Sotho verbs

Notes:

Sesotho verbs are words in the language that signify the action or state of a substantive, and are brought into agreement with it using the subjectival concord. This definition excludes imperatives and infinitives, which are respectively interjectives and class 14 nouns.

In the Bantu languages, verbs often form the centre of a complex web of regular derivational patterns, and words/roots belonging to many parts of speech may be directly or indirectly derived from them. Not only may new verbs be derived using a large number of derivational suffixes, Sesotho nouns (and, iteratively, the other parts of speech that derive from them), some imperative interjectives and, to a lesser extent, ideophones may be formed by simple morphological devices.

Varieties

Verb stems may be divided into four varieties:

  1. Regular stems beginning with a consonant and ending in a vowel
  2. Monosyllabic verbs
  3. Vowel verb stems beginning with a vowel
  4. Derived verbs constructed from other verbs, noun roots, adjectival roots, and ideophones by suffixes.

Regular verbs are those beginning with a consonant and ending in the vowel a. The final a may change into any vowel except the near-close near-back vowel (/ʊ/) through inflexion or derivation. The verb root is the atomic part of the verb, which does not change (save for some purely phonetic changes) and Bantu languages share numerous similar verb roots (with predictable sound changes between languages).

Stem [bɔnɑ] -bona ('see') from the root -bon-, also existing as isiZulu -bon-, Swahili -on-, Tshivenda -vhon-, Chishona -von-, Chilamba -won- etc. Proto-Bantu *-bon-

Monosyllabic stems may be classified into several categories:

Vowel verb stems are conjugated as regular verbs but are put into a separate class due to their being uncommon in Bantu languages (and because, in some languages but not in Sesotho, they cause changes to concords and other formatives prefixed to them).[3] Class 1 and 5 nouns derived from these verbs do not cause any velarization to the prefix. The Proto-Bantu reconstructions of many of these verbs suggest that they originally began with *g (or sometimes *j), which "protected" the vowel.

[ilɑ] -ila ('avoid as a taboo')
[ɛtʼɑ] -eta ('travel')
[ut͡ɬʼʷɑ] -utlwa ('hear')
[ɑhɑ] -aha ('construct')
[ɔt͡ɬʼɑ] -otla ('strike')

Tones

Main article: Sesotho tonology

Verbs fall into only two categories when it comes to their tones: L verbs and H verbs. The difference lies in whether the "underlying tone" of the verb's first syllable is high or null (under-specified). Thus, all verbs of a certain length in the same tonal category are pronounced with similar tonal patterns under the same grammatical circumstances.

What the verbal tone system lacks in variety, however, it more than makes up for in complexity. The tones of the syllables of the verbs regularly change under varying grammatical environments, with the high tones being manipulated by "tonal rules", and the tones associated with certain syllables being changed by numerous "tonal melodies."

Verbal derivatives

Various derivatives may (recursively) be formed from verbs by means of several suffixes (called "extensions"). Each derived verb is as much an authentic verb as the original.

In the following sections, "polysyllabic" generally means "of more than two syllables."

Verbs are derived primarily through suffixes, some of which are no longer active ("dead").

Verb derivations using the root [ǃɛtʼ] -qet-[4]
Type Suffix Valency
change
Example Meaning
Simple-a
0
[ǃɛtʼɑ]-qeta'finish'
Passive-wa
1
[ǃɛtʼʷɑ]-qetwa'be finished'
-uwa[ǃetʼuwɑ]-qetuwa
Neutro-active-ahala
intr.
[ǃɛtʼɑhɑlɑ]-qetahala'finishable'
Neutro-passive-eha
intr.
[ǃɛtʼɛhɑ]-qeteha'finishable'
Applied-ela
+1
[ǃɛtʼɛlɑ]-qetela'finished for'
Causative-isa
+1
[ǃetʼisɑ]-qetisa'cause to finish'
Intensive -isisa
0
[ǃetʼisisɑ]-qetisisa'finish intensely'
Perfective-ella
0
[ǃɛtʼɛl̩lɑ]-qetella'finish completely'
Reciprocal-ana
1
[ǃɛtʼɑnɑ]-qetana'finish each other'
Associative-ahana
1
[ǃɛtʼɑhɑnɑ]-qetahana'be finished together'
Reversive-olla
0
[ǃetʼʊl̩lɑ]-qetolla'unfinish'
Augmentative-olla
0
[ǃetʼʊl̩lɑ]-qetolla'finish extensively'
Extensive -aka
0
[ǃɛtʼɑkʼɑ]-qetaka'finish repeatedly and extensively'
Diminutive(see text)
0
[ǃɛtʼɑǃɛtʼɑ]-qeta-qeta'finish a little'
Positional (dead)-ama
0
[t͡sʼʊʀɑmɑ]-tsorama'squat'
Stative extensive (dead)-ala
0
[ʀɔbɑlɑ]-robala'sleep'
Contactive (dead)-ara
0
[fupʼɑʀɑ]-fupara'clench the hand'


The passive indicates that the subject is acted upon by the agent, just like the passive voice in English. The agent is indicated by the copulative prefix [kʼɪ] ke- although passives may also be used idiomatically without an agent.

The suffix may be either [wɑ] -wa (Proto-Bantu *-u-) (short passive) or [uwɑ] -uwa (long passive).

The following rules are applied to form the passive:

It is very rare to have other verbs derived from the passive through suffixes.

This suffix has the effect of decreasing the valency of the verb and giving it an agentive import.

In the most formal standard language, the perfect of the passive is generally formed by inserting [ilʷ] -ilw- before the final vowel of the perfect form (that is, the passive suffix has to come after the perfect suffix). In non-standard common speech, however, the perfect of the passive may alternatively be formed by using the long passive with the final vowel changed to the final vowel (usually [e]) of the verb's perfect. Additionally, in non-standard speech the perfect passive of verbs ending in a [mɑ] -ma that changes to [ŋʷɑ] -ngwa in the passive replace it with [ŋ̩ŋʷe] -nngwe.

