Third-oldest university in England debate

The title of third-oldest university in England is claimed by three institutions: Durham University as the third oldest officially recognised university (1832) and the third to confer degrees (1837), the University of London as the third university to be granted a Royal Charter (1836), and University College London as it was founded as London University (1826) and was the third oldest university institution to start teaching (1828). A fourth institution, King's College London, officially claims to be the fourth oldest university in England but is claimed by some students to be the third oldest as the third university institution to receive a Royal Charter (1829). Deciding which is truly the "third oldest university" depends largely on the definition of university status.^{[note 1]}

History of the Debate

The debate over which is the oldest of the universities founded in the early 19th century has going on (originally between London and Durham) since at least the mid 19th century. Durham was referred to as England's third university in 1841.^[1] In 1853, however, Lord Brougham secured London's precedence in the Charitable Trusts Act on the grounds of it having the earlier charter,^[2] but in the 1858 Medical Act Durham was given precedence.^[3] The topic also came up in the House of Commons during a speech by the Chancellor of the Exchequer at the committee stage of the Reform Act 1867, the Chancellor originally claiming that London was the older but accepting a correction that "Durham is the older University".^[4] Dod's Peerage, Baronetage and Knightage stated that precedence should be given to London, giving the dates of foundation as those of the royal charters.^[5] Durham, however, was given precedence at the quatercentenary of the University of Aberdeen in 1906,^[6] and was also named as the elder in a 1905 article by Richard Claverhouse Jebb, president of the Educational Science Section of the British Association for the Advancement of Science.^[7]

This early period of debate appears to have ended by 1906, when Sir Arthur William Rucker, Principal of the University of London, named Durham as the third University to be successfully established in England in a speech to a delegation from Paris and other French universities who were visiting the University of London.^[8] Through most of the 20th century, Durham's claim appears to have gone unchallenged. It was named as the "third oldest university in England" in the Proceedings of the International Assembly of the Inter-state Post-Graduate Medical Association of North America in 1930;^[9] the Society of Chemical Industry referred to Durham as "the third University to be established in England" in 1937;^[10] Durham was named as "the third oldest University in the country" in Parliament in 1962;^[11] and social anthropologist Joan Abbott recorded in 1971 that "The fact that Durham is the third oldest university in England was the first thing the author was told again and again soon after arrival".^[12]

In 1986, however, London's claim was reasserted by Negley Harte in his 150th anniversary history.^[13] Durham's claim was also directly disputed by UCL in 1998.^[14] All three of the claimants have since regularly asserted that they are the third oldest, and thus all have featured in the press identified as such over the last couple of decades.^[15] Both The Independent's and the Daily Telegraph's university guides have hedged their bets, giving the title to both UCL and Durham,^{[27][28][29][30]} while referring to King's College London as "the fourth oldest university institution".^[31][32] The debate also spilled over into Scotland in 2007, when The Guardian mistakenly called Durham the "third oldest university in the UK" (rather than in England).^[33]

Defining a university

Judging a university's foundation as occurring at the earliest point to which teaching can be traced, the establishment of predecessor institutions, the institution's foundation by Act of Parliament, Royal Charter or otherwise, its incorporation, or its date of formal recognition as a university all produce different results.

Formal Definition

Formally, a university is an institution that has been granted the right by the government to use the title of University. By this criterion, Durham is the third oldest university, having been named as a university in the Durham University Act 1832^[34] as well as in the Municipal Corporations Act 1835^[35] and the Established Church Act 1836,^[36] prior to the University of London receiving the title in 1836. The government assiduously avoided using the names "London University" or "University of London" to refer to UCL during the period when it used those names, including in the 1836 royal charter, the reason being demonstrated on the one occasion (in 1835) when they slipped by William Tooke asking "whether, His Majesty having in his most gracious answer to the Address of the House of Commons recognised by name, and in explicit terms, the University of London, it is not by this royal and official sanction of its style as a University, entitled, without further pageanty or form, to confer all manner of degrees except in Theology and Medicine" (emphasis in original).^[37]

However, while this usage was standard for most of the 19th and 20th centuries (e.g. the enumeration of universities in the Robbins Report counts only those formally granted the status, referring to the University of London as a "congeries (collection) of university institutions"^[38]), by the 1990s the usage of "university" had extended to take in colleges of London (and Wales) in the Dearing Report.^[39] This was at least in part due to the decrease of the power of the central University of London and the concomitant rise in status of the colleges, which had gained the right to confer London degrees themselves and direct access to government funding in the early 1990s.^[40] In its modern usage "university" thus often takes on the meaning of de facto rather than de jure university. It is notable that by the formal definition, both UCL and King's remain colleges of the University of London rather than universities in their own right.

This is part of the definition used by the European University Association's four-volume series, A History of the University in Europe, which lists Durham as the third oldest university in England (from 1832) with London as the fourth oldest (from 1836) and UCL and King's only as colleges of London.^[41] The full definition used is "institutions of higher education founded or recognized as universities by the public authorities of their territory and authorized to confer academic degrees in more than one discipline", thus excluding single-faculty universities (which is unimportant for this debate).^[42]

Royal Charters

By date of earliest royal charter, King's College London is the oldest of the four institutions, chartered in 1829. However, its charter was as a college rather than as a university; the first institute to be chartered as a university was the University of London in 1836.

Neither Oxford nor Cambridge, the oldest two universities in England (founded pre-1116 and in 1209 respectively) were founded by Act of Parliament or Royal Charter (Charters were bestowed on Oxford and Cambridge in 1248 and 1231 respectively, although neither is still in force),^[43] and both owe their incorporation to an act of parliament in 1571.^[44] Similarly, the pre-reformation Scottish universities were founded by Papal Bull, while the University of Edinburgh was founded under authority granted to the town council by a royal charter rather than a charter to the university. While universities were founded in Dublin and Canada by royal charter, no university in Britain was founded by grant of a royal charter to the institution prior to London in 1836.

From 1836 to 1992, in contrast, only one university (Newcastle, established by Act of Parliament) was not founded by royal charter. These charters were often accompanied by acts of parliament to transfer the property and obligations of predecessor institutes to the newly-founded university. The danger of dating by earliest royal charter is demonstrated by listing the ancient universities by accepted date of establishment, date of royal charter, and date of incorporation; it can be seen that dating by royal charter or incorporation gives a significantly different ordering from the historically-accepted dates.

