Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States

Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States

Argued December 12, 1919
Decided January 26, 1920
Full case name Silverthorne Lumber Co., Inc., et al. v. United States
Citations

251 U.S. 385 (more)

Holding
To permit derivatives would encourage police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment, so the illegal copied evidence was held tainted and inadmissible.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Edward D. White
Case opinions
Majority Holmes, joined by McKenna, Day, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Brandeis, Clark
Dissent White
Dissent Pitney

Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920), was a U.S. Supreme Court Case in which Silverthorne attempted to evade paying taxes. Federal agents illegally seized tax books from Silverthorne and created copies of the records. The issue in this case is whether or not derivatives of illegal evidence are permissible in court. The ruling, delivered by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., was that to permit derivatives would encourage police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment, so the illegal copied evidence was held tainted and inadmissible. This precedent later became known as the "fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine,"[1] and is an extension of the exclusionary rule.

Chief Justice White and Associate Justice Pitney dissented without a written opinion.

See also

Further reading

References

  1. ↑ Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 (1939)

External links

Wikisource has original text related to this article:
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Sunday, January 10, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.