The passive is used more commonly in Sesotho than the English passive voice. Consider the following example:

Sesotho (passive) [n̩t͡ʃʼɑɪt͡ɬʼɑfepʼuwɑkʼɪmɑŋ̩] ntja e tla fepuwa ke mang?
English (active) who will feed the dog?

The alternatives are more complex in their respective languages:

Sesotho (normal) [kʼɪmɑŋ̩jɑt͡ɬʼɑfɛpʼɑŋ̩n̩t͡ʃʼɑ] ke mang ya tla fepang ntja?
English (passive) the dog will be fed by whom?

Passive verbs are rare in the Niger–Congo family outside the Bantu sub-branch.


The neutro-active indicates an intransitive state without reference to the agent determining the condition. It can be approximated in English by using "get" or "become." It is, however, distinct from the passive. It indicates a current state of being done or being doable.

The suffix is -ahala. Only transitive verbs may take this suffix.

[pʰɛtʰɑ] -phetha ('accomplish') → [pʰɛtʰɑhɑlɑ] -phethahala ('get finished')
[et͡sʼɑ] -etsa ('do') → [et͡sʼɑhɑlɑ] -etsahala ('be done')

This suffix has the effect of making the valency of the verb 0, even if the original verb had two objects. The resultant verb is completely intransitive and cannot assume any objects even if they are prefixed.

The perfect of verbs ending with this suffix is achieved by changing the final -ala to -etse.

This extension is quite rare in the Bantu language family as a whole.


The neutro-passive indicates an intransitive state without reference to the agent determining the condition. It can be approximated in English by the suffix "-able." It is, however, distinct from the passive. It indicates that the verb has the potential of being doable, but not necessarily currently.

The suffix is -eha (Proto-Bantu *-ik-,[5] with an irregular vowel shift). Only transitive verbs may take this suffix.

[ǃhɑlɑ] -qhala ('disperse') → [ǃhɑlɛhɑ] -qhaleha ('be potentially spillable')
[et͡sʼɑ] -etsa ('do') → [et͡sʼɛhɑ] -etseha ('be doable')

This suffix has the effect of making the valency of the verb 0, even if the original verb had two objects. The resultant verb is completely intransitive and cannot assume any objects even if they are prefixed.

The past tense of verbs ending with this suffix is formed in the general way by replacing the final vowel with -ile.


The applied indicates an action applied on behalf of or with regard to some object. It can be approximated in English by prepositions and prepositional phrases such as "for" and "towards."[6]

The suffix is -ela (Proto-Bantu *-id-, with an irregular vowel shift[7]). Sometimes this extension is doubled to -ella, causing the verb to look like a perfective form but with an applied meaning.

The following rules apply when forming the applied:

[sebet͡sʼɑ] -sebetsa ('work') → [sebelet͡sʼɑ] -sebeletsa ('work for')

The applied increases the valency of verbs; intransitive verbs may become transitive in the applied, and transitive verbs may become doubly transitive

[pʰɪlɑ] -phela ('live') → [pʰɪlɛlɑ] -phelela ('live for')
[bʊlɛlɑ] -bolela ('say something') → [bʊlɛl̩lɑ] -bolella ('tell someone something' [two objects])

The past tense of verbs ending with this suffix changes the [elɑ] -ela to [et͡sʼɪ] -etse.


The causative indicates an action caused to happen by some agent. It can be approximated in English by using "cause to."

The suffix is [isɑ] -isa (Proto-Bantu long causative *-îc- + short causative *-î- → *-îcî-).

The following rules apply when forming the causative. Most complications are caused by the original Proto-Bantu "short causative" *-î- being absorbed into the preceding consonant (Sesotho does not allow palatal glides):

Often the causative verb has a meaning implying "help to do"

[ɑhɑ] -aha ('build') → [ɑhisɑ] -ahisa ('help to build') → [ɑhisɑnɑ] -ahisana ('help each other to build') → [mʊ'ɑhisɑnɪ] moahisane ('neighbour' coming from the tradition of neighbouring houses sharing a wall and yard, which the owners would build together)

The causative may increase the valency of verbs

[t͡sʼɪbɑ] -tseba ('know something') → [t͡sʼiˌbisɑ] -tsebisa ('cause someone to know something')

Usually the perfect is formed by further suffixing [it͡sʼe] -itse, but if the derivation alveolarized an original final [lɑ] -la to [t͡sʼɑ] -tsa then the alveolarization is reversed, resulting in final [dit͡sʼe] -ditse. If the suffix changed final [nɑ] -na to [ɲɑ] -nya then the perfect is formed by replacing this final syllable with [n̩t͡sʼe] -ntse.


The intensive indicates intensity or quickness of action.

The suffix is simply a doubling of the causative suffix (-isisa) and the first syllable therefore follows similar phonetic rules as the causative. Sometimes, the suffix -isa is used instead, resulting in causative and intensive verbs looking the same.

[bɑt͡ɬʼɑ] -batla ('look for') → [bɑt͡ɬʼisisɑ] -batlisisa ('investigate')
[et͡sʼɑ] -etsa ('do')→ [et͡sʼisisɑ] -etsisisa ('do intensely')


The perfective indicates an action that has been carried out to completion or perfection.

The suffix is simply a doubling of the applied suffix (-ella). It must therefore not be confused with the applied form of verbs ending in -ela.

[hɑtʼɑ] -hata ('step on') → [hɑtʼɛl̩lɑ] -hatella ('oppress')
[et͡sʼɑ] -etsa ('do')→ [et͡sʼɛl̩lɑ] -etsella ('do thoroughly')

A further intensification of meaning is achieved with the suffixes [elet͡sʼɑ] -eletsa ([ɛl̩lɑ] -ella + Proto-Bantu *-îa) and [el̩let͡sʼɑ] -elletsa ([ɛl̩lɛlɑ] -ellela + Proto-Bantu *-îa), a compounding of intensive and perfective suffixes. These verbs tend to denote meanings indicating specific purpose, and it is not unlikely that they are in fact intensifications of the applied suffix -ela instead (though the verb's valency is not increased).