Institution	Foundation	Royal Charter	Incorporation
Cambridge	1209	1231[45]	1571[44]
Oxford	1116	1248[45]	1571[44]
Glasgow	1451	1453[46]	uncertain[47]
Aberdeen	1495	1495[48]	1505[49]
St Andrews	1413	1532[50]	1411[51]
Edinburgh	1583	Never[note 2]	1858[53][54]

Durham University's 1837 charter is now the oldest current royal charter of any university in England, with London's current charter being from 1863, UCL's from 1977 and KCL's from 2009.

Dictionary Definitions

Modern dictionary definitions use multiple factors to define "University". The OED goes for "A high-level education institution in which students study for degrees and academic research is done" while Collins Dictionary uses "An institution of higher education having authority to award bachelors' and higher degrees, usually having research facilities". ^[55][56]

Both of these have three components: education, degrees and research, but the balance between them is different. Collins makes research usual, rather than necessary, while the OED only requires students to study for degrees rather than that the institute have its own degree awarding powers.

While research was not as important to universities in the 19th century as it is today, UCL, King's and Durham all had staff engaged in research from the start (e.g Edward Turner at UCL and James Finlay Weir Johnston at Durham). The OED definition thus places Durham, where students studied for degrees from 1833, as the third oldest and UCL and King's, where the first students matriculated in the University of London in 1838, as joint fourth. The Collins definition, by requiring both education and degree awarding powers, clearly favours Durham as London had the degree awarding powers but was an examining body rather than an educational institute, while UCL and King's were both educational institutes but without degree awarding powers.

Older dictionaries use a variety of definitions. Johnson's Dictionary has "a school where all the arts and faculties are taught and studied"^[57] (or, in the 'miniature' edition, "a general school of liberal arts"^[58]). Other dictionaries followed Johnson in using this definition,^[59] and it was used to claim that UCL could not be a university as it did not teach all the liberal arts (omitting theology). This definition was also followed by John Henry Newman in his Idea of a University, where he defined a university as "a place of teaching universal knowledge".^[60] This would appear to favour King's College (where theology was taught), but was shown to be due to a false etymology.^[61]

Other 19th century dictionaries build on this. One (from 1824) has "a collection of colleges, where all the liberal arts are taught".^[62] This adds to Johnson's definition the idea that a university must consist of colleges. Again, this was used to attack UCL, but was shown to be false by reference to the Scottish universities.^[61] By this definition Durham (which was collegiate, although initially, like Dublin, consisting of only one college) would be the third oldest university.

This concept is also seen in the definition (from 1848): "A college, incorporated for the education of youth, in all the liberal arts, sciences, &c., and empowered to confer degrees. A university generally comprehends many colleges, as is exemplified in those of Oxford and Cambridge, in England."^[63] Here it is only general, rather than a rule, and confined to England, but Johnson's concept of teaching all the liberal arts is still present, and the idea that degree awarding powers form part of the definition is now present.

Some 19th century dictionaries go a different route. One (from 1849) defines University with: "Originally, any community or corporation; the whole body of students, or of teachers and students assembled, in a place of education, with corporate rights, and under bye-laws of their own—the name was also held to imply that all branches of study were taught in a university: in the modern sense of the term, a university is an establishment for the purposes of instruction in all, or some of the most important divisions of science and literature, and having the power of conferring certain honorary dignities, called degrees; in some old authors, university means the world."^[64] While this mentions Johnson's definition it sets it apart from the "modern sense", which is a more general concept of education (which need only include some branches of knowledge) and degree awarding powers that is similar (except for not mentioning research) to modern definitions.

Vaisey Criteria

Multiple criteria are also used by the only judgement in English law on what the defining characteristics of a university are. This comes from the decision of Mr Justice Vaisey in St David's College, Lampeter v Ministry of Education (1951) before the Chancery Division.^[65] The judgement gives six "essential qualities" that a university should possess. It:

• "must be incorporated by the highest authority, i.e. by the sovereign power"
• "must be open to receive students from any part of the world"
• "must [have] a plurality of masters"
• "must be an institution in which at least one of the higher faculties is taught" (theology; law or philosophy; medicine)
• "cannot be a university without residents either in its own buildings or near at hand"
• "must have the power to grant its own degrees" (which he calls "the most obvious and most essential quality of a university")

He ruled that St David's College passed most of these, but that based on "its limited powers [of awarding degrees] and the absence of any express intention of making it a university by the sovereign power" it did not qualify as a university.

From the Vaisey principles, assuming them all to be applicable, the ordering of when the "prime contenders" below (see discussion there for references) achieved university status is:

• Durham University: 1837 (incorporation)
• University of London: 1900 (plurality of masters; teaching higher faculties)
• University College London: 2005 (degree awarding powers)
• King's College London: 2006 (degree awarding powers)

It should be noted that both Durham (1832) and London (1836) could be considered as having been expressly made universities by the sovereign power (royal assent to an Act of Parliament in Durham's case, royal charter in London's), making them universities whether they fulfilled all the criteria or not. Thus Masters could write in 1862 that "the distinctive character of the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge is, that they are corporations of Teachers in Arts, having the power to grant Degrees. This is Huber’s idea; and it would appear to be his opinion that this is the essential character of a University : but we shall learn in the sequel that of the three elements here commingled, only two are common to all Universities of modern date".^[66]

Besides the question of defining a university, there is the question of what is meant by "third oldest university". The above listing assumes that it means the third institution to achieve university status, but if "third oldest university" means the third oldest institute to have eventually achieved university status (as defined above), then date of foundation is all that is being assessed and the list looks very different:

• University College London: 1826 (Deed of Settlement)
• King's College London: 1829 (Royal Charter)
• Durham University: 1832 (Act of Parliament)
• University of London: 1836 (Royal Charter)

By selectively choosing the meaning of the question and the factors used to assess university status, many different orderings can be produced.

Discussion of criteria: Incorporation

The first criterion, incorporation, does not apply to all modern universities, some of which are unincorporated trusts under Church of a England dioceses and others are parts of larger, for-profit, corporations. "Sovereign power" might also be seen to exclude any modern university that gained its title through the Companies House route.

