Dog coat genetics

Modern breeds of dog exhibit a diverse range of coat colorings, patterns, lengths and textures. In recent years, the understanding of the genetic basis for coat coloring and patterning[1] and coat length and texturing[2] has increased significantly. Genes occur in pairs, and for each gene a dog will either be:Homozygous, that is, Inherited the same gene from each parent, and therefore likely to express that trait; or Heterozygous, that is, Inherited a different variant from each parent, and would require understanding of the individual gene to know how the dog will look.

Newfoundland lying next to its combed-out seasonal undercoat.

Genes associated with coat color

Close up of a greyhound's short-haired single coat.
Flakes and greasy coat
Black-coated Chow-Chow whose long hair has faded due to exposure to the elements.
Creamy-white-coated French Bulldog

Coat colour in dogs consists of specific patterns of:

There are currently eight known genes within the canine genome that are associated with coat color. Each of these genes occurs in at least two variants, or alleles, which accounts for the variation in coat color among animals. Each of these genes exists at a fixed location, or locus, of the animal's genome. The loci associated with canine coat color are:

A (agouti) locus

The alleles at the A locus are related to the production of agouti signalling protein (ASIP) and determine whether an animal expresses an agouti appearance, and if so what type, by controlling the distribution of pigment in individual hairs. There are four known alleles that occur at the A locus:

Most texts suggest that the dominance hierarchy for the A locus alleles appears to be as follows: Ay > aw > at > a; however, research suggests the existence of pairwise dominance/recessiveness relationships in different families and not the existence of a single hierarchy in one family.[5]

B (brown) locus

The alleles at the B locus are related to the production of tyrosinase related protein 1 (TYRP1) and determine the degree to which an animal expresses tyrosinase, an enzyme related to the production of melanin, in its coat and skin (including the nose and paw pads). There are four known alleles that occur at the B locus:

B is dominant to b.

D (dilute) locus

The alleles at the D locus (the melanophilin gene or MLPH) are related to the dilution of eumelanin and phaeomelanin and determine the intensity of pigmentation. There are two known alleles:

D is completely dominant to d.

E (extension) locus

The alleles at the E locus (the melanocortin receptor one gene or MC1R) determine whether an animal expresses a melanistic mask, as well as determining whether an animal can produce eumelanin in its coat. There are three known, plus two more theorized, alleles that occur at the E locus:

The dominance hierarchy for the E locus alleles appears to be as follows: Em > EG > E > eh > e.

H (harlequin) locus

DNA studies have not yet isolated the gene at the H locus, but the traits associated with it have been mapped to chromosome 9.[10] The H locus is a modifier locus (of the M locus) and the alleles at the H locus will determine if an animal expresses a harlequin vs merle pattern. There are two alleles that occur at the H locus:

H/h heterozygotes are harlequin and h/h homozygotes are non-harlequin. Breeding data suggests that homozygous H/H is embryonic lethal and that therefore all harlequins are H/h.[10]

K (dominant black) locus

The alleles at the K locus (the β-Defensin 103 gene or DEFB103) determine the coloring pattern of an animal's coat.[11] There are three known alleles that occur at the K locus:

The dominance hierarchy for the K locus alleles appears to be as follows: KB > kbr > ky.

M (merle) locus

The alleles at the M locus (the silver locus protein homolog gene or SILV, aka premelanosome protein gene or PMEL) determine whether an animal expresses a merle pattern to its coat. There are two alleles that occur at the M locus:

M and m show a relationship of both co-dominance and no dominance.

