Cardinal voting

Part of the Politics series
Electoral systems
Plurality/majoritarian Simple majoritarianism Limited voting Single non-transferable vote Plurality First-past-the-post Two-round Exhaustive ballot Ranked voting Borda count Bucklin voting Condorcet methods (Copeland's, Dodgson's, Kemeny-Young, Minimax, Nanson's, Ranked pairs, Schulze) Coombs' method Instant-runoff (alternative vote) Contingent vote Oklahoma primary electoral system Cardinal voting Approval voting Proportional approval voting Sequential proportional approval voting Satisfaction approval voting Majority judgment Range voting
Proportional representation Party-list (Open lists, Closed lists, Local lists) Highest averages (D'Hondt, Sainte-Laguë) Largest remainder (Hare, Droop, Imperiali, Hagenbach-Bischoff) Single transferable vote (CPO-STV, Gregory, Schulze STV, Wright) Dual-member proportional representation
Mixed-member Mixed-member proportional Majority bonus system Additional Member System Scorporo, AV+ Parallel voting Majoritarian representation Plurality-at-large Preferential block voting General ticket
Other Proxy voting Delegable voting Delegated voting Random selection Sortition Random ballot Social choice theory Arrow's theorem Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem Voting method criteria Public choice theory (separate but related) Multiple Ballot Voting Cumulative voting
Politics portal

Cardinal voting is an electoral system which allows the voter to give each candidate an independent rating or grade from among at least two levels of approval. Along with ordinal voting systems (also called ranked voting), they are the two main branches of modern voting systems to compete with the venerable simple plurality voting. These are also referred to as "rated", "evaluative", "graded", or "absolute" voting systems.^[1][2]

On a rated ballot, the voter may rate each choice independently.

An approval voting ballot does not require ranking or exclusivity.

A majority judgment ballot is based on grades like those used in schools.

The simplest possible cardinal method is Approval voting, which allows only the two grades: "approved" or "unapproved". Other cardinal methods include Score/Range voting, in which ratings are numerical and the candidate with the highest average (or total^[3][4]) rating wins; and Majority Judgment, in which ratings are verbal grades and the candidate with the highest median grade wins.

Other variants include disapproval voting options such as negative assignment, but typically out of the same absolute number of votes. That is, a -2 and a +8 add up to ten points, not six, because the absolute value of a negative vote is the same as positive.

By avoiding ranking (and its implication of a monotonic approval reduction from most- to least-preferred candidate) cardinal voting methods may solve a very difficult problem:

A foundational result in social choice theory (the study of voting methods) is Arrow's impossibility theorem, which states that no method can comply with all of a simple set of desirable criteria. However, since one of these criteria (called "universality") implicitly requires that a method be ordinal, not cardinal, Arrow's theorem does not apply to cardinal methods.^[5][6][7][8]

Others, however, argue that this is not true, for instance because interpersonal comparisons of cardinal measures are impossible.^[9] If that is the case, then cardinal methods do indeed fail to escape Arrow's result.

Psychological research has shown that cardinal ratings are more valid and convey more information than ordinal rankings in measuring human opinion.^{[10][11][12][13]}

In any case, cardinal methods do fall under the Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem, and therefore any such method must be subject to strategic voting in some instances.^[14][15][16]

References