Unique Identification Authority of India

Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI)
भारतीय विशिष्ट पहचान प्राधिकरण
Agency overview
Formed 28 January 2009 (2009-01-28)[1]
Jurisdiction Government of India
Headquarters 3rd Floor, Tower II, Jeevan Bharati Building,
124 Connaught Circus, New Delhi
Annual budget 1615.34 crore (US$240 million) (2014-15)
Agency executive
  • Vijay S. Madan, Chairman, Director General and Mission Director[2]
Website uidai.gov.in

The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) is a central government agency of India. It is attached to the erstwhile Planning Commission of India, now NITI Aayog.[3] Its objective is to collect the biometric and demographic data of residents, store them in a centralised database, and issue a 12-digit unique identity number called Aadhaar to each resident.[4][5] It is considered the world's largest national identification number project.[6][7]

As of August 2015, the legislation to back UIDAI is still pending in the Parliament of India.[8] Some civil liberty groups, like Citizens Forum for Civil Liberties and Indian Social Action Forum (INSAF), have opposed the project on privacy concerns.[9][10][11]

On 23 September 2013, the Supreme Court of India issued an interim order saying that "no person should suffer for not getting Aadhaar" as the government cannot deny a service to a resident if s/he does not possess Aadhaar, as it is voluntary and not mandatory.[12] In another interim order on 11 August 2015, the Supreme Court of India ruled that "UIDAI/Aadhaar will not be used for any other purposes except PDS, kerosene and LPG distribution system" and made it clear that even for availing these facilities Aadhaar card will not be mandatory.[13][14][15]

India’s Unique Identification (Aadhaar Card) was created to “plug loopholes” and help tackle the issue of infiltration of over 1.4 million illegal Bangladeshis into India over the past decade.

Overview

The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) was set up by the Government of India on 28 January 2009 as an attached office of the erstwhile Planning Commission of India vide its a gazette notification.[16] The UIDAI is mandated to assign a 12-digit unique identification (UID) number (termed as Aadhaar) to all the residents of India. As per the notification, the UIDAI has been given the responsibility to lay down plan and policies to implement UID scheme, to own and operate the UID database and be responsible for its updation and maintenance on an ongoing basis. The implementation of UID scheme entails generation and assignment of UID to residents; defining mechanisms and processes for interlinking UID with partner databases; operation and management of all stages of UID life cycle; framing policies and procedures for updation mechanism and defining usage and applicability of UID for delivery of various services among others.[16] The number is linked to the resident's basic demographic and biometric information such as photograph, ten fingerprints and two iris scans, which are stored in a centralised database.[4]

Starting with issuing of first UID in September 2010, the UIDAI has been targeting to issue UID - a unique 12 digit Aadhaar number to all the residents that (a) is robust enough to eliminate duplicate and fake identities, and (b) can be verified and authenticated in an easy and cost-effective way online anywhere, anytime.[17] The Government of India in a notification dated 16 December 2010 recognizes the letter issued by Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) containing details of name, address and Aadhaar number, as an officially valid document.[18] It neither aims to replace any existing identity cards nor it is a cognizance of citizenship.[19] Aadhaar neither confers citizenship nor it guarantees rights, benefits or entitlements. Aadhaar is a random number which never starts with a 0 or 1, and is not loaded with profiling or intelligence into identity numbers that makes it insusceptible to fraud and theft. The unique ID would also qualify for as a valid ID while availing various government services, like a LPG connection or subsidised ration or kerosene from PDS or benefits under NSAP or pension schemes, e-sign, digital locker,[20] Universal Account Number (UAN) under EPFO;[21] and for some other services, like a SIM card or opening a bank account.[22][23] According to the UIDAI website, any Aadhaar holder or service provider can verify an Aadhaar number for its genuineness through a user-friendly service of UIDAI called Aadhaar Verification Service (AVS) available on its website.[24][25] Also, a resident already enrolled under National Population Register is not required to enrol again for Aadhaar.[26]

Enrolment

As of 31 January 2016, over 97 crore (970 million) Aadhaar numbers have been issued in the project.[27]

AADHAARs Issued (state-wise)
Rank State / Union Territory Population AADHAARs Issued % of Population
INDIA1,280,000,000970,000,000 75.8%
1Uttar Pradesh211,105,381131,611,17362.3%
2Maharashtra118,861,427100,617,49984.7%
3West Bengal96,622,18668,525,75870.9%
4Bihar109,798,35361,344,74455.9%
5Madhya Pradesh76,789,37458,182,26875.8%
6Tamil Nadu76,304,28754,924,25072.0%
7Rajasthan72,583,21353,370,12473.5%
8Karnataka64,660,41251,718,22880.0%
9Andhra Pradesh52,229,92448,972,43393.8%
10Gujarat63,870,20044,481,45569.6%
11Telangana37,253,81336,963,70899.2%
12Kerala35,315,49332,577,35592.2%
13Odisha44,369,41330,724,75469.2%
14Jharkhand34,869,72028,728,86482.4%
15Punjab29,303,88827,267,23193.0%
16Haryana26,816,97724,561,88391.6%
17Chhattisgarh27,014,89622,401,60782.9%
18Delhi17,720,57318,823,065106.2%
19Uttarakhand10,700,8977,489,68870.0%
20Himachal Pradesh7,252,4066,729,41592.8%
21Jammu and Kashmir13,273,5056,229,41346.9%
22Tripura3,882,9993,476,71489.5%
23Goa1,541,8921,381,62789.6%
24Manipur2,878,9111,454,68550.5%
25Puducherry1,316,3201,202,68291.4%
26Chandigarh1,115,5841,026,91292.1%
27Nagaland2,094,963977,99546.7%
28Sikkim642,776572,91389.1%
29Assam32,968,997575,3511.7%
30Arunachal Pradesh1,462,443565,26038.7%
31Mizoram1,154,010402,32334.9%
32Andaman and Nicobar Islands401,882338,14284.1%
33Dadra and Nagar Haveli362,649292,14480.6%
34Daman and Diu256,937188,13773.2%
35Lakshadweep68,14961,90690.8%
36Meghalaya3,135,15044,8951.4%
37Others09,7520.00%