S (spotting) locus

The alleles at the S locus (the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor gene or MITF) determine the degree and distribution of white spotting on an animal's coat.[14] There is disagreement as to the number of alleles that occur at the S locus, with researchers postulating either two[15] or four[16] alleles. The four alleles postulated are:

S is incomplete dominant (towards co-dominant) to sp. DNA studies have not yet confirmed the existence of all four alleles, with some research suggesting the existence of at least two alleles (S and sp)[14] and other research suggesting the possible existence of a third allele (si).[17]

In 2014, a study found that a simple repeat polymorphism in the MITF-M Promoter is a key regulator of white spotting and that white color had been selected for by humans.[19][20]

Theoretical genes for color and pattern

There are at least six additional theoretical loci thought to be associated with coat color in dogs. DNA studies are yet to confirm the existence of these genes or alleles but their existence is theorised based on breeding data:[21]

C (colored) locus

The alleles at the theoretical C locus are thought to determine the degree to which an animal expresses phaeomelanin, a red-brown protein related to the production of melanin, in its coat and skin. Five alleles are theorised to occur at the C locus:

The C locus in dogs is not well understood and the theorised alleles are based on those present in other species.[16] True albinism has not been conclusively shown to exist in dogs. It is thought that an animal that is heterozygous for the C allele with any of the c alleles will express a result somewhere between the two alleles.[22]

White in Doberman Pinschers and albino-like animals of Asian/Tibetan companion breeds have a phenotype resembling a C locus dilution, but all tested animals have been C/C. The gene responsible is recessive and not at the C locus.[23]

F (flecking) locus

The alleles at the theoretical F locus are thought to determine whether an animal displays small, isolated regions of white in otherwise pigmented regions (not apparent on white animals). Two alleles are theorised to occur at the F locus:

It is thought that F is dominant to f.[18]

G (progressive greying) locus

The alleles at the theoretical G locus are thought to determine if progressive greying of the animal's coat will occur. Two alleles are theorised to occur at the G locus:

It is thought that G is dominant to g.

I (intensity) locus

The alleles at the theoretical I locus are thought to affect phaeomelanin expression. Two alleles are theorised to occur at the I locus:

It is thought that I and i interact with semi-dominance, so that there are three distinct phenotypes. I/i heterozygotes are paler than I/I animals but darker than i/i animals.

T (ticking) locus

The alleles at the theoretical T locus are thought to determine whether an animal displays small, isolated regions of pigment in otherwise s-spotted white regions. Two alleles are theorised to occur at the T locus:

It is thought that T is dominant to t. Ticking may be caused by several genes rather than just one. Patterns of medium-sized individual spots, smaller individual spots, and tiny spots that completely cover all white areas leaving a roan-like or merle-like appearance (reserving the term large spots for the variation exclusive to the Dalmatian) can each occur separately or in any combination.

Shiba Inu displaying urajiro pattern.

U (urajiro) locus

The alleles at the theoretical U locus are thought to limit phaeomelanin production on the cheeks and underside.[24] Two alleles are theorised to occur at the U locus:

It is thought that U is dominant to u but incomplete with homozygosity required for complete dilution to off-white and heterozygotes displaying a darker cream. The urajiro pattern is expressed in the tan (phaeomelanin) areas of any dog who is not e/e. In e/e dogs, the urajiro gene causes dilution of the entire dog to off-white or cream.

Interactions of color and pattern genes

Alleles at the Agouti (A), Extension (E) and Black (K) loci determine colour pattern (eumelanin vs phaeomelanin):

PATTERN GENE
INTERACTIONS[25]
Fawn or Sable
Ay/-
Wolf Sable
aw/aw
, aw/at or aw/a
Tan Point
at/at
or at/a
Rec. Black
a/a
Dom. Black
KB/-
Mask
Em/-
black
(with mask)*
black
(with mask)*
black
(with mask)*
black
(with mask)*
wildtype E
E/E or E/e
black black black black
Cocker Sable
eh/eh
or eh/e
? ? cocker sable ?
Brindle
Kbr/Kbr
or Kbr/ky
Mask
Em/-
brindle
with mask
brindle
with mask
black & brindled tan
with mask
black
(with mask)*
wildtype E
E/E
or E/e
brindle brindle black & brindled tan black
Grizzle
EG/EG, EG/E
or EG/e
? ? brindle & tan ?
wildtype K
ky/ky
Mask
Em/-
fawn or sable
with mask
wolf sable
with mask
black & tan
with mask
black
(with mask)*
wildtype E
E/E
or E/e
fawn or sable wolf sable black & tan black
Grizzle
EG/EG, EG/E
or EG/e
? ? grizzle ?
any K
-/-
Clear Fawn
e/e
tan tan tan white
* Note that the black mask on a black dog is only phenotypically evident in presence of G/- and an appropriate coat type.

eh and EG are only included in the table where their interactions are known.

