Burmese folk religion

Nat Mahagiri.

Myanmar's folk religion refers to the animistic and polytheistic religious worship of nats (deities of local and Hindu origin) in Burma (Myanmar). Although the beliefs of nats differ across different regions and villages in Burma, there are a handful of beliefs that are universal in Burmese folk religion.

A nat is a spirit or god who resembles a human in shape that often maintains or guards objects. When people die, they can become nats. Those who become nats often have a gruesome violent death which explains their vengeful nature. Nats also are believed to have the ability to possess animals, such as tigers or alligators. These spirits can also be found in nature in things such as trees and rocks. The majority of these nats are viewed as troublesome and irritable. They require calming, food and offerings.

There is a specific nat called an ouktazaung that is said to guard treasure. Rumor has it that this ouktazaung lures men to them, similar to a siren, in Greek mythology. If the victim is caught by the ouktazaung it takes her place and the ouktazaung can roam free, but only for twenty years, after which she must return to her treasure. A village will traditionally also have a spirit which is the patron of their village; this is called a Bo Bo Gyi.[1]

History and origins

Me Wunna with her sons Min Gyi and Min Lay at Mount Popa
Coconut, as a symbol for the nat hung on a post in a house.

The precise origins of Burmese folk faith and nat worship are not definitively known. However at the time King Anawrahta (1044-1077) was ruling, nat worship was rampant. He became frustrated with this widespread worship of nats, and tried to eliminate them. The people continued to worship the nats, and so the king ordered the destruction of all statues and images of nats. Despite this people still worshiped them, by using a coconut as a symbol for them. Now in place of a typical nat statue, there sat a coconut, which served as an offering to the nat, as well as a symbol for the nat itself.[2]

The king came to the realisation that he couldn’t possibly stop these nats from being worshiped, so he created a formal list of 37, strategically renaming the head one, Thagyamin, which was a name of Buddhist origin. He also placed statues of deva in front of the nats. This symbolised the preference for practising Buddhism over folk faith. Despite continued opposition, this nat worship survived. A testament to the continued survival of Burmese folk religion can be seen by the fact that the prime minister of Burma in the mid 20th century, U Nu, erected a nat-sin (nat shrine) as well as a traditional Buddhist shrine. This toleration of the nats continued through the socialist regime (1962-1968).[3]

Nat-kadaw and nat-pwe

Every village has someone that is a nat-kadaw. This person is seen as the master of ceremonies regarding nats, a type of shaman. They often lead festivals, called nat-pwes, which are devoted to interacting with the nats. The nat-kadaw has the special power to be able to be possessed by nats. Once possessed, their voice changes and they perform elaborate dances. This profession is somewhat frowned upon because it is centred on frivolity and letting go of restraints. Although it doesn’t have the best reputation as a profession, it is an extremely profitable one. Oftentimes when offerings are given to the nats, they are given directly to the nat-kadaw, who is said to be possessed by a nat. Throughout a festival the nat-kadaw will often ask for money. Although some of this money is given to the accompanying orchestra at a festival, the nat-kadaw also keeps some of this money.

Although this profession is seen as a frivolous one, nat-kadaws are in fact very religious. They still follow and uphold the precepts of Buddhism (Five Precepts), while simultaneously interacting closely with these nats. Oftentimes a nat-kadaw can become tormented by a specific nat. Even if they already have a human husband or wife, they decide that they must marry this nat, for only then will they be at peace, and the torment that this nat is causing them will finally cease. The marriage of a nat and a nat-kadaw is done through an extremely elaborate ceremony titled Ley-Bya-Taik. In this ceremony, the nat-kadaw identifies the particular nat that they would like to marry, and then surrenders to it. In this process mirrors are used to trap the soul (mentioned earlier) that leaves the host. Once this soul has left, the nat takes the place of it. After this transformation is complete, the nat-kadaw dances, embracing their recent marriage with a nat.[4]

An offering one might see at a nat pwe.

As mentioned earlier, these nat-kadaws are central in every nat-festival or nat-pwe. These nat-pwes are held at specific times of the year, or if there is a special occasion. They follow a similar structure and sequence of events. They always include an orchestra, and lots of dancing. The first step in these festivals is the donation of many offerings, usually consisting of a coconut, bananas, fruits, leaves and rice. These offerings are prepared, to eventually summon the nats to the ceremony. This practice of summoning is done by the nat-kadaw. Once the nats are summoned, a feast is had with them. After this, there is a farewell ceremony and everyone bids the nats goodbye.[5][6][7][8]

A nat-kadaw leading a festival.

