Canon EF-S 10–22mm lens

EF-S 10–22mm f/3.5–4.5 USM
Maker Canon
Technical data
Type Zoom
Focus drive Ultrasonic motor
Focal length 10–22mm
Focal length (35mm equiv.) 16–35mm
Crop factor 1.6
Aperture (max/min) f/3.5–4.5 / f/22–29
Close focus distance 0.24 m (0.79 ft)
Max. magnification 0.17 @ 22mm
Diaphragm blades 6
Construction 13 elements in 10 groups
Features
Short back focus  Yes
Lens-based stabilization  No
Macro capable  No
Application Ultra-Wide Zoom
Physical
Max. length 89.8 mm (3.5 in)
Diameter 83.5 mm (3.3 in)
Weight 385g (13.6 oz)
Filter diameter 77 mm
Accessories
Lens hood EW-83E, optional
Case LP1319, included
Angle of view
Horizontal 97°10'–54°30'
Vertical 74°10'–37°50'
Diagonal 107°30'–63°30'
History
Introduction 2004
Retail info
MSRP $650 USD

The Canon EF-S 10–22mm f/3.5–4.5 USM lens is a wide to ultra-wide angle zoom lens for Canon digital single-lens reflex cameras with a Canon EF-S lens mount.[1] The field of view has a 35 mm equivalent focal length of 16–35mm, which is analogous to the EF 16–35mm f/2.8L on a full-frame camera. The 10–22mm is an internal focusing lens. Of the 13 elements, one is of Canon's Super Ultra-Low Dispersion glass and three are aspherical elements.

Reception

Praise

The 10–22 is considered to have good image quality (sharp and low distortion) and build. The optical construction is similar to L-series lenses, but it is not designated as L-series (as reflected in the build quality), which some have argued is for marketing reasons, as with the 17–55.[2]

Criticism

Cost is the biggest criticism; until fairly recently, the 10–22 cost as much as many L-series lenses, but is only usable on APS-C cameras, and thus is questionable as a long-term investment.[3][5] Others think this less of a concern.[2]

Chromatic aberration is somewhat high at 10mm, and vignetting is measurable at 10mm and maximum aperture (0.85 EV units),[6] but not terribly noticeable in normal use.[2]

Use

Optimal aperture (for sharpness and to reduce vignetting) is f/5.6 to f/8; f/8 is particularly recommended at 22mm.[3][5][6]

Filters exacerbate vignetting, hence thin filters are recommended at 10mm, and stacking filters is discouraged.[2]

Similar lenses

In May 2014, Canon announced a less expensive alternative wide-angle zoom for APS-C bodies, the EF-S 10–18mm. The new lens, which is being sold alongside the 10–22, is slower than the 10–22 (maximum aperture range of f/4.5–5.6) and also lacks a USM motor, but adds both image stabilization and Canon's stepping motor technology. It is also smaller and lighter than the 10–22.[7]

The Nikon 12–24 DX is Nikon's ultra-wide angle zoom for its APS-C sensors (which are slightly larger than those of Canon), and is earlier, but is more expensive, not as wide, and has more barrel distortion.[8]

Sigma offers two ultra-wide angle lenses for APS-C sensors—the 8–16 DC and 10–20 DC. Tamron also offers a 10–24mm ultra-wide zoom lens for APS-C cameras as well as an older 11–18mm lens.

Some consider the Tokina 12–24 to be comparable and cheaper,[9] while others consider the Canon 10–22 to be significantly superior.[4] In May 2008, "PhotoZone" considered the Tokina 11–16mm, f/2.8, introduced in 2008, to be the best ultra-wide angle lens available for Canon APS-C Format cameras.[10] Noted photography blogger Ken Rockwell, however, considered the Canon 10–22 to be better than either version of the Tokina 11–16 — the original reviewed by PhotoZone,[11] or the Mark II released in 2012[12] — for Canon shooters. After reviewing the 10–18 in June 2014, Rockwell considers the 10–18 optically superior to all other ultrawides designed for Canon APS-C bodies.[13]

References

  1. Canon Inc. "EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM". Canon Camera Museum. Retrieved 31 May 2007.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Atkins, Bob. "Canon EF-S 10-22/3.5-4.5 USM Lens Review". photo.net. Retrieved 9 March 2008.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 "Canon EF-S 10–22mm f/3.5–4.5 USM". The Luminous Landscape. Retrieved 9 March 2008.
  4. 1 2 Rockwell, Ken. "Canon 10–22mm". KenRockwell.com. Retrieved 9 March 2008.
  5. 1 2 Andrews, Ian. "Canon EF-S 10–22mm f/3.5–4.5 USM". photodo.
  6. 1 2 "Canon EF-S 10–22mm f/3.5–4.5 USM". SLRgear.com. Retrieved 9 March 2008.
  7. "Canon Broadens Its Imaging Lineup with Two New EF Ultra Wide-Angle Zoom Lenses and White EOS Rebel SL1 Digital SLR Camera" (Press release). Canon U.S.A., Inc. 13 May 2014. Retrieved 13 May 2014.
  8. Rockwell, Ken. "Nikon 12–24mm f/4". KenRockwell.com. Retrieved 9 March 2008.
  9. "Canon EF-S 10–22mm f/3.5–4.5 USM – Test Report / Review". photozone.de. Retrieved 9 March 2008.
  10. "Tokina AF 11–16mm f/2.8 AT-X Pro DX (Canon) – Review / Lens Test Report". photozone. Retrieved 15 July 2008.
  11. Rockwell, Ken (September 2012). "Tokina 11–16mm: Recommendations". KenRockwell.com. Retrieved 15 March 2013. If you shoot Canon, get the Canon 10–22mm, since it doesn't cost much more and has a much wider and longer zoom range. I have not compared its sharpness, however the Canon's distortion control is superior.
  12. Rockwell, Ken (September 2012). "Tokina 11–16mm f/2.8 II: Compared". KenRockwell.com. Retrieved 15 March 2013. Canon's [10–22mm] lens is wonderful, and seeing how it sells for about the same price, I'd get the Canon lens for Canon.
  13. Rockwell, Ken (11 June 2014). "Canon 10-18mm". KenRockwell.com. Retrieved 12 June 2014. This lens has no competition. Every other ultrawide lens for Canon's APS-C cameras is optically inferior, can't focus as close, has no IS, and costs at least twice as much.

Specifications

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.