Expenditure

By July 2013, the government had spent a total of 3062 crore (US$450 million) on the project.[3] By February 2015, the government had spent 5630 crore (US$830 million) on the project and generated 78.65 crore (786.5 million) Aadhaar numbers.[28]

Expenditure by UIDAI (by year)[29]
Fiscal year Expenditure
2009-10 26.21 crore (US$3.9 million)
2010-11 268.41 crore (US$40 million)
2011-12 1187.50 crore (US$170 million)
2012-13 1338.72 crore (US$200 million)
2013-14 1544.44 crore (US$230 million)
2014-15 1615.34 crore (US$240 million)
Total 5980.62 crore (US$880 million)

In September 2013, the Delhi Development Authority accepted a complaint from the India Against Corruption activist group and cancelled a land allotment to UIDAI. The land was previously owned by BSNL, and MTNL had also laid claims on it. It was of an estimated 900 crore (US$130 million) value, but it had been allotted to UIDAI at a very cheap rate.[30]

The issue of constructing UIDAI HQs and UIDAI Regional Office, Delhi's building was resolved with Department of Telecom (DoT). Following which, the Ministry of Urban Development has issued a notification on 21 May 2015 clearing the titles of the land in favour of UIDAI including land use.[31]

History

Previous identity card programs

In 1999 after the Kargil war, the Kargil Review Committee, headed by security analyst K. Subrahmanyam, was formed to study the state of national security. It submitted its report to Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee on 7 January 2000.[32] Among its various recommendations, was the proposal that citizens in villages in border region be issued identity cards on a priority basis, later such id cards should be issued to all people living in border states.[33][34]

A Group of Ministers (GoM), headed by L. K. Advani, was formed to study the recommendations and examine possible implemenatation. The GoM submitted its report in May 2001. It had accepted the recommendation for an id card. The report said the a "multi-purpose National Identity Card" project would be started soon. The card would be first issued in border villages and then elsewhere.[34][35] In late September 2001, the Ministry of External Affairs proposed that a mandatory national identity card be issued. This announcement can after reports that some people had multiple Indian passports with different details. This was attributed to the lack of computerisation between the passport centres.[36][37] In December 2003, the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2003 was introduced in the Lok Sabha by L. K. Advani. It primarily aim to provide various rights to persons of Indian origin.[38] However, the bill also introduced the clause 14 (a) that said "The Central Government may compulsorily register every citizen of India and issue national identity card to him."[34][39][40][41]

2009-2014

The UIDAI was established on 28 January 2009 after the Planning Commission of India issued a notification. On 23 June 2009, Nandan Nilekani, the co-founder of Infosys, was appointed by the United Progressive Alliance government to head the project. He was given the newly created position of the Chairman of UIDAI which was equivalent to a Cabinet minister.[6][22][42] In April 2010, the logo and the brand name Aadhaar was launched by Nilekani.[43] In May 2010, Nilakani said he would support a legislation to protect the data held by the UIDAI.[44]

In July 2010, UIDAI published a list 15 of agencies which were qualified to provide training to personnel to be involved in the enrollment process. It also published a list of 220 agencies which were qualified to take part in the enrollment process. Before this, the project had been only 20 states and with Life Insurance Corporation of India and State Bank of India as qualified registrars. This announcement introduced several private firms. It was estimated that to achieve the target of enrolling 40% of the population in two years, 31,019 personnel would be required and 155 training centres would be required to train them. It was also estimated that 4,431 enrollment centres and 22,157 enrollment stations would have to be established.[45]

On 7 February 2012, the UIDAI launched an online verification system for Aadhar numbers. Using the system banks, telecom companies and government departments could enter an Aadhaar number and verify if the person was a resident of India.[46]

On 26 November 2012, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh launched an Aadhaar-linked direct benefit transfer scheme. The project aimed to eliminate leakages in the system by directly transferring the money to the bank account of the recipient. The project was to be introduced in 51 districts on 1 January 2013 and then slowly expanded to cover all of India.[47][48]

In late November 2012, a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice K S Puttaswamy, and a lawyer, Parvesh Khanna, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) against the government in the Supreme Court of India. They contented that the government was implementing the project without any legislative backing.[49] In December 2011, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance, led by Yashwant Sinha, rejected the National Identification Authority of India Bill, 2010 in its then present form and suggested modifications. It termed the project "unethical and violative of Parliament's prerogatives".[50] On 23 September 2013, the Supreme Court issued an interim order saying that the government cannot deny a service to anyone who does not possess Aadhaar, as it is voluntary.[12]