Relationship with Buddhism

Burmese folk religion and Buddhism are very closely tied to each other. Oftentimes it is common to see a Buddhist offering, and a nat-sin (or nat shrine) besides it. In Burma there are varying degrees of reliance on nats versus Buddhist doctrine. The beliefs and practices of folk faith vary widely across Burma, so it is difficult to define this religion exactly. Several scholars in the 19th and 20th century have done field research in villages in Burma, their findings have then been reported by themselves, as well as recently by others in various books and articles. Although it is difficult to determine what the precise beliefs and practices are, these anthropologists found several common trends that help give us a better picture of Burmese folk religion.[9][10][11][12] In many instances folk faith was practised directly alongside Buddhism. It wasn’t uncommon to see families who had both Buddhist shrines and nat shrines in their own homes. There were also plenty of Buddhist monks, who simultaneously believed in the nats. Several quotes from various scholars in Burma exemplify the relationship between Buddhism and nat worship.

"The Buddhism of the people forms little or no part of their daily life,” and that although every Burman as a boy must go to a monastic school and wear the yellow robe, in his everyday life, from the day of his birth to his marriage, and even when he lies on his death bed, all the rites and forms that he observes are to be traced to folk religious and not to Buddhist sources. If calamity overtakes him he considers it to be the work of his nats, and when he wishes to commence any important undertaking, he propitiates these nats, who are the direct representatives of the old folk worship. Even the pongyi [monks] themselves are often directly influenced by the strong under-current of Burmese folk religion which underlies their faith in Buddhism”- Bishop Bigandet [13]
“They [monks] are often the most expert tattooers and astrologers and fortune tellers. The Burman has much more faith in the ascertaining of lucky and unlucky days and in the deductions from his horoscope than in the virtue of alms and the efficacy of worship at the Pagoda.” [13]
"As a simple matter of fact, it is undeniable that the propitiating of the nats is a question of daily concern to the lower-class Burman, while the worship at the pagoda is only thought of once a week.”-Richard Carnac Temple[14]

The veneration of nats also shares similar practices with Buddhism. In Buddhism, offerings are extremely common and expected. Shrines and temples, in which these offerings are to be made, are seen in both Burmese folk religion and Buddhism. In both the faiths, many different statues of various deities can also be seen around the house. Burmese folk religion differs dramatically in the concept of a soul. Buddhism does not believe in a soul that leaves after one dies, but rather a consciousness that is transferred to a new person (consciousness is reborn in another). In contrast, Burmese folk religion holds that the soul can leave the body it inhabits. This soul is often depicted in the form of a butterfly called a leppya.[15] The act of the soul leaving the host often happens in dreams, or when someone is sick or dying. If one is awoken in the middle of their dream, it is said that their soul might not be back to them yet. If a host tries to live without its soul it will die. When someone is dying, butterfly hunts are often held to try to recapture the soul that has wondered off.[16]

Melford Spiro remarks on an interesting difference with the concept of suffering in Burmese folk religion as opposed to Buddhism. Buddhism teaches that suffering comes from bad karma (which one has rightfully accumulated from a past life) and this karma can’t be improved upon until the next life. In contrast, folk faith places the cause of suffering on mischievous evil spirits. In this way those that suffer are free from blame involving misdeeds they did in their past life. They didn’t do anything wrong, but they must deal with the nuisance of nats. Burmese folk religion also allows for a cure to suffering, in the form of supernatural help from magical people, or offerings to the spirits.[17]

The folk religious practices offer a very different aspect of life from the Buddhist practices. Burmese folk faith consists of many different kinds of festivals that all involve singing and dancing, drinking and merriment, or nat-pwes. These festivals are a way for people to let go, and enjoy themselves. This idea of relieving stress and indulging in various pleasures is very different from the traditional doctrine of Buddhism, which emphasises losing all desires. This can often be done by fasting or through deep meditation in a quiet temple. These traditional Buddhist practices offer a starkly different way of achieving religious consciousness.[18]

Amongst the individual villages, religious beliefs also vary greatly. Although there are the thirty-seven main nats that are commonly and communally worshiped, there are also many local nats, differing in every village. To add on to this, the idea that after death one may become a nat also implies that there are many nats that can be worshiped. For some villages nats are in nearly everything. They can be any ancestors, in nature, found guarding objects etc. For others nats are less prominent, but still play some role in the village society.