Alleles present at the Brown (B) and Dilution (D) loci determine melanin colour:

COLOUR GENE
INTERACTIONS[26]
Not Dilute
(D/D
or D/d)
Dilute
(d/d)
Black
B/B
or B/b
Black eumelanin
Red* phaeomelanin
Blue-grey eumelanin
Yellow phaeomelanin
Brown
b/b
Chocolate-brown eumelanin
Orange* phaeomelanin
Taupe or "Isabella" eumelanin
Yellow phaeomelanin
* Note that phaeomelanin is frequently diluted by intensity factor of theoretical I locus.

Alleles present at the Intensity (I), Urajiro (U), Greying (G) and Albino (C-like) loci determine melanin shade.

Alleles present at the Merle (M) and Harlequin (H) loci cause patchy reduction of melanin to half (merle), zero (harlequin) or both (double merle).

Alleles present at the Spotting (S), Ticking (T) and Flecking (F) loci determine white markings.

Genes associated with hair length, growth and texture

Every hair in the dog coat grows from a hair follicle, which has a three phase cycle, as in most other mammals. These phases are:

Most dogs have a double coat, each hair follicle containing 1-2 primary hairs and several secondary hairs. The primary hairs are longer, thicker and stiffer, and called guard hairs or outer coat. Each follicle also holds a variety of silky- to wiry-textured secondary hairs (undercoat) all of which are wavy, and smaller and softer than the primary hair. The ratio of primary to secondary hairs varies at least six-fold, and varies between dogs according to coat type, and on the same dog in accordance with seasonal and other hormonal influences.[28] Puppies are born with a single coat, with more hair follicles per unit area, but each hair follicle contains only a single hair of fine, silky texture. Development of the adult coat begins around 3 months of age, and is completed around 12 months.

Research indicates that the majority of variation in coat growth pattern, length and curl can be attributed to mutations in four genes, the R-spondin-2 gene or RSPO2, the fibroblast growth factor-5 gene or FGF5, the keratin-71 gene or KRT71[2] and the melanocortin 5 receptor gene (MC5R). The wild-type coat in dogs is short, double and straight.

L (length) locus

The alleles at the L locus (the fibroblast growth factor-5 gene or FGF5) determine the length of the animal's coat.[29] There are two known alleles that occur at the L locus:

L is dominant to l. A long coat is demonstrated when a dog has pair of recessive l alleles at this locus. The dominance of L > l is incomplete, and L/l dogs have a small but noticeable increase in length and finer texture than closely related L/L individuals. However, between breeds there is significant overlap between the shortest L/L and the longest L/l phenotypes. In certain breeds (German Shepherd, Alaskan Malamute, Cardigan Welsh Corgi), the coat is often of medium length and many dogs of these breeds are also heterozygous at the L locus (L/l).

W (wired) locus

Wire hair.

The alleles at the W locus (the R-spondin-2 gene or RSPO2) determine the coarseness and the presence of "facial furnishings" (e.g. beard, moustache, eyebrows).[2] There are two known alleles that occur at the W locus:

Curly hair.

W is dominant to w, but the dominance of W > w is incomplete. W/W dogs have coarse hair, prominent furnishings and greatly-reduced shedding. W/w dogs have the harsh wire texture, but decreased furnishings, and overall coat length and shedding similar to non-wire animals.[30]

Animals that are homozygous for long coat (i.e., l/l) and possess at least one copy of W will have long, soft coats with furnishings, rather than wirey coats.[2]

R (curl) locus

The Puli's coat forms cords as it grows.

