduced water diversions from the state water project. The summer of 2007 saw some of the worst wildfires in Southern California history.[41]

2011–2017

Progression of the drought from December 2013 to July 2014

The period between late 2011 and 2014 was the driest in California history since record-keeping began.[42] In May 2015, a state resident poll conducted by Field Poll found that two out of three respondents agreed that it should be mandated for water agencies to reduce water consumption by 25%.[43]

The 2015 prediction of El Niño to bring rains to California raised hopes of ending the drought. In the spring of 2015, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration named the probability of the presence of El Niño conditions until the end of 2015 at 80%. Historically, sixteen winters between 1951 and 2015 had created El Niño. Six of those had below-average rainfall, five had average rainfall, and five had above-average rainfall. However, as of May 2015, drought conditions had worsened and above average ocean temperatures had not resulted in large storms.[44]

The drought led to Governor Jerry Brown's instituting mandatory 25 percent water restrictions in June 2015.[45]

Many millions of California trees died from the drought - approximately 102 million, including 62 million in 2016 alone.[46] By the end of 2016, 30% of California had emerged from the drought, mainly in the northern half of the state, while 40% of the state remained in the extreme or exceptional drought levels.[47] Heavy rains in January 2017 were expected to have a significant benefit to the state's northern water reserves, despite widespread power outages and erosional damage in the wake of the deluge.[48] Among the casualties of the rain was 1,000 year-old Pioneer Cabin Tree in Calaveras Big Trees State Park, which toppled on January 8, 2017.[49]

The winter of 2016–17 turned out to be the wettest on record in Northern California, surpassing the previous record set in 1982–83.[50] Floodwaters caused severe damage to Oroville Dam in early February, prompting the temporary evacuation of nearly 200,000 people north of Sacramento.[51] In response to the heavy precipitation, which flooded multiple rivers and filled most of the state's major reservoirs, Governor Brown declared an official end to the drought on April 7.[52]

Possible Responses

Adaptation

Adaptation is to adjust to the circumstances, which means not trying to stop the drought, but try to preserve the water given the drought conditions. This is the most used option,

because stopping a drought is difficult given that its is a meteorological process. Adapting to the problem using innovation and problem solving is often the cheaper and more useful way to go because trying to change the natural processes of the earth could have unforeseen consequences.

Mitigation

Mitigation is the attempt to stop the droughts from occurring, since this is an environmental process, the ability to control it is slim. There are few options which involving helping the environment to stabilize the climate and try to reduce the likelihood of severe droughts. Implementing policy to begin efforts to help climate will lead to less variable weather partners, which in turn stabilize the environment and reduce drought occurrences. To expand upon the possible policy options, policies including water use limit per household, water recycling requirements, etc. Let’s evaluate both policies starting with water use limit per household, this policy would likely work to decrease water use which would reduce the need for water and limit the effects of a drought. This policy would not cost much, only the need to install monitors in the household which track the amount of water used. The citizens would be against this policy since they would want to have unlimited access to water. But the politicians and environmentalists would be in favor because it would reduce the water crisis and help with the drought. This policy would likely not easy political acceptability because many people would likely fight this policy and file lawsuits on the government for mandating their water. Water recycling requirements is different from recycling wastewater because it would be a policy requiring water recycling for everyone and it would include more than just waste water, such as rain water.