A particularly strong sense of folk faith is found in the tribal parts of Burma. In this instance, there is not some type of divine being, and folk religion is practised entirely separately from Buddhism. In these tribal societies all nats are traditionally viewed as harmful, unlike in other villages where nats are invited to partake in festivals. Instead of adorning these nats with offerings and food, the most effort is put into fending evil spirits off. These tribes just merely want to be left alone, undisturbed by the malicious spirits.[12]

Folk beliefs and practices

Various forms of folk practices are held in Burma today, often with folk religious roots. As mentioned earlier though, it is difficult to determine to what extent these beliefs and traditions are practised, because every village has slightly different beliefs and practices. Their astrology, thought to be descended from Indian religious beliefs, is present in Burma. With this astrology, comes the practice of divination and horoscopes.[19]

There are also several different folk methods that are thought to keep away troublesome nats or evil spirits. These include wearing amulets or tattoos, which were said to keep the spirits away. This was also seen in the form of various people, who are believed to have magical powers or the ability to interact with spirits. These include alchemists, healers, sorcerers and exorcists.[20]

These exorcists, or ahletan hsaya, are said to possess powers that can fend away or challenge these evil demons. These exorcists were often seen as very holy, because they had to be to combat troublesome spirits. They attempt exorcisms by giving the nat offerings. As an interesting overlap with Buddhism, exorcisms can be performed by holding the Buddha up to the possessed person, in an effort to have the Nat flee. If the exorcist cannot banish this spirit alone, they often ask for the assistance of the nat-kadaw. Sorcerers, or weikzas also harnessed the power of these nats through many complex rituals, to gain their own supernatural powers.[21][22]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Rodrigue, Yves (1992). Nat-Pwe: Burma's supernatural sub-culture. Gartmore: Kiscadale. pp. 8–9.
  2. ↑ Temple, Richard Carnac (1906). The Thirty-Seven Nats. London: W. Griggs. pp. 2–3.
  3. ↑ Rodrigue, Yves (1992). Nat-Pwe: Burma's supernatural sub-culture. Gartmore: Kiscadale. pp. 19–20.
  4. ↑ Rodrigue, Yves (1992). Nat-Pwe: Burma's supernatural sub-culture. Gartmore: Kiscadale. pp. 47–55.
  5. ↑ Rodrigue, Yves (1992). Nat-Pwe: Burma's supernatural sub-culture. Gartmore: Kiscadale. pp. 56–61.
  6. ↑ "Irrawaddy River, Myanmar's River of Spirits - National Geographic Magazine". Retrieved 5 January 2014.
  7. ↑ Temple, Richard Carnac (1906). The Thirty-Seven Nats. London: W. Griggs. pp. 24–25.
  8. ↑ "Animism has Deep Roots in Burmese Culture". Retrieved 5 March 2014.
  9. ↑ Rodrigue, Yves (1992). Nat-Pwe: Burma's supernatural sub-culture. Gartmore: Kiscadale.
  10. ↑ Spiro, Melford E. (1967). Burmese Supernaturalism. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  11. ↑ Temple, Richard Carnac (1906). The Thirty-Seven Nats. London: W. Griggs.
  12. 1 2 Scott, James-George (1882). The Burman: his life and notions. London: Macmillan. p. 231.
  13. 1 2 Temple, Richard Carnac (1906). The Thirty-Seven Nats. London: W. Griggs. p. 2.
  14. ↑ Scott, James-George (1882). The Burman: his life and notions. London: Macmillan. p. 229.
  15. ↑ Temple, Richard Carnac (1906). The Thirty-Seven Nats. London: W. Griggs. p. 9.
  16. ↑ Rodrigue, Yves (1992). Nat-Pwe: Burma's supernatural sub-culture. Gartmore: Kiscadale. pp. 53–55.
  17. ↑ Spiro, Melford E. (1967). Burmese Supernaturalism. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. pp. 4–5.
  18. ↑ Rodrigue, Yves (1992). Nat-Pwe: Burma's supernatural sub-culture. Gartmore: Kiscadale. pp. 20–21.
  19. ↑ Temple, Richard Carnac (1906). The Thirty-Seven Nats. London: W. Griggs. pp. 27–28.
  20. ↑ Rodrigue, Yves (1992). Nat-Pwe: Burma's supernatural sub-culture. Gartmore: Kiscadale. p. 10.
  21. ↑ Rodrigue, Yves (1992). Nat-Pwe: Burma's supernatural sub-culture. Gartmore: Kiscadale. pp. 10–14.
  22. ↑ Aung, Maung. "Folk-Elements in Burmese Buddhism". 1958. Retrieved 5 March 2014.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.