[hʊ'ɑ] -hoa ('shout') → [hʊ'elet͡sʼɑ] -hoeletsa ('call out')
[t͡sʰiʀɑ] -tshira ('obscure') → [t͡sʰiʀelet͡sʼɑ] -tshireletsa ('protect')

Though one might expect this suffix to form the perfect by replacing the [ɛl̩lɑ] -ella with [elet͡sʼɪ] -eletse, it often appears as [el̩let͡sʼɪ] -elletse instead, even in standard speech.


The reciprocal denotes a reciprocated action.

It is formed by suffixing [ɑnɑ] -ana (Proto-Bantu *-an-[9]).

It is usually used with plural subjects and plural concords, and has the effect of decreasing the valency. However, an object (the second subject) as well as a singular subject may still be used if the object is prefixed with the conjunctive enclitic le- (and, with); that is, they have a conjunctive import

[bu'ɑ] -bua ('speak') → [bu'isɑ] -buisa ('cause to speak') → [bɑ'ɑbu'isɑnɑ] ba a buisana ('they communicate'), [kʼiˌbu'isɑnɑlɪjɛnɑ] ke buisana le yena ('I communicate with him')
[et͡sʼɑ] -etsa ('do')→ [et͡sʼɑnɑ] -etsana ('do to each another')

Often this suffix is used when there is no chance that two subjects are involved in reciprocating the action. In this case it simply converts the verb from transitive to conjunctive import, with a minor modification of meaning (the action is slightly extended in time, or indicates a habit of the actor)

[ʃɛbɑ] -sheba ('look at') → [kʼɪ'ɑdiʃɛbɑ] ke a di sheba / [kʼɪʃɛbɑnɑlɪt͡sʼɔnɑ] ke shebana le tsona ('I am looking for them' class 8 or 10 object)

The perfect is usually formed by changing the final vowel to [ɪ] -e, though if the original verb was monosyllabic then the perfect replaces the [nɑ] -na with [n̩ne] -nne


The associative indicates that two or more subjects are associated together in the action of the verb.

It is formed by suffixing -ahana.

This derivative formation is not regularly used with most verbs.

[hʊkʼɑ] -hoka ('attach')→ [hʊkʼɑhɑnɑ] -hokahana ('be attached to each other')
[et͡sʼɑ] -etsa ('do')→ ([et͡sʼɑhɑnɑ] -etsahana ('be done together')

The perfect simply replaces the final vowel with -e


The reversive (or inversive) indicates an entire reversal of an action.

It is formed by suffixing [ʊl̩lɑ] -olla (Proto-Bantu *-udud-) although several other dead formations exist, showing two sets of derivations into intransitive, transitive, and causative. These extensions, or at least their short forms as found in other languages (Proto-Bantu intransitive *-uk- and transitive *-ud-), are sometimes called the "separative" instead.

Dead reversive forms
TypeIntransitiveTransitiveCausative
Short [ʊhɑ] -oha[ʊlɑ] -ola[ʊsɑ] -osa
Full [ʊlʊhɑ] -oloha[ʊl̩lɑ] -olla[ʊlʊsɑ] -olosa
[et͡sʼɑ] -etsa ('do')→ [et͡sʼʊl̩lɑ] -etsolla ('undo')

Though the theory (and standard grammar) would dictate that this suffix forms its perfect by changing to [ʊlʊt͡sʼɪ] -olotse, it often appears as [ʊl̩lʊt͡sʼɪ] -ollotse instead, even in standard speech.


The augmentative is a largely dead formation signifying an augmentation or extension of a verb.

It is indicated by suffixes similar to the dead full formation of the reversive ([ʊlʊhɑ] -oloha, [ʊl̩lɑ] -olla, and [ʊlʊsɑ] -olosa).

[xɛtʰɑ] -kgetha ('set apart') → [xetʰʊlʊhɑ] -kgetholoha ('be distinct')


The extensive indicates performing the action repeatedly or extensively.

It is formed with the suffix -aka[10] but is limited in scope. It is primarily used with verbs signify discrete actions, causing them to be continuous or habitual. It is also sometimes heard doubled as -akaka, with the same meaning.

[ǃʰʊmɑ] -qhoma ('jump') → [ǃʰʊmɑkʼɑ] -qhomaka ('prance about')
[et͡sʼɑ] -etsa ('do')→ [et͡sʼɑkʼɑ] -etsaka ('do repeatedly')

The perfect of this extension simply suffixes -ile.


The diminutive indicates an action done "a little."

It is indicated by reduplication,[11] the form being determined by the length of the verb:

Note that this derivation pattern, like all other uses of reduplication in Bantu languages, is also sometimes used to indicate an intensification and/or repetition of an actionin these cases the actual meaning must be determined from context.

After the reduplication, the new verb may only have an underlying high tone on the first syllable (that is, only the phones of the first syllable are repeated, but not its tone).


The positional is a dead stative[13] formation found in many verbs, mostly indicating bodily positions.

It is marked by the suffix -ama (Proto-Bantu *-am-). Originally, this suffix was not used to derive new meanings as such, but rather to emphasise the stative positional nature of the verb.

The perfect of these verbs changes the -ama to -ame and indicates a continuous, current action instead of a completed one. Past tense may be indicated by multi-verbal conjugation.

[pʼɑǃɑmɑ] -paqama ('lie face downwards') → [ʊpʼɑǃɑmɪ] o paqame ('he is lying face down'), [uˌ'ile ɑpʼɑǃɑmɑ] o ile a paqama ('he assumed a lying position'), [ʊne ɑpʼɑǃɑmɪ] o ne a paqame ('he was lying')


The stative extensive is a dead stative[13] formation found in a few miscellaneous verbs, united by the fact that they all indicate states.