In late September 2013, following the Supreme Court verdict, Union Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs and Planning Rajeev Shukla said that the National Identification Authority of India Bill, 2010 would be attempted to be passed in the winter session of the Parliament.[51] On 9 October 2013, the National Payments Corporation of India launched an Aadhaar-based remittance system. Using the system funds could be transferred to any Aadhaar-linked bank accounts, if only the Aadhaar number was known. It was announced that an SMS could be used for amounts up to 5,000 and for amounts over that a mobile bank app could be used. By this time around 44,000,000 Aadhaar numbers had been issued.[52]

In March 2014, Nandan Nilekani resigned as the Chairman to contest in the general election on an Indian National Congress nomination from Bangalore South.[53] His responsibilities taken over by 1981-batch Indian Administrative Service officer Vijay Madan, who was given an extension of his term as the director-general and mission director by the government.[54] Nilekani lost to Ananth Kumar.[55]

2014-present

Before elections in March 2014, BJP national spokesperson Meenakshi Lekhi and general secretary Ananth Kumar had criticised the project for issuing Aadhaar to illegal immigrants. Lekhi pointed out that project continued to be run even after a parliamentary committee voted againist and despite the Supreme Court order.[56] Subramanian Swamy, another BJP leader and economist, said that UIDAI was a useless scheme and Nilekani should be prosecuted for wasting resources by hiring US firms.[57][58]

On 10 June 2014, the new government disbanded four Cabinet Committees to streamline the decision making process; among them was also the Cabinet Committee on Aadhaar.[59] Also in June 2014, the IT Department held a meeting with the secretaries of the states to receive feedback on the project.[60]

On 1 July 2014, the former UIDAI Chairman Nandan Nilekani met with the Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley to convince them of the project's merits.[61] On 5 July 2014, Modi announced that his government retain the project and asked official to look into linking the project with passports.[62] In the 2014-15 Budget, 2039.64 crore (US$300 million) was allotted to the project for the fiscal year 2014-15. It was a substantial increase from the previous year's 1550 crore (US$230 million).[63] Also in July, it was reported that UIDAI would hire an advertising agency and spend about 30 crore on an advertising campaign.[64]

On 10 September 2014, the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs gave approval to the Phase-V of the UIDAI project, starting the enrollment process in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand.[65] The Union Cabinet allocated 1200 crore (US$180 million) to the project to reach the target of 100 crore enrollment by 2015 end.[66]

On 18 June 2015, in a high level review meeting on the progress of the UID project and DBT scheme, Prime Minister Narendra Modi asked the officials to accelerate the delivery of benefits and expand the applications of the Aadhaar (UID) platform. He also asked them to examine the possibility of incentivising the states, through a one-time sharing of a portion of the savings. It was reported that the government was saving up to 14-15% in the direct benefit transfers of subsidies on LPG to the beneficiaries through Aadhaar.[67]

Finding the experience with DBT scheme in LPG "very encouraging" with a reported savings to the tune of 12700 crore (US$1.9 billion) to the public exchequer this year, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley on 5 July 2015, said, "If we can realize the government’s JAM—Jan Dhan, Aadhaar, Mobile—vision we can ensure that money goes directly and more quickly into the pockets of the poor and from the savings we achieve, we can put even more money for the poor. If we can be careful in our design and implementation, we can extend DBT to other commodities, so that the poor get more money to spend for their upliftment." [68]

In April 2015 AADHAAR powered DigiLocker service was launched where users can save their documents online and can share it with the government officials whenever required without any need to carry them. [69]

Applications and related projects

Direct Benefit transfer (DBT)

Aadhaar project has been linked to some public subsidy and unemployment benefit schemes like the domestic LPG scheme and MGNREGS. In these Direct Benefit Transfer schemes, the subsidy money is directly transferred to a bank account which is Aadhaar-linked.[70][71]

On 29 July 2011, the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas signed a memorandum of understanding with UIDAI. The Ministry had hoped the ID system would help them eliminate loss of the subsidised kerosene and LPG.[72] In May 2012, the government announced that it will begin issuing Aadhaar-linked MGNREGS cards.[71] On 26 November 2012, a pilot project was launched in 51 district.[47]

Under the original policy for liquified petroleum gas subsidies, the customers bought gas cylinders from retailers at subsidised prices, and the government compensated companies for their losses. Under the current Direct Benefit Transfer of LPG (DBTL), introduced in 2013, customers had to buy at the full price, and the subsidy would be then directly credited to their Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. This scheme, however, did not take off, as in September 2013, a Supreme Court order put a halt on it.[12] Subsequently, GOI constituted a committee to review the "Direct Benefits Transfer for LPG Scheme"[73] to study the shortcomings in the scheme and recommend changes. The DBTL scheme was modified later as PAHAL by the new government in November 2014. Under PAHAL, subsidies could be credited to one's bank account even if the one did not have an Aadhaar number. Official data show that cooking gas consumption during the January–June period grew at a slower 7.82%, nearly four percentage points less than 11.4% growth in the same period last year.[74][75]

