Cambridge University (UK Parliament constituency)
Cambridge University | |
---|---|
Former University constituency for the House of Commons | |
1603–1950 | |
Number of members | two |
Replaced by | Cambridge |
Cambridge University was a university constituency electing two members to the British House of Commons, from 1603 to 1950.
Boundaries, Electorate and Election Systems
This university constituency was created by a Royal Charter of 1603. It was abolished in 1950 by the Representation of the People Act 1948.
The constituency was not a geographical area. Its electorate consisted of the graduates of the University. Before 1918 the franchise was restricted to male graduates with a Doctorate or MA degree. Sedgwick records that there were 377 electors in 1727. For the 1754–1790 period Namier and Brooke estimated the electorate at about 500.
The constituency returned two Members of Parliament. Before 1918 they were elected using the block vote. From 1918, the MPs were elected by the Single Transferable Vote method.
History
In the early 18th century the electors were mostly Tory. However the Whig ministers of King George I were able to persuade the King to use the royal prerogative power to confer doctorates, so from 1727 the University returned Whig representatives. Oxford University, where the King did not have the same prerogative power, remained safely Tory (indeed often Jacobite) in sympathies.
The leading mid-18th century Whig politician, the Duke of Newcastle, was Chancellor of the University from 1748–68. He "recommended" suitable candidates to represent the institution in Parliament. This practice continued under his successor, another Whig Duke and Prime Minister (1768–1770), the Duke of Grafton (Chancellor 1768–1811). However Grafton was less prominent as a politician than Newcastle had been and less attentive to the University. As a result, some of Grafton's choices were criticised, notably that of the Duke's friend Richard Croftes.
Croftes was atypical of a University MP: he was neither the son of a peer (like the Hon. John Townshend, the Marquess of Granby and Grafton's own son the Earl of Euston), a distinguished lawyer-politician (such as William de Grey, James Mansfield and Sir Vicary Gibbs) nor a prominent political figure (like William Pitt and Lord Henry Petty).
In the late 18th and early 19th centuries Pittite/Tory candidates began to be elected. At the start of this political development some of the Pittite MPs, like William Pitt himself (MP for the University 1784–1806), called themselves Whigs. As time passed the division between the 19th century Tory and Whig parties became clearer.
The future Prime Minister, Viscount Palmerston, retained his seat as a Whig after he left the Tory ranks. However, by 1831 he was defeated. After Palmerston ceased to represent the University he was elected by a territorial constituency. From then until the 1920s all the University MPs were Tory/Conservative.
Even after the introduction of the single transferable vote in 1918, most Cambridge University MPs continued to be Conservatives.
Members of Parliament
This is a list of people who have been elected to represent this University in the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
1603 to 1660
- Constituency created 1603
Year | First member | Second member |
---|---|---|
1604 | Nicholas Steward | Henry Mountlow |
1614 | Sir Miles Sandys | Sir Francis Bacon |
1621 | Robert Naunton | Barnaby Gough |
1624 | Sir Robert Naunton | Barnaby Gough |
1625 | Sir Robert Naunton | Sir Albert Morton |
1626 | Thomas Eden | Sir John Coke |
1628–1629 | Thomas Eden | Sir John Coke |
1629–1640 | No Parliaments summoned | |
Apr 1640 | Thomas Eden | Henry Lucas |
Nov 1640 | Thomas Eden | Henry Lucas |
Eden died 1644 replaced by Nathaniel Bacon | ||
1648 | Lucas secluded in Pride's Purge | |
1654 | Henry Cromwell | (one seat only) |
1656 | Richard Cromwell | (one seat only) |
1659 | John Thurloe | Thomas Sclater |
1660 to 1784
Year | Member | Party | Member | Party |
---|---|---|---|---|
1660 Apr | George Monck | Thomas Crouch | ||
1660 Jun | William Montagu | |||
1661 | Sir Richard Fanshawe | |||
1667 | Sir Charles Wheler, 2nd Baronet | |||
1679 | Sir Thomas Exton | James Vernon | ||
1681 | Robert Brady | |||
1689 | Sir Robert Sawyer | Isaac Newton | Whig | |
1690 | Edward Finch | |||
1692 | Henry Boyle | Whig | ||
1695 | George Oxenden | |||
1698 | Anthony Hammond | |||
1701 | Isaac Newton | Court Whig | ||
1702 | Arthur Annesley | Tory | ||
1705 | Dixie Windsor | Tory | ||
1710 | Thomas Paske | Tory | ||
1720 | Thomas Willoughby | Tory | ||
1727 | Edward Finch | Whig | Thomas Townshend | Whig |
1768 | Charles Yorke | Rockingham Whig | ||
1770 | William de Grey | |||
1771 | Richard Croftes | |||
1774 | Charles Manners, Marquess of Granby | |||
1779 | James Mansfield | |||
1780 | Lord John Townshend | Whig | ||
1784 to 1950
Notes:-
- 1 Pitt called himself a Whig, but is usually retrospectively regarded as a Tory since most of his followers (whether their background was in the Whig or Tory tradition) came to call themselves the Tory Party in the decade after Pitt's death.