It is marked by the suffix -ala (Proto-Bantu *-ad-). Originally, this suffix was not used to derive new meanings as such, but rather to emphasise the stative nature of the verb.

The perfect of these verbs changes the -ala to -etse and indicates a continuous, current action instead of a completed one. Past tense may be indicated by multi-verbal conjugation.

[mɑkʼɑlɑ] -makala ('wonder') → [bɑmɑkʼet͡sʼɪ] ba maketse ('they are in awe'), [bɑ'ilebɑmɑkʼɑlɑ] ba ile ba makala ('they became amazed'), [bɑnebɑmɑkʼet͡sʼɪ] ba ne ba maketse ('they were amazed')


The contactive is a dead formation found in a few verbs, all indicating touch or contact of some sort.

It is marked by the suffix -ara (Proto-Bantu *-at-). Originally, this suffix was not used to derive new meanings as such, but rather to emphasise or intensify the contactive nature of the verb.

The perfect of these verbs changes the -ara to -ere and indicates a continuous, current action instead of a completed one. Past tense may be indicated by multi-verbal conjugation.

[ɑpʼɑʀɑ] -apara ('wear') → [ʀɪ'ɑpʼeʀɪ] re apere ('we are clothed'), [ʀiˌ'ileʀɑ'ɑpʼɑʀɑ] re ile ra apara ('we did become dressed'), [ʀɪneʀɪ'ɑpʼeʀɪ] re ne re apere ('we were dressed')

Compounding of extensions

A verb may assume more than one extension, giving it a correspondingly more complex meaning.

[ʃɛbɑ] -sheba ('watch [X]') → causative [ʃebisɑ] -shebisa ('cause [Y] to watch [X]') → causative-applied [ʃebiset͡sʼɑ] -shebisetsa ('cause [Y] to watch [X] on behalf of [Z] → causative-applied-reciprocal [ʃebiset͡sʼɑnɑ] -shebisetsana ('cause [Y] to watch [X] on behalf of each other')

Though it may appear that the possibilities are endless, the truth is that the depth is limited by various factors. Apart from the obvious constraints of semantics (whether a complex meaning actually makes any sense and serves any possible purpose) and markedness (how strange and complex the verb sounds to the native speaker), there are also restrictions on the order of the extensions.

If an extension increases the valency of a verb, any objects of the original verb are demoted and the new object is made principal.

[kʼɪʃɛbɑmɑsimʊ] ke sheba masimo ('I watch the fields') → [kʼɪʃebisɑbɑnɑmɑsimʊ] ke shebisa bana masimo ('I cause the children to watch the fields') → [kʼɪʃebiset͡sʼɑŋ̩xʊnʊbɑnɑmɑsimʊ] ke shebisetsa nkgono bana masimo ('I cause the children to watch the fields on behalf of the old woman' highly marked)

If an objectival concord is used instead of an object, the concord agrees with what would have been the principal object. Additionally, if the original object was also only indicated by an objectival concord, then it becomes demoted to an absolute pronoun (Sesotho verbs may only have one objectival concord).

ke a a sheba ('I watch them') masimo ('fields) → ke ba shebisisa ona ('I cause them [children] to watch them [fields] → ke mo shebisisetsa bona ona ('I cause them [children] to watch them [fields] on behalf of her [old woman])

Note how the infix[14] -a- disappears when the verb is followed by a direct object, even if it is not the object indicated by the concord.

Like all other Bantu languages, Sesotho has inherited certain restrictions on the order of the extensions. The most basic rule (which is broken by very few languages) is that the passive and the short causative[15] always follow all the other extensions (including the perfect -il-, which is always used with a final -e). Although it is probable that Proto-Bantu had fairly strict restrictions on the order of the other extensions, these rules have been relaxed somewhat in modern Bantu languages.

For example, since the causative -is- is normally ordered closer to the verb stem than the reciprocal -an- (as well as most other extensions), to form the causative of the reciprocal the (dead) short causative (Proto-Bantu *-î-) is usually used instead, therefore palatalizing the reciprocal to -ny-. Various other unexpected palatalizations and alveolarizations brought on by combinations of the causative with other extensions may be similarly explained by the action of the short causative either replacing the normal causative, or being used together with the long causative around another extension (causative + other extension → -is- + other extension + *-î- → -is- + modified extension).

Certain extensions (intensive, perfective, associative, reversive, and augmentative) are obviously fossilised compound extensions. Often a derived verb may continue being used while the original verb disappears from the language.

Note that, since prefixes are of the shape CV or V (where C represents a consonant and V a vowel), verb roots end without the final vowel, prefixes are of the shape (VC)* (* indicates possible repetition) and the final vowel simply has shape V, this and other structures reinforce the open syllable structure of the Bantu languages, and very few languages have broken it.

Non-verbal derivatives

Verbs may also, to a lesser degree, be derived from nouns, qualificatives, and ideophones.


Denominative verbs are stative verbs[13] derived from nouns and qualificatives.

They are formed by suffixing -fa or, more commonly, -fala to the stem, giving a verb meaning "become...."

[bʊɬɑlɪ] bohlale ('intelligence') → [ɬɑlɪfɑ] -hlalefa ('become intelligent')
[bʊnɔlɔ] bonolo ('soft') → [nɔlɔfɑlɑ] -nolofala ('become soft')

The monosyllabic adjectival roots (except [ŋ̩] -ng 'some', and [nɛ] -ne 'four') become nasalized before assuming the suffix. Furthermore, the vowel of [t͡ɬʼɛ] -tle ('beautiful') changes to [t͡ɬʼɑ] -tla:

[bɪ] -be ('ugly') → [m̩pʼɪfɑlɑ] -mpefala ('become ugly')
[t͡ʃʰɑ] -tjha ('new') → [ɲ̩t͡ʃʰɑfɑlɑ] -ntjhafala ('become renewed')
[t͡ɬʼɛ] -tle ('beautiful') → [n̩t͡ɬʼɑfɑlɑ] -ntlafala ('become beautiful')
[t͡sʰʊ] -tsho ('black') → [n̩t͡sʰʊfɑlɑ] -ntshofala ('become black')

Causatives are formed regularly by changing the -fala suffix to -fatsa. Perfects are formed regularly by changing the -fala suffix to -fetse.