The PAHAL scheme has covered 11.89 crore of the 14.54 crore active LPG consumers till March, as stated by the Petroleum Minister in the Parliament. Thereby, the DBT has become a "game changer" for India, claimed the Chief Economic Adviser to the Finance Ministry, Government of India, Arvind Subramanian, for in case of LPG subsidy, DBT had resulted in a 24% reduction in the sale of subsidized LPG, as "ghost beneficiaries" had been excluded. The savings to the government were to the tune of 12700 crore (US$1.9 billion) in 2014-15.[76] The success of the modified scheme helped fuel marketing companies save almost 8000 crore (US$1.2 billion) from November 2014 to June 2015, said oil company officials.[74] The DBT for the public distribution system (PDS) will be rolled out in September 2015.[76]

Aadhaar-enabled biometric attendance systems

In July 2014, Aadhaar-enabled biometric attendance systems (AEBAS) was introduced in government offices. The system was introduced to check late-arrival and absentiism of government employeers. The public could see the daily in and out of employees on the website attendance.gov.in.[77][78][79] However, in October 2014, the website was closed to the public.[80] The employees use the last four digits of their Aadhaar number and their fingerprints, for authentication.[81]

Other uses by central government agencies

In November 2014, it was reported the Ministry for External Affairs was considering making Aadhaar a mandatory requirement for passport holders.[82] In February 2015, it was reported that people with Aadhaar number will get their passports issued within 10 days, as it allowed the verification process to be easier by checking if applicant had any criminal records in the National Crime Records Bureau's database.[83] In May 2015, it was announced that the Ministry of External Affairs was testing the linking of passports to the Aadhaar database.[84]

In 2015, MEA decided to use Aadhar Cards are a basis for Facts Verification of a Passport Applicant. With this in place the issuing of passports which earlier took over a month, is now possible in a matter of 10-15 days. [85]

In October 2014, the Department of Electronics and Information Technology said that they were considering linking Aadhaar to SIM cards.[86] In November 2014, the Department of Telecom asked all telecom operators to collect Aadhaar from all new applicants of SIM cards.[87] On 4 March 2015, Aadhaar-linked SIM cards began to be sold in some cities in a pilot project. The purchase could activate the SIM at the time of purchase by submitting his Aadhaar number and pressing his fingerprints on a machine.[88] It is part of the Digital India plan. The Digital India project aims to provide all government services to citizens electronically and is expected to be completed by 2018.[88][89]

In July 2014, Employees' Provident Fund Organisation of India (EPFO) began linking provident fund accounts with Aadhaar numbers.[21] In November 2014, EPFO became an UIDAI registrar and began issuing Aadhaar number to provident fund subscribers.[90] In December 2014, Labour Minister Bandaru Dattatreya clarified that an Aadhaar number was not necessary for any provident fund transaction.[91]

In August 2014, Prime Minister Modi directed the Planning Commission of India to enroll all prisoners in India under UIDAI.[92]

In December 2014, it was proposed by the Minister for Women and Child Development Maneka Gandhi that Aadhaar should be made mandatory for men to create a profile on matrimonial websites, to prevent fake profiles.[93] In July 2015, the Department of Electronics and Information Technology (DeitY) called a meeting of meeting of various matrimonial sites and other stakeholders discuss the use of Aadhaar to prevent fake profile and protect women from exploitation.[94]

On 3 March 2015, the National Electoral Roll Purification and Authentication Programme (NERPAP) of the Election Commission of India was started. It aims to link the Elector's Photo Identity Card (EPIC) with the Aadhar number of the registered voter. It is aims to create an error-free voter identification system in India, especially by removing duplications.[95][96]

Other uses by states

In Hyderabad region of Telangana state, Aadhaar numbers were linked to ration cards to remove duplicate and illegal ration cards. The project was started in July 2012 and was carried out despite the 2013 Supreme Court order. More than 63,932 ration cards in the white category, and 2,29,757 names were removed from its database in the drive between July 2012 and September 2014.[97][98][99] In August 2012, the neighbouring state of Andhra Pradesh, asked citizens to surrender illegal ration cards, before it began to link them with Aadhaar numbers. By September 2014, 15 lakh illegal ration cards had been surrendered.[100][101] In April 2015, the state of Maharashtra began enrolling all school students in the state in the Aadhaar project to implement the Right to Education Act properly.[102]

Impediments and other concerns

Feasibility concerns

In October 2010, R. Ramakumar, an economist at the Tata Institute of Social Sciences,[103] wrote in an editorial for The Hindu that the project was being implemented without any cost-benefit or feasibility studies to ensure whether the project will meet its stipulated goals. He also pointed the government was obscuring the security aspects of Aadhaar and focusing on the social benefit schemes. He quoted former chief of the Intelligence Bureau Ajit Doval who had said that originally Aadhaar aimed to weed out illegal aliens.[34]

On 9 November 2012, the National Institute of Public Finance and Policy published a paper titled A cost-benefit analysis of Aadhaar. The paper claimed that by 2015-16 the benefits of the project will surpass the costs, and by 2020-21 the total benefit would be 25,100 crore against the total expenditure of 4,835 crore. The benefits would come from plugging leakages in various subsidy and social benefit schemes.[104][105]