It could be similarly argued that it did not apply in the early 19th century, when the University of Edinburgh (which was indisputably recognised as a university) was a trust under the town corporation. This is important for the debate as neither UCL not Durham were founded as corporations. If trusts under corporations fall within the definition, then Durham (as a trust under Durham Cathedral established by Act of Parliament) qualifies from 1832, otherwise only from 1837. UCL was not founded by "sovereign power", but as an unincorporated joint stock company, similar to the modern Companies House route.

Discussion of criteria: Teaching and Residents

The next three criteria are taken from Hastings Rashdall's definition of mediaeval studium generale.^[67] UCL, King's and Durham meet these from early on, Durham specialising in theology and the London colleges in medicine, but London did not have a teaching rule until it became a federal university in 1900.

The fifth criterion, residents, would appear to imply that universities must be residential. This was certainly not the case in the early 19th century as the Scottish universities were non-residential. The London colleges followed this pattern (as did the redbrick university colleges later on the century), although Durham followed Oxford and Cambridge in being residential. It also does not apply to the modern era, with both the Open University and the University of Arden being distance-learning institutes.

Discussion of criteria: Degree awarding powers

The sixth criterion, degree awarding powers, was the subject of debate at the time, as discussed below under Durham. One side held that degree awarding powers were essential to a university,<sup class="reference plainlinks nourlexpansion" id="ref_e.g Malden, a professor at UCL, who wrote "In later times the name university came to have a technical meaning when applied to places of education. It was given to those bodies only which had the power of conferring degrees. This power was held to be an essential element of a university."^[68]"> and thus a grant of University title automatically implied degree awarding powers (as proposed by Tooke^[69] and Wetherell^[70] amongst others). The other, alternatively, believed that degree awarding powers were separate from, and hence not essential to, university title, and had to be explicitly granted (e.g. by royal charter), as held by Hamilton^[71] (and, to judge from his statement in the House of Lords, by Van Mildert^[72]).

Hamilton claimed that "University, in its proper and original meaning, denotes simply the whole members of a body (generally, incorporated body,) of persons teaching and learning one out more departments of knowledge; and not an institution privileged to teach a determinate circle of sciences, and to grant certificates of proficiency (degrees) in any fixed and certain department of that circle (faculties)" (emphasis in original), by which definition UCL would clearly be the third oldest.

He goes on to claim that "every liberty conferred was conferred not as an incident, through implication, but by express concession." The two ways in which this could be done were "either by an explicit grant of certain enumerated rights, or by bestowing on it implicitly the known privileges enjoyed by certain other pattern Universities", concluding that "we make bold to say, that there is not to be found, throughout Europe, one example of a University erected without the grant of determinate privileges,—far less of a University, thus erected, enjoying, through this omission, privileges of any, far less of every other.—In particular, the right of granting degrees, and that I'm how many faculties, must (in either way) be expressly conferred."

Contrary to this, however, Rashdall states that "the special privilege of the jus ubique docendi [the precursor to the modern degree] … was usually, but not quite invariably, conferred in express terms by the original foundation-bulls ; and was apparently understood to be involved in the mere act of erection even in the rare cases where it is not expressly conceded".^[73] Furthermore Edinburgh (Hamilton's own university) was granted the rights of the other Scottish universities by Act of Parliament in 1621,^[74] but conferred its first degrees in 1587 without any explicit grant of privileges.^[75] This would appear to support the contention of the 18th century Attorney General Philip Yorke (quoted by Wetherell) that "If the Crown erects a university, the power of conferring degrees is incident to the grant".

Prime contenders

As seen above, a number of institutions have significant claims to being the third-oldest university in England. Among the contenders for the title is University College London (UCL) which, although established as a teaching institution in 1826, did not have degree-awarding powers and did not obtain a Royal Charter until 1836, and then only as a college associated with the University of London rather than as a university. King's College London (KCL) was established by Royal Charter in 1829, again as a college unable to award degrees rather than as a university. Like UCL, it was associated with the University of London from 1836. Durham University was established in 1832 by an Act of Parliament which specifically named it as a university, and was incorporated by Royal Charter in 1837, while the University of London was created with explicit degree-awarding powers by Royal Charter in 1836.

Institution	Foundation	Earliest teaching	Royal Charter	Degree-awarding powers	Earliest degrees
University College London	1826	1828	1836	2005	2008
King's College London	1829	1831	1829	2006	2008
Durham University	1832	1833	1837	Unclear (1832–1837)	1837
University of London	1836	1900	1836	1836	1839

University College London

The claim of University College London (UCL) to be the third oldest university in England is based on its establishment in 1826 under the name of "London UniverIsity" as an institution delivering university-level education. It is opposed by the fact that it never received official recognition as a university and is not listed as a university in 19th century reference works; that it does not have a continuous history as an autonomous institution, having been merged into the University of London from 1907 to 1977; that it only received degree awarding powers in 2005; that it accepted a charter as a college in 1836, giving up its claim to be a university. It is also opposed by the fact that it did not receive its charter until 1836, after KCL.

Following an abortive attempt by Henry Brougham to establish "London College" via an Act of Parliament,^[76] UCL was established on 11 February 1826 as a joint-stock company – equivalent to a modern limited liability company, although not incorporated– under the name of "University of London".^[77] It opened for teaching on 1 October 1828. This gives it the earliest date of foundation of any of the contenders and makes it the first to begin operation. It was the first broad-curriculum institution providing education in Arts and the higher faculties of Law and Medicine (as opposed to the specialist medical, legal, and theological schools) and, as such, has a strong claim to be the third oldest university institution in England (which may or may not correspond to being the third oldest university).