This extension (the long -fala) is quite rare in the Bantu languages, though all languages have a few verbs in this form even if it may no longer be active.


Deideophonic verbs are formed rather irregularly from disyllabic ideophones.

They are miscellaneous in nature and are formed by the addition of several suffixes such as [hɑ] -ha, [lɑ] -la, [t͡sʼɑ] -tsa, [sɑ] -sa, [mɑ] -ma, [t͡sʼɛhɑ] -tseha, [bɑlɑ] -bala, [kʼɑ] -ka etc.

However, common across the Bantu language group are the forms [hɑ] -ha for the intransitive, [lɑ] -la for the transitive, and [t͡sʼɑ] -tsa for the causative. Additionally, the causative of the intransitive may be formed regularly with the suffix [sɑ] -sa, but this is usually not done if the causative [t͡sʼɑ] -tsa form is regularly used.

[pʰetʰʊ] phetho ('of turning over') → [pʰetʰʊhɑ] -phethoha ('flip over')
[t͡sʼʷɪtʼɪ] tswete ('of being completely full') → [t͡sʼʷɪtʼɪhɑ] -tsweteha ('burst open')
[tʰɑxʊ] thakgo ('of picking up and throwing forward') → [tʰɑxʊhɑ] -thakgoha ('stand up and move in a certain direction'), and [tʰɑxʊlɑ] -thakgola ('initiate a process or plan')

When forming these verbs, the tone of the first syllable of the verb (its characteristic tone) corresponds to the tone of the first syllable of the part of the original word used to form the verb (usually the root, but a complete noun for monosyllabic roots). Thus verbs derived regularly from monosyllabic stems are all L verbs (due to the null toned prefix).

[bʊbɛbʊ] bobebo ('easy') [ _ _ ¯ ][bɛbʊfɑlɑ] -bebofala ('become easy') (L verb)
[bʊhɑlɪ] bohale ('angry')[ _ ¯ _ ][hɑlɪfɑ] -halefa ('become angry') (H verb)
[mɑt͡ɬʼɑ] matla ('strong') [ _ _ ][mɑt͡ɬʼɑfɑlɑ] -matlafala ('become strong') (L verb)

Inflexion during conjugation

In addition to the verbal derivatives, the following changes may occur to the stem's suffix -a, during conjugation:

The general rules for the formation of the perfect are varied due to various mostly phonological interactions with the suffix:[16]

For all verbs, however, the past tense may also be indicated with the simple -ile (past subjunctive) multi-verbal conjugation, although its meaning does diverge somewhat from that of the perfect (especially with stative verbs)

[bɑ'ilebɑbinɑ] ba ile ba bina ('they sang')

Conjugation

Verbal conjugation is by far the most complex and varied topic in the Bantu languages. The tenses are conjugated by means of prefixes and infixes[14] indicating person, mood, implication, and aspect.

There are two conjugations, the positive and negative, and most tenses have corresponding forms in each. The language recognises four moods: the indicative, the subjunctive, the potential, and the participial sub-mood (infinitives are nouns and imperatives are interjectives). The moods may be divided into tenses according to time (remote past, immediate past, present, immediate future, and remote future) and implication (simple, progressive, and exclusive), which may be further subdivided according to aspect into indefinite, continuous, and perfect.

There are also many often complex compound tenses, indicated by changes in tone and the use of deficient verbs (multi-verbal conjugations).

Import refers to how the object of the verb is indicated.

Verbs can be either:

Many verbs can have more than one import ([t͡sʼɑmɑjɑ] -tsamaya ('walk') can be locative, instrumental, or conjunctive; [bu'ɑ] -bua ('speak') can be intransitive, transitive, instrumental, or conjunctive) and verb derivatives can also change the import of the stem.

Many shades of meaning are achieved by the employment of deficient verbs in multi-verbal conjugations. Many tenses and moods may only be formed in this manner.

The verbal complex

In the Bantu languages, the typical full structure of verbs, excluding contractions, is as follows (the * indicates possible iteration):

PI SC NEG TM AM OC ROOT EXT* FV
                                      
                                    final vowel
                              extensions
                        vb. root
                    objectival concord
                aspect marker
            tense marker
        negative
   subjectival concord
pre-initial morpheme

In Sesotho, as with most other Bantu languages, this has been modified somewhat, resulting in the following structure [hɑkʼɪsɑt͡ɬʼɑmʊʃɛbɛlɑ] hakesatlamoshebela ('I shall no longer look on his behalf'):

Ha   ke   sa  tla   mo   sheb    el     a
PI  SC  A1  A2  OC  ROOT  EXT*  FV
                                 
                               final vowel
                         extensions
                   vb. root
               objectival concord
           second verbal auxiliary
       first verbal auxiliary
   subjectival concord
pre-initial morpheme


Though indicative tenses form their negatives with the prefix ha-, many other moods and tenses form their negatives with an infix (either -sa- or -se-, depending on the specific tense). The verbal auxiliary infixes are used to indicate tense, certain forms of the subjunctive, progressive implication, the potential mood, as well verb focus in the present indicative tense. The verbal infixes always follow the simple infixes, though there are some instances where two simple infixes are used at the same time.

The extensions include suffixes used in verbal derivatives as well as the perfect -il- (which is always followed by a final -e).

