United States v. Salerno

United States v. Salerno

Argued January 21, 1987
Decided May 26, 1987
Full case name United States v. Salerno
Citations

481 U.S. 739 (more)

Holding
Given the Act's legitimate and compelling regulatory purpose and the procedural protections it offers, 18 U.S.C. 3142(e) is not facially invalid under the Due Process Clause.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Case opinions
Majority Rehnquist, joined by White, Blackmun, Powell, O'Connor, Scalia
Dissent Marshall, joined by Brennan
Dissent Stevens

United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987), was a United States Supreme Court decision. It determined that the Bail Reform Act of 1984, which permitted the federal courts to detain an arrestee prior to trial if the government could prove that the individual was potentially dangerous to other people in the community, did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, nor the Excessive Bail Clause of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The case was brought up when Mafia member Anthony Salerno was arrested and indicted for violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO Act).

Chief Justice William Rehnquist wrote the opinion for the majority.

Salerno is famous for expounding the "no set of circumstances" test. Challengers bringing a facial challenge to a statute are claiming the statute is 'void on its face' and should be declared unconstitutional. This is an extremely high burden, because the challenger must show that no set of circumstances exists under which the statute would be valid. The Court did however recognize the well-established overbreadth doctrine, which provides a different standard for facial challenges of laws alleged to violate the First Amendment.

See also

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, February 02, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.