Warburg hypothesis
The Warburg hypothesis (/ˈvɑːrbʊərɡ/), sometimes known as the Warburg theory of cancer, postulates that the driver of tumorigenesis is an insufficient cellular respiration caused by insult to mitochondria.[1] The term Warburg effect describes the observation that cancer cells, and many cells grown in-vitro, exhibit glucose fermentation even when enough oxygen is present to properly respire. In other words, instead of fully respiring in the presence of adequate oxygen, cancer cells ferment. The Warburg hypothesis was that the Warburg effect was the root cause of cancer. The current popular opinion is that cancer cells ferment glucose while keeping up the same level of respiration that was present before the process of carcinogenesis, and thus the Warburg effect would be defined as the observation that cancer cells exhibit glycolysis with lactate secretion and mitochondrial respiration even in the presence of oxygen.[2]
Warburg's hypothesis was postulated by the Nobel laureate Otto Heinrich Warburg in 1924.[3] He hypothesized that cancer, malignant growth, and tumor growth are caused by the fact that tumor cells mainly generate energy (as e.g. adenosine triphosphate / ATP) by non-oxidative breakdown of glucose (a process called glycolysis). This is in contrast to "healthy" cells which mainly generate energy from oxidative breakdown of pyruvate. Pyruvate is an end-product of glycolysis, and is oxidized within the mitochondria. Hence, according to Warburg, the driver of cancer cells should be interpreted as stemming from a lowering of mitochondrial respiration. Warburg reported a fundamental difference between normal and cancerous cells to be the ratio of glycolysis to respiration; this observation is also known as the Warburg effect.
Cancer is caused by mutations and altered gene expression, in a process called malignant transformation, resulting in an uncontrolled growth of cells.[4][5] The metabolic differences observed by Warburg adapts cancer cells to the hypoxic (oxygen-deficient) conditions inside solid tumors, and results largely from the same mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes that cause the other abnormal characteristics of cancer cells.[6] Therefore, the metabolic change observed by Warburg is not so much the cause of cancer, as he claimed, but rather, it is one of the characteristic effects of cancer-causing mutations.
Warburg articulated his hypothesis in a paper entitled The Prime Cause and Prevention of Cancer which he presented in lecture at the meeting of the Nobel-Laureates on June 30, 1966 at Lindau, Lake Constance, Germany. In this speech, Warburg presented additional evidence supporting his theory that the elevated anaerobiosis seen in cancer cells was a consequence of damaged or insufficient respiration. Put in his own words, "the prime cause of cancer is the replacement of the respiration of oxygen in normal body cells by a fermentation of sugar."[7]
Warburg's hypothesis has re-gained attention due to several discoveries linking impaired mitochondrial function as well as impaired respiration to the growth, division and expansion of tumor cells. In a study by Michael Ristow and co-workers, colon cancer lines were modified to overexpress frataxin. The results of their work suggest that an increase in oxidative metabolism induced by mitochondrial frataxin may inhibit cancer growth in mammals.[8]
Studies published since 2005 have shown that the Warburg effect, indeed, might lead to a promising approach in the treatment of solid tumors. Alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (ACCA;CHCA), a small-molecule inhibitor of monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs; which prevent lactic acid build up in tumors) has been successfully used as a metabolic target in brain tumor pre-clinical research.[9][10][11][12] Higher affinity MCT inhibitors have been developed and are currently undergoing clinical trials by Astra-Zeneca.[13] The chemical dichloroacetic acid (DCA), which promotes respiration and the activity of mitochondria, has also been shown to kill cancer cells in vitro and in some animal models.[14] The body often kills damaged cells by apoptosis, a mechanism of self-destruction that involves mitochondria, but this mechanism fails in cancer cells where the mitochondria are shut down. The reactivation of mitochondria in cancer cells restarts their apoptosis program.[15] Besides promising human research at the Department of Medicine, University of Alberta led by Dr Evangelos Michelakis, other glycotic inhibitors besides DCA that hold promise include 3-BrOP being researched at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) at Emory University School of Medicine, and lactate dehydrogenase A [16] at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
See also
- Reverse Warburg effect
- Carcinogen
- 2-Deoxy-D-glucose
- Ketogenic diet
- Pyruvic acid
- Cellular respiration
- Inverse Warburg Effect
References
- ↑ Warburg O (24 February 1956). "On the Origin of Cancer Cells". Science 123 (3191): 309–14. doi:10.1126/science.123.3191.309. PMID 13298683.