In March 2011, Rajanish Dass of IIM Ahmedabad's Computer and Information Systems Group, published a paper titled "Unique Identity Project in India: A divine dream or a miscalculated heroism". Dass claimed that even if enrollment is voluntary, it is being made mandatory by indirect means. He pointed out that essential schemes like the National Food Security Act, 2013 was being linked to UIDAI. He also pointed the feasibility of a project of this size had not been studied and raised concerns about the quality of the biometric data being collected. He cited another researcher Usha Ramanathan that UIDAI will ultimately have to become profit-making to sustain itself.[106][107]

Lack of legislation and privacy concerns

In late November 2012, a former Karnataka High Court judge, Justice K. S. Puttaswamy, and a lawyer, Parvesh Khanna, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) against the government in the Supreme Court of India. They had contended that government was implementing the project without any legislative backing. They pointed out that the National Identification Authority of India Bill, 2010 which introduced in the Rajya Sabha was still pending.[49] They said that since UIDAI was running on only an executive order issued on 28 January 2009, it cannot collect biometric data of citizens as it would be a violation of privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution.[1]

On 23 September 2013, the Supreme Court issued an interim order saying that "no person should suffer for not getting the Aadhaar card in spite of the authority making it mandatory". The court noted that the government had said that Aadhaar is voluntary.[12][108][109]

On 2 February 2015, the Supreme Court asked the new government to clarify its stance on the project. This was in response to a new PIL filed by Mathew Thomas, a former army officer. Thomas had claimed that government was ignoring previous orders while pushing ahead with the project and that the project was unconstitutional as it allowed profiling of citizens. The government in a reply on 12 February said that it will continue the project.[110][111] On 16 July 2015, the government requested the Supreme Court to revoke its order, saying that it intends to use Aadhaar for various services.[112] On 21 July 2015, the Court noted that some states were insisting on Aadhaar for benefits despite its order.[113]

On 11 August 2015, the Supreme Court directed the government to widely publicise in print and electronic media that Aadhaar is not mandatory for any welfare scheme. The Court also referred the petitions claiming Aadhaar is unconstitutional to a Constitutional Bench.[114]

Legality of sharing data with law enforcement

In 2013 Goa, the CBI was trying to solve the case of a rape of a schoolgirl. It approached a Goa local court saying that they had acquired some fingerprints from the scene and they could be matched with the UIDAI database. The court asked UIDAI to hand over all data of all persons in Goa to CBI.[115][116]

The UIDAI appealed in the Bombay High Court saying that accepting such a request would set precedent for several more such requests. The High Court rejected the argument and on 26 February 2014 in an interim order directed Central Forensic Science Laboratory (CFSL) to study technological capability of the database to see if it can solve such a crime. The UIDAI then appealed in the Supreme Court. It argued that the chance of a false positive was 0.057% and with 60,00,00,000 people in its database it would result in lakhs of false results.[116][117]

The Supreme Court, on 24 March 2014, restrained the central government and the Unique Identification Authority of India from sharing data with any third party or agency, whether government or private, without the consent of the Aadhaar-holder in writing. Vide another interim order dated 16 March 2015, the Supreme Court of India has directed the Union of India and States and all their functionaries should adhere to the order passed by this court on 23 September 2013. It observed that some government agencies were still treating Aadhaar as mandatory and asked all agencies to issue notifications clarifying that it was not mandatory.[115]

Security concerns

In an August 2009 interview with the Tehelka, former chief of the Intelligence Bureau (IB), Ajit Doval, said that it was originally intended to flush out illegal immigrants, but social security benefits were later added to avoid privacy concerns.[118] In December 2011, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance, led by Yashwant Sinha, rejected the National Identification Authority of India Bill, 2010 and suggested modifications. It expressed objections to the issuing of Aadhaar numbers to illegal immigrants. The Committee said that the project was being implemented in an unplanned manner and by bypassing the Parliament.[50]

In May 2013, deputy director general of UIDAI, Ashok Dalwai, admitted that there had been some errors in the registration process. Some people had received Aadhaar cards with wrong photographs or fingerprints.[119] According to Aloke Tikku of Hindustan Times, some officials of the Intelligence Bureau (IB) had criticised the UIDAI project in September 2013. The unnamed IB officials have said that Aadhaar number cannot be treated as a credible proof of residence. As under the liberal pilot phase, where a person claims to live was accepted as the address and recorded.[120]

The element of doubt in the veracity of government clearances only vindicates the distrust in the departmental procedures of procuring Aadhaar, which includes checks and clearance by babus — easily the most suspect of the lot. The corrupt-as-ever babus even local political representatives are known to provide all sorts of documents ranging from ration cards to utility bills to illegal immigrants as political or personal favours. Consider this: The US Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), 2008 prohibits U.S. insurance companies and employers from discriminating on the basis of information derived from genetic tests. That United States found it so necessary to enact a law to check abuse only endorses the fact that genetic information like DNA facilitates discrimination. And, India blissfully chooses to collate and accumulate the data without putting the prerequisite checks in legislation and practice in place. If the UIDAI database is leaked or simply sold by a political entity to insurance companies who stand to gain immensely by assimilating and utilising the data for which they usually shell out fortunes through market surveys and online reviews, millions across the nation risk losing a lot at stake here. It’s for this very reason that the US legislated to create GINA — to eliminate unfair discrimination. India, with its colossal consumer base and without protective legislation in place, is a sitting duck when it comes to tackling powerful insurance companies.[121]