The R (curl) Locus[note 1] The alleles at the R locus (the keratin-71 gene or KRT71) determine whether an animal's coat is straight or curly.[2] There are two known alleles that occur at the R locus:

The relationship of R to r is one of no dominance. Heterozygotes (R/r) have wavy hair that is easily distinguishable from either homozygote. Wavy hair is considered desirable in several breeds, but because it is heterozygous, these breeds do not breed true for coat type.

Corded coats, like those of the Puli and Komondor are thought to be the result of continuously growing curly coats (long + wire + curly) with double coats, though the genetic code of corded dogs has not yet been studied. Corded coats will form naturally, but can be messy and uneven if not "groomed to cord" while the puppy's coat is lengthening.

Interaction of length and texture genes

These three genes responsible for the length and texture of an animal's coat interact to produce eight different (homozygous) phenotypes:[2]

COAT TYPE GENE
INTERACTIONS[31]
Straight
R/R
Wavy
R/r
Curly
r/r
Non-wire
w/w
Short
L/L
or L/l
Short
(e.g., Akita, Greyhound)
Short wavy
(e.g., Chesapeake Bay Retriever)
Short curly
(Curly Coated Retriever? (unproven))
Long
l/l
Long
(e.g., Pomeranian, Cocker Spaniel)
Long wavy
(e.g., Boykin Spaniel)
Long curly
(e.g., Irish Water Spaniel)
Wire
W/W
or W/w
Long
l/l
Shaggy
(e.g., Shih Tzu, Bearded Collie)
Poofy
(e.g., Bichon Frise, Portuguese Water Dog, SCWT)
Long curly with furnishings or
Corded (e.g., Poodle, Puli, Komondor)
Short
L/L
or L/l
Wire
(e.g., Border Terrier, Scottish Terrier)
Wavy wire
(e.g., Wire Fox Terrier)
Curly-wire
(e.g., Wirehaired Pointing Griffon)

Breed exceptions to coat type

Breeds in which coat type Is not explained by FgF5, RSPO2 and KRT71 genes:[32]

Genotypes of dogs of these 3 breeds are usually L/L or L/l, which does not match with their long-haired phenotype. The Yorkshire and Silky Terriers share common ancestry and likely share an unidentified gene responsible for their long hair. The Afghan Hound has a unique patterned coat that is long with short patches on the chest, face, back and tail. The Irish Water Spaniel may share the same pattern gene, although unlike the Afghan Hound, the IWS is otherwise genetically a long-haired (fixed for l/l) breed.

Shedding gene

The alleles on the melanocortin 5 receptor gene (MC5R)[33] determine whether an animal will have neotenous retention of a puppy-like coat type. The locus has not been assigned a common name or letter, but has been called the shedding gene or single coat gene. There are two known alleles that occur at this locus:

The mutant allele is incomplete dominant. With respect to coat texture, shedding, follicle density and number of secondary hairs per follicle, heterozygotes closely resemble animals homozygous for the mutant allele, with minor differences. With respect to coat length and the prominence of fringing and furnishings, the relationship between the two alleles is more complex and dependent on the alleles present at the L and W loci:

Remaining influences of length (e.g., setter vs Cocker Spaniel), texture (e.g., setter vs mountain dog vs spitz or Bearded Collie vs Old English Sheepdog) and abundance of undercoat (e.g., Labrador Retriever vs Keeshond) are likely polygenic.

Hairlessness gene

Some breeds of dog do not grow hair on parts of their bodies and may be referred to as "hairless". Examples of "hairless" dogs are the Xoloitzcuintli (Mexican Hairless Dog), the Peruvian Inca Orchid (Peruvian Hairless Dog) and the Chinese Crested. Research suggests that hairlessness is caused by a dominant allele of the forkhead box transcription factor (FOXI3) gene, which is homozygous lethal.[34] There are coated heterozygous dogs in all hairless breeds, because this type of inheritance prevents the coat type from breeding true. The hairlessness gene permits hair growth on the head, legs and tail. Hair is sparse on the body, but present and typically enhanced by shaving, at least in the Chinese Crested, whose coat type is shaggy (long + wire). Teeth are affected as well, and hairless dogs have incomplete dentition.