- 2 Jebb died on 10 December 1905 – seat vacant at dissolution.
- 3 Co. is an abbreviation for Coalition.
- 4 Ind. is an abbreviation for Independent.
- 5 Butler died on 2 May 1929 – seat vacant at dissolution.
Elections before 1715
Election by Block Vote 1715–1918
1710s – 1720s – 1730s – 1740s – 1750s – 1760s – 1770s – 1780s – 1790s – 1800s – 1810s – 1820s – 1830s – 1840s – 1850s – 1860s – 1870s – 1880s – 1890s – 1900s – 1910s |
Elections in the 1710s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Hon. Dixie Windsor | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Thomas Paske | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Elections in the 1720s
- Death of Paske
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Thomas Willoughby | 176 | 55.17 | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Henry Finch | 143 | 44.83 | N/A | |
Majority | 33 | 10.34 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 319 | N/A | N/A | ||
Tory hold | Swing | N/A | |||
- Note (1722): Stooks Smith gives Willoughby 319 votes.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Hon. Dixie Windsor | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory | Thomas Willoughby | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Hon. Edward Finch | 221 | 37.14 | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Thomas Townshend | 198 | 33.28 | N/A | |
Tory | Hon. Dixie Windsor | 176 | 29.58 | N/A | |
Turnout | 595 (377 voted) | 79.70 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 473 | ||||
- Note (1727): Unusually, for a pre-1832 election, Stooks Smith records the total number of electors for the constituency as well as the number who voted; so a turnout figure can be calculated.
Elections in the 1730s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Hon. Thomas Townshend | 222 | 30.33 | -2.95 | |
Whig | Hon. Edward Finch | 209 | 28.55 | -8.59 | |
Whig | -. Goodrick | 174 | 23.77 | N/A | |
Tory | Hon. Dixie Windsor | 137 | 17.35 | -12.23 | |
Turnout | 732 | N/A | N/A | ||
- Note (1734): Goodrick was an Opposition Whig
Elections in the 1740s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Hon. Edward Finch | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Thomas Townshend | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Seat vacated when Finch was appointed a Groom of the Bedchamber
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Hon. Edward Finch | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Hon. Edward Finch | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Thomas Townshend | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Elections in the 1750s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Hon. Edward Finch | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Thomas Townshend | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Seat vacated when Finch was appointed to an office
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Hon. Edward Finch | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Elections in the 1760s
- Seat vacated when Finch was appointed to an office
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Hon. Edward Finch | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Hon. Edward Finch | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Thomas Townshend | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Hon. Charles Yorke | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Hon. Thomas Townshend | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Elections in the 1770s
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Yorke as Lord Chancellor
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | William de Grey | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
- Seat vacated on the appointment of de Grey as Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Richard Croftes | 76 | 62.81 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | William Wynne | 45 | 37.19 | N/A | |
Majority | 31 | 25.62 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 121 | N/A | N/A | ||
Non Partisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Marquess of Granby | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Richard Croftes | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Succession of Granby as the 4th Duke of Rutland
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | James Mansfield | 157 | 35.68 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Hon. John Townshend | 145 | 32.95 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Lord Hyde | 138 | 31.36 | N/A | |
Majority | 12 | 2.73 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 440 | N/A | N/A | ||
Non Partisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Elections in the 1780s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | James Mansfield | 277 | 27.10 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Hon. John Townshend | 247 | 24.17 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Lord Hyde | 206 | 20.16 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Richard Croftes | 150 | 14.68 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Hon. William Pitt | 142 | 13.89 | N/A | |
Turnout | 1,022 (546 voters) | N/A | N/A | ||
- Note (1780): Stooks Smith records Townshend as getting 237 votes.