Overlaps with National Population Register

The Aadhaar and the similar National Population Register (NPR) projects have been reported to be having conflicts. In January 2012, it was reported that UIDAI will share its data with NPR and NPR will continue to collect its own data.[122] In January 2013, then Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde said that Aadhaar was not an identity card but a number, while NPR was necessary for national security purposes.[123] The 2013 Supreme Court order did not affect the NPR project as it was not linked to any subsidy.[124]

In July 2014, a meeting was held to discuss the possibility of merging the two projects Aadhaar and National Population Register, or making them complementary. The meeting was attended by Home Minister Rajnath Singh, Law and Justice and Telecom Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad and Minister of State for Planning Rao Inderjit Singh.[125] However, later in the same month, Rao Inderjit Singh told the Lok Sabha that no plan to merge the two projects have been made.[126]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 "Supreme Court notice to govt on PIL over Aadhar". The Times of India. 1 December 2012. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  2. "UIDAI: Contacts". UIDAI. Retrieved 30 May 2015.
  3. 1 2 "Unique Identification project expenditure at Rs 3,062 crore as of July end". The Economic Times. 29 August 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  4. 1 2 "Learning with the Times: What is Aadhaar?". The Times of India. 4 December 2010. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  5. Chin, Roger (June 2015). "India’s Aadhaar Project: The Unprecedented and Unique Partnership for Inclusion" (PDF). Journal of Administrative Science.
  6. 1 2 "UIDAI: Inside the World's Largest Data Management Project". Forbes (India). 29 November 2010. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
  7. "Aadhaar world’s largest biometric ID system". The Times of India. 27 April 2015. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  8. "National Identification Authority of India Bill, 2010". PRS Legislative Research. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  9. "UID an assault on individual liberty: Activists". Rediff. 6 September 2010. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  10. "AADHAR: Union Cabinet of Ignorance!". Rediff. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  11. "The Trouble With Big Brother’s Eye". Tehelka. 31 August 2012. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  12. 1 2 3 4 "Don’t tie up benefits to Aadhaar, court tells Centre". The Hindu. 24 September 2013. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  13. "Aadhaar Card Not Mandatory, Supreme Court Rules". NDTV. 11 August 2015. Retrieved 6 September 2015.
  14. "Aadhaar shall remain optional: Supreme Court". The Hindu. 11 August 2015. Retrieved 6 September 2015.
  15. "SC rules Aadhaar card not mandatory, says government cannot share any personal information". IBNLive. 11 August 2015. Retrieved 6 September 2015.
  16. 1 2 "Notification No.-A-43011/02/2009-Admn.I, 28 January 2009, Planning Commission, Government of India" (PDF). UIDAI. 28 January 2009. Retrieved 7 July 2015.
  17. Chin, Roger (June 2015). "India’s Aadhaar Project: The Unprecedented and Unique Partnership for Inclusion" (PDF). Journal of Administrative Science.
  18. "Government of India Notification (No. 14/2010 / F. No. 6/2/2007 – ES)". Reserve Bank of India. 15 March 2011. Retrieved 7 July 2015.
  19. "Nilekani to give numbers, ministries to issue cards". The Economic Times. 16 July 2009. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  20. "Move to link digital locker with Aadhaar challenged". The Hindu. 5 July 2015. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  21. 1 2 "EPFO revives Aadhaar for rolling out unique account numbers". The Indian Express. 23 July 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  22. 1 2 "Nilekani takes charge, says first set of IDs in 12-18 months". The Times of India. 24 July 2009. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  23. "Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) By Customers: Aadhaar Payment Bridge (APB) System" (PDF). National Payments Corporation of India. Retrieved 7 July 2015.
  24. "India launches Aadhaar verification services, enrolment centers". ZDNet. 27 May 2013. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  25. "Verify Aadhaar". UIDAI. Retrieved 9 July 2015.
  26. "Where to Enroll". UIDAI. Retrieved 9 July 2015.
  27. "Public Data Portal". UIDAI. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  28. "Government expenditure on Aadhaar project is Rs 5,630 crore". The Economic Times. 13 March 2015. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  29. "Expenditure of UIDAI for the year 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 , 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 (Up to March 2015)". UIDAI. Retrieved 30 May 2015.
  30. "UIDAI land allotment scam: DDA accepts IAC prayer to scrap the deal". Money Life. 17 September 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  31. "No. K-13011/26/2012-DD-I" (PDF). Gazette of India. Retrieved 7 July 2015.
  32. "A committee and some questions: A first-person account with regard to the Kargil Review Committee Report and its implications.". Frontline (magazine). 4 February 2000.
  33. "The Kargil Review Committee Report: 'The fallacy of showing the LOC as running northeast to the Karakoram Pass must be exposed'". Rediff. 4 March 2000. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
  34. 1 2 3 4 "What the UID conceals". The Hindu. 21 October 2010. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
  35. "Group of Ministers' Report on "Reforming the National Security System"". Press Information Bureau. 23 May 2001. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
  36. "Govt in no position to check passport fraud". The Times of India. 21 September 2001. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
  37. "Obtaining second passport is easy". The Times of India. 23 September 2001. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
  38. "Dual citizenship Bill passed". The Hindu. 22 December 2003. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