Hairless and Coated Xoloitzcuintli.

The American Hairless Terrier is unrelated to the other hairless breeds and displays a different hairlessness gene. Unlike the other hairless breeds, the AHT is born fully coated, and loses its hair within a few months. The AHT gene, serum/glucocorticoid regulated kinase family member 3 gene (SGK3), is recessive and does not result in missing teeth. Because the breed is new and rare, outcrossing to the parent breed (the Rat Terrier) is permitted to increase genetic diversity. These crosses are fully coated and heterozygous for AHT-hairlessness.

Ridgeback

Some breeds (e.g., Rhodesian Ridgeback, Thai Ridgeback) have an area of hair along the spine between the withers and hips that leans in the opposite direction (cranially) to the surrounding coat. The ridge is caused by a duplication of several genes (FGF3, FGF4, FGF 19, ORAOV1 and sometimes SNP), and ridge is dominant to non-ridged.[35]

Genetic testing and phenotype prediction

In recent years genetic testing for the alleles of some genes has become available.[36] Software is also available to assist breeders in determining the likely outcome of matings.[37]

Characteristics linked to coat colour

The genes responsible for the determination of coat colour also affect other melanin-dependent development, including skin colour, eye colour, eyesight, eye formation and hearing. In most cases, eye colour is directly related to coat colour, but blue eyes in the Siberian Husky and related breeds, and copper eyes in some herding dogs are not known to be related to coat colour.

The development of coat colour, skin colour, iris colour, pigmentation in back of eye and melanin-containing cellular elements of the auditory system occur independently, as does development of each element on the left vs right side of the animal. This means that in semi-random genes (M merle, s spotting and T ticking), the expression of each element is independent. For example, skin spots on a piebald-spotted dog will not match up with the spots in the dog's coat; and a merle dog with one blue eye can just as likely have better eyesight in its blue eye than in its brown eye.

Loci for coat colour, type and length

All known genes are on separate chromosomes, and therefore no gene linkage has yet been described among coat genes. However, they do share chromosomes with other major conformational genes, and in at least one case, breeding records have shown an indication of genes passed on together.

Gene Chromosome
(in Dogs)

[38][39]
Symbol Locus
Name
Description Share
Chr
[40][41]
ASIP 24 Ay, aw, at, a Agouti Sable, wolf-sable, tan point, recessive black; as disproven
TYRP1 11 B, bs, bd, bc Brown Black, 3 x chocolate / liver
SLC45A2 4 C Colour No alleles known; possible tyrosinase gene[42] STC2, GHR(1)
& GHR(2) size
MLPH 25 D, d Dilution Black/chocolate, blue/isabella
MC1R 5 Em, Eg, E, eh, e Extension Black mask, grizzle, normal extension, cocker-sable, recessive fawn
PSMB7 9 H, h Harlequin Harlequin, non-harlequin
DEFB103 16 KB, Kbr, ky blacK Dominant black, brindle, agouti-enabler
FgF5 32 L, l Longcoat Short coat, long coat
PMEL 10 M, m Merle Double merle, merle, non-merle HMGA2 size
KRT71 27 R, r cuRlycoat Straight coat, curly coat
MITF 20 S, si, sp Spotting Solid, Irish spotting, piebald spotting; sw not proven to exist
RSPO2 13 W, w Wirecoat Wire coat, non-wire coat
MC5R 1 n/a Shedding Single coat/minimal shedding, double coat/regular shedding C189G bobtail
FOXI3 17 n/a Hairless Hairless, coated
SGK3 29 n/a AHT Coated, AHT-hairless
n/a 18 n/a Ridgeback Ridgeback, non-ridgeback
-- 3 - - No coat genes yet identified here. IGF1R size
-- 7 - - No coat genes yet identified here. SMAD2 size
-- 15 - - No coat genes yet identified here. IGF1 size