- Seat vacated on Townshend being appointed to an office
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Hon. John Townshend | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
- Seat vacated on Townshend being appointed to an office
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Hon. John Townshend | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
- Seat vacated on Mansfield being appointed as Solicitor General for England and Wales
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | James Mansfield | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Non Partisan hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non Partisan | Rt Hon. William Pitt | 351 | 31.65 | +17.76 | |
Non Partisan | Earl of Euston | 299 | 26.96 | N/A | |
Non Partisan | Hon. John Townshend | 278 | 25.07 | +0.90 | |
Non Partisan | James Mansfield | 181 | 16.32 | -10.78 | |
Turnout | 1,109 (588 voters) | N/A | N/A | ||
- The 1784 election was broadly a contest between the new government of Pitt and the ousted Fox-North Coalition, in which both Townshend and Mansfield had held office.
Elections in the 1790s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Rt Hon. William Pitt | 510 | 42.50 | +10.85 | |
Whig | Earl of Euston | 483 | 40.25 | +13.29 | |
Whig | Lawrence Dundas | 207 | 17.25 | N/A | |
Turnout | 1,200 (684 voters) | N/A | N/A | ||
- Note (1790): Party labels in the 1790–1832 period follow Stooks Smith, who classifies Pitt and his Pittite supporters as Tories without regard to what they would have actually called themselves.
- Seat vacated on Pitt being appointed Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Rt Hon. William Pitt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold | Swing | N/A | |||
- Seat vacated on Euston being appointed to an office
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Earl of Euston | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Rt Hon. William Pitt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Earl of Euston | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Elections in the 1800s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Rt Hon. William Pitt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Earl of Euston | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Seat vacated on Pitt being appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Rt Hon. William Pitt | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Tory hold | Swing | N/A | |||
- Death of Pitt
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Lord Henry Petty | 331 | 54.80 | N/A | |
Whig | Viscount Althorp | 145 | 24.01 | N/A | |
Tory | The Viscount Palmerston | 128 | 21.19 | N/A | |
Majority | 186 | 30.79 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 604 | N/A | N/A | ||
Whig gain from Tory | Swing | N/A | |||
- Palmerston was a Peer of Ireland
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Rt Hon. Lord Henry Petty | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | Earl of Euston | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Earl of Euston | 324 | 26.75 | N/A | |
Tory | Sir Vicary Gibbs | 312 | 25.76 | N/A | |
Tory | The Viscount Palmerston | 310 | 25.60 | N/A | |
Whig | Rt Hon. Lord Henry Petty | 265 | 21.88 | N/A | |
Turnout | 1,211 (631 voters) | N/A | N/A | ||
Elections in the 1810s
- Succession of Euston as the 4th Duke of Grafton
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | The Viscount Palmerston | 451 | 56.66 | N/A | |
Whig | John Henry Smyth | 345 | 43.34 | N/A | |
Majority | 106 | 13.32 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 796 | N/A | N/A | ||
Tory gain from Whig | Swing | N/A | |||
- Seat vacated on Gibbs being appointed a Judge of the Court of Common Pleas
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | John Henry Smyth | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig gain from Tory | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | The Viscount Palmerston | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | John Henry Smyth | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | The Viscount Palmerston | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | John Henry Smyth | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Elections in the 1820s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | The Viscount Palmerston | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | John Henry Smyth | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Death of Smyth
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | William John Bankes | 419 | 45.59 | N/A | |
Tory | Lord Harvey | 281 | 30.58 | N/A | |
Whig | James Scarlett | 219 | 23.83 | N/A | |
Majority | 138 | 15.02 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 919 | N/A | N/A | ||
Tory gain from Whig | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Sir John Singleton Copley | 772 | 32.88 | N/A | |
Whig | The Viscount Palmerston | 631 | 26.87 | N/A | |
Tory | William John Bankes | 508 | 21.64 | N/A | |
Tory | Rt Hon. Henry Goulburn | 437 | 18.61 | N/A | |
Turnout | 2,348 (1,293 voters) | N/A | N/A | ||
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Copley as Lord Chancellor and creation as 1st Baron Lyndhurst
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Sir Nicholas Conyngham Tindal | 479 | 55.89 | N/A | |
Tory | William John Bankes | 378 | 44.11 | N/A | |
Majority | 101 | 11.79 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 857 | 43.93 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 1,951 | ||||
Tory hold | Swing | N/A | |||
- Note (1827): Unusually for a pre-1832 election Stooks Smith provides a total electorate figure, so a turnout percentage can be calculated. See the 1727 result above for another instance.