  39. "The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2003". Indian Kanoon. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
  40. "The Citizenship Act, 1955 (as of 2005)" (PDF). Ministry of Home Affairs (India). Retrieved 26 May 2015.
  41. "The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2003" (PDF). PRS Legislative Research. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
  42. "Creation of position of the Chairperson UID Authority of India". Press Information Bureau. 25 June 2009. Archived from the original on 5 July 2009. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  43. "UID number gets brand name, logo". The Hindu. 27 April 2010. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
  44. "UIDAI will back law to protect data: Nilekani". The Hindu. 20 May 2010. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
  45. "UIDAI empanels enrollment & training agencies". Business Standard. 18 July 2010. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
  46. "UIDAI launches online verification of Aadhaar numbers". The Economic Times. 8 February 2012. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  47. 1 2 "PM launches Aadhar-based direct cash transfers in 51 districts of India". NDTV. 26 November 2012. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  48. "Cash transfer of subsidies in 51 districts begins on Jan 1". The Tribune (India). 24 November 2012. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  49. 1 2 "Supreme Court seeks government's response on PIL challenging AADHAAR implementation". The Economic Times. 30 November 2012. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  50. 1 2 "Why Parliamentary Panel rejected the UID Bill". IBNLive. 13 December 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  51. "Central government seeks statutory cover for UIDAI". The New Indian Express. 25 September 2013. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  52. "Punch in recipient's Aadhaar number to transfer funds". The Economic Times. 10 October 2013. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  53. "Nilekani resigns as UIDAI chairman". The Hindu. 13 March 2014. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  54. "Two dozen officers indispensable for government due to functional requirements: DoPT". The Economic Times. 17 July 2014. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  55. "Modi wave sinks Nandan Nilekani in Lok Sabha elections". Live Mint. 16 May 2014. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  56. "Aadhaar a 'fraud', will review it if voted to power: BJP". The Times of India. 12 March 2014. Retrieved 30 May 2015.
  57. "Swamy: prosecute Nilekani for graft". The Hindu. 30 March 2014. Retrieved 30 May 2015.
  58. "Nilekani squandered national resources to US firm: Swamy". The Indian Express. 31 March 2014. Retrieved 30 May 2015.
  59. "Narendra Modi scraps 4 Cabinet Committees, including the one on Aadhar". India Today. 10 June 2014. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  60. "Aadhaar future at stake, govt seeks meeting with states". The Indian Express. 17 June 2014. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  61. "Nandan Nilekani impresses Narendra Modi & Arun Jaitley, gets Aadhaar a lifeline". The Economic Times. 24 July 2014. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  62. "Aadhaar, DBT get a lifeline, Modi to retain, push UPA schemes". The Indian Express. 7 July 2014. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  63. "Govt to continue Aadhaar, provides Rs. 2k cr in 2014-15". The Hindu. 10 July 2014. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  64. "UIDAI set for an image makeover, to spend Rs 30 crore for its media campaign". The Economic Times. 12 July 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  65. "UID phase-V: Aadhaar enrolments in four states get Cabinet approval". The Indian Express. 11 September 2014. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  66. "Union Cabinet clears Rs 1,200 crore for Aadhaar". The Times of India. 11 September 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  67. "Modi for expanding ambit of direct benefits, Aadhaar applications". The Hindu Business Line. 18 June 2015. Retrieved 7 July 2015.
  68. "Need reforms backed by growth to end poverty". Deccan Herald. 6 July 2015. Retrieved 6 July 2015.
  69. "DigiLocker: An Aadhaar Powered Online Government Portal For Documents". Government Of India. 10 April 2015. Retrieved 10 April 2015.
  70. "Link your LPG connection to Aadhaar or bank a/c to keep getting subsidy". DNA India. 2 January 2015. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  71. 1 2 "In convergence push, NREGA card to carry Aadhar number". The Economic Times. 2 May 2012. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  72. "UIDAI, Petroleum Ministry sign MoU on AADHAR". The Hindu. 30 June 2011. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  73. "Review of the Direct Benefit Transfer for LPG Scheme" (PDF). Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. Retrieved 18 July 2015.
  74. 1 2 "DBTL helps govt save Rs10,000 crore as illegal LPG consumption falls". Live Mint. 3 July 2015. Retrieved 3 July 2015.
  75. "New LPG subsidy transfer linked with Aadhaar starts today". DNA India. 15 November 2015. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  76. 1 2 "NDA govt kicks off PDS reforms with direct cash transfers". Live Mint. 3 July 2015. Retrieved 3 July 2015.
  77. "Aadhar-enabled biometric attendance system introduced". The Hindu. 22 November 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  78. "Modi's biometric scheme ups employee attendance by 20 minutes a day". Daily Mail. 3 January 2015. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  79. "Government website throws up shocking attendance figures". DNA India. 11 October 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  80. "Password veil over officials’ attendance". The Telegraph (India). 14 October 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  81. "Aadhaar-linked biometric attendance for Central staff". Deccan Herald. 23 August 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  82. "Aadhaar to be must for passports". The Times of India. 11 November 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  83. "Have Aadhaar? Get passport in 10 days". The Times of India. 16 February 2015. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  84. "Soon, passport authorities to verify applicant identity with Aadhaar database". The Times of India. 1 May 2015. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  85. Get Passport in 10 Days with Aadhar Card