With the exception of the verb root, each of these formatives is monosyllabic, but in Sesotho some verbal infixes (those that are contractions) and extensions (those that are obvious compoundings of earlier forms) also have more than one syllable.

Additionally, the structure (obj conc. + stem) is often called the "macrostem" in various syntactical and tonal theories.

Many aspects and tenses are indicated by multi-verbal conjugations and, with the exception of the subjectival concord, the root, and the final vowel, most of these formatives are not always necessary. Note that infinitives and imperatives (both of with do not have subjectival concords) may be considered separate parts of speech (nouns/gerunds and interjectives). Deficient verbs are never used with objectival concords, and the use of the other formatives with them is also limited.

This structure obviously ignores any possible enclitics that is suffixed.

Tenses

The Sesotho tense system is somewhat less complex (though not necessarily less complicated) than that of other Bantu languages. Whereas many Bantu languages clearly divide the time into remote past, immediate past, present, immediate future, and remote future, not all Sesotho moods divide very clearly between immediate and remote tenses, and the differences in meaning are not as great.

Examples indicating the tenses (positive simple indicative mood)
TenseExample
Present[kʼɪt͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] ke tseba nnete ('I know the truth')
Past perfect[kʼɪt͡sʼiˌbilen̩nɪtʼɪ] ke tsebile nnete ('I knew the truth')
Immediate past[kʼɪt͡sʼʷɑt͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] ke tswa tseba nnete ('I just recently knew the truth')
Immediate future[kʼiˌ'ilot͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] ke ilo tseba nnete ('I shall know the truth soon')
Future[kʼɪt͡ɬʼɑt͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] ke tla tseba nnete ('I shall know the truth')

Moods

There are basically four moods.[18]

Examples indicating the moods (present tense)
MoodPositiveNegative
Indicative[kʼɪt͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] ke tseba nnete ('I know the truth')[hɑkʼɪt͡sʼɪbɪn̩nɪtʼɪ] ha ke tsebe nnete ('I do not know the truth')
Potential[ŋ̩kʼɑt͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] nka tseba nnete ('I may know the truth')[ŋ̩kʼekʼekʼɑt͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] nke ke ka tseba nnete ('I may not know the truth')
Participial[kʼɪt͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] ...ke tseba nnete ('...while I know the truth')[kʼɪsɑt͡sʼɪbɪn̩nɪtʼɪ] ...ke sa tsebe nnete ('...while I do not know the truth')
Subjunctive[kʼɪt͡sʼɪbɛn̩nɪtʼɪ] ...ke tsebe nnete ('...so I may know the truth')[kʼɪsɪt͡sʼɪbɪn̩nɪtʼɪ] ...ke se tsebe nnete ('...so I may not know the truth')

Implication

Within the indicative and participial moods, tenses may be further sub-divided according to the implication of the action.

Examples indicating implication (indicative mood)
ImplicationExample
Simple[kʼɪt͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] ke tseba nnete ('I know the truth')
Progressive[kʼɪsɑt͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] ke sa tseba nnete ('I still know the truth')
Exclusive[kʼɪsekʼɪt͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] ke se ke tseba nnete ('I now know the truth')

Aspects

The tenses may be further divided according to the aspect of the action. In Sesotho there are at least three aspects, the definite, the continuous, and the perfect.

Examples indicating aspect (with a multi-verbal indicative past tense)
AspectExample
Definite[kʼiˌ'ilekʼɑt͡sʼɪbɑ] ke ile ka tseba ('I did know')
Continuous[kʼɪnekʼɪt͡sʼɪbɑ] ke ne ke tseba ('I knew')
Perfect[kʼɪnekʼɪt͡sʼiˌbile] ke ne ke tsebile ('I had known')

Deficient verbs

Deficient verbs, so called because they require a subordinate or complementary verb to complete their action, are used to form many tenses and to impart certain shades of meaning. They form part of multi-verbal conjugations consisting of a string of verbs, each with its own subjectival concord.

Deficient verbs, being "deficient", are never used alone. Many of them are irregular in form and have irregular inflexions. Monosyllabic deficient verbs are never used with the penultimate e- that is sometimes used with normal verbs (not to be confused with the indefinite concord).

Many of these verbs seem radical in nature, while others (especially those with complex implications) are obviously derived from certain extant normal verbs (but are used with slightly different meanings). What distinguishes the deficient usage of these normal verbs is the fact that they are followed directly by another verb and affect its meaning (and only the main verb may carry an objectival concord).

[kʼɪsekʼɪsɑt͡sʼɪbɪ] ke se ke sa tsebe ('I no longer know')
[kʼɪnekʼɪt͡sʼɪbɑ] ke ne ke tseba ('I knew')
[kʼɪt͡ɬʼɑbekʼɪt͡sʼɪbɑ] ke tla be ke tseba ('I shall [at some specific time] know')
[ŋ̩kʼɑbekʼiˌ'ilekʼɑt͡sʼɪbɑ] nka be ke ile ka tseba ('I should/would have known')
[ŋ̩kʼɑɬɑkʼɑt͡sʼɪbɑ] nka hla ka tseba ('I may indeed know')
[kʼɪt͡ɬʼɑm̩pʼekʼɪt͡sʼɪbɛ] ke tla mpe ke tsebe ('I will at least know')
[ŋ̩kʼɑn̩nɑkʼɑt͡sʼɪbɑ] nka nna ka tseba ('I may still know')
[kʼɑbɑt͡ɬʼɑkʼɪt͡sʼɪbɑ] ka batla ke tseba ('I nearly knew')
[ŋ̩kʼekʼekʼɑɬɔlɑkʼɪt͡sʼɪbɑ] nke ke ka hlola ke tseba ('I shall no longer know')
[kʼɪt͡sʰʷɑnet͡sʼɪhʊt͡sʼɪbɑ] ke tshwanetse ho tseba ('I have to know')

