Chrysler Auto Strike

The Chrysler Auto Strike began as a struggle between the Chrysler Auto manufacturer and the union known as The International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, better known as the United Automobile Workers (UAW). The strike began in October 1939 in Detroit, Michigan.

Background

Both the Congress of Industrial Organization and the American Federation of Labor had each chartered a labor union for auto workers, both named the UAW. UAW-CIO met in Cleveland and represented 370,000 members. UAW-CIO elected R.J Thomas, who was a former Chrysler worker and the former Vice President of the UAW-AFL union. They had also re-elected the left-leaning George Addes as Secretary Treasurer. Walter Reuther was chosen as the leader of the union’s key GM department. In 1939 GM, Briggs and Chrysler cancelled their collective-bargaining agreements. They refused to recognize the legitimacy of the UAW-CIO and UAW-AFL. In July 1939, UAW-CIO mustered up enough supporters and toolmakers to go on strike and nearly delayed the introduction of its 1940 Chrysler models. Four weeks later, GM gave up and recognized the UAW-CIO as the sole bargaining committee and agreed to abide to all National Labor Relation Board elections.[1][2]

Chrysler Strike of 1939

The UAW-CIO defeated the UAW-AFL in a union election by a huge margin. Of the 44,000 votes, 37,000 votes were for the CIO; 4,000 for the AFL; and 3,000 votes were for no union. As soon as the CIO solidified its place in the Auto industry, they moved quickly to stop the Chrysler Speed Up Initiative. Chrysler claimed their production speed had fallen throughout the year. They claimed that the “management had cut wheel production per worker from 90 to 85 an hour.” The union counter-argued that although production had been reduced, they had also laid off a large amount of helpers. The Union stated that “Fender production had been cut 6 percent while the number of workers had been cut 12 percent. At Dodge Main, the union claimed that new crankshafts weighed four pounds more than the old cranks, meaning each worker who lifted 125 shafts an hour was carrying an extra two tons per eight-hour shift.” Although there were over 2,700 complaints, only 800 of these were resolved. The workers began to challenge the foremen and supervisors. They would shout “slowdowns” and used restrooms as their command post. On October 6, Chrysler declared that they would not allow the workers “to take into their own hands the running of the plants,” and fired several stewards at the Dodge Main body plant. The strike was different from the sit-down strike, as this strike was a slowdown strike.[3]

The CIO used the slowdown strike tactic due to the labor law in Michigan. Unemployment laws made it tougher for the workers who were on strike to get unemployment. However, during a slowdown strike, workers could not complete the quota if the previous workers could not complete theirs. It started a chain reaction that led to a series of factories closing down. Since the shops closed and the workers were laid off, the workers were then entitled to unemployment.

Homer Martin’s UAW-AFL (the UAW-CIO’s counterpart) encouraged 1,700 African American workers to go back to work. Almost immediately, prominent African American leaders such as Reverend Horace White and Senator Charles Diggs Sr. denounced the AFL act. They claimed the effort as a cynical effort “to invite physical violence and bloodshed” between the white American and African American workers. The CIO believed that the AFL was trying to bring the State Troops and National Guard to break the CIO effort, but the state of Michigan denied any efforts to send in its troops to break the strike. In response, Chrysler closed all of its gates except for the Conant Gates, located on the Detroit side of the Plant, for the returning workers. The Chrysler spokesman proclaimed that workers “who appeared for work would get it if there was anything for them to do.” Thus Congressman Clare E. Hoffman warned the Governor Luren D. Dickinson to use force to protect those who seek to return to work. Gov. Dickinson responded to the request with him never receiving any letters and he believed the State polices had adequate means and manpower to protect the Chrysler workers.[4]

The AFL’s motion had caused a racial divide that many expected a violent confrontation when the gates were open. Police forces were dispatched to ensure the safety of returning workers. The day came and the violence expected did not occur due to the support of the Diggs, White, Reverend Charlie Hill, and Louis Martin. The 6,000 picketers let them enter the factory without any confrontation.

Aftermath

Although a few workers returned to work, it was not enough to maintain the production line, leading Chrysler to comply with the union. Chrysler conceded to the union and agreed to the negotiation of production standards, arbitrate unsolved grievance and finally rehire all 105 men that were fired in early October.[5][6]

Legacy

Detroit’s auto manufacturing company had gone through dramatic changes during the 1930s. From the Ford Strike to the Chrysler Strike, the Union had won the glorious battle for better working places and better experience. From the early days of Ford Motor’s revolutionary Assembly line and the 5 dollars work days to the Detroit union town, it prepared the United States for the terrible World War II. Chrysler Slowdown Strike had been the unsung hero of the upcoming struggle that the United States of America will experience. The UAW-CIO had won the battle at last and had borne its first fruit. Under the leadership of Walter Reuther, who later would be elected President of the Union, the Union grew rapidly through a series of successful strikes and political alliance. Not long after the Chrysler Strike, The UAW had set its sight on the Ford Motor Factory which had long resisted Unionization.[7]

References

  1. ↑ Steve Babson, Ron Alpern, Dave Elsila and John Revitte, Working Detroit: The Making of A Union Town, (Wayne State University Press; n edition, 1986), 99
  2. ↑ "UAW History." http://uaw.org/page/uaw-history
  3. ↑ C.I.O. Threatens Chrysler with General Strike,” Chicago Daily Tribune, October 12, 1939, accessed 13 May 2015, http://archives.chicagotribune.com/1939/10/12/page/19/article/c-i-o-threatens-chrysler-with-general-strike
  4. ↑ “Halt Chrysler Strike, Demand on Dickinson,” Chicago Daily Tribune, November 27, 1939, accessed May 13, 2015, http://archives.chicagotribune.com/1939/11/27/page/7/article/halt-chrysler-strike-demand-on-dickinson
  5. ↑ "Chrysler Auto Strike Ends: Union Granted Right to Deal for Members". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 1 June 2015.
  6. ↑ Babson, Alpern, Elsila and Revitte, Working Detroit, 101-102
  7. ↑ Bernstein, Irving A History of the American Worker 1933-1941: Turbulent Years (1970) pp 499-571

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.