Treviño enclave dispute

The Treviño enclave is shown in blue

The administrative conflict over the Treviño enclave is a territorial dispute in northern Spain between the administration of the Province of Burgos and Castile and León on the one side, and those of Álava and the Basque Country on the other, over the administration of the territory.^[1] The conflict does not only involve territorial questions, but also extends to political^[2] and language^[3] issues, as well as questions about provision of services and transport connections.

Geographically, the enclave is situated inside the Province of Álava, which completely surrounds it. However, administratively, it belongs to the Province of Burgos.^[4] The territory is near the large Basque city of Vitoria-Gasteiz, with over 200,000 inhabitants, while the nearest urban center in Burgos province is Miranda de Ebro, with about 40,000 inhabitants. The enclave holds cultural, commercial and linguistic links with the neighbouring Álava province.^[5] According to a Burgos newspaper, in a legal sense there is no territorial dispute, since Treviño's status as part of Castile and León is long established.^[6] However, Treviño has been subject to heated political dispute during the last decades, including legal litigation at the highest level.

The two municipalities which make up the enclave, Condado de Treviño and La Puebla de Arganzón, have at various times sought to join Álava,^[7] and the inhabitants of the two towns have also campaigned to join the Basque Country.^[8]

History

Treviño was officially founded in 1161 by King Sancho VI of Navarre on the site of a monastery.^[9] and became part of the Kingdom of Castile in 1201, following a military victory by King Alfonso VIII of Castile over the Navarrans.^[10]

When Javier de Burgos conducted the 1833 territorial division of Spain—a decision passed by royal decree—one of the principles held in the new arrangement was the elimination of enclaves and their incorporation into the nearest appropriate territory,^[2] in this case the closest territory belonging to the Spanish general regime,^[11] as opposed to the Basque territories (Exempt Territories, Foral Territories). Nevertheless, the Treviño enclave survived and was confirmed as part of Castile in the final legislation.^[2] The Basque territories clung onto home rule (fueros) up to the end of the Third Carlist War, with their separate taxation system. Therefore the fiscal contribution of the enclave added to the Spanish central coffers, not to the Basque relevant one—Álava.

Following this legislation, three unsuccessful attempts were made to incorporate the area into Álava. In 1880, the two municipalities covering Treviño requested that they be transferred from Burgos to Álava, while the inhabitants of the enclave requested their transfer in 1940 and 1958.^[12]

Position of Álava and the Treviño enclave

Most of the main political parties in Álava are in favour of adding the Treviño enclave to their territory. Modern votations on Treviño's status date from the 1940 referendum in Treviño, where 98% of the population voted to join Álava. Several further attempts have occurred since then. In 1998, in another unofficial referendum, 68% of voters in the exclave were in favour of holding an official referendum on joining Álava. 76% of voters took part.^[13] The municipality of La Puebla de Arganzón voted in 1995 and 1997 to join Álava.^[13] The majority of political parties in Treviño are in favour of joining Álava, with the authorities of the enclave requesting in 2013 the initiation of proceedings leading to their incorporation into Álava.^[14] Their reasons are usually the practical grounds of better links with Álava rather than Burgos.^[15]

Position of Burgos

In contrast, all political groupings in Burgos have defended the enclave remaining part of their territory, on both legal and historic grounds.^[16] In 2014, initiatives by Basque and Treviño's local authorities to assert their will for at least a cooperation with Álava have been rejected by the highest authorities in Burgos (Spanish Conservatives, with the support of the Socialists in this respect).

1970s and 1980s

In 1979, deputies (congressmen) Xabier Arzalluz of the Basque Nationalist Party (PNV) and José María Bandrés of Euskadiko Ezkerra, affirmed that Article 8 of the then-new Statute of Autonomy of the Basque Country was intended to integrate Treviño into Álava and the similar exclave of Villaverde de Trucíos (Cantabria) into Biscay.^[17] Nonetheless, Treviño remained part of the province of Burgos. Burgos was quick to react by sealing in their later Statute of Autonomy (1983) any possibility of a smooth integration of Treviño into Álava by means of provisions that actually clash with the avenues established in the Basque Statute of Autonomy (1978), since it requires the consent of the authorities of the province of Burgos and the autonomous community of Castile and León before Treviño can join Álava.^[18]

After that, the government and parliament of the Basque Country brought a case challenging the constitutionality of that provision, but in 1986 it was rejected by the Constitutional Court of Spain.^[18] (The Statutes of Autonomy in Spain were approved as Organic Law by the Cortes Generales ^[19])

2013 and on

The 2011 local elections in the two Treviño municipalities resulted in a majority of seats for parties in favour of joining Álava and a formal request for this to take place. However, the Province of Burgos blocked the move.^[20] The rigid position held by the Castilian authorities has brought all attempts to progress to a standstill.^[21] The mayor of the Treviño municipality stated in February 2014 that the question of Treviño has been turned into a matter of State, and urged the Spanish government to accept the bill passed by the Basque parliament to take the steps necessary for the incorporation of the enclave.^[22]

Sources

• This article draws heavily on the corresponding article in the Spanish-language Wikipedia, which was accessed in the version of 23 March 2014.

References

Further reading

• The Basque Parliament's juridical record and considerations on the Treviño dispute