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "A History of Drought in California: Learning From the Past, Looking to the Future". Civil Eats. 2014-02-05. Retrieved 2017-05-03.
  2. "California Drought: Bad Policy, Poor Infrastructure".
  3. "California Faces Lost Decades in Solving Drought".
  4. "Day Flow Calculations 2015".
  5. http://cw3e.ucsd.edu/FIRO/firo_introduction.html
  6. 1 2 http://www.water.ca.gov/storage/docs/NODOS%20Project%20Docs/NODOS_Prelim_Admin_Draft_EIR/09-Flood_Control_prelim_admin_draft_Dec2013_w_figures.pdf
  7. 1 2 3 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. "Central Valley Flood Management Systems" (PDF). Auburn Dam Council. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-11. Retrieved 2017-05-02.
  8. https://www.usbr.gov/mp/sccao/storage/docs/phase1_rpt_fnl/tech_app/09_pine_flat.pdf
  9. http://www.sacbee.com/news/state/california/water-and-drought/article60419396.html
  10. http://cw3e.ucsd.edu/FIRO/
  11. http://www.spk.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Folsom-Water-Control-Manual-Update/
  12. Although the nominal capacity is 568,000 acre feet, Lake Isabella is currently limited to 360,000 acre foot capacity due to structural problems with the dam.
  13. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/california-climate-temperature_us_58a49f38e4b03df370dca5cf
  14. http://cpo.noaa.gov/ClimatePrograms/ModelingAnalysisPredictionsandProjections/MAPPTaskForces/DroughtTaskForce/CaliforniaDrought.aspx
  15. Williams,, A. Park; et al. (2015). "Contribution of anthropogenic warming to California drought during 2012-2014". Geophysical Research Letters. doi:10.1002/2015GL064924.
  16. "California Just Had Its Worst Drought in Over 1200 Years".
  17. "California drought the worst in 1,200 years, new study says".
  18. "California Drought Worst in 1,200 Years: Study".
  19. "California Drought Worst In 1,200 Years".
  20. "California Is In The Middle Of Its Worst Drought In 1,200 Years".
  21. "California's worst drought in 1,200 years in pictures".
  22. "Thanks to storm runoff, there's a lot of water over California's second-largest reservoir".
  23. "Daily Reservoir Storage Summary".
  24. 1 2 "LA County Water Rates".
  25. "Another dry year could be bad news for California".
  26. "Cows Not Almonds Are Biggest Water Users".
  27. "California Agricultural Production Statistics".
  28. "CDFA Statistics".
  29. "Forget The Missing Rainfall. Where's the Delta Smelt?".
  30. "Drought Triggers Need for Installation of Emergency Salinity Barrier on Delta Channel".
  31. "California Drought".
  32. "Groveland Battling Water Bottler (Niagra) to Preserve Chance of Future Growth".
  33. "Nestle Continues Stealing World’s Water During Drought - Nestlé is draining California aquifers, from Sacramento alone taking 80 million gallons annually. Nestlé then sells the people's water back to them at great profit under many dozen brand names".
  34. "Nestle Outbids Township That Wanted Well For Drinking Water".
  35. Center, U.S. Geological Survey California Water Science. "Impacts of Drought | USGS California Water Science Center". ca.water.usgs.gov. Retrieved 2017-05-03.
  36. "Drought background". California Department of Water Resources. Retrieved October 26, 2014.
  37. "MAJOR FLOODS AND DROUGHTS IN CALIFORNIA". USGS.
  38. 1 2 3 Curwen, Thomas (7 June 2015). "California drought: No rain, but 'the sky is not falling'". LA Times. Retrieved 8 June 2015.
  39. The 1976–1977 California Drought: A Review (PDF). Department of Water Resources. May 1978.
  40. Water Resources Support Center, Institute For Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (1992). Lessons learned from the California Drought (1987–1992). ASCE Publications. p. 122. ISBN 9780788141638. Retrieved 2013-06-11.
  41. California’s Drought of 2007–2009: An Overview (PDF). California Department of Water Resources. September 2010. pp. 1–2.
  42. Ellen Hanak; Jeffrey Mount; Caitrin Chappelle (January 2015). "California's Latest Drought". PPIC.
  43. Alexander, Kurtis (19 May 2015). "California drought: People support water conservation, in theory". SF Gate. Retrieved 20 May 2015.
  44. Rogers, Paul (14 May 2015). "California drought: El Niño conditions strengthening, but don't break out the galoshes yet". San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved 20 May 2015.
  45. "The California drought: What would you ask Gov. Jerry Brown?". USC News. 8 June 2015. Retrieved 10 June 2015.
  46. USDA Office of Communications (2016-11-18). "New Aerial Survey Identifies More Than 100 Million Dead Trees in California". USDA/U.S. Forest Service. Retrieved 22 November 2016.
  47. USDA Brad Rippey (2016-12-26). "U.S. Drought Monitor California". Retrieved 28 December 2016.
  48. rogers, Paul (January 9, 2017). "California storms add 350 billion gallons to parched reservoirs". The Mercury News (San Jose). Bay Area News Group. Retrieved 10 January 2017.
  49. Andrews, Travis M. (January 9, 2017). "Morning Mix: Winter storm fells one of California’s iconic drive-through tunnel trees, carved in the 1880s". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 10, 2017.
  50. Parvini, Sarah (2017-04-13). "Northern California gets its wettest winter in nearly a century". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2017-04-16.
  51. Park, Madison; McLaughlin, Eliott C. (2017-02-13). "Evacuations ordered over concerns at California dam system". CNN. Retrieved 2017-04-16.
  52. Associated Press (2017-04-07). "California's drought is officially over, Gov. Jerry Brown says". CBS News. Retrieved 2017-04-16.
  53. 1 2 "California's Drought: Adapting and Mitigating". Retrieved 2017-05-03.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.