There are size genes on all 39 chromosomes, 17 classified as "major" genes.[43] 7 of those are identified as being of key importance and each results in ~2x difference in body weight.[44] IGF1 (Insulin-like growth factor 1), SMAD2 (Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 2), STC2 (Stanniocalcin-2) and GHR(1) (Growth hormone receptor one) are dose-dependent with compact dwarfs vs leaner large dogs and heterozygotes of intermediate size and shape. IGF1R (Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor) and HMGA2 (High-mobility group AT-hook 2) are incomplete dominant with delicate dwarfs vs compact large dogs and heterozygotes closer to the homozygous dwarfed phenotypes. GHR(2) (Growth hormone receptor two) is completely dominant, homozygous and heterozygous dwarfs equally small, larger dogs with a broader flatter skull and larger muzzle.[45] It is believed that the PMEL/SILV merle gene is linked to the HMGA2 size gene, meaning that alleles are most often inherited together, accounting for size differences in merle vs non-merle litter mates, such as in the Chihuahua (merles usually larger) and Shetland Sheepdog (merles frequently smaller).

See also

Notes

  1. Researchers have not yet assigned a letter to this locus and "R" has been selected based on the use of the term "Rex" for curled hair in domestic cats.

References

  1. Schmutz, S. M.; Berryere, T. G. (December 2007). "Genes affecting coat color and pattern in domestic dogs: a review". Animal Genetics. 38 (6): 539–549. PMID 18052939. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01664.x.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Edouard Cadieu; Mark W. Neff; Pascale Quignon; Kari Walsh; Kevin Chase; Heidi G. Parker; Bridgett M. VonHoldt; Alison Rhue; Adam Boyko; Alexandra Byers; Aaron Wong; Dana S. Mosher; Abdel G. Elkahloun; Tyrone C. Spady; Catherine André; K. Gordon Lark; Michelle Cargill; Carlos D. Bustamante; Robert K. Wayne; Elaine A. Ostrander (October 2009). "Coat Variation in the Domestic Dog Is Governed by Variants in Three Genes". Science. 326 (5949): 150–153. PMC 2897713Freely accessible. PMID 19713490. doi:10.1126/science.1177808.
  3. Dreger, Dayna L.; Schmutz, Sheila M. (2011). "A SINE Insertion Causes the Black-and-Tan and Saddle Tan Phenotypes in Domestic Dogs". Journal of Heredity. 102: S11–S18. PMID 21846741. doi:10.1093/jhered/esr042.
  4. Dreger DL, Parker H, Ostrander E, Schmutz SM. The involvement of RALY in a complex gene interaction producing the saddle tan phenotype in dogs. A presentation at Advances in Canine and Feline Genomics and Inherited Diseases 2012 Conference, Visby, Sweden. June 1, 2012.
  5. Julie A. Kerns; J. Newton; Tom G. Berryere; Edward M. Rubin; Jan-Fang Cheng; Sheila M. Schmutz; Gregory S. Barsh (October 2004). "Characterization of the dog Agouti gene and a nonagouti mutation in German Shepherd Dogs". Mammalian Genome. 15 (10): 798–808. ISSN 0938-8990. PMID 15520882. doi:10.1007/s00335-004-2377-1.
  6. https://homepage.usask.ca/~schmutz/dogbrown.html
  7. Ute Philipp; Henning Hamann; Lars Mecklenburg; Seiji Nishino; Emmanuel Mignot; Anne-Rose Günzel-Apel; Sheila M Schmutz; Tosso Leeb (June 2005). "Polymorphisms within the canine MLPH gene are associated with dilute coat color in dogs". BMC Genetics. 6 (34): 34. ISSN 1471-2156. PMC 1183202Freely accessible. PMID 15960853. doi:10.1186/1471-2156-6-34.
