Comparison of cognitive architectures

The following table compares cognitive architectures.

Comparison of cognitive architectures
Names Underlying theory
(symbolic, connectionist, or hybrid)
Achievements Estimated requirements Non-laboratory usages Activity status
(active or dead + RSS news)
Year of creation Related publications License
(if applies, for example GPL)
4CAPS ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
ACT-R hybrid ? ? ? active ? Anderson, 2007
ASMO hybrid Many robotic systems ? IBM internet-of-things system active 2009 Novianto, Johnston and Williams 2010
CHREST symbolic ? ? ? active 1992 [1] ?
CLARION hybrid ? ? ? active ? Sun, 2002
Copycat ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
DUAL hybrid ? ? ? ? ? ?
EPAM ? ? ? ? ? 1959 [1] ?
EPIC ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
GLAIR symbolic ? ? ? active ? Bona and Shapiro, 2009 ?
Hierarchical Temporal Memory connectionist online learning, anomaly detection ? anomaly detection active 2009 Hawkins et al (multiple) AGPL
LIDA symbolic ? ? ? ? ? ?
MAMID ? ? ? ? ? ? Hudlicka, 2002; 2003 ?
Mibe architecture ? ? ? ? ? 1998 ?
OpenCog hybrid chatbot, game avatar ? misc subsystems in commercial, financial, medical active 2001 Goertzel et al (multiple) AGPL
Parallel terraced scan ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Procedural Reasoning System ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
R-CAST ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Soar ? ? ? yes active 1983 Laird (2012)
Sigma Hybrid Ray Kurzweil Awards at AGI 2011 and 2012 ? not yet active 2009 Rosenbloom, Demski, Ustun (2016) BSD 2 clause
TinyCog symbolic ? ? ? active 2015 Bergmann and Fenton, 2015 GPL V3

See also

References

  1. 1 2 http://www.chrest.info/history.html
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.