Notes

  1. 1 2 Simple phonotactic explanations may make these apparent irregularities more understandable.
    Almost all the non-velar e-stems are palatal or postalveolar in nature. This may be due to an original palatal glide being "absorbed" into the original consonant of the verbs (the alveolar /s/ also has similar origins). In Sesotho, the palatal /ɪ/ (spelled y may not be followed by the vowels /i/ or /u/ and these become weakened to /ɪ/ and /ʊ/. The original passive suffix (still used in Setswana and many Northern Sotho languages) was [iwɑ] -iwa, and so the suffixes are weakened to [ɪlɛ] -ele, [ɪsɑ] -esa and [ɪwɑ] -ewa.
    The velar e-stems apparently use the modern [uwɑ] -uwa passive instead, and due to phonotactic restrictions occasionally applied on the labial approximant /w/ (similar to those on the palatal) together with the restriction that labialized consonants may not be followed by back vowels, the suffixes are weakened to -ele, -esa and -owa.
  2. The first two verbs, together with the copulative verb -na (indicating possession, with a conjunctive import), are used in many Bantu languages in generally restricted circumstances.
    There exists certain "defective" verbs across most Bantu languages: Proto-Bantu *-di (Sesotho participial copulative [lɪ] -le), *-ti (Sesotho [ʀɪ] -re), and *-na (Sesotho [nɑ] -na). Additionally, a common variant of *-ti *-tio appears as Sesotho [t͡ʃʰɔ] -tjho an irregular palatalization (when an alveolarization would have been expected) possibly due to the verb being borrowed from some Nguni language (it does not exist in most other Sotho–Tswana languages).
    These are distinguished from other verbs in that they are normally not used with many of the affixes in the verbal complex. For example, though they are all transitive and are therefore used with objects, they never take objectival concords (in Sesotho and many other languages, -re may take an objectival concord when used with ideophones). Additionally, except for Sesotho -re and -tjho, they may not be used as infinitives.
    Even though they have these peculiarities and, except for -na, they do not end with the typical vowel, Bantuists consider them verbs because they may be used with subjectival concords.
    The highly irregular passive of -re may be due to Nguni -thiwa (most other Sotho–Tswana languages use -riwa instead).
  3. The specific label comes from early descriptions of isiZulu grammar, where it was discovered that, apart from simply looking different from other verbs, vowel verbs are also conjugated slightly differently from normal verbs under certain situations, and many of them have alternative (and, at least in modern popular urban isiZulu, more common) forms with the initial vowel deleted. Though isiZulu has five vowel phonemes, vowel verbs in that language may only begin with the vowels /ɑ/, /ɔ/, and /ɛ/ (written a, o, and e, respectively). There is no similar restriction in Sesotho.
  4. The traditional verb root used to demonstrate these derivations (and to form their traditional names by using the class 5 noun prefix [lɪ] le- and changing the final vowel to [i]) is [et͡sʼ] -ets- ('do'). The problem with this root is that the /t͡sʼ/ consonant tends to greatly complicate the forms of the derivatives (due to alveolarization), and it has been felt wise in this table to use a verb root with more neutral sounds. Note that the [ɛ] in [ǃɛtʼɑ] -qet- regularly undergoes vowel raising when followed by certain vowels and consonants, but this is a simpler and more predictable phenomenon than the various complications brought on by the /t͡sʼ/.
    Compare this with the situation in Arabic where the verb فَعَلَ (faʿala 'he did') traditionally used to indicate the various verb forms often confuses non-native learners due to the sound of ʿAin (ع) being confused with that of the Hamza ء that appears in some forms (such as the causative stem IV أَفْعَلََ 'afʿala).
  5. Proto-Bantu also had an allomorphic non-productive suffix (called the "impositive"), which, instead of meaning "to be put in a state" (the meaning of the neutro-passive), actually meant "to put in a state." As with the productive suffix, the vowel has undergone an irregular vowel shift in Sesotho, but unlike the productive suffix the /h/ reflex from Proto-Bantu *k is sometimes weakened (through voicing) and elided, thus resulting in verbs that end with -ea
    Proto-Bantu *-janik- ('spread to dry out in the sun') → Sesotho [ɑnɛhɑ] -aneha
    Proto-Bantu *-jambik- ('cook) → Sesotho [ɑpʼɛhɑ] -apea (slightly archaic)
  6. It is possible that in pre-Proto-Bantu the various meanings of this suffix where indicated by several different forms that eventually merged and became the single *-id-.
  7. This "irregular" shift, which causes the applied suffix to look like it came from Proto-Bantu *-ed- instead of *-id-, is found in many other Bantu languages.
  8. This may, as usual, be better explained by looking to the original Proto-Bantu morphology. The Proto-Bantu short causative *-î- alveolarizes the Sesotho /l/ to /t͡sʼ/. Additionally, there were, and (in almost all Bantu languages) still are, fairly strong restrictions on the ordering of the verbal extensions the most basic restriction being that the short passive and the short causative *-û- always follow the other extensions (isiXhosa is an example of a language that allows other extensions to follow the passive).

