Argersinger v. Hamlin
Argersinger v. Hamlin |
---|
|
Argued December 6, 1971 Reargued February 28, 1972 Decided June 12, 1972 |
---|
Full case name |
Argersinger v. Hamlin |
---|
Docket nos. |
70-5015 |
---|
Citations |
407 U.S. 25 (more) 92 S. Ct. 2006; 32 L. Ed. 2d 530; 1972 U.S. LEXIS 139 |
---|
Argument |
Oral argument |
---|
Procedural history |
Certiorari to the Florida Supreme Court, 236 So. 2d 442. |
---|
Holding |
---|
A criminal defendant may not be actually imprisoned unless provided with counsel |
Court membership |
---|
- Chief Justice
- Warren E. Burger
- Associate Justices
- William O. Douglas · William J. Brennan, Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun Lewis F. Powell, Jr. · William Rehnquist
|
Case opinions |
---|
Majority |
Douglas, joined by Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall, Blackmun |
---|
Concurrence |
Brennan, joined by Douglas, Stewart |
---|
Concurrence |
Burger |
---|
Concurrence |
Powell, joined by Rehnquist |
---|
Laws applied |
---|
U.S. Const. amend. VI |
Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 (1972), is a United States Supreme Court decision holding that the accused cannot be subjected to actual imprisonment unless provided with counsel. Gideon v. Wainwright made the right to counsel provided in the Sixth Amendment applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
Background
Jon Richard Argersinger was sentenced under Florida law to 90 days in jail for carrying a concealed weapon, but was never represented by counsel. Hamlin was the local sheriff. Argersinger claimed his conviction was unconstitutional, but his case was dismissed by the Florida Supreme Court, who relied on Duncan v. Louisiana, which held that jury trials were not required for crimes with a sentence of less than six months. The Florida court claimed that since jury trials were not required for misdemeanors, then neither was counsel.
Supreme Court decision
The U.S. Supreme Court disagreed with the Florida courts, and overturned the conviction. The Court held that a criminal defendant may not be actually imprisoned unless provided with counsel.
References
External links
|
---|
|
---|
- Beavers v. Haubert (1905)
- United States v. Provoo (1955)
- Pollard v. United States (1957)
- United States v. Ewell (1966)
- Klopfer v. North Carolina (1967)
- Smith v. Hooey (1969)
- Dickey v. Florida (1970)
- United States v. Marion (1971)
- Barker v. Wingo (1972)
- Strunk v. United States (1973)
- United States v. Lovasco (1977)
- United States v. MacDonald (1982)
- United States v. Loud Hawk (1986)
- Doggett v. United States (1992)
- Vermont v. Brillon (2009)
- Betterman v. Montana (2016)
|
|
|
Impartial Jury Clause |
---|
Availability |
- Callan v. Wilson (1888)
- Natal v. State (1891)
- Schick v. United States (1904)
- District of Columbia v. Colts (1930)
- District of Columbia v. Clawans (1937)
- United States v. Barnett (1964)
- Cheff v. Schnackenberg (1966)
- Duncan v. Louisiana (1968)
- Bloom v. Illinois (1968)
- DeStefano v. Woods (1968)
- Frank v. United States (1969)
- Baldwin v. New York (1970)
- Mayberry v. Pennsylvania (1971)
- Taylor v. Haynes (1974)
- Codispoti v. Pennsylvania (1974)
- Blanton v. North Las Vegas (1989)
- United States v. Nachtigal (1993)
- Lewis v. United States (1996)
|
---|
Impartiality | |
---|
Facts found | |
---|
Size and unanimity | |
---|
| |
---|
Impeachment of verdicts | |
---|
|
|
Information Clause |
---|
- Twitchell v. Pennsylvania (1868)
- Cole v. Arkansas (1948)
- Russell v. United States (1962)
|
|
|
---|
Out-of-court statements | |
---|
Face-to-face confrontation |
- Snyder v. Massachusetts (1934)
- Kentucky v. Stincer (1987)
- Coy v. Iowa (1988)
- Maryland v. Craig (1990)
|
---|
Restrictions on cross-examination |
- Douglas v. Alabama (1965)
- McCray v. Illinois (1967)
- Smith v. Illinois (1968)
- Chambers v. Mississippi (1973)
- Davis v. Alaska (1974)
- Delaware v. Fensterer (1985)
- Delaware v. Van Arsdall (1986)
|
---|
Right to present relevant evidence |
- Cooper v. California (1967)
- McCray v. Illinois (1967)
- Pennsylvania v. Ritchie (1987)
- Olden v. Kentucky (1988)
- Michigan v. Lucas (1991)
|
---|
|
|
|
|
---|
Choice |
- Chandler v. Fretag (1954)
- Morris v. Slappy (1983)
- Wheat v. United States (1988)
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United States (1989)
- United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez (2006)
|
---|
Appointment | |
---|
Constructive denial |
- Avery v. Alabama (1940)
- Ferguson v. Georgia (1961)
- Brooks v. Tennessee (1972)
- Herring v. New York (1975)
- Geders v. United States (1976)
- Perry v. Leeke (1989)
|
---|
Conflict-free |
- Glasser v. United States (1942)
- Dukes v. Warden (1972)
- Holloway v. Arkansas (1978)
- Cuyler v. Sullivan (1980)
- Burger v. Kemp (1987)
- Wheat v. United States (1988)
- Mickens v. Taylor (2002)
|
---|
| |
---|
Uncounseled statements | |
---|
| |
---|
|
|