Baxstrom v. Herold

Baxstrom v. Herold
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued December 9, 1965 Decided February 23, 1966
Full case name	Baxstrom v. Herold, State Hospital Director
Citations	383 U.S. 107 (more) 86 S. Ct. 760; 15 L. Ed. 2d 620; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2214
Holding
Civil commitment following a prison term does not constitute an unconstitutional double jeopardy.
Court membership
Chief Justice Earl Warren Associate Justices Hugo Black · William O. Douglas Tom C. Clark · John M. Harlan II William J. Brennan, Jr. · Potter Stewart Byron White · Abe Fortas
Case opinions
Majority	Warren, joined by Douglas, Clark, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White, Fortas
Concurrence	Black (in judgment)

Wikisource has original text related to this article:

Baxstrom v. Herold

Baxstrom v. Herold, 383 U.S. 107 (1966), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that civil commitment following a prison term does not run afoul of double jeopardy principles.^[1]

References

↑ Bonnie, R.J. et al. Criminal Law, Second Edition. Foundation Press, NY: 2004, p. 664

External links

Full text of the opinion from Justia.com

United States Fifth Amendment criminal procedure case law

Grand Jury Clause

Hurtado v. California (1884)
Ex parte Wilson (1885)
United States v. Petit (1885)
Mackin v. United States (1886)
Ex parte Bain (1887)
Parkinson v. United States (1887)
McNulty v. California (1893)
Wong Wing v. United States (1896)
Maxwell v. Dow (1900)
Lem Woon v. Oregon (1913)
United States v. Moreland (1922)
Costello v. United States (1956)
Lawn v. United States (1958)
Green v. United States (1958)
Stirone v. United States (1960)
Beck v. Washington (1962)
Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States (1989)
United States v. Cotton (2002)
United States v. Miller (2007)

Double Jeopardy Clause

After acquittal	United States v. Randenbush (1834) Ball v. United States (1896) Burton v. United States (1906) Helvering v. Mitchell (1938) Green v. United States (1957) Fong Foo v. United States (1962) United States v. Tateo (1964) Ashe v. Swenson (1970) Wilson v. United States (1975) Serfass v. United States (1975) United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co. (1977) Burks v. United States (1978) Crist v. Bretz (1978) Sanabria v. United States (1978) United States v. Scott (1978) Bullington v. Missouri (1981) Tibbs v. Florida (1982) Arizona v. Rumsey (1984) Poland v. Arizona (1986) Witte v. United States (1995) Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania (2003) Smith v. Massachusetts (2005) Yeager v. United States (2009)
After conviction	United States v. La Franca (1931) United States ex rel. Marcus v. Hess (1943) Rex Trailer Co. v. United States (1956) United States v. Wilson (1975) Ludwig v. Massachusetts (1976) Brown v. Ohio (1977) Harris v. Oklahoma (1977) Garrett v. United States (1985) United States v. Halper (1989) Grady v. Corbin (1990) United States v. Felix (1992) United States v. Dixon (1993) Department of Revenue of Montana v. Kurth Ranch (1994)
After mistrial	United States v. Perez (1824) United States v. Dinitz (1976) Arizona v. Washington (1978) Oregon v. Kennedy (1982) Renico v. Lett (2010) Blueford v. Arkansas (2012)
Multiple punishment	Ex parte Lange (1873) Blockburger v. United States (1932) Whalen v. United States (1980) Missouri v. Hunter (1983) Rutledge v. United States (1996)
Dual sovereignty doctrine	Bartkus v. Illinois (1959) Waller v. Florida (1970) Heath v. Alabama (1985) United States v. Lara (2004) Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle (2016)
Other	Ex parte Bigelow (1885) Palko v. Connecticut (1937) Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber (1947) Baxstrom v. Herold (1966) North Carolina v. Pearce (1969) Benton v. Maryland (1969) Morris v. Mathews (1986)

Self-Incrimination Clause
Griffin v. California (1965) Tehan v. United States ex rel. Shott (1966) Williams v. Florida (1970) Brooks v. Tennessee (1972) Lakeside v. Oregon (1978) Mitchell v. United States (1999)

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.