The Campden Wonder

The Campden Wonder is the name given to events surrounding the return of a man thought murdered in the town of Chipping Campden, Gloucestershire, in the 17th century. A family servant and the servant's mother and brother were hanged for killing their master, but following the man's return it became clear that no murder had taken place, despite the testimony of one of the accused. The story attracted popular attention in England in the years 1660–1662.

Disappearance

On 16 August 1660 a 70-year-old man named William Harrison left his home in Chipping Campden, intending to walk two miles to the village of Charingworth.[1] When he did not return home at the expected time his wife sent his manservant John Perry to look for him. Neither Harrison nor Perry had returned by the next morning.[2]

Edward Harrison, William Harrison's son, was then sent out to look for the pair and on his way to Charingworth he met John Perry. The servant said that he had not been able to find his master, and he and Edward continued to Ebrington, where they questioned one of the tenants whom Harrison had been going to see. The tenant said that Harrison had been there the previous night. Edward Harrison and John Perry then went to the village of Paxford, but their search proved fruitless.[3]

Edward and John then headed back to Chipping Campden. During the journey they heard that some items belonging to William Harrison had been discovered on the main road between Chipping Campden and Ebrington. These included a hat, a shirt and a neckband. Although the hat had been slashed by a sharp implement, and the shirt and the neckband were covered in blood, there was no sign of the body of William Harrison.[4]

Investigation

Under questioning John Perry said that he knew Harrison had been murdered, but claimed to be innocent of the crime. He then said that his mother, Joan, and his brother, Richard, had killed Harrison for his money and hidden the body. Joan and Richard denied that they had had anything to do with Harrison's disappearance, but John kept up his assertion that they were guilty claiming they had dumped his body in a millpond. The pond was dredged, but no body was found.[2]

Trials

The first court hearings dealt with charges linked to a plot to steal money from William Harrison. Despite his mother and brother pleading "not guilty", John Perry's testimony convinced the jury based on the following:

  1. John seemed to have no apparent reason to be lying about the matter.
  2. John claimed that he was the one who suggested the robbery to Richard.
  3. John told the court that Joan and Richard had already stolen 140 pounds from William Harrison's house the previous year.
  4. John had lied about being attacked by robbers a few weeks before Harrison's disappearance.

The defendants had all changed their pleas to guilty, because as first time offenders they were granted a free pardon under the Indemnity and Oblivion Act of 1660. Stratmann states that this was a bad piece of advice by the lawyers for the defendants.[5] However, at the time, the judge refused to prosecute the three for murder as there was no body.[6]

In Spring 1661 the court reconvened to hear the charge of murder and because of the earlier guilty plea to the robbery, they were now considered to be criminals.[7] This time John Perry joined his mother and brother in pleading not guilty in the killing of William Harrison. The servant claimed that his original testimony had been false by reason of insanity. Nevertheless, the jury found all three of the Perrys guilty and they were sentenced to death.

The three Perrys were hanged together on Broadway Hill in Gloucestershire,[7] and Broadway Tower now stands on the very site of their hanging.[8] On the scaffold Richard and John reiterated that they were entirely innocent of killing William Harrison. As their mother was also suspected of being a witch, she was executed first in case she had cast a spell on her son(s) which would make them free to confess.[9]

Return of William Harrison

In 1662 Harrison returned to England aboard a ship from Lisbon. He claimed that he had been abducted, wounded and had his pockets stuffed with money and spirited away on horses from England via Deal port in Kent, transferred to a Turkish ship and sold into slavery in Turkey.[7] Harrison said that after about a year and three quarters his master had died and that he then went to a port and stowed away on a Portuguese ship, finally returning to Dover by way of Lisbon.

This led to England having a criminal law of 'no body, no murder.' This principle was kept for 294 years before being rescinded in the early part of the 20th century.[10] Morton states that this is actually a misconception and no such law existed.[3]

Linda Stratmann, in her book Gloucestershire Murders, states that Harrison's story makes no sense; who would abduct a 70-year-old man, stuff his pockets with money and sell him into slavery for a few pounds? Why did no-one notice him being taken on horseback from Chipping Campden to Deal? She also states that he claimed his attackers wounded him in the thigh and side with a sword, only to then nurse him back to health, which also makes no sense.[11]

Later accounts

John Masefield wrote two plays on the subject: The Campden Wonder and Mrs Harrison. The latter dealt with the popular myth that Harrison's wife committed suicide on learning that her husband was alive.

The case is mentioned, along with the Sandyford murder case, in E.C. Bentley's detective novel Trent's Last Case (1920). It is also mentioned (as the "Camden Mystery") in John Rhode's detective novel "In Face of the Verdict" (in the U.S., "In the Face of the Verdict") (1936).

There is also a radio play of the story dating from 1994, "Roger Hume - The Campden Wonder".[12]

The final track on Inkubus Sukkubus' 2016 album Barrow Wake is a musical telling of the tale.

References

  1. ↑ Goodman, Jonathan (1993). Bloody versicles : the rhymes of crime (Rev. ed.). Kent, Ohio: Kent State Univ. Press u.a. p. 103. ISBN 9780873384704.
  2. 1 2 Sale 2007, p. 48.
  3. 1 2 Morton 2015, p. 11.
  4. ↑ Stratmann 2005, p. 7.
  5. ↑ Stratmann 2005, p. 12.
  6. ↑ Morton 2015, p. 12.
  7. 1 2 3 Stratmann 2005, p. 13.
  8. ↑ Stratmann 2005, p. 14.
  9. ↑ "The Campden Wonder". The Campden Wonder. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
  10. ↑ Watson, Greig (5 January 2017). "The mother, the medium and the murder that changed the law". BBC News. Retrieved 5 January 2017.
  11. ↑ Stratmann 2005, pp. 13-14.
  12. ↑ Hume, Roger (28 April 1994). "Campden Wonder, The". archive.org. BBC. Retrieved 5 January 2017.

Bibliography

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.