  8. https://asas.org/docs/default-source/wcgalp-proceedings-oral/278_paper_10239_manuscript_1637_0.pdf?sfvrsn=2
  9. Dayna L. Dreger; Sheila M. Schmutz (Jun 2010). "A New Mutation in MC1R Explains a Coat Color Phenotype in 2 ‘‘Old’’ Breeds: Saluki and Afghan Hound". Journal of Heredity. 101 (5): 644–649. PMID 20525767. doi:10.1093/jhered/esq061.
  10. 1 2 Leigh Anne Clark; Alison N. Starr; Kate L. Tsai; Keith E. Murphy (July 2008). "Genome-wide linkage scan localizes the harlequin locus in the Great Dane to chromosome 9". Gene. 418 (1–2): 49–52. PMID 18513894. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2008.04.006.
  11. Sophie I. Candille; Christopher B. Kaelin; Bruce M. Cattanach; Bin Yu; Darren A. Thompson; Matthew A. Nix; Julie A. Kerns; Sheila M. Schmutz; Glenn L. Millhauser; Gregory S. Barsh (November 2007). "A β-Defensin Mutation Causes Black Coat Color in Domestic Dogs". Science. 318 (5855): 1418–1423. PMC 2906624Freely accessible. PMID 17947548. doi:10.1126/science.1147880.
  12. Leigh Anne Clark; Jacquelyn M. Wahl; Christine A. Rees; Keith E. Murphy (January 2006). "Retrotransposon insertion in SILV is responsible for merle patterning of the domestic dog". PNAS. 103 (5): 1376–1381. ISSN 0273-1134. PMC 1360527Freely accessible. PMID 16407134. doi:10.1073/pnas.0506940103.
  13. "George Strain on Merle" (PDF). Merle Poms. Retrieved 27 October 2011.
  14. 1 2 3 Sheila M. Schmutz; Tom G. Berryere; Dayna L. Dreger (June 2009). "MITF and White Spotting in Dogs: A Population Study". Journal of Heredity. 100 (Supplement 1): 566–574. doi:10.1093/jhered/esp029.
  15. Winge, Ojvind (1950). Inheritance in Dogs: With Special Reference to the Hunting Breeds. Catherine Roberts (translator). Ithaca, N.Y.: Comstock Publishing. p. 194.
  16. 1 2 Little, Clarence Cook (1957). The Inheritance of Coat Color in Dogs. New York: Comstock Publishing. p. 194. ISBN 0-87605-621-4.
  17. Karlsson E. K.; Baranowska I.; Wade C. M.; Salmon Hillbertz N. H.; Zody M. C.; Anderson N.; Biagi T. M.; Patterson N.; Pielberg G. R.; Kulbokas E. J. III; Comstock K. E.; Keller E. T.; Mesirov J. P.; von Euler H.; Kämpe O.; Hedhammar A.; Lander E. S.; Andersson G.; Andersson L.; Lindblad-Toh K. (November 2007). "Efficient mapping of mendelian traits in dogs through genome-wide association". Nature Genetics. 39 (11): 1304–1306. PMID 17906626. doi:10.1038/ng.2007.10.
  18. 1 2 Edward J. Cargill1, Thomas R. Famula, Robert D. Schnabel, George M. Strain & Keith E. Murphy (July 2005). "The color of a Dalmatian's spots: Linkage evidence to support the TYRP1 gene". BMC Veterinary Research. 1 (1): 1. ISBN 1-74661-481-1. PMC 1192828Freely accessible. PMID 16045797. doi:10.1186/1746-6148-1-1.
  19. Why white dogs are white Uppsala University 2014
  20. Baranowska Körberg, Izabella; Sundström, Elisabeth; Meadows, Jennifer R. S.; Rosengren Pielberg, Gerli; Gustafson, Ulla; Hedhammar, Åke; Karlsson, Elinor K.; Seddon, Jennifer; Söderberg, Arne; Vilà, Carles; Zhang, Xiaolan; Åkesson, Mikael; Lindblad-Toh, Kerstin; Andersson, Göran; Andersson, Leif (2014). "A Simple Repeat Polymorphism in the MITF-M Promoter is a Key Regulator of White Spotting in Dogs". PLoS ONE. 9 (8): e104363. PMC 4130573Freely accessible. PMID 25116146. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104363.