UCL applied for a charter under the name of "University of London" in 1830, which would have granted it university status and the right (by implication) of granting degrees in Arts, Law and Medicine. This charter was approved by the law officers of the Crown in 1831 but never received the Great Seal that would have made it valid. In 1834 a second attempt was made to obtain a charter under that name, and in 1835 the House of Commons voted in favour of a petition to the king to grant a charter along the lines of that approved in 1831.^[78] However, the government chose instead to grant UCL a charter as a college, rather than as a university, and to found the University of London as a separate body.^{[note 3]} Lord Brougham, the chair of UCL's council, made it clear in a meeting of the proprietors that accepting this charter meant surrendering their claim to be a university, saying "it went a little to his heart … to sink into a college when they had originally started as an university" but that "for his own part he would rather accept it", which the proprietors voted unanimously to do.^[83] In November 1838, the first UCL students matriculated in the new University of London and the first London degrees were awarded in 1839.^[84]

The first objection to UCL's claim to be the third oldest university in England is that it was never granted university status.^[85] Possibly due to this, UCL does not feature in 19th century lists of universities in England.^[86] In an article for the Journal of Education in 1888, Edith Wilson states: "There are five, and only five, universities in England. (I begin by starting this explicitly because the name University College so often misleads even those familiar with the language of the educational world.) These five are Oxford, Cambridge, Durham, London, and Victoria.^[87] However, UCL still does not have official university status, as it is a college of the University of London, but it is considered to be effectively an independent university by, e.g., the Russell Group.^[88] Its claim to be the third oldest university rests on its de facto status, rather than its de jure status.

Another point of opposition to UCL's claim is that it has not been an autonomous institution for the entire period since its founding. After the University of London was reconstituted as a federal body in 1900, UCL surrendered its property and independence and was merged into the University of London under the 1905 University College London (Transfer) Act, which went into effect in 1907. It was not until 1977 that UCL once more became an autonomous Institute.^[89][90] And not until 1993 that it (along with the other colleges) received government funding from HEFCE as an independent institution rather than getting an allocation from the University of London's grant.^[91]

A third challenge to UCL's claim is that it did not receive degree awarding powers until 27 September 2005,^[92] although it was included in the Education (Recognised Bodies) Order 1997^[93] as one of the "Schools, Colleges and Institutes of the University of London permitted by the University to award University of London degrees". The first UCL degrees were awarded in summer 2008.^[94] This is one of the Vaisey criteria for being recognised as a de facto university (see above), so failing to have degree awarding powers could be seen as weakening UCL's case for recognition as a de facto university. However, it has also been claimed that at the time of UCL's foundation there may have been no legal bar to any institute awarding whatever degrees it liked, such as the "Diploma of Master of Medicine and Surgery in the University of London" (M. Med. et Chir. U. L.) advertised in UCL's 1832 calendar.^[95] When Brougham (then Lord Chancellor) asked in the Privy Council in 1834, "Pray, Mr. Bickersteth, what is to prevent the London University granting degrees now?" he received the reply: "The universal scorn and contempt of mankind." ^[96] Contrary to this view, a case was brought before the House of Lords in 1745 regarding the power of Marischal College in Aberdeen to grant degrees, implying that this was regarded as an activity regulated by law.^[97] It was also disputed in the 1830 whethr degree awarding powers were an essential part of being a university or not (see discussion under Durham below).

UCL's claim is also opposed by the assertion that it surrendered its claim to University status when it accepted a royal charter as a college in 1836, under the name "University College, London". Rather than receiving its own degree awarding powers, it was associated with the new University of London, with degrees being examined and conferred by the university. This was described as "a barren collegiate Charter" by William Tooke, who had led the parliamentary campaign for UCL's recognition as a university,^[98] and an official history of the University of London in 1912 claimed "[UCL's] acceptance of it implied the renunciation of all claim to exercise the full functions of a University, and placed them on a footing of equality with some younger and less important institutions."^[99]

The final objection to UCL's claim is its lack of a royal charter prior to 1836. This is the point on which KCL, which is otherwise similar to UCL in terms of objections to its claim, is differentiated from UCL. By date of foundation, UCL is the older, but by date of royal charter KCL is the senior. While it has been noted above that dating charter is not a method of determining the age of universities (see also discussion under London), this is due to the variety of different methods of creating a university: ancient prescription, Papal bull, act of parliament and royal charter, of which only the later two have been used since the Reformation. UCL had none of these, and was neither incorporated in its own right nor (like Edinburgh until 1858 and Durham until 1837) a trust under a corporation (the town council and the cathedral chapter respectively). One answer to this is that UCL claims to be the third oldest university not on the basis of its de jure status but of its de facto status, making this argument irrelevant: if judged by de jure standards, then UCL's and KCL's cases both fail. However, "incorporation by the highest authority" is one of Vaisey's criteria for recognition as a de facto university (see above), so UCL's failure to gain incorporation until 1836 could be seen as denying it de facto status prior to that. Yet the laws on incorporation changed dramatically between the 1820s and Vaisey's judgement, and UCL's formation as a joint stock company would have led to its incorporation in later years.

The critical question for UCL is whether it gained de facto status as a university and has maintained that status, despite the objections raised above. This essentially reduces to whether teaching alone is needed to be considered a university, or whether degree awarding powers and/or incorporation are also required. If it has been a de facto university since 1826 (or the start of operations in 1828), then it is the third oldest university in England, but if it only gained this status later, or lost it through its merger into the University of London from 1907 to 1977, then one of the other claimants will prevail.

King's College London

The claim of King's College London (KCL) to be the third oldest university in England is based on it holding the third oldest royal charter and the third oldest incorporation of any current University-level institution in England. It is opposed in a similar manner to UCL by the fact that it never received official recognition as a university; that it does not have a continuous history as an autonomous Institute, having been merged into the University of London from 1910 to 1980; that it only received degree awarding powers in 2006; that it was chartered as a college rather than a university and, as such, is not listed as a university in 19th century reference works. It is further opposed by the fact that KCL itself claims only to be the fourth oldest university in England and by the claim that a charter and legal incorporation are not necessary for a university. If UCL is accepted as being a university from the date of its foundation in 1826, then the claim of KCL must fail.