- ↑ Vazquez, A.; Liu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Oltvai, Z. (2010). "Catabolic efficiency of aerobic glycolysis: the Warburg effect revisited". BMC systems biology 4: 58. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-4-58. PMC 2880972. PMID 20459610.
- ↑ O. Warburg, K. Posener, E. Negelein: Ueber den Stoffwechsel der Tumoren; Biochemische Zeitschrift, Vol. 152, pp. 319-344, 1924. (German). Reprinted in English in the book On metabolism of tumors by O. Warburg, Publisher: Constable, London, 1930.
- ↑ Bertram JS (2000). "The molecular biology of cancer". Mol. Aspects Med. 21 (6): 167–223. doi:10.1016/S0098-2997(00)00007-8. PMID 11173079.
- ↑ Grandér D (1998). "How do mutated oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes cause cancer?". Med. Oncol. 15 (1): 20–6. doi:10.1007/BF02787340. PMID 9643526.
- ↑ Hsu PP and Sabatini DM (2008). "Cancer Cell Metabolism: Warburg and Beyond". Cell. 134 (5): 703–7. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.021. PMID 18775299.
- ↑ Otto Heinrich Warburg (June 30, 1966). "The Prime Cause and Prevention of Cancer".
- ↑ Schulz TJ, Thierbach R, Voigt A, Drewes G, Mietzner B, Steinberg P, Pfeiffer AF, Ristow M. (January 13, 2006). "Induction of oxidative metabolism by mitochondrial frataxin inhibits cancer growth: Otto Warburg revisited.". Journal of Biological Chemistry 281 (2): 977–981. doi:10.1074/jbc.M511064200. PMID 16263703.
- ↑ Colen, CB, PhD Thesis (2005) http://elibrary.wayne.edu/record=b3043899~S47
- ↑ Colen CB, Seraji-Bozorgzad N, Marples B, Galloway MP, Sloan AE, Mathupala SP (2006). "Metabolic remodeling of malignant gliomas for enhanced sensitization during radiotherapy: an in vitro study". Neurosurgery 59 (6): 1313–1323. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000249218.65332.BF. PMID 17277695.
- ↑ Colen CB, Shen Y, Ghoddoussi F, Yu P, Francis TB, Koch BJ, Monterey MD, Galloway MP, Sloan AE, Mathupala SP (2011). "Metabolic targeting of lactate efflux by malignant glioma inhibits invasiveness and induces necrosis: an in vivo study". Neoplasia 13 (7): 620–632. PMC 3132848. PMID 21750656.
- ↑ Mathupala SP, Colen CB, Parajuli P, Sloan AE (2007). "Lactate and malignant tumors: a therapeutic target at the end stage of glycolysis (Review)". J Bioenerg Biomembr. 39 (1): 73–77. doi:10.1007/s10863-006-9062-x. PMID 17354062.
- ↑ http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01791595
- ↑ Bonnet S, Archer S, Allalunis-Turner J, Haromy A, Beaulieu C, Thompson R, Lee C, Lopaschuk G, Puttagunta L, Bonnet S, Harry G, Hashimoto K, Porter C, Andrade M, Thebaud B, Michelakis E (2007). "A mitochondria-K+ channel axis is suppressed in cancer and its normalization promotes apoptosis and inhibits cancer growth". Cancer Cell 11 (1): 37–51. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.020. PMID 17222789.
- ↑ Pedersen, Peter L (February 2007). "The cancer cell's "power plants" as promising therapeutic targets: an overview". Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes 39 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1007/s10863-007-9070-5. ISSN 0145-479X. PMID 17404823.