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Tindal as Chief Justice of the Court of Common Pleas
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Cavendish | 609 | 56.86 | N/A | |
Tory | William John Bankes | 462 | 43.14 | -0.97 | |
Majority | 147 | 13.73 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 1,071 | N/A | N/A | ||
Whig gain from Tory | Swing | N/A | |||
Elections in the 1830s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | The Viscount Palmerston | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig | William Cavendish | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
- Seat vacated on the appointment of Palmerston as Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | The Viscount Palmerston | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Whig hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tory | Rt Hon. Henry Goulburn | 805 | 28.26 | N/A | |
Tory | William Yates Peel | 804 | 28.22 | N/A | |
Whig | William Cavendish | 630 | 22.11 | N/A | |
Whig | The Viscount Palmerston | 610 | 21.41 | N/A | |
Turnout | 2,849 | N/A | N/A | ||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Henry Goulburn | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Rt Hon. Charles Manners-Sutton | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Turnout | 2,319 | N/A | N/A | ||
- Note (1832): Manners-Sutton was the Speaker of the House of Commons.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Henry Goulburn | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Rt Hon. Charles Manners-Sutton | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Turnout | 2,319 | N/A | N/A | ||
- Manners-Sutton created 'The 1st Viscount Canterbury'.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Hon. Charles Law | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Henry Goulburn | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Hon. Charles Law | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Turnout | 2,613 | N/A | N/A | ||
- Note (1837): McCalmont's Parliamentary Poll Book classifies Law as a Peelite between this election and that of 1847.
Elections in the 1840s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Henry Goulburn | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Hon. Charles Law | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Turnout | 2,873 | N/A | N/A | ||
- Note (1841): McCalmont's Parliamentary Poll Book classifies Goulburn as a Liberal Conservative and Law as a Peelite for this election.
- Goulburn appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Henry Goulburn | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Hon. Charles Law | 1,486 | 31.74 | N/A | |
Conservative | Rt Hon. Henry Goulburn | 1,189 | 25.40 | N/A | |
Conservative | Viscount Feilding | 1,147 | 24.50 | N/A | |
Liberal | John George Shaw-Lefevre | 860 | 18.37 | N/A | |
Turnout | 3,800 | 61.61 | N/A | ||
- Note 1 (1847): 3,800 registered electors; 4,682 votes cast; minimum possible turnout estimated by dividing votes by 2. To the extent that electors did not use both their votes, the figure will be an underestimate.
- Note 2 (1847): McCalmont's Parliamentary Poll Book classifies Goulburn as a Liberal Conservative and Law as a Peelite for this election.
Elections in the 1850s
- Death of Law.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Loftus Wigram | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Henry Goulburn | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Loftus Wigram | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Turnout | 4,063 | N/A | N/A | ||
- Note (1852): McCalmont's Parliamentary Poll Book classifies Goulburn as a Liberal Conservative for this election.