  21. Sheila M. Schmutz (December 27, 2008). "Coat Color Alleles in Dogs". Retrieved September 12, 2010.
  22. Pamela A. Davol (January 29, 2001). "B/b, E/e, and Beyond: A Detailed Examination of Coat Color Genetics in the Labrador Retriever". Retrieved September 11, 2010.
  23. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092127
  24. http://www.doggenetics.co.uk/albino.html
  25. http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2897713/reload=0
  26. http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2897713/reload=0
  27. Evans, Howard E.; de Lahunta, Alexander (August 7, 2013). Miller's Anatomy of the Dog (Fourth ed.). Saunders. pp. 71–73. ISBN 978-1437708127.
  28. Miller's Anatomy of the Dog
  29. D. J. E. Housley; P. J. Venta (August 2006). "The long and the short of it: evidence that FGF5 is a major determinant of canine ‘hair’-itability". Animal Genetics. 37 (4): 309–315. PMID 16879338. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2006.01448.x.
  30. Hayward, J. J. et al. Complex disease and phenotype mapping in the domestic dog. Nat. Commun. 7:10460 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10460 (2016)
  31. http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2897713/reload=0
  32. http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2897713/reload=0
  33. Hayward JJ et al. 2016 Complex disease and phenotype mapping in the domestic dog. Nat. Commun. 7, 10460
  34. Droegemueller, C; Karlsson, EK; Hytšnen, MK; Perloski, M; Dolf, G; Sainio, K; Lohi, H; Lindblad-Toh, K; Leeb, T (2008). "A mutation in hairless dogs implicates FOXI3 in ectodermal development". Science. 321: 1462.
  35. Salmon Hillbertz N H C, Isaksson M, Karlsson E K, Hellmen E, Rosengren Pielberg G, Savolainen P, Wad C M, von Euler E, Gustafson U, Hedhammar A, Nilsson M, Lindblad-Toh K, Andersson L, Andersson G (2007): "Duplication of FGF3, FGF4, FGF 19 and ORAOV1 causes hair ridge and predisposition to dermoid sinus in, Ridgeback dogs" in Nature Genetics, Vol. 39, Number 11, November 2007.
  36. "Vet Gen". Veterinary Genetic Services. 2010. Retrieved September 12, 2010.
  37. "Breeders Assistant". Premier Pedigree Software. 2009. Retrieved September 12, 2010.
  38. https://homepage.usask.ca/~schmutz/mapping.html#loci
  39. http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2897713/reload=0
  40. Hayward, J. J. et al. Complex disease and phenotype mapping in the domestic dog. Nat. Commun. 7:10460 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10460 (2016). supplementary figures and tables
  41. Hytönen et al (2008), "Ancestral T-Box mutation is present in many, but not all, short-tailed dog breeds", Journal of Heredity, Advance Access published online on October 14, 2008, doi:10.1093/jhered/esn085
  42. https://homepage.usask.ca/~schmutz/dilutions.html
  43. https://www.nature.com/article-assets/npg/ncomms/2016/160122/ncomms10460/extref/ncomms10460-s1.pdf
  44. http://genome.cshlp.org/content/suppl/2013/10/22/gr.157339.113.DC1/Supplemental_FigureS4.pdf
  45. Rimbault M, Beale HC, Schoenebeck JJ, Hoopes BC, Allen JJ, Kilroy-Glynn P, et al. Derived variants at six genes explain nearly half of size reduction in dog breeds. Genome Res. 2013;23:1985–1995. doi: 10.1101/gr.157339.113
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.