Curtiss-Wright C-76 Caravan

C-76 Caravan
Role Medium transport
National origin United States
Manufacturer Curtiss-Wright
First flight May 3, 1943
Status Canceled
Primary user United States Army Air Forces
Number built 25 (11 prototypes, 5 production C-76, 9 revised YC-76A)

The Curtiss-Wright C-76 Caravan (company designation CW-27) was an American all-wood military transport aircraft. The C-76 was intended as a substitute standard aircraft in the event of expected wartime shortages of light alloys.[1] However, both prototype and production aircraft failed several critical flight and static tests, and after U.S. aluminum production proved sufficient for wartime defense requirements, orders for the C-76 were cancelled and production terminated.[2]

Design and development

Curtiss AT-9 under C-76 Caravan's wing at Curtiss-Wright in 1943.

In 1941, Curtiss-Wright was contracted by the United States Army Air Forces to design and construct an all-wood military transport aircraft, with performance specifications meeting or exceeding that of the Douglas C-47 Skytrain then in service.[1][3]

The Curtiss-Wright CW-27 was designed by Curtiss-Wright's chief designer George A. Page, Jr. as a high-wing, twin-engine, cargo transport aircraft, utilizing plywood construction with a tricycle undercarriage. Though the British de Havilland Mosquito had successfully employed a ply construction using a balsa wood core and birch hardwood exterior, Curtiss-Wright engineers, using research provided by Forest Products Laboratory,[4] rejected this approach, insisting instead on a ply construction of dense mahogany, which greatly increased the plane's weight.[5] At Curtiss' request, Army Materiel Command laid in large supplies of mahogany, and a number of furniture manufacturers, including the Baldwin Piano Company, were subcontracted to build components for the aircraft, which would be assembled at Curtiss-Wright's new defense plant in Louisville, Kentucky.[2][5]

A radial engine was mounted on each wing, and the aircraft was capable of carrying 23 personnel or a cargo payload. The Caravan had a nose section that swung out to the right to enable outsize loading, including a jeep or small artillery pieces.[6]

The original contract called for 11 YC-76 preproduction aircraft, and the first aircraft would be built and tested at Curtiss-Wright's St. Louis, Missouri Division plant.[3] Subsequently, orders for five C-76 production aircraft and nine revised YC-76As were placed by the USAAF, with line production to commence at the Curtiss-Wright plant in Louisville as well as a Higgins Aircraft factory in New Orleans, Louisiana.[2][3][7] To keep the plywood flexible during construction the factory was kept hot and damp.[8] The prototype YC-76 first flew on May 1, 1943.[3]

Only five production aircraft were completed in 1943: three from Curtiss-Wright's St. Louis Division, and two from a new plant at Louisville, Kentucky, which was finished in May 1942.[2][3][8] The Higgins Aircraft Co. contract was cancelled by the Army on August 3, 1943 before the Higgins factory in New Orleans had been completed, and Higgins was awarded another contract to produce the C-46 Commando.[7]

Operational history

The YC-76

The first flight of the YC-76 prototype took place on 3 May 1943.[2] The C-76 proved severely underpowered from the start, with a cruising speed of 160 mph (260 km/h), a service ceiling of 22,600 feet (6,900 m), a range of only 750 mi (1,210 km), and a cargo capacity of under 8,000 lb (3,600 kg). Colonel J.W. Sessums, a USAAF officer at the Air Materiel Command at Wright Field, later related:

'The first flight [of the C-76] was made and the airplane was very heavy. It developed some serious vibrations. In fact, the pilot was awful glad to make a quick circuit to get back on the ground ... two of the Curtiss test pilots took it out on a flight and the Army requested that our project officer on the airplane be allowed to fly along on this trip. The Curtiss Company refused. We were very glad that they refused because on this second flight, it [the C-76] flew apart and the pilots were lost and so was the plane.[5]

Compared to other cargo aircraft then coming into service, the C-76 was already obsolescent, even allowing for its war-priority method of construction. In addition, the C-76 failed a number of critical flight tests.[9] It was discovered in testing that the C-76 was unstable when not carrying a cargo load; in order to obtain a stable center of gravity, the plane had to be ballasted beyond its maximum permissible gross takeoff weight.[5][9] At any speed, or in any gusting wind, the C-76's elevators would flap back and forth violently.[9] The wing structure failed in eight separate static tests, sometimes with a load as low as 40% of the wing's rated capacity.[10] The wing failures were attributed by some sources to the failure of the fasteners used to secure the wood components of the aircraft.[9][11] Numerous additional fasteners, metal stirrups, and wood ply reinforcements were added to the structure in an effort to strengthen it, thereby increasing the plane's overall weight.[9]