    So with these facts in mind, this particular morphological rule for forming the applied may be explained by simply saying that the short passive that alveolarized the original /l/ is removed from its current position (thus reversing the alveolarization) and placed after the applied extension to conform to the rules about extension ordering (with the added side-effect that the /l/ in the applied extension is now alveolarized).
  9. Many researchers believe that this suffix might be from an earlier preposition *na (cf. the conjunctive clitic *na-, corresponding to the Sesotho proclitic le-), which became grammaticalised and attached to the verb. That is, Verb-a na X ("Verb along with X") became Verb-ana X in pre-Proto-Bantu (with the same meaning) and this was eventually used as a productive suffix.
  10. Comparison with other languages shows that this is actually irregular, as one would expect it to appear as -aha in Sesotho.
  11. The verb thus formed is a full, independent verb, rather than a mere repeating of the verb's syllables. In particular, the derived verb belongs to the same tonal class as the original, with the underlying tone on the first syllable of the stem not copied when the syllable is copied. This is overwhelmingly the case in the Bantu languages, although there is one notable exception, viz. Chichewa.
  12. The verb thus formed is a full, independent verb.
  13. 1 2 3 These "stative" verbs in Sesotho all have a strong inceptive feel to them. That is, instead of simply meaning "to be x", they actually mean "to become x", with the actual stative "to be x" meaning achieved by using the "present stative" tense (which is formed in exactly the same manner as the perfect for non-stative verbs). The "stative" label comes from the fact that in many other Bantu languages these verbs do actually indicate present states, not a continuous inceptive event.
  14. 1 2 The use of this term in Bantu linguistics means "formatives placed in the middle of a word" and not the more common "formatives placed in the middle of a morpheme." Bantu languages, being agglutinative, construct words by placing affixes around a stem, and if an affix is always placed after other affixes but before the stem (such as in certain verb tenses and moods) then it is usually called an "infix."
  15. See the note above on the alveolarization of the applied.
  16. In the formation of the perfect of many of the derivational suffixes listed earlier, many of the complications are caused by a process known as "imbrication" where the perfect suffix -il- loses its consonant and the vowel is placed before the previous consonant, thus causing changes to the previous vowel (and to the following consonant).

    In isiZulu the forms are very predictable, with suffixes of the form aCa generally changing to eCe (aCa + ile → aiCe → eCe).
  17. The fact that this is indeed the simple copulative (and not just a prefix that happens to be allomorphic with it) is evidenced by looking at these verbs in a language such as isiZulu where the simple copulative is much more complicated and yet coincides perfectly with the marking of the objects of agentive verbs.
  18. This is Doke's analysis.

    The issue of how many moods individual Bantu languages have exactly is not entirely settled due to their complex morphologies. A more inclusive scheme for Sesotho (and the one taught to first-language speakers in schools) is as follows:
    Sesotho moods
    Mood ([sɪkʼɑ'ʊ] Sekao)Positive ([tʼumɛlɔ] Tumelo)Negative ([tʼɑtʼʊlɔ] Tatolo)
    Indicative ([n̩nɪtʼɪ] Nnete)[kʼɪt͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] ke tseba nnete ('I know the truth')[hɑkʼɪt͡sʼɪbɪn̩nɪtʼɪ] ha ke tsebe nnete ('I do not know the truth')
    Potential ([xɔnɛhɔ] Kgoneho)[ŋ̩kʼɑt͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] nka tseba nnete ('I may know the truth')[ŋ̩kʼekʼekʼɑt͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] nke ke ka tseba nnete ('I may not know the truth')
    Situative[kʼɪt͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] ...ke tseba nnete ('...while I know the truth')[kʼɪsɑt͡sʼɪbɪn̩nɪtʼɪ] ...ke sa tsebe nnete ('...while I do/did not know the truth')
    Subjunctive ([tʼɑkʼɑt͡sʼɔ] Takatso)[kʼɪt͡sʼɪbɛn̩nɪtʼɪ] ...ke tsebe nnete ('...so I may know the truth')[kʼɪsɪt͡sʼɪbɪn̩nɪtʼɪ] ...ke se tsebe nnete ('...so I may not know the truth')
    Relative/Qualificative ([xetʰi] Kgethi)[jɑt͡sʼɪbɑŋ̩n̩nɪtʼɪ] ...ya tsebang nnete ('...who knows the truth')[jɑsɑt͡sʼɪbɪŋ̩n̩nɪtʼɪ] ...ya sa tsebeng nnete ('...who does not know the truth')
    Consecutive ([tʼɑtʼɛlɑnɔ] Tatelano)[kʼɑt͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] ...ka tseba nnete ('...and then I knew the truth')[kʼɑsɪt͡sʼɪbɪn̩nɪtʼɪ] ...ka se tsebe nnete ('...and then I did not know the truth')
    Habitual ([t͡ɬʼʷɑɛlɔ] Tlwaelo)[kʼɪjekʼɪt͡sʼɪbɪn̩nɪtʼɪ] ke ye ke tsebe nnete ('I often know the truth')[hɑŋ̩kʼekʼɪt͡sʼɪbɪn̩nɪtʼɪ] ha nke ke tsebe nnete ('I do not often know the truth')
    Infinitive ([hʊ] Ho)[hʊt͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] ho tseba nnete ('to know the truth')[hʊsɪt͡sʼɪbɪn̩nɪtʼɪ] ho se tsebe nnete ('to not know the truth')
    Imperative ([tʼɑ'ɛlɔ] Taelo)[t͡sʼɪbɑn̩nɪtʼɪ] tseba nnete ('know the truth')[sɪt͡sʼɪbɪn̩nɪtʼɪ] se tsebe nnete ('do not know the truth')

    According to Doke's analysis, the situative is just the participial sub-mood, the qualificative is a form of the participial, the consecutive is the past subjunctive (used when telling stories, it sounds as if the story-teller is using the present tense to describe a past action, but the subjectival concords differ from those of the indicative present), the habitual is a multi-verbal tense using a specific set of deficient verbs (Group III in Doke's classification) followed by a perfect subjunctive (and its negative uses another deficient verb in the same group); while the infinitive and most imperatives are not verbal moods (they are separate parts of speech and cannot be used as the predicate of a sentence, though imperatives can form interjectival sentences and there is a form of the subjunctive that could alternatively be interpreted as an imperative using subjectival concords).

    The analysis is further complicated by the seemingly unpredictable form of the negative for each tense of each verb. The one point most Bantuists seem to agree upon is that, apart from the indicative mood, Bantu languages also have a subjunctive formed (usually) by changing the final vowel of the verb to *-e (which corresponds to Sesotho /ɛ/).

References

External links

For a list of words relating to Sesotho verbs, see the Sesotho verbs category of words in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, January 25, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.