- ↑ {Le A, Cooper CR, Gouw AM, Dinavahi R, Maitra A, Deck LM, Royer RE, Vander Jagt DL, Semenza GL, Dang CV. Inhibition of Lactate Dehydrogenase A Induces Oxidative Stress and Inhibits Tumor Progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 2; 107(5):2037-42}
Further reading
- Warburg O (24 February 1956). "On the Origin of Cancer Cells". Science 123 (3191): 309–14. doi:10.1126/science.123.3191.309. PMID 13298683.
- Ristow M (July 2006). "Oxidative metabolism in cancer growth". Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care 9 (4): 339–45. doi:10.1097/01.mco.0000232892.43921.98. PMID 16778561.
- ""Energy Blocker" kills Big Tumors in Rats" (Press release). Johns Hopkins Medicine. 14 October 2004.
- Gatenby RA, Gillies RJ (2004). "Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis?" (reprint). Nature Reviews Cancer 4 (11): 891–9. doi:10.1038/nrc1478. PMID 15516961.
- Pelicano H, Martin DS, Xu RH, Huang P (2006). "Glycolysis inhibition for anticancer treatment". Oncogene 25 (34): 4633–46. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209597. PMID 16892078.
- Weinhouse S (1976). "The Warburg hypothesis fifty years later". Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 87 (2): 115–26. doi:10.1007/BF00284370. PMID 136820.
- Garber K (2004). "Energy Boost: The Warburg Effect Returns in a New Theory of Cancer". Journal of the National Cancer Institute 96 (24): 1805–6. doi:10.1093/jnci/96.24.1805. PMID 15601632.
- Seyfried TN, Mukherjee P (Oct 2005). "Targeting energy metabolism in brain cancer: review and hypothesis". Nutr Metab (Lond) 2 (1): 30. doi:10.1186/1743-7075-2-30. PMC 1276814. PMID 16242042.
- Pedersen PL (Jun 2007). "Warburg, me and Hexokinase 2: Multiple discoveries of key molecular events underlying one of cancers' most common phenotypes, the "Warburg Effect", i.e., elevated glycolysis in the presence of oxygen". J Bioenerg Biomembr. 39 (3): 211–22. doi:10.1007/s10863-007-9094-x. PMID 17879147.
- Glycolytic enzyme inhibitors as novel anti-cancer drugs (3-bromopyruvate (3BP) and iodoacetate (IAA)), James C.K. Lai et al., Idaho State, June 2007
- Can a High-Fat Diet Beat Cancer? by Richard Friebe, Time magazine, Monday, Sep. 17, 2007,
- Moreno-Sánchez R, Rodríguez-Enríquez S, Marín-Hernández A, Saavedra E (Mar 2007). "Energy metabolism in tumor cells". FEBS J. 274 (6): 1393–418. doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05686.x. PMID 17302740.
- Pedersen PL (Feb 2007). "The cancer cell's "power plants" as promising therapeutic targets: an overview". J Bioenerg Biomembr. 39 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1007/s10863-007-9070-5. PMID 17404823.
- Aft RL, Zhang FW, Gius D (Sep 2002). "Evaluation of 2-deoxy-D-glucose as a chemotherapeutic agent: mechanism of cell death". Br J Cancer 87 (7): 805–12. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600547. PMC 2364258. PMID 12232767.
- US 6670330 Cancer chemotherapy with 2-deoxy-D-glucose
- Can Ancient Herbs Treat Cancer? Time magazine, October 15, 2007 (describes the drug trial of BZL101, a compound from the Scutellaria Barbata herb that prevents cancerous cells from undergoing glycolysis).
- Isidoro A, Casado E, Redondo A, et al. (Dec 2005). "Breast carcinomas fulfill the Warburg hypothesis and provide metabolic markers of cancer prognosis". Carcinogenesis 26 (12): 2095–104. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgi188. PMID 16033770.