  86. "Aadhaar-SIM Card Linking Project Soon". The New Indian Express. 31 October 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  87. "Dot Tells Operators to Collect Aadhaar Numbers for Issuing New SIM Cards". NDTV. 3 November 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  88. 1 2 "Aadhaar-based SIM sale begins today amid Intelligence Bureau objections". DNA India. 4 March 2015. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  89. "Digital India – A programme to transform India into digital empowered society and knowledge economy". Press Information Bureau. 20 August 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  90. "Now get Aadhaar number through EPFO". The Hindu. 30 November 2015. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  91. "Aadhaar details not mandatory for PF transactions: Government". The Times of India. 8 December 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  92. "PM asks Plan panel to enrol inmates under Aadhaar". The Indian Express. 6 August 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  93. "Government asks matrimonial websites to authenticate profiles using Aadhaar cards". The Economic Times. 16 December 2014. Retrieved 7 July 2015.
  94. "Govt to check fraud by linking Aadhaar to matrimonial accounts". Hindustan Times. 7 July 2015. Retrieved 7 July 2015.
  95. "EC launches NERPAP countrywide". Business Standard. 3 March 2014. Retrieved 4 March 2015.
  96. "Voters’ List Duplication to be Thing of Past with Aadhaar Linking". The New Indian Express. 4 March 2015. Retrieved 4 March 2015.
  97. "64,000 bogus cards deactivated after survey". The Hindu. 12 September 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  98. "Aadhaar helps weed out bogus ration cards". The Hindu. 21 January 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  99. "Aadhaar hurdle in drive against fake ration cards". The Hindu. 2 July 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  100. "15 lakh bogus ration cards found so far: Sunitha". The Hindu. 6 September 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  101. "2.10 lakh fake ration cards surrendered". The New Indian Express. 26 August 2012. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  102. "Maharashtra to link school admission with Aadhaar". The Hindu. 23 April 2015. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  103. "R. Ramakumar, Dean". Tata Institute of Social Sciences. Retrieved 26 May 2015.
  104. "NIPFP study: 52.85 per cent returns expected from Aadhaar project". The Economic Times. 10 November 2012. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  105. "A cost-benefit analysis of Aadhaar" (PDF). National Institute of Public Finance and Policy. 9 November 2012. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  106. "IIMA prof’s study finds loopholes in UID project". The Indian Express. 18 March 2011. Retrieved 30 May 2015.
  107. "Unique Identification for Indians: A Divine Dream or a Miscalculated Heroism?" (PDF). IIM Ahmedabad. Retrieved 30 May 2015.
  108. K. S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (Supreme Court of India 2013) (“In the meanwhile, no person should suffer for not getting the Adhaar card inspite of the fact that some authority had issued a circular making it mandatory and when any person applies to get the Adhaar Card voluntarily, it may be checked whether that person is entitled for it under the law and it should not be given to any illegal immigrant.”). Text
  109. "How Nandan Nilekani Took Aadhaar Past The Tipping Point". Forbes (India). 8 October 2013. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  110. "Supreme Court seeks Modi government's view on Aadhaar scheme". India Today. 3 February 2015. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  111. "Will continue with Aadhaar scheme: Centre to Supreme Court". The Economic Times. 13 February 2015. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  112. "Centre wants SC to lift stay order on linking Aadhaar to benefits". Hindustan Times. 17 July 2015. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  113. "Why Are States Still Insisting on Aadhar Card, Asks Supreme Court". NDTV. 22 July 2015. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  114. "Aadhaar shall remain optional: Supreme Court". The Hindu. 11 August 2015. Retrieved 11 August 2015.
  115. 1 2 "Don’t exclude those without Aadhaar, share data: SC". The Indian Express. 25 March 2014. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  116. 1 2 "Stop Aadhaar data use to probe crime: UIDAI to SC". The Indian Express. 19 March 2014. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  117. "UIDAI approaches SC over sharing data with CBI". Deccan Herald. 17 March 2014. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  118. "Falling Between the Barcodes". Tehelka. 22 August 2009. Retrieved 7 July 2015.
  119. "Dogs, trees and chairs have Aadhaar cards". The Times of India. 31 May 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  120. "IB slams Uidai, says Aadhaar not credible as residence proof". Hindustan Times. 25 September 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  121. "Fraught with risks, Aadhar lacks application of mind". Tehelka. 23 January 2013.
  122. "UIDAI's mandate expanded". The Hindu. 27 January 2012. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  123. "NPR vs Aadhar card game gets tougher". The New Indian Express. 10 February 2013. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  124. "NPR rolls on, regardless". The Hindu. 5 October 2013. Retrieved 31 May 2015.
  125. "Government favours Aadhaar-NPR synergy". The Hindu. 4 July 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2014.
  126. "No proposal to integrate Aadhar with National Population Register: Centre". IBNLive. 25 July 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2015.

Further reading

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Unique Identification Authority of India.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, February 11, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.