- Death of Goulburn.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Spencer Horatio Walpole | 886 | 67.89 | N/A | |
Liberal | Hon. George Denman | 419 | 32.11 | N/A | |
Majority | 467 | 35.79 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 4,552 | 28.67 | N/A | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Loftus Wigram | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Turnout | 4,552 | N/A | N/A | ||
- Appointment of Walpole as Secretary of State for the Home Department.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Jasper Selwyn | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Rt Hon. Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Turnout | 4,566 | N/A | N/A | ||
Elections in the 1860s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Jasper Selwyn | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Rt Hon. Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Turnout | 5,184 | N/A | N/A | ||
- Appointment of Walpole as Secretary of State for the Home Department.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
- Appointment of Selwyn as Solicitor-General.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Jasper Selwyn | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
- Appointment of Selwyn as Judge of the Court of Appeal in Chancery.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alexander Beresford Hope | 1,931 | 57.97 | N/A | |
Conservative | A. Cleasby | 1,400 | 42.03 | N/A | |
Majority | 531 | 15.94 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 5,184 | 64.26 | N/A | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alexander Beresford Hope | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Rt Hon. Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Turnout | 5,435 | N/A | N/A | ||
Elections in the 1870s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alexander Beresford Hope | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Rt Hon. Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Turnout | 5,855 | N/A | N/A | ||
Elections in the 1880s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alexander Beresford Hope | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Rt Hon. Spencer Horatio Walpole | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Turnout | 6,161 | N/A | N/A | ||
- Resignation of Walpole.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Henry Cecil Raikes | 3,491 | 72.85 | N/A | |
Liberal | James Stuart | 1,301 | 27.15 | N/A | |
Majority | 2,190 | 45.70 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 6,371 | 75.22 | N/A | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alexander Beresford Hope | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Rt Hon. Henry Cecil Raikes | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | n/a | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Alexander Beresford Hope | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Rt Hon. Henry Cecil Raikes | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | n/a | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Henry Cecil Raikes | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Prof. George Gabriel Stokes | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Elections in the 1890s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Prof. Richard Claverhouse Jebb | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Sir John Eldon Gorst | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Prof. Richard Claverhouse Jebb | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | n/a | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Sir John Eldon Gorst | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Richard Claverhouse Jebb | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | n/a | |||
Elections in the 1900s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Rt Hon. Sir John Eldon Gorst | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Sir Richard Claverhouse Jebb | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | n/a | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Samuel Henry Butcher | 3,050 | 39.72 | N/A | |
Conservative | John Frederick Peel Rawlinson | 2,976 | 38.76 | N/A | |
Free Trade | Rt Hon. Sir John Eldon Gorst | 1,653 | 21.53 | N/A | |
Turnout | 4,063 | 65.8 | N/A | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | n/a | |||
Elections in the 1910s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Samuel Henry Butcher | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | John Frederick Peel Rawlinson | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | n/a | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Samuel Henry Butcher | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | John Frederick Peel Rawlinson | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | n/a | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Sir Joseph Larmor | 2,308 | 50.24 | N/A | |
Free Trade | Harold Cox | 1,954 | 42.53 | N/A | |
Independent Conservative | Thomas Ethelbert Page | 332 | 7.23 | N/A | |
Majority | 354 | 7.71 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 7,129 | 64.44 | N/A | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Elections 1918–1950
General Elections, from 1918 when most constituencies polled on the same day, were on different polling days than for territorial constituencies. The polls for university constituencies were open for five days. The elections were also conducted by Single Transferable Vote.
Elections in the 1910s
General Election 1918: Cambridge University (2 seats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | % 1st Pref | Count 1 | Count 2 | |
Coalition Unionist | John Frederick Peel Rawlinson | 35.16 | 2,034 | ||
Coalition Unionist | Sir Joseph Larmor | 32.69 | 1,891 | 1,986 | |
Independent | Sir William Cecil Dampier Whetham | 21.09 | 1,220 | 1,229 | |
Labour | John Collings Squire | 11.06 | 640 | 641 | |