At the Louisville plant, Curtiss line workers would later recall two C-76 production planes that were kept for some time in the assembly building, with one plane cannibalized to keep the other in flyable condition.[11] On 10 May 1943, the first YC-76 constructed at the Louisville, Kentucky plant, 42-86918, lost its tail unit at due to lack of forgotten securing bolts during test flight, crashing at Okolona, Kentucky, killing three Curtiss-Wright test crew, pilot Ed Schubinger, co-pilot John L. "Duke" Trowbridge, and engineer Robert G. Scudder.[2][12][13] As war priority measures designed to increase aluminum production proved successful, the feared shortage of light alloys never materialized.[2] Moreover, USAAF Training Command had begun to forward widespread complaints of insufficient service life on their wooden-winged Fairchild PT-19 primary trainers when exposed to high heat in training bases located in Texas and Florida.[5]

The War Department cancelled its orders for the C-76 on 3 August 1943.[12][14] The Sara Clark Collection, National Archives, Record Group 342, Box 2719, document the disposition of the 25 YC-76 aircraft as Articles #1, #3, # 4, and #5 were placed in the "Z" category, ZC-76, due to the poor gluing conditions and assembly procedures by subcontractors found through a Material Division inspection of the subcontractors work. These aircraft were assigned to the Technical Training Command and used for ground purposes only. Article #2 was destroyed in static testing at Wright Field. Article #6 was lost in a crash. Article #9 was under repair, but repairs were stopped and the airplane placed in Class 26, non-operational status. Air Service Command operated 12 YC-76s on a service test basis for nine months and found that they required excessive man hours to maintain. It was suggested that these be placed into Class 26 or Survey.

The final disposition of the aircraft as of 1 October 1945, by letter of the Air Technical Service Command; 1-Washout upon delivery from factory, 5-Class 26, 10-Survey, 1-Condemned, 8-Reconstruction Finance Corp. to be sold as surplus. In the interim, the Curtiss-Wright plants at Buffalo, New York and Louisville, Kentucky went over to full production of the Curtiss C-46 Commando.[2][15][16] USAAF Materiel Command later estimated the entire C-76 project cost the U.S. government $400 million dollars and several months in lost production time.[5]

Variants

YC-76
Prototypes, 11 built.[17]
C-76
Production aircraft built at St Louis, five built.[17]
YC-76A
Production variant, nine built.[17]
C-76A
Production variant, order for 175 cancelled, none built.[17]

Specification

General characteristics

Performance

See also

Related lists

References

  1. 1 2 Dreher, Carl, Wood Is A War Weapon, Popular Science, Vol. 141 No.3 (September 1942), pp. 48-74
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Kleber, John E., The Encyclopedia of Louisville, University Press of Kentucky (2001) ISBN 0-8131-2100-0, ISBN 978-0-8131-2100-0, pp. xxvii, 235-236
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Dorrell, David (ed.), Curtiss Caravan, Air Pictorial: Journal of the Air League, Air League of the British Empire, Volume 35, No. 7 (July 1973), p. 69
  4. ↑ Forest Products Journal, January 1, 2007: "G.A. Page, chief engineer of the Curtiss-Wright Division at St. Louis, Mo., wrote, "It [the Design Handbook] has expedited and facilitated our work in connection with the design of the C-76 airplane to a degree that is hard to estimate." Forest Products Laboratory: supporting the nation's armed forces with valuable wood research for 90 years
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sessums, Col. J.W., Design and Engineering Problems of Aircraft Production {Restricted}, May 14, 1946, pp. 6-8 National Defense University Archives
  6. ↑ "Army In Long Pants" Popular Mechanics, July 1944 - bottom of page 21 photo showing front nose opened for loading
  7. 1 2 Burck, Gilbert, Mr. Higgins and His Wonderful Boats, Life Magazine, 16 August 1943, p. 112
  8. 1 2 "Aircraft: Curtiss C-76 Caravan". cuny.edu.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 Mansfield, Howard, Skylark: The Life, Lies, and Inventions of Harry Atwood, UPNE (1999) ISBN 0-87451-891-1, ISBN 978-0-87451-891-7, pp. 204-205
  10. ↑ Curtiss-Wright Corporate Records, Static Tests of Curtiss-Wright C-76 Wings, ENG-51-C359-10, 7/24/43
  11. 1 2 Aviation Enthusiast Corner, Curtiss C-76 Caravan
  12. 1 2 Boyne, Walt, "C-46 [sic]: 'The Basketcase Bummer' " Airpower, Granada Hills, California, May 1974, Volume 4, Number 3, page 64.
  13. ↑ Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. VII
  14. ↑ News Article, New York Times, August 4, 1943, October 17, 1943
  15. ↑ "The Curtiss C-46 Commando". faqs.org.
  16. ↑ News Article, New York Times, August 11, 1944
  17. 1 2 3 4 Andrade 1979, p. 80

Bibliography

  • Andrade, John (1979). U.S.Military Aircraft Designations and Serials since 1909. Midland Counties Publications. ISBN 0-904597-22-9. 
  • The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Aircraft (Part Work 1982-1985). Orbis Publishing. 

Media related to Curtiss-Wright C-76 Caravan at Wikimedia Commons

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.