KCL was established by Royal Charter on 14 August 1829 as a reaction to UCL with the aim of providing an Anglican education.^{[note 4] [note 5]} It was chartered as a college, not a university; the term "university" does not appear in the charter.^[101] The college opened its doors to students in 1831. Students at King's either left for degrees at Oxford and Cambridge, gained medical qualifications through the Royal Colleges, or (from 1834) took the Associate of King's College (first awarded 1835); the college did not award degrees of its own.^[102]

Following the establishment of the University of London in 1836, King's became an associated college of that university, allowing its students to sit examinations for London degrees. However, students were still encouraged to take the AKC rather than the London degree – which was also open to "godless" UCL students.^[103] It also made agreements with Durham and Edinburgh to allow KCL students to take degrees at those universities with only one year of residence.^[104]

Many of the objections to KCL's claim parallel those raised against UCL's. It lacked (and still lacks) de jure status as a university, and only gained degree awarding powers in July 2006,^[105] awarding its first degrees in summer 2008.^[106] It surrendered its autonomy to be merged into the University of London from 1910 to 1980,^[107][108] and was only funded as an independent institution rather than through the University of London after 1993.^[91] Like UCL, it does not feature in 19th century university lists.^[86]

An objection specific to KCL is that it only claims to be "the fourth oldest [university] in England" in its 2008 annual report^[109] and on its website, implicitly accepting the claim of UCL to be the third oldest. The title of third oldest is, however, claimed by KCL student papers and societies.^[110][111] In a podcast on the KCL website, Arthur Burns (Professor of Modern History at KCL) describes UCL and KCL as the third and fourth oldest university institutions, rather than the third and fourth oldest universities.^[112]

The critical questions for KCL are whether it gained de facto university status from its foundation and has managed to keep this status since, despite the objections above, and whether, if it has, UCL attained de facto university status before KCL (see discussion above). If both of these are answered in KCL's favour, then it is the third oldest university in England.

Durham University

Durham University's claim to be the third oldest university in England is based on it being the third institution to gain official recognitions as a university, through the 1832 University of Durham Act and again in public general acts in 1835 and 1836, and on it being the third university in England to matriculate students on degree courses and to grant degrees. It is opposed by the fact that it did not gain its royal charter until 1837, later than the other three contenders and the claim that it did not hold degree awarding powers prior to this charter being granted. If either UCL or KCL is accepted as having been a university since its foundation in 1826 or 1829 respectively, Durham's claim must fail.

Durham University had its beginnings in an act of Chapter on 28 September 1831, which resolved to accept "A plan of an academic institution, to be called Durham College, in connexion with the Dean and Chapter".^{[113] [note 6]} By December of that year, the "college" was being advertised as a "university", with the prospectus appearing in London newspapers.^[116] On 4 July 1832, an Act of Parliament was passed, specifically empowering the "Establishment of a University" by the Dean and Chapter, setting up the university as an eleemosynary trust (equivalent to a modern charitable trust) with the Dean and Chapter as trustees and the Bishop of Durham as the Visitor.^[34] Students were admitted to degree programmes from 28 October 1833, with the first calendar (from autumn 1833) advertising the institution as "University of Durham founded by Act of Chapter with the Consent of the Bishop of Durham 28 September 1831. Constituted a University by Act of Parliament 2nd and 3rd William IV., Sess. 1831-2."^[117] An Act of Chapter on 4 April 1834 resolved "that the College established by Act of Chapter, 28th September 1831, be constituted a University".^{[113][note 7]} Durham received its royal charter on 1 June 1837,^[120] and the first degrees were conferred on 8 June 1837.^[121]

The first objection to Durham's claim is that it did not receive a royal charter to make it a university until 1837. The question here is whether the royal charter or the 1832 act of parliament (possibly combined with the 1834 act of chapter) gave Durham university status. (It should be noted that whether Durham became a university in 1832 or 1834 does not affect the third oldest university in England debate.)

Not all universities in the United Kingdom possess charters, with the "post-92" institutions explicitly deriving their university status from the Further and Higher Education Act 1992, and Newcastle University from the Universities of Durham and Newcastle-upon-Tyne Act 1963. Even more relevant to Durham's case are the examples of Oxford and Cambridge, both of which operated for many years without a charter following their respective foundations – indeed, by date of charter Cambridge is the senior – while neither was formally incorporated until 1571.^[122]

The university was referred to as "the University of Durham" in two public acts of parliament prior to the granting of its charter: the Municipal Corporations Act 1835,^[35] and the Established Church Act 1836.^[36] The Royal Charter itself is explicit that it is incorporating a pre-existing University, not founding a new one, referring to it as the "University of Durham, so established under our Royal sanction, and the authority of our Parliament".^[120] The 1837 Attorneys and Solicitors Act, which extended various privileges of Oxford, Cambridge and Dublin graduates to Durham and London, draws a sharp distinction between the foundation of Durham under the act of parliament and the foundation of London by royal charter.^[123] The 1907 University of Durham Act also makes it clear that Durham's foundation as a university was distinct from the incorporation by royal charter.^[125]

The second objection to Durham's claim is that it did not have degree awarding powers until it received its royal charter in 1837. During the second reading of the bill which became the Act in the House of Lords, William van Mildert, the Bishop of Durham, had said that degree awarding powers would require a royal charter would be required.^[72] This charter was not conferred until 1 June 1837, with the first students graduated a few days later on 8 June. However, contrary to what van Mildert had said and following legal advice from Sir Charles Wetherell,^[126] it contained no grant of degree awarding powers.^{[120][note 8]}

The reason behind this can be seen in the debate in the mid 1830s on the nature of universities and their degree awarding powers. One side held that university status and degree awarding powers were inseparable, so that the creation of a university contained implicitly a grant of degree awarding powers. Adherents to this view included William Tooke, who led the parliamentary campaign for the recognition of UCL as the University of London, ^[69] and Sir Charles Wetherell, who argued against the grant of a charter to UCL as the University of London before the Privy Council.^{[70][note 9]}

The other side of the argument was that university status was distinct from degree awarding powers, so it was quite possible for a university to exist without holding the right to grant degrees. This was supported by Bishop van Mildert, as shown above, and by the liberal Sir William Hamilton, who wrote a response to Wetherell in the Edinburgh Review arguing that historically the power to award specific degrees was explicitly granted, and thus the recognition of an institution as a university does not, in itself, grant any power to award degrees. "But when it has been seriously argued before the Privy Council by Sir Charles Wetherell, on behalf of the English Universities … that the simple fact of the crown incorporating an academy under the name of university, necessarily, and in spite of reservations, concedes to that academy the right of granting all possibly degrees; nay when (as we are informed) the case itself has actually occurred, —the "Durham University," inadvertently, it seems, incorporated under that title, being in the course of claiming the exercise of this very privilege as a right, necessarily involved in the public recognition of the name : — in these circumstances we shall be pardoned a short excursus, in order to expose the futility of the basis on which this mighty edifice is erected."^[71]

Caught between these two points of view, Thorp wrote to the Prime Minister, Lord Melbourne in February 1836 noting that degree awarding powers might be inherent in being a university, but that it would be desirable to have either a charter or a legal declaration that one was unnecessary (no response is recorded).^[128] The university also sought Wetherell's counsel on the matter of the charter in March, and were advised to avoid mention of degree awarding powers and let them be carried by the title of university. It can be seen from the charter that Wetherell's council prevailed, and Durham went on to award degrees without any explicit grant of powers.

What is important for the third oldest university in England debate, however, is that the view that Durham did not gain degree awarding powers via recognition as a university relies on degree awarding powers not being essential to being a university. This point of view also strongly supports the claims of UCL and KCL, although if formal recognition as a university is considered essential Durham could still prevail.

The first critical question for Durham is whether it gained de jure University status via the 1832 act of parliament (or the subsequent 1834 act of chapter) or, despite the various legal recognitions of its status in the intervening years, not until the 1837 royal charter. If it gained university status in 1832 or 1834, then Durham is the third oldest de jure university in England. Alternatively, if London was not truly established as a university in 1836 (see discussion below), then Durham is the third oldest de jure university in England regardless of which date is taken for its foundation.

The second critical question is whether either UCL or KCL should be considered de facto universities prior to this, despite the objections given in their discussions. If neither of them qualifies, and if the first question established Durham as the third oldest de jure university, then Durham is the third oldest university in England.

University of London

The University of London's claim to be the third oldest university in England is based on it being the third institute in England to receive a Royal Charter as a university and the claim that it was the third university in England to gain degree awarding powers. It is opposed by the fact that dating by royal charter is not consistent with the historically-accepted dates of foundation for British universities and that possessing a Royal Charter is not necessary to be a university; by the fact that its royal charter was annulled by the death of William IV and the claim that the later date of December 1837, when it was rechartered by Queen Victoria, should therefore be used; and by the claim that the lack of teaching in the University of London prior to its reconstitution as a federal institution in 1900 meant it was not truly a university. Its claim to be the third University to gain degree awarding powers is also disputed. As London's date of foundation is later than the other three institutions, if any of their claims to have been a university from their dates of foundation are accepted, London's claim must fail.

The University of London was established and chartered in 1836 as a degree awarding body. It received a second charter in 1837, a third in 1858 and a fourth in 1863, under which it is now incorporated. It matriculated is first students in 1838 (from UCL and KCL) and awarded its first degrees in 1839 (again to students from UCL and KCL). In 1900 it was reconstituted as a federal university by statutes drawn up under the University of London Act 1898, including as schools of the university UCL and KCL along with a number of other colleges in London.^[129]

The first objection to London's claim is that dating by royal charter does not reflect historical reality as a royal charter is not necessary to be a university. Ordering British universities by date of royal charter places Cambridge (charter 1231^[45]) as the oldest rather than Oxford (charter 1248^[45]) and moves St Andrews (charter 1532^[50][130]) down to third oldest in Scotland, behind Glasgow (charter 1453^[46]) and Aberdeen (charter 1495^[48]). Related to this is the fact that most British universities have been created under acts of parliament (particularly the Further and Higher Education Act 1992) rather than by royal charter, and so would be missing entirely from an ordering drawn up by royal charter. While this does not entirely invalidate London's claim, it means that the critical question (besides whether official status should be the deciding factor at all) is whether Durham gained official university status under its 1832 act of parliament, which was discussed in the previous section.

The second objection is that London was only incorporated under its 1836 charter "during Our Royal Will and Pleasure". Sources give two differing interpretations on what this meant, with some saying the charter expired on the death of William IV,^[131][132] and others that it may never have been valid but if it were it would have expired 6 months after the king's death.^[133][134] It was re-incorporated by a second Royal Charter on 5 December 1837 (postdating the royal charters of the other three contenders). This date is sometimes given in Victorian sources as the founding of the University,^[78][135] and is the date used as the date of creation in the supplemental charter of 1850 and the charters of 1858 and 1863. It is notable that while the 1863 corporation was made the legal successor to the 1858 corporation in its charter, and the 1858 corporation was made the legal successor to the 1837 corporation, the 1837 corporation was not made the legal heir to the 1836 corporation.^[136] However, the privileges granted to the University of London under the Attorneys and Solicitors Act 1837, made in July between Victoria's accession and the sealing of London's second charter, appear to have been applied to the subsequent legal corporations without any need for renewal, indicating that there may have been an implied inheritance of legal status.

The third objection is that the University of London, as constituted in the 19th century, was truly a university has also been questioned. As founded in 1836/7, it was "an examining board appointed by the government",^[137] with no teaching and degree awarding powers limited to six named degrees.^[138] As noted above, some authorities believed this limitation on degree powers as unenforceable legally,^[70] but London chose to apply for (and received) further charters when it wished to expand its degree-awarding powers, until these were removed from its charter and into the university's statutes in 1900.^[127]

However, it was the first of these issues – the lack of teaching in the university – that led to the most criticism. Henry Wace, Principal of KCL told a Royal Commission said in 1888 that he "had two … objections to the title of the University of London: one, that it is not a University, and the other that it is not of London".^[139] In a similar vein, Karl Pearson, a professor at UCL, said that "[t]o term the body which examines at Burlington House a University is a perversion of language, to which no charter or Act of Parliament can give a real sanction".^[140] Modern historians have taken a similar line, describing the University of London of that era as "a Government department, in the form of a board of examiners with power to matriculate students and award degrees … it had the trappings of a university, but not its most obvious function – it did not teach,"^[141] and as "what would today be called a quango".^[142] The problems thrown up by the lack of teaching in the university led eventually to its reconstitution as a federal teaching and research institution in 1900.^[143]

The claim that London was the third university in England to gain degree awarding powers is disputed as it depends on Durham not having gained them implicitly through being granted university status (or having failed to obtain University status prior to the granting of its royal charter). This is discussed in the previous section. This claim also depends on the 1836 charter being valid, which (as noted above) is called into doubt by contemporary sources. London was certainly, however, the first university in England to receive an explicit grant of degree awarding powers as Oxford and Cambridge owe their powers to ancient prescription and Durham has only an implicit grant.

For London, the critical question is whether any of the prior claims of UCL, KCL and Durham are true. If these claims are not considered valid, then London is the third oldest university in England unless it is shown that it was, for some reason (see discussion above), not a university prior to Durham's royal charter being granted on 1 June 1837, after which Durham's status is not disputed.

Lesser claims

Many present day institutions incorporate earlier foundations, such as theological colleges or medical schools, or are able to trace their origins to earlier teaching operations, and thus may be considered to have a longer heritage than those listed above.

Constituent institutions

The medical school of Queen Mary, University of London - Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry - incorporates St. Bartholomew's Hospital, which began unofficial medical teaching in 1123, the earliest date of known organised medical teaching in the United Kingdom. The school also comprises one of the first official medical schools in England (the London Hospital Medical College, founded 1785); however, that school was not a university in its own right, having only prepared students for the examinations of the Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Surgeons and the Worshipful Society of Apothecaries of London.

In the same vein, the medical school of King's College London — Guy's, King's and St Thomas' (GKT) School of Medical Education — incorporates St Thomas's Hospital Medical School, which traces its history back to the first recorded teaching in St Thomas' Hospital in 1561,^[144] and regarded as one of the oldest medical schools.^[145] The hospital itself was founded in 1173 and traces its roots to the establishment of St Mary Overie Priory in 1106.^{[146][147][148]}

Wye College was founded in 1447 by John Kemp, the Archbishop of York, as a college for the training of priests. It merged with Imperial College London in 2000 and was closed in 2009. Similarly, Ushaw College of Durham University hosted until 2011 a Roman Catholic seminary that had been established in 1568 in Douai in northern France and which relocated to Ushaw Moor, four miles west of Durham in 1808 but did not become part of the University (as a Licensed Hall) until 1968. Durham University already has a much stronger claim to be the third-oldest university through its creation by Act of Parliament in 1832. Heythrop College, the specialist philosophy and theology constituent college of the University of London, was founded in 1614 in Belgium but did not move to London (after several other locations) until 1970 and became part of the University in 1971.

Predecessor institutions

Of the redbrick universities, the University of Birmingham has traced formal medical lectures to 1767 through the Birmingham Workhouse Infirmary, a precursor to Birmingham Medical School which was founded in 1825 and received a Royal Charter as Queen's College, Birmingham in 1843.^[149] The University of Manchester can trace its teaching (through the Victoria University of Manchester, Owen's College, and the Royal School of Medicine and Surgery^[150]) to an 1814 anatomy school founded by Joseph Jordan that merged with the Royal School of Medicine and Surgery in 1834.^[151] Similar claims can be made for other redbrick institutions such as the University of Liverpool which developed from the Liverpool Royal Institution (a society established 1814 "for promoting the increase and diffusion of Literature, Science and the Arts",^[152] Royal Charter 1821).^[153] A number of universities also claim heritage from earlier Mechanics' Institutes, including Liverpool John Moores University, descended from a Mechanics' Institute founded in 1823; Birkbeck, University of London, founded in 1823 as the London Mechanics Institute and Leeds Metropolitan University from the 1824-founded Leeds Mechanics Institute.

Figurative claims

The four Inns of Court in London, together with the associated Inns of Chancery, formed a recognised centre of legal and intellectual education, and – although never a university in any technical sense – were sometimes collectively described in the early modern period as England's "third university".^[154] Most notably, this claim was made in Sir George Buck's tract, The Third Universitie of England: Or a Treatise of the Foundations of all the Colledges, Auncient Schooles of Priviledge, and of Houses of Learning, and Liberall Arts, within and about the Most Famous Cittie of London, published in 1615 as an appendix to John Stow's Annales.

Gresham College, a higher education institute founded in London in 1597 was the first home of the Royal Society (who received their royal charter in 1662). The college was also mentioned in Buck's Third Universitie of England alongside the Inns of Court.^[155]

See also

• List of UK universities by date of foundation
• List of oldest universities in continuous operation
• University of Wales, Lampeter, the third-oldest higher education institute in England and Wales
• Ancient university
• Medieval university

References

Notes

Universities in the United Kingdom England East Anglia Anglia Ruskin BPP University Campus Suffolk Cambridge East Anglia Norwich University of the Arts London University of London Birkbeck Courtauld Goldsmiths Heythrop Institute of Cancer Research King's London Business School LSE LSHTM Queen Mary Royal Academy of Music RCSSD Royal Holloway Royal Veterinary College St George's SOAS UCL Other BPP Brunel City East London Greenwich Imperial Kingston Law London Met London South Bank Middlesex Regent's University London Richmond, The American International University in London Royal College of Art Royal College of Music Roehampton St Mary's University University of the Arts London Westminster West London Midlands Aston BPP Birmingham Birmingham City Bishop Grosseteste Coventry De Montfort Derby Harper Adams Keele Law Leicester Lincoln Loughborough Newman Northampton Nottingham Nottingham Trent Staffordshire University College Birmingham Warwick Wolverhampton Worcester North Bolton BPP Bradford Central Lancashire Chester Cumbria Durham Edge Hill Huddersfield Hull Lancaster Law Leeds Leeds Beckett Leeds Trinity Liverpool Liverpool Hope Liverpool John Moores Manchester Manchester Metropolitan Newcastle Northumbria Salford Sheffield Sheffield Hallam Sunderland Teesside York York St. John South Arts Bournemouth Ashridge Bath Bath Spa Bedfordshire Bournemouth BPP Brighton Bristol Buckingham Buckinghamshire New Canterbury Christ Church Chichester Cranfield Creative Arts Essex Exeter Falmouth Gloucestershire Hertfordshire Kent Law Oxford Oxford Brookes Plymouth Portsmouth Reading Royal Agricultural University St Mark & St John Southampton Southampton Solent Surrey Sussex UWE Winchester Northern Ireland Queen's Ulster Scotland Aberdeen Abertay Dundee Dundee Edinburgh Edinburgh Napier Glasgow Glasgow Caledonian Heriot-Watt Highlands and Islands Queen Margaret Robert Gordon Royal Conservatoire of Scotland St Andrews Stirling Strathclyde University of the West of Scotland Wales Aberystwyth Bangor Cardiff Cardiff Metropolitan Glyndŵr South Wales Swansea Swansea Metropolitan UW Trinity Saint David Overseas territories American University of the Caribbean Bermuda College Cayman Islands Law School International College of the Cayman Islands Saint James School of Medicine St. Matthew's University University of Gibraltar University College of the Cayman Islands University of Science, Arts and Technology University of the West Indies Non−geographic Lambeth degrees Open University University of London International Programmes Related List by date of foundation (Third-oldest in England) List by endowment List by enrollment Colleges within universities Degree abbreviations National Union of Students Rankings Undergraduate degree classification UCAS HEFCE Category Commons List

University College London   Academics Faculties, schools & groupings Faculty of Arts and Humanities (Slade School of Fine Art) Faculty of Brain Sciences Faculty of the Built Environment (The Bartlett) Faculty of Engineering Sciences School of Energy and Resources School of Management Faculty of Laws Faculty of Life Sciences School of Pharmacy Faculty of Mathematical and Physical Sciences Faculty of Medical Sciences Medical School Faculty of Population Health Sciences Faculty of Social and Historical Sciences School of Slavonic and East European Studies Institute of Education Neuroscience Centres & departments Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis Centre for Digital Humanities Centre for the History of Medicine Centre for Neuroimaging The Constitution Unit Department of Information Studies Department of Science and Technology Studies Department of Space and Climate Physics EPPI-Centre London Centre for Nanotechnology London Knowledge Lab Slade Centre for Electronic Media in Fine Art Urban Laboratory Institutes & laboratories Ear Institute Eastman Dental Institute Institute of Archaeology Institute of Child Health Institute for Global Health Institute of Jewish Studies Institute of Neurology Institute of Ophthalmology Institute of Security and Crime Science Pedestrian Accessibility and Movement Environment Laboratory Other Edwards Professor of Egyptian Archaeology and Philology Grote Chair of the Philosophy of Mind and Logic Pender Chair Papers from the Institute of Archaeology Public Archaeology Quain Professor Slade Professor of Fine Art UCL Jurisprudence Review Transcribe Bentham   University Campus Bloomsbury Bloomsbury Theatre Church of Christ the King Euston Road Gordon Square Gower Street Gray's Inn Road Halls of residence Holmbury St Mary Main Building Petrie Museum of Egyptian Archaeology Queen Square Somers Town Tavistock Square Tottenham Court Road University of London Observatory Woburn Square People Academics List of notable people List of Nobel laureates Jeremy Bentham Michael Arthur (Provost) Student life UCL Boat Club The Cheese Grater Law Society University College Opera Pi Magazine Rare FM Royal Free and University College Medical School Boat Club Royal Free, University College and Middlesex Medical Students RFC UCL Union Student Central Other Citrus Saturday UCL Business Filming at UCL History Rivalry with King's College London Third-oldest university in England   Affiliates Medical Francis Crick Institute Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust Great Ormond Street Hospital Moorfields Eye Hospital Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust The Royal Free Hospital Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital UCLH/UCL Biomedical Research Centre UCL Partners University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Eastman Dental Hospital Hospital for Tropical Diseases National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery Royal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital UCH Macmillan Cancer Centre University College Hospital University College Hospital at Westmoreland Street Whittington Hospital Other Alan Turing Institute Anna Freud Centre Association of Commonwealth Universities European Network for Training Economic Research G5 Golden triangle Institute of Advanced Legal Studies League of European Research Universities Russell Group Thomas Young Centre UCL Academy University College School University of London Yale UCL Collaborative Category Commons

King's College London University of London Academic schools Dental Institute Institute of Psychiatry Faculty of Arts and Humanities School of Law School of Medicine Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery Departments, centres and divisions Centre for Children and Adolescents Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine Department of Digital Humanities Department of War Studies Digital Classicist International Centre for Prison Studies Liddell Hart Centre for Military Archives Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute MRC SGDP Centre Randall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases Twins Early Development Study People Academics List of notable alumni Associates List of Chaplains List of Deans Fellows List of Nobel laureates People associated with King's College London Principal: Ed Byrne Chairman of the Council: The Duke of Wellington Dean: Richard Burridge Visitor: Archbishop of Canterbury Student life All the King's Men GKT Rugby Football Club Macadam Cup Reggie the Lion Roar! Newspaper Rugby Club Students' Union (KCLSU) Tolstoy Cup Affiliates Medical Evelina London Children's Hospital Francis Crick Institute Guy's Hospital King's Health Partners King's College Hospital South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust Bethlem Royal Hospital Lambeth Hospital Maudsley Hospital St Thomas' Hospital University Hospital Lewisham Other Golden triangle King's College School Royal Academy of Dramatic Art Russell Group Thomas Young Centre Buildings and places Bush House Gordon Museum of Pathology King George III Museum King's Building King's College London Chapel Maughan Library Museum of Life Sciences Somerset House East Wing Other Academic dress of King's College London Aldwych tube station Associateship of King's College Chelsea College of Science and Technology Coat of arms of King's College London History of King's College London Inkha King's College London Business King's College London–UCL rivalry Roman Baths, Strand Lane Third-oldest university in England debate Queen Elizabeth College Category Commons Wikisource Wikiquote Wikinews

Durham University Governance Chancellor Sir Thomas Allen Vice-Chancellor & Warden Stuart Corbridge Visitor The Bishop of Durham Colleges Collingwood Grey Hatfield John Snow Josephine Butler St Aidan's St Chad's St Cuthbert's St Hild & St Bede St John's St Mary's Stephenson Trevelyan University Ustinov Van Mildert Colleges Departments and research institutes Business School Centre for Research into Earth Energy Systems Durham Energy Institute (DEI) Department of Physics Law School Institute of Advanced Study International Boundaries Research Unit School of Engineering and Computing Sciences School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health Wolfson Research Institute Student life Durham Student Theatre Team Durham Boat Club Boat Race MCCU Swimming Club The Racecourse Inter-Collegiate Christian Union Palatinate Palatinate Award Purple Radio Senior Man Solar Car Students' Union Union Society (debating) Northumbrian Universities Air Squadron Northumbrian University Royal Naval Unit Miscellaneous Academic dress Botanic Garden Durham Concerto List of Durham University people Museum of Archaeology The Observatory Oriental Museum Scarves Teikyo University of Japan in Durham Third oldest university in England University Library Categories University Colleges People Chancellors Professorships Academics Alumni Category Commons