Electorate: 9,282 Valid: 5,785 Quota: 1,929 Turnout: 62.32% |
Elections in the 1920s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | John Frederick Peel Rawlinson | 4,192 | 49.39 | +14.23 | |
Independent Liberal | James Ramsay Montagu Butler | 3,453 | 39.86 | +39.86 | |
Unionist | William Ritchie Sorley | 1,018 | 11.75 | +11.75 | |
Quota | 2,888 | ||||
Registered electors | 13,592 | ||||
Turnout | 8,663 | 63.74 | |||
Independent Liberal gain from Unionist | Swing | N/A | |||
- As two candidates achieved the quota only one count was necessary
General Election 1923: Cambridge University (2 seats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | % 1st Pref | Count 1 | Count 2 | |
Unionist | Rt Hon. John Frederick Peel Rawlinson | 40.85 | 4,207 | ||
Unionist | Sir George Geoffrey Gilbert Butler | 27.61 | 2,844 | 3,560 | |
Independent Liberal | James Ramsay Montagu Butler | 31.54 | 3,248 | 3,283 | |
Electorate: 14,974 Valid: 10,229 Quota: 3,434 Turnout: 68.78% |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Rt Hon. John Frederick Peel Rawlinson | 4,569 | 38.60 | -2.25 | |
Unionist | Sir George Geoffrey Gilbert Butler | 4,026 | 34.01 | +6.40 | |
Independent Liberal | James Ramsay Montagu Butler | 3,241 | 27.38 | -4.16 | |
Quota | 3,946 | ||||
Registered electors | 16,621 | ||||
Turnout | 11,836 | 71.21 | +2.43 | ||
Unionist hold | Swing | ||||
- As two candidates achieved the quota only one count was necessary
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | John James Withers | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Unionist hold | Swing | N/A | |||
General Election 1929: Cambridge University (2 seats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | % 1st Pref | Count 1 | Count 2 | |
Unionist | John James Withers | 39.76 | 6,356 | ||
Unionist | Godfrey Harold Alfred Wilson | 31.71 | 5,069 | 6,046 | |
Liberal | Hubert Douglas Henderson | 19.38 | 3,099 | 3,131 | |
Labour | Alexander Wood | 9.15 | 1,463 | 1,480 | |
Electorate: 23,978 Valid: 15,987 Quota: 5,330 Turnout: 66.67% |
Elections in the 1930s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Godfrey Harold Alfred Wilson | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative | Sir John James Withers | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Kenneth William Murray Pickthorn | Unopposed | N/A | N/A | |
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Sir John James Withers | 7,602 | 42.30 | N/A | |
Conservative | Kenneth William Murray Pickthorn | 6,917 | 38.49 | N/A | |
Labour | Herbert Lionel Elvin | 3,453 | 19.21 | N/A | |
Quota | 5,991 | ||||
Registered electors | 33,617 | ||||
Turnout | 17,972 | 53.46 | N/A | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | ||||
- As two candidates achieved the quota only one count was necessary
Elections in the 1940s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Independent Conservative | Archibald Vivian Hill | 9,840 | 64.62 | N/A | |
Independent Progressive | John Alfred Ryle | 5,387 | 35.38 | N/A | |
Majority | 4,453 | 29.24 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 39,171 | 38.87 | N/A | ||
Independent Conservative gain from Conservative | Swing | N/A | |||
General Election 1945: Cambridge University (2 seats) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | % 1st Pref | Count 1 | Count 2 | Count 3 | Count 4 | |
Conservative | Kenneth William Murray Pickthorn | 46.18 | 10,202 | ||||
Independent | Henry Wilson Harris | 16.18 | 3,574 | 4,709 | 5,185 | 6,556 | |
Independent Progressive | John Boynton Priestley | 22.82 | 5,041 | 5,128 | 5,238 | 5,745 | |
Independent | Charles Hill | 10.13 | 2,238 | 3,092 | 3,595 | eliminated | |
National Independent | Ernest Leslie Howard-Williams | 4.69 | 1,036 | 1,798 | eliminated | – | |
Electorate: 42,012 Valid: 22,091 Quota: 7,364 Turnout: 52.58% |
See also
References
- Boundaries of Parliamentary Constituencies 1885–1972, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Parliamentary Reference Publications 1972)
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1832–1885, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Macmillan Press 1977)
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1885–1918, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Macmillan Press 1974)
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1918–1949, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Macmillan Press, revised edition 1977)
- McCalmont's Parliamentary Poll Book: British Election Results 1832–1918 (8th edition, The Harvester Press 1971)
- The House of Commons 1715–1754, by Romney Sedgwick (HMSO 1970)
- The House of Commons 1754–1790, by Sir Lewis Namier and John Brooke (HMSO 1964)
- The Parliaments of England by Henry Stooks Smith (1st edition published in three volumes 1844–50), second edition edited (in one volume) by F.W.S. Craig (Political Reference Publications 1973)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament: Volume I 1832–1885, edited by M. Stenton (The Harvester Press 1976)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume II 1886–1918, edited by M. Stenton and S. Lees (Harvester Press 1978)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume III 1919–1945, edited by M. Stenton and S. Lees (Harvester Press 1979)
- Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume IV 1945–1979, edited by M. Stenton and S. Lees (Harvester Press 1981)
- Leigh Rayment's Historical List of MPs – Constituencies beginning with "C" (part 1)
Parliament of the United Kingdom | ||
---|---|---|
Preceded by Appleby |
Constituency represented by the Prime Minister 1784–1801 |
Succeeded by Devizes |
Preceded by Devizes |
Constituency represented by the Prime Minister 1804–1806 |
Vacant Title next held by Northampton in 1809 |
Preceded by Scarborough |
Constituency represented by the Speaker 1832–1835 |
Succeeded by Edinburgh |