Synonymous substitution

A synonymous substitution (often called a silent substitution though they are not always silent) is the evolutionary substitution of one base for another in an exon of a gene coding for a protein, such that the produced amino acid sequence is not modified. This is possible because the genetic code is "degenerate", meaning that some amino acids are coded for by more than one three-base-pair codon; since some of the codons for a given amino acid differ by just one base pair from others coding for the same amino acid, a mutation that replaces the "normal" base by one of the alternatives will result in incorporation of the same amino acid into the growing polypeptide chain when the gene is translated. Synonymous substitutions and mutations affecting noncoding DNA are often considered silent mutations; however, it is not always the case that the mutation is silent.[1][2][3][4][5] Synonymous mutations can affect transcription, splicing, mRNA transport, and translation, any of which could alter phenotype, rendering the synonymous mutation non-silent.[3] The substrate specificity of the tRNA to the rare codon can affect the timing of translation, and in turn the co-translational folding of the protein.[1] This is reflected in the codon usage bias that is observed in many species. A nonsynonymous substitution results in a change in amino acid that may be arbitrarily further classified as conservative (change to an amino acid with similar physiochemical properties), semi-conservative (e.g. negative to positively charged amino acid), or radical (vastly different amino acid).

Degeneracy of the genetic code

Protein translation involves a set of twenty amino acids. Each of these amino acids is coded for by a sequence of three DNA base pairs called a codon. Because there are 64 possible codons, but only 20 amino acids (as well as a stop signal [i.e. the three codons that do not code for any amino acid and are known as stop codons], indicating that translation should stop), some amino acids are coded for by 2, 3, 4, or 6 different codons. For example, the codons TTT and TTC both code for the amino acid phenylalanine. This is often referred to as redundancy of the genetic code. There are two mechanisms for redundancy: several different transfer RNAs can deliver the same amino acid, or one tRNA can have a non-standard "wobbly" base in position three of the anti-codon, which recognises more than one base in the codon.

In the above phenylalanine example, suppose that the base in position 3 of a TTT codon got substituted to a C, leaving the codon TTC. The amino acid at that position in the protein will remain a phenylalanine. Hence, the substitution is a synonymous one.

Substitution versus mutation

Although mutation and substitution are often used interchangeably, there is a subtle but important difference. A nucleotide mutation is a base change (whether synonymous or non-synonymous) such that the mutant and wild-type forms coexist in a population. A nucleotide substitution is a base change between two populations. Thus, a mutation only becomes a substitution when the most recent common ancestor of the entire population carried that mutation . When all lineages carrying alternative mutations have died off, the remaining mutation is said to be fixed. Note that fixed mutations may never reach 100% frequency in the population, as further mutations at the same site may arise; these subsequent mutations, however, will all share a common ancestor which had the fixed mutation.

Synonymous substitutions and evolution

When a synonymous or silent mutation occurs, the change is often assumed to be neutral, meaning that it does not affect the fitness of the individual carrying the new gene to survive and reproduce.

Synonymous changes may not be neutral because certain codons are translated more efficiently (faster and/or more accurately) than others. For example, when a handful of synonymous changes in the fruit fly alcohol dehydrogenase gene were introduced, changing several codons to sub-optimal synonyms, production of the encoded enzyme was reduced[6] and the adult flies showed lower ethanol tolerance.[7] Many organisms, from bacteria through animals, display biased use of certain synonymous codons. Such codon usage bias may arise for different reasons, some selective, and some neutral. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae synonymous codon usage has been shown to influence mRNA folding stability, with mRNA encoding different protein secondary structure preferring different codons.[8]

Another reason why synonymous changes are not always neutral is the fact that exon sequences close to exon-intron borders function as RNA splicing signals. When the splicing signal is destroyed by a synonymous mutation, the exon does not appear in the final protein. This results in a truncated protein. One study found that about a quarter of synonymous variations affecting exon 12 of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene result in that exon being skipped.[9]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 Kimchi-Sarfaty, C.; Oh, J. M.; Kim, I.-W.; Sauna, Z. E.; Calcagno, A. M.; Ambudkar, S. V.; Gottesman, M. M. (26 January 2007). "A "Silent" Polymorphism in the MDR1 Gene Changes Substrate Specificity". Science 315 (5811): 525–8. doi:10.1126/science.1135308. PMID 17185560.
  2. ↑ Chamary, JV; Parmley, JL; Hurst, LD (February 2006). "Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals.". Nature reviews. Genetics 7 (2): 98–108. doi:10.1038/nrg1770. PMID 16418745.
  3. 1 2 Goymer, Patrick (February 2007). "Synonymous mutations break their silence". Nature Reviews Genetics 8 (2): 92. doi:10.1038/nrg2056.
  4. ↑ Zhou, Tong; Ko, Eun A.; Gu, Wanjun; Lim, Inja; Bang, Hyoweon; Ko, Jae-Hong; Uversky, Vladimir N. (31 October 2012). "Non-Silent Story on Synonymous Sites in Voltage-Gated Ion Channel Genes". PLoS ONE 7 (10): e48541. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048541. PMC 3485311. PMID 23119053.
  5. ↑ Graur, Dan (2003). "Single Base Mutation" (PDF). In Cooper, David N. Nature Encyclopedia of the Human Genome (PDF). MacMillan. ISBN 0333803868.
  6. ↑ Carlini, David B.; Stephan, Wolfgang (2003). "In vivo introduction of unpreferred synonymous codons into the Drosophila Adh gene results in reduced levels of ADH protein". Genetics 163 (1): 239–243. PMC 1462401. PMID 12586711.
  7. ↑ Carlini, David B. (2004). "Experimental reduction of codon bias in the Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase gene results in decreased ethanol tolerance of adult flies". Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17 (4): 779–785. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00725.x. PMID 15271077.
  8. ↑ Kahali, Bratati; Basak Surajit; Ghosh Tapash Chandra (March 2007). "Reinvestigating the codon and amino acid usage of S. cerevisiae genome: a new insight from protein secondary structure analysis". Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 354 (3): 693–9. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.01.038. PMID 17258174.
  9. ↑ Pagani, Franco; Raponi, Michela; Baralle, Francisco E. (2005). "Synonymous mutations in CFTR exon 12 affect splicing and are not neutral in evolution". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102 (18): 6368–72. doi:10.1073/pnas.0502288102. PMC 1088389. PMID 15